Atlas Energy Solutions (AESI) Risk Analysis

Our business and operations may be affected by natural or man-made disasters and other external events, many of which are not in our control. In addition to the other risks described in these risk factors, risks include: - unanticipated ground, grade or water conditions;- environmental hazards;- physical facility security breaches;- inability to acquire or maintain necessary permits or mining or water rights;- failure to maintain dust controls and meet restrictions on, or applicable requirements with respect to, respirable crystalline silica dust;- failures in quality control systems or training programs;- technical difficulties or key equipment failures;- inability to obtain necessary mining or production equipment or replacement parts;- fires, explosions or industrial accidents or other accidents; and - facility shutdowns in response to environmental regulatory actions. These hazards can also cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution or environmental damage and suspension or cancellation of operations. Any prolonged downtime or shutdowns at our mining properties or production facilities could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our operations are subject to, and exposed to, employee/employer liabilities and risks such as wrongful termination, discrimination, labor organizing, retaliation claims and general human resource related matters. Not all of these risks are reasonably insurable, and our insurance coverage contains limits, deductibles, exclusions and endorsements. Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to meet our needs in the event of loss and any such loss may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The dredging process that we currently employ to produce from our Kermit, Texas and Monahans, Texas proppant production and processing facilities requires significant quantities of water from the aquifer underlying our acreage. If in the future there is insufficient capacity available from this aquifer to provide a source of water for our dredging and associated processes as a result of drought or similar conditions affecting the environment, we will be required to obtain water from other sources that may not be readily available, or may be too costly, and we may be unable to continue our dredge mining operations entirely. The effects of climate change may also further exacerbate water scarcity in certain regions, including at the aquifer on our acreage. If an environmental, weather or other event were to require us to discontinue dredging and resume operations using traditional proppant production processes, this could impair our cost of operations and ability to economically produce our product and would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The quality and safety of our products are critical to the success of our business. These factors depend significantly on the effectiveness of our quality control systems, which, in turn, depend on a number of factors, including the design of our quality control systems, our quality-training program and our ability to ensure that our employees adhere to the quality control policies and guidelines. Any significant failure or deterioration of our quality control systems could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.

Our business involves significant risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents and breakdowns of equipment and machinery. Our electric dredge mining operations are subject to delays and accidents associated with electrical supply, repositioning and maintenance. Furthermore, during operational breakdowns, the relevant facility may not be fully operational within the anticipated timeframe, which could result in further business losses. The occurrence of any of these or other hazards could delay production, suspend operations, increase repair, maintenance or medical costs and, due to the integration of our facilities, could have an adverse effect on the productivity and profitability of a particular facility or on our business as a whole. Although insurance policies provide limited coverage for these risks, such policies will not fully cover some of these risks.

We may encounter adverse geological conditions, regulatory procedures or other legal requirements that could impede the operation of the Dune Express. The inability to obtain any permits and other federal, state or local approvals that may be required, and any excessive delays in obtaining such permits and approvals due, for example, to litigation or third-party appeals, could potentially prevent us from successfully operating the Dune Express in a timely manner. We could also face difficulties meeting certain delivery obligations to our customers or incur additional costs in making such deliveries by truck or other alternative means. Any material delay caused by our subcontractors could impact our ability achieve the anticipated benefits of the Dune Express and its integrated mining facilities and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Operation of the Dune Express will depend on transmission and distribution facilities. If transmission to the Dune Express or any of its integrated mining facilities were to be interrupted physically, mechanically or with cyber means, it may hinder our ability to mine, sell or deliver proppant to our customers, satisfy our contractual obligations or otherwise operate or fully realize the expected benefits of the Dune Express.

Efficient sand excavation using modern techniques and equipment requires skilled laborers, preferably with several years of experience and proficiency in multiple tasks, including processing of mined minerals. If there is a shortage of experienced labor in areas in which we operate, we may find it difficult to hire or train the necessary number of skilled laborers to perform our own operations, which could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. As a result of the volatility of the oilfield services industry and the demanding nature of the work, workers may choose to pursue employment in fields that offer a more desirable work environment at wage rates that are competitive. Increased competition for their services could result in a loss of available, skilled workers or at a price that is not as advantageous to our business, both of which could negatively affect our operating results. If we are unable to retain or meet the growing demand for skilled technical personnel, our operating results and our ability to execute our growth strategies may be adversely affected.

