We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our products, ETUARY, Etorel and Contiva, which are approved and commercialized by us in the PRC, and product candidates. In order to protect the technologies, products and product candidates that we consider commercially important, we have filed and continue to file patent applications in the PRC, United States and other countries. However, applying for patent protection is an expensive and time-consuming process, and we may not be able to successfully file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. We may not be able to prevent competitors from developing and commercializing competitive products in all such fields and territories.
The strength of patents in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical field involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. For example, there can be no assurance that we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our patents or pending patent applications because of the delay between publications of discoveries in scientific or patent literature and actual discoveries and patent applications. Under the "first-to-file" system adopted by the PRC, and the United States, even after reasonable investigation, we may be unable to determine with certainty whether our product, product candidates, processes, technologies, improvement and other related matters are or may become unpatentable because a third-party filed or may file a patent application earlier than we have or do for inventions thereunder that are the same or substantially similar to our inventions. Additionally, the USPTO and patent offices in other jurisdictions have often required that patent applications directed to pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology-related inventions be limited or narrowed substantially to cover only the specific innovations exemplified in the patent application, thereby limiting the scope of protection against competitive challenges. Accordingly, even if we or our licensors are able to obtain patents, the patents might be substantially narrower than anticipated. Thus, there is no assurance as to the degree and range of protections any of our patents, if issued, may afford us or whether patents will be issues. Third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope of our patents, which may result in those patents being narrowed or invalidated. The patent applications that we own may fail to result in issued patents with claims that cover our product and product candidates in the PRC, United States or in other foreign countries. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our intellectual property, provide exclusivity for our product or product candidates or prevent others from designing around our claims. Certain of our patents also cover processes, for which enforcement can be difficult. Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties, which may have an adverse impact on our business.
If the patents or patent applications we hold or have in-licensed for ETUARY, Etorel, Contiva, our programs or product candidates are invalidated or fail to issue, if their breadth or strength of protection is threatened, or if they fail to provide meaningful exclusivity for our product or product candidates, it could threaten our ability to commercialize future products. Further, if we encounter delays in regulatory approvals, the period of time during which we could market a product candidate under patent protection could be reduced. In addition, patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years after it is filed. In the PRC, the amendment to the PRC Patent Law (the "Amended PRC Patent Law") provides for patent term extension and patent linkage. The Amended PRC Patent Law and relevant implementing regulations provide a cause of action to allow a patent holder to initiate a declarative action during the regulatory review process of a drug to determine whether the drug in review falls within the relevant scope of the patent of such patent holder, which may be comparable to the patent linkage system in the United States. The system requires that the NMPA continue to review the potentially infringing follow-on application during any lawsuit by the innovator. However, the NMPA may not approve the follow-on application pending resolution of the patent litigation in favor of the follow-on application or for a specified period of time, whichever is shorter. The Amended PRC Patent Law and relevant implementing regulations also provide patent term extension, similar to the United States, for the patent term lost during the regulatory review process of a new drug upon the patent holder's request. The extended term shall not exceed five years, and the total patent term of the new drug from the date of its market approval shall not exceed 14 years. However, subject to the decision of relevant authorities, the patents we have in-licensed or own in the PRC may not be eligible to be extended for any patent term lost during the regulatory review process. Various extensions may be available; however, the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be subject to competition from generic medications.
In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we elect not to patent and other elements of our product candidate discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining the physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is challenging and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside of the United States may be less willing to protect trade secrets. While we have confidence in these individuals, organizations and systems, agreements or security measures may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors.
Although we expect all of our employees and consultants to assign their applicable inventions to us, and all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology to enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot provide guarantee that all such agreements have been duly executed or that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. Misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets could impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed inadequate, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating the trade secret. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and proprietary information. Moreover, some of our employees, including senior management, may have been employed at other pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Such employees may have executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such previous employment. We may be subject to claims these employees have used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such employee's former employer. In the event that litigation is necessary to defend against such claims, we may be subject to monetary damages and lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.
Further, filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our products, ETUARY, Etorel and Contiva, and product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the PRC and United States are less extensive than those in the PRC and United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the PRC or United States. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property in the PRC, United States and abroad. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the non-patented intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, and there is no guarantee that we will have any such enforceable trade secret protection, we may not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may be involved in claims and disputes of intellectual property infringement in other jurisdictions, and the defense of these claims or disputes, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business.