If significant new reserves of proppant are discovered and developed and have similar characteristics to the proppant we produce, we may be unable to renew or replace our existing contracts on favorable terms, if at all. Specifically, if proppant is oversupplied, our customers may not be willing to enter into long-term take-or-pay contracts, may demand lower prices or both, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a historic slowdown in oil and natural gas activity, which led to an increase in available proppant supply relative to the reduced demand. The foregoing events have led to increased competition among our competitors, which could lead to pressure to further reduce prices to compete effectively.

We and our customers hold numerous governmental, environmental, mining and other permits and approvals authorizing operations at each of our facilities. Our future success depends on, among other things, our ability, and the ability of our customers, to obtain and maintain the necessary permits and licenses required to conduct operations. In order to obtain permits and renewals of permits in the future, we may be required to prepare and present data to governmental authorities pertaining to the impact that our activities may have on the environment. Compliance with these regulatory requirements is expensive and significantly lengthens the time needed to conduct operations. Additionally, obtaining or renewing required permits is sometimes delayed, conditioned or prevented due to community opposition, opposition from other parties, the location of existing or proposed third-party operations, or other factors beyond our control. The denial of a new or renewed permit essential to our operations, delays in obtaining such a permit or the imposition of conditions in order to acquire the permit could impair our ability to continue operations at the affected facilities, delay those operations, or involve significant unplanned costs, any of which could adversely affect our business, performance and financial condition.

Various federal and state statutes prohibit certain actions that adversely affect endangered or threatened species and their habitat, migratory birds, wetlands, and natural resources. These statutes include the ESA, the MBTA and the CWA. The USFWS may designate critical habitat areas that it believes are necessary for survival of threatened or endangered species. A critical habitat designation could result in further material restrictions on federal land use or on private land use and could delay or prohibit land access or development. Where takings of or harm to species or damages to wetlands, habitat, or natural resources occur or may occur, government entities or at times private parties may act to prevent or restrict oil and natural gas exploration activities or seek damages for any injury, whether resulting from drilling or construction or releases of oil, wastes, hazardous substances or other regulated materials, and in some cases, criminal penalties may result. The DSL is one example of a species that, if listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA, could impact our operations and the operations of our customers. On May 20, 2024, the USFWS finalized a rule listing the DSL as an endangered species under the ESA, but did not concurrently propose to designate any critical habitat. However, in the final rule, USFWS determined that designating DSL critical habitat was prudent, but not determinable at the time of issuance, thus triggering a one-year review period for the future designation of critical habitat. Legal challenges have been filed relating to the listing, and we cannot predict what actions, if any, the Trump administration may take relating to the listing of the DSL as endangered. Our operations and the operations of our customers in any area that is later designated as DSL critical habitat may be limited, delayed or, in some circumstances, prohibited, and we and our customers could be required to comply with expensive mitigation measures intended to protect the DSL and its habitat. However, to mitigate the impact of some of these risks, we are a participant in a CCAA for DSL habitat in non-federal lands in certain counties of western Texas, which was approved by the USFWS in January 2021. We have been a contributor to and supporter of the CCAA since its inception and our participation in the CCAA and our other voluntary conservation measures for the benefit of the DSL, including setting aside as much as 17,000 acres for DSL habitat, helps reduce the risk of disruptions to our business and operations in the event DSL critical habitat is designated in the areas in which we operate. Another species recently listed that could impact the operations of our customers is the lesser prairie-chicken. In November 2022, the USFWS formally listed two Distinct Population Segments ("DPSs") of the lesser prairie-chicken under the ESA. The Southern DPS, the habitat of which includes portions of southeast New Mexico and western Texas, was listed as endangered, while the Northern DPS, the habitat of which spans from northern Texas through eastern Oklahoma and into southeastern Colorado and southwestern Nebraska, was listed as threatened. The listed territory of the Southern DPS could overlap with the operating areas of some of our customers, who in turn may be adversely affected by any restrictions which arise as a result of the endangerment determination. The identification or designation of further previously unprotected species as threatened or endangered in areas where we or our customers operate could cause us to incur increased costs arising from species protection measures or could result in limitations on our customers that result in reduced demand for our services, adversely affecting our results of operations. There is also increasing interest from a variety of stakeholders, including investors and institutional lenders, in nature-related matters beyond protected species, such as general biodiversity, which may similarly require us to incur costs or take other measures which may materially impact our business or operations.

Many of our customers possess leases in New Mexico, which are granted by the federal government and administered by the BLM. Operations conducted by our customers on federal oil and natural gas leases must comply with numerous additional statutory and regulatory restrictions. These leases contain relatively standardized terms requiring compliance with detailed regulations. Under certain circumstances, the BLM may require operations on federal leases to be suspended or terminated. Any such suspension or termination of our customers' leases could reduce demand for our products or services and adversely impact our results of operations. The Biden Administration has taken several actions to curtail oil and natural gas activities on federal lands including a temporary pause on new oil and gas leasing, increases in royalty rates, and a reduction in the total acreage available through lease sales. On April 10, 2024, BLM finalized a rule to reduce the waste of natural gas from venting, flaring, and leaks during oil and gas production activities on Federal and Native American leases. On April 23, 2024, BLM finalized further reforms to the federal oil and gas leasing program, including increased bonding requirements and the codification of certain IRA provisions related to minimum bids, base rental rates, and royalty rates. While we cannot predict the ultimate impact of these actions or whether the Department of Interior and BLM will implement further reforms or operating restrictions, any revisions to the federal leasing or permitting process that make it more difficult for our customers to pursue operations on federal lands and operate economically may materially adversely impact our operations. The development and implementation of a Social Cost of GHGs ("SC-GHG") (formerly known as the Social Cost of Carbon or "SCC") metric may also impact future regulatory decision-making and our customers' ability to obtain federal leases. On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order revoking the Biden administration's re-establishment of a working group to develop a SC-GHG metric and directing the EPA to consider eliminating the SC-GHG analysis from any federal permitting decisions. Whether and how climate change impacts will be assessed in federal environmental reviews is uncertain, and the implementation of any SC-GHG metric in agency decision-making, and the result of any related litigation, could impact the character of new regulations on certain of the federal oil and gas leases of our customers, which in turn could impact our results of operations. Additionally, oil and natural gas operations on federal lands, and related infrastructure projects may be impacted by recent litigation regarding NEPA's implementing regulations. In 2020, the first Trump administration made a variety of substantive and procedural changes to NEPA, including limiting the scope of review to the direct effects of a proposed project on the environment. A new "Final Rule," introduced by the Council on Environmental Quality ("CEQ") under the Biden administration, which took effect in May 2022, reversed several changes introduced by the 2020 rule, including the scope limitations. The 2022 Final Rule requires NEPA reviews to incorporate consideration of indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposed project, including effects on climate change and GHGs, consistent with pre-2020 requirements. The new rule also allows agencies to create stricter NEPA rules as they see fit, but left in place the 2020 rule two-year time limit to complete environmental impact statements. More recently, in January 2023, the CEQ released updated guidance for agency consideration of GHG emissions and climate change impacts in environmental reviews, which includes, among other recommendations, best practices for analyzing and communicating climate change effects, though the current Trump administration may rescind this guidance. Additionally, in May 2024, the CEQ finalized revisions to NEPA that would expand requirements to analyze the cumulative effects of the project on climate change and consider any disproportionate impact of the project on communities with environmental justice concerns as well enhance certain project obligations for implementing environmental mitigation measures. However, on November 12, 2024, the D.C. Circuit Court concluded that CEQ has no authority to issue binding NEPA regulations, and a federal district court in North Dakota reached the same conclusion on February 3, 2025. The latter court vacated the Biden administration's 2024 CEQ NEPA revisions as to those parties, though the 2024 rule currently remains in effect (and the Biden administration's other NEPA revisions) as to non-parties. Further, on January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing CEQ to proposed rescinding all of CEQ's existing NEPA regulations and publish non-binding guidance on how agencies should implement NEPA in federal environmental reviews. To the extent changes to or the repeal of the NEPA implementing regulations restrict or limit the ability of our customers to pursue oil and gas operations and development projects in an economical manner or create uncertainty surrounding permitting for these projects, demand for our products and services may be impacted, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Operations on federal lands also face litigation risks. From time to time, legal challenges have been filed relating to federal leasing decisions, such as for failure to adequately assess the impact of any increase of GHG emissions resulting from increased production on federal lands. Separately, there is a risk that authorizations required for existing operations may be delayed to the point that it causes a business disruption, and we cannot guarantee that further action will not be taken to curtail oil and natural gas development on federal land. For example, certain lawmakers have proposed to reduce or ban further leasing on federal lands or to adopt further restrictions on such leasing. To the extent such legislation is passed, it may adversely impact our customers' operations, which could negatively impact our financial performance or results of operations.

Multiple aspects of our and our customers' operations are subject to occupational health and safety standards, including our mining operations, our trucking operations, and employee exposure to crystalline silica. Our mining operations are subject to the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended by the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006 (as amended, the "Mine Act"), which imposes stringent health and safety standards on numerous aspects of mineral extraction and processing operations, including the training of personnel, operating procedures, operating equipment and other matters. Our operating locations are regularly inspected by MSHA for compliance with the Mine Act. The DOT and various state agencies exercise broad powers over our trucking services, generally governing matters including authorization to engage in motor carrier service, equipment operation, safety, alcohol and drug testing, and financial reporting. In addition, our operations must comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act and comparable state laws, which govern such matters as wages and overtime, and which is administered by the DOL or applicable state agencies. We may be audited periodically by the DOT or the DOL or state agencies to ensure that we are in compliance with these safety, hours-of-service, wage and other rules and regulations, and failure to comply could result in material costs. We are also subject to laws and regulations relating to human exposure to crystalline silica. Several federal and state regulatory authorities, including MSHA and OSHA, may continue to propose changes to their regulations regarding workplace exposure to crystalline silica, such as permissible exposure limits, required controls and personal protective equipment. Most recently, in April 2024, MSHA issued a final rule designed to reduce miner exposures to respirable crystalline silica, including by lowering the permissible exposure limit and establishing an action level for all miners. Our failure to comply with existing or new health and safety standards, or changes in such standards or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, could require us or our customers to modify operations or equipment, shut down some or all operating locations, impose significant restrictions on our ability to conduct operations, impose fines or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, employee relations and results of operations.

In addition to the regulatory matters described above, we and our customers are subject to extensive permitting obligations and regulations. In order to obtain permits and renewals of permits in the future, we may be required to prepare and present data to governmental authorities pertaining to the potential adverse impact that any proposed excavation or production activities, individually or in the aggregate, may have on the environment. Certain approval procedures may require preparation of archaeological surveys, endangered species studies, and other studies to assess the environmental impact of new sites or the expansion of existing sites. Compliance with these regulatory requirements is expensive and significantly lengthens the time needed to develop a site. Finally, obtaining or renewing required permits is sometimes delayed or prevented due to community opposition and other factors beyond our control. Our future success depends on, among other things, our ability to extract our proppant deposits profitably, and our customers' ability to operate their businesses as they currently do. The denial or cancellation of a permit essential to our or our customers' operations or the imposition of conditions with which it is not practicable or feasible to comply could have an adverse effect on our business. Significant opposition to a permit by neighboring property owners, members of the public or other third parties or a delay in the environmental review and permitting process also could impair or delay our or our customers' operations. Additionally, new regulations or permitting requirements could require us to modify existing permits or obtain new permits, implement additional pollution control technology, curtail operations (including our ability to extract or the pace of extraction of mineral deposits), significantly increase our operating costs or impose additional operating restrictions among our customers (including impacts that may impact our customers' ability to use our proppant, logistics or power solutions) that reduce demand for our products or services. Such permit proceedings are often subject to public notice and comment, and third parties, including nongovernmental environmental organizations, may challenge government actions related to permits required for our operations. A failure to timely obtain the permits required for the operation of our business may adversely affect our results of operations.

We are subject to laws and regulations relating to human exposure to crystalline silica. For example, OSHA has implemented rules establishing a more stringent permissible exposure limit for exposure to respirable crystalline silica and provided other provisions to protect employees. These rules require compliance with engineering control obligations to limit exposures to respirable crystalline silica in connection with hydraulic fracturing activities. In June 2022, the DOL's MSHA launched a new enforcement initiative to better protect U.S. miners from health hazards resulting from repeated overexposure to respirable crystalline silica. MSHA reports that silica dust affects thousands of miners each year and, without adequate protection, miners face risks of serious illnesses, many of which can be fatal. As part of the program, MSHA will conduct silica dust-related mine inspections and expand silica sampling at mines, while providing mine operators with compliance assistance and best practices to limit miners' exposure to silica dust. Specifically, the silica enforcement initiative will include: - Spot inspections at mines with a history of repeated silica overexposures to closely monitor and evaluate health and safety conditions. - Increased oversight and enforcement of known silica hazards at mines with previous citations for exposing miners to silica dust levels over the existing permissible exposure limit of 100 micrograms. For mines where the operator has not timely abated hazards, MSHA will issue a withdrawal order until the silica overexposure hazard has been abated. - Expanded silica sampling at mines to ensure inspectors' samples represent the mines, commodities, and occupations known to have the highest risk for overexposure. - A focus on sampling during periods of the mining process that present the highest risk of silica exposure for miners. - Reminding miners about their rights to report hazardous health conditions, including any attempt to tamper with the sampling process. In addition, the DOL's Educational Field and Small Mine Services staff will provide compliance assistance and outreach to mine operators, unions and other mining community organizations to promote and advance protections for miners. The MSHA initiative is intended to take immediate action to reduce the risks of silica dust exposure as the DOL's development of a mining industry standard continues. Then, in a related subsequent regulatory action, on April 18, 2024, MSHA published a final rule designed to reduce miner exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Under the final rule, which took effect in June 2024, the uniform permissible exposure limit for respirable crystalline silica is set at 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air and the action level is set at 25 cubic meters of air for all mines. The rule also imposes requirements for monitoring and controlling exposure to respirable crystalline silica, requires medical surveillance at certain mines, and updates existing respiratory protection requirements to match industry standards. We could face increased compliance costs as a result of this rule. If we are unable to satisfy these obligations, or are not able to do so in a manner that is cost effective or attractive to our customers, our business operations may be adversely affected or availability or demand for our products could be significantly affected. Federal and state regulatory authorities, including OSHA and MSHA, and analogous state agencies may continue to propose changes in their regulations regarding workplace exposure to crystalline silica, such as permissible exposure limits and required controls and personal protective equipment, and we can provide no assurance that we will be able to comply with any future laws and regulations relating to exposure to crystalline silica that are adopted, or that costs of complying with such future laws and regulations or any costs arising from non-compliance would not have an adverse effect on our operating results by requiring us to modify or cease our operations. In addition, the inhalation of respirable crystalline silica is associated with health risks, including the lung disease silicosis. There is evidence of an association between crystalline silica exposure or silicosis and lung cancer and possible association with other diseases, including immune system disorders such as scleroderma. These health risks have been, and may continue to be, a significant issue confronting the hydraulic fracturing industry. Concerns over silicosis and other potential adverse health effects, as well as concerns regarding potential liability from the use of frac sand, may have the effect of discouraging our customers' use of frac sand. The actual or perceived health risks of handling frac sand could adversely affect hydraulic fracturing service providers, including us, through reduced use of frac sand, the threat of product liability or employee lawsuits naming us as a defendant, increased scrutiny by federal, state and local regulatory authorities of us and our customers or reduced financing sources available to the hydraulic fracturing industry. Over the past few decades, a number of companies that utilize silica in their operations have been named as a defendant, usually among many defendants, in numerous product liability lawsuits brought by or on behalf of current or former employees or customers alleging damages caused by silica exposure. The silica-related litigation brought against us to date and associated litigation costs, settlements and verdicts have not resulted in a material liability to us, and we presently maintain insurance policies where available. However, we may continue to have silica exposure claims filed against us in the future, including claims that allege silica exposure for periods or in areas not covered by insurance, and the costs, outcome and impact to us of any pending or future claims is not certain. Any such pending or future claims or inadequacies of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations.

In 2024, Moser derived more than 10% of its total revenues from a single customer. If, following our acquisition of Moser, we were to lose this or any of our power solutions segment's significant customers without finding replacement customers, or if these customers were to change the terms, including pricing terms, on which they buy power solutions from us, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our operations that produce and transport proppant are materially dependent on the levels of activity in oil and natural gas exploration, development and production. More specifically, the demand for the proppant we produce is closely related to the number of oil and natural gas wells completed in geological formations where sand-based proppant is used in fracture treatments. These activity levels are affected by both short- and long-term trends in oil and natural gas prices. Additionally, our distributed power operations are also tied to activity levels in the oil and gas industry, most specifically through levels of spending tied to production, gathering, and treatment activities. In recent years, oil and natural gas prices and, therefore, the level of exploration, development and production activity, have experienced significant volatility. When oil and natural gas prices decrease, exploration and production companies may reduce their exploration, development, production and well completion activities. During such periods, demand for our products and services, which supply oil and natural gas wells, including our transportation and logistics solutions, may decline, and may lead to a decline in the market price of proppant, if the supply of proppant is not similarly reduced. When demand for proppant increases, there may not be a corresponding increase in the prices for our products or our customers may not increase use of our products, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Worldwide economic, political and military events, including war, terrorist activity, events in the Middle East and initiatives by OPEC+, have contributed, and are likely to continue to contribute, to oil and natural gas price volatility. For example, the ongoing armed conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Hamas and the continuation of, and the escalation in the severity of, these conflicts has led to extreme regional instability, caused dramatic fluctuations in global financial markets and has increased the level of global economic uncertainty, including uncertainty about world-wide oil supply and demand, which in turn has caused increased volatility in commodity prices. Further, the Houthi movement, which controls parts of Yemen, has targeted and launched numerous attacks on Israeli, American and international commercial marine vessels in the Red Sea as the ships approach the Suez Canal, resulting in many shipping companies re-routing to avoid the region altogether and worsening existing supply chain issues, including delays in supplier deliveries, extended lead times and increased cost of freight, impacts to the shipping of oil and gas, insurance and materials. The potential for conflict with Iran, a major oil producer, the Houthi movement in Yemen or the Hezbollah movement in Lebanon has increased as a result of continued, increasing hostilities in the Middle East. Additionally, warmer than normal winters in North America and other weather patterns may adversely impact the short-term demand for natural gas and, therefore, demand for our products. Reduction in demand for natural gas to generate electricity could also adversely impact the demand for proppant. In addition, any future decrease in the rate at which oil and natural gas reserves are discovered or developed, whether due to increased governmental regulation, limitations on exploration and drilling activity, technological innovations that result in new processes for oil and natural gas production that do not require proppant or other factors, could adversely affect the demand for our products, even in a stronger oil and natural gas price environment. Moreover, the energy transition to a low carbon economy, increased deployment of renewable power generation, renewable fuels and electric vehicles all have the potential to reduce demand for oil and natural gas and consequently the services we provide. The continued or future occurrence of any of these risks could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is directly affected by capital spending to explore for, develop and produce oil and natural gas in the United States. The oil and natural gas industry is cyclical and historically has experienced periodic downturns in activity. During periods of economic slowdown in one or more of the industries or geographic regions we serve or in the worldwide economy, our customers often reduce their production and capital expenditures by deferring or canceling pending projects, even if such customers are not experiencing financial difficulties. These developments can have an adverse effect on sales of our products and our results of operations. Weakness in the industries we serve has had, and may in the future have, an adverse effect on our sales and results of operations. A continued or renewed economic downturn in one or more of the industries that we serve, or in the worldwide economy, could cause actual results of operations to differ materially from historical and expected results. Industry conditions are influenced by numerous factors over which we have no control, including: - expected economic returns to E&P companies from new well completions;- domestic and foreign economic conditions and supply of and demand for oil and natural gas;- the level of prices, and expectations about future prices, of oil and natural gas;- the level of global oil and natural gas E&P and inventories;- federal, state and local regulation of hydraulic fracturing and E&P activities;- United States federal, tribal, state and local and non-United States governmental laws, regulations and taxes, including the policies of governments regarding the exploration for and production and development of their oil and natural gas reserves;- changes in tariffs, trade barriers, price and exchange controls and other regulatory requirements;- volatility in political, legal and regulatory environments in connection with the U.S. presidential transition;- changes in the transportation industry that services our business, including the price and availability of transportation;- political and economic conditions in oil and natural gas producing countries, including uncertainty or instability resulting from civil unrest, terrorism or war, such as the current conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Hamas and other instability in the Middle East, including from the Houthi rebels in Yemen;- actions by members of OPEC+ with respect to oil production levels and announcements of potential changes in such levels, including the failure of such countries to comply with supply limitation and production cuts;- global or national health epidemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic;- political or civil unrest in the United States or elsewhere;- worldwide political, military and economic conditions;- stockholder activism or activities by non-governmental organizations to limit certain sources of funding for the energy sector or restrict the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas;- advances in exploration, development and production technologies or in technologies affecting energy consumption; and - the potential acceleration of development of alternative fuels, and the impact of related energy supply and conservation policies and regulations by governmental authorities.

Frac sand is the most commonly used proppant in the completion and re-completion of oil and natural gas wells through hydraulic fracturing. A significant shift in demand from frac sand to other proppants, such as ceramic proppant, the development and use of other effective alternative proppants, or the development of new processes to replace hydraulic fracturing altogether, could cause a decline in demand for frac sand that we produce and would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas could reduce demand for oil and natural gas. The impact of the reduced demand for oil and natural gas may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels) could reduce demand for oil and natural gas and therefore for our products and services, which would lead to a reduction in our revenues and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to the risk of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our customers, suppliers and vendors. Our credit procedures and policies may not be adequate to fully eliminate customer credit risk. If we fail to adequately assess the creditworthiness of existing or future customers or unanticipated deterioration in their creditworthiness, any resulting increase in nonpayment or nonperformance by them and our inability to re-market or otherwise use the production could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. A decline in oil and natural gas prices could negatively impact the financial condition of our customers and sustained lower prices could impact their ability to meet their financial obligations to us. Further, our contract counterparties may not perform or adhere to our existing or future contractual arrangements. To the extent one or more of our contract counterparties is in financial distress or commences bankruptcy proceedings, contracts with these counterparties may be subject to renegotiation or rejection under applicable provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Any material nonpayment or nonperformance by our contract counterparties due to inability or unwillingness to perform or adhere to contractual arrangements could adversely affect our business and results of operations. If our customers delay or fail to pay us a significant amount of our outstanding receivables, it could have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Public health crises, pandemics and epidemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely impact our operations, the operations of our customers and the global economy, including the worldwide demand for oil and natural gas and the level of demand for our products and services. Fear of such events has previously altered the level of capital spending by oil and natural gas companies for E&P activities and has adversely affected global economies and financial markets, resulting in economic downturns that have affected demand for our products and services. For instance, the outbreak of COVID-19 caused governmental authorities to impose mandatory closures, seek voluntary closures and impose restrictions on, or advisories with respect to, travel, business operations and public gatherings or interactions. The impact of future health crises, pandemics and epidemics and responsive measures could adversely affect our business in a number of ways, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

The threat of climate change continues to attract considerable attention in the United States and around the world. Numerous proposals have been made and could continue to be made at the international, national, regional and state levels of government to monitor and limit existing emissions of GHGs. These efforts have included consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG disclosure obligations and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. As a result, our operations and the operations of our natural gas and crude oil exploration and production customers are subject to a series of regulatory, political, litigation, financial, and physical risks associated with the production and processing of fossil fuels and the emission of GHGs. At the federal level, the EPA has adopted rules that, among other things, establish construction and operating permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources and require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain industrial sources. However, on January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing the EPA to reconsider the legality of its GHG "endangerment finding," which provides the basis for EPA's authority to regulate GHG emissions. The EPA has also adopted rules imposing new standards reducing methane emissions from oil and gas operations through limitations on venting and flaring and the implementation of enhanced emission leak detection and repair requirements. The regulation of methane emissions from oil and gas facilities has been subject to considerable attention in recent years, and the EPA recently finalized rules in December 2023 that establish new and more stringent standards for the use of emission capture and control equipment and systems, leak detection equipment and monitoring, and so-called "green well completion" requirements for both new and existing sources across the oil and gas sector. The BLM also finalized a rule on April 10, 2024 intended to curtail the waste of methane flared, vented, or leaked from oil and gas operations on federal and Tribal lands. In addition, the U.S. Congress may continue to consider and pass legislation related to the reduction of GHG emissions, including methane and carbon dioxide. For example, the IRA, which was signed into law in August 2022, appropriates significant federal funding for renewable energy initiatives The IRA also, for the first time ever, imposes a fee on GHG emissions from certain facilities. In November 2024, the EPA issued a final rule to implement this emissions charge, setting the fee for 2024 at $900 per ton of methane emitted above statutorily specified waste emissions thresholds set by Congress. The fee is set to increase to $1,200 per ton in 2025, and $1,500 in 2026 and each year thereafter. Congress and the Trump administration may take action to amend, rescind, or otherwise modify the IRA 2022 and its implementing regulations, though the impact or timing of such action, or whether action will occur at all, cannot be predicted. These regulatory actions, the emissions fee, and funding provisions of the IRA could increase operating costs within the oil and gas industry and accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels, which could in turn reduce demand for our products and services and adversely affect our and our customers' business and results of operations. At the international level, the United Nations-sponsored Paris Agreement, though non-binding, calls for signatory nations to limit their GHG emissions through individually determined reduction goals every five years after 2020. However, on January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order once again withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement. The United States' participation in future United Nations climate-related conferences and the impacts of these orders, pledges, agreements and any legislation or regulation promulgated to fulfill the United States' commitments under the Paris Agreement or other international agreements cannot be predicted at this time. Litigation risks are also increasing, as a number of cities and other entities have sought to sue various oil and natural gas companies in state or federal court, alleging, among other things, that such companies created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to climate change and its effects, such as rising sea levels or extreme weather events, and therefore are responsible for resulting infrastructure damages, or alleging that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change for some time but defrauded their investors by failing to adequately disclose those impacts. Our customers' involvement in such a case, regardless of the substance of the allegations, could have adverse reputational impacts and any unfavorable ruling in any such case could significantly impact their operations and consequently could have an adverse impact on demand for our products and services. There are also increasing financial risks for the oil and gas sector as shareholders, bondholders, and lenders may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy sectors. Certain institutional lenders have shifted their investment practices to favor non-fossil fuel energy sources, such as wind and solar, and some of them may elect not to provide funding to the oil and gas sector. Additionally, there is also a risk that financial institutions will be pressured or required to adopt policies that limit funding for the oil and gas sector, though this trend has waned in recent years. Further, the SEC finalized a rule in March 2024 that establishes a framework for the reporting of climate risks, targets, and metrics. The rule is currently stayed pending litigation, and on February 11, 2025, SEC Acting Chairman Mark T. Uyeda requested that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit not schedule argument in the case while the SEC reconsiders the March 2024 rule. Relatedly, California has enacted new laws requiring additional disclosure with respect to certain climate-related risks and GHG emissions reduction claims, and New York and other states are considering adopting similar laws. Litigation over these laws is ongoing, and we cannot predict the outcome. Enhanced climate-related disclosure requirements could result in additional legal and accounting costs and accelerate the trend of certain stakeholders and lenders restricting or seeking more stringent conditions with respect to their investments in carbon-intensive sectors. Such disclosure regulations could also lead to increased litigation risks and reputational harm. Any material reduction in the capital available to us or our customers could make it more difficult to secure funding for our growth projects or our customers' exploration and production activities, which could reduce the demand for our products and services and impact our financial performance. Finally, physical climate change impacts, including increased frequency and severity of storms, severe and persistent drought conditions, winter storms, floods and other climatic events, may potentially have a large impact on our operations and financial results, and our customers' exploration and production operations. While our consideration of changing climatic conditions and inclusion of safety factors in the design and operation of our facilities is intended to reduce the uncertainties that climate change and other events may potentially introduce, our ability to mitigate the adverse impacts of these events depends in part on the effectiveness of our disaster preparedness and response and business continuity planning and those of our customers, which may have not considered or prepared for every eventuality.

Our autonomous proppant-delivery vehicles contain complex information and operational technology systems and built-in data connectivity to log location data and accept and install periodic remote updates to improve or update their functionality or performance. Our technology partner expects to design, implement and test security measures intended to prevent unauthorized access to its and our information and operational technology networks, the autonomous vehicle platforms it produces and related or connected systems. However, hackers may attempt to gain unauthorized access to modify, alter and use such networks, vehicles and systems to gain control of or to change our autonomous vehicles' functionality, user interface and performance characteristics, or to gain access to data stored in or generated by our autonomous vehicles. Future vulnerabilities could be identified and manipulated and our or our technology partner's efforts to remediate such vulnerabilities may not be successful. Any unauthorized access to or control of our autonomous proppant-delivery vehicles, or any loss of data, could result in legal claims or proceedings or regulatory investigations and enforcement against us and remediation of such problems could result in significant, unplanned capital expenditures. In addition, regardless of their veracity, reports of unauthorized access to our autonomous proppant-delivery vehicles or our or our customers' data, as well as other factors that may result in the perception that our autonomous proppant-delivery vehicles or data are capable of being "hacked," could negatively affect our brand and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.