Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.
WisdomTree disclosed 65 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. WisdomTree reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.
Risk Overview Q2, 2025
Risk Distribution
35% Finance & Corporate
23% Production
15% Legal & Regulatory
11% Ability to Sell
9% Tech & Innovation
6% Macro & Political
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.
Risk Change Over Time
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
WisdomTree Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
Risk Highlights Q2, 2025
Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 23 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 23 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
65
+12
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
65
+12
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
12Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jun 2025
12Risks added
0Risks removed
0Risks changed
Since Jun 2025
Number of Risk Changed
0
-5
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
0
-5
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of WisdomTree in the last period.
Risk Word Cloud
The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 65
Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 23/65 (35%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights10 | 15.4%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
Abnormally wide bid/ask spreads and market disruptions that halt or disrupt trading or create extreme volatility could undermine investor confidence in the ETP investment structure and limit investor acceptance of ETPs.
ETPs trade on exchanges in market transactions that generally approximate the value of the referenced assets or underlying portfolio of securities held by the particular ETP. Trading involves risks including the potential lack of an active market for fund shares, abnormally wide bid/ask spreads (the difference between the prices at which shares of an ETP can be bought and sold) that can exist for a variety of reasons, and losses from trading. These risks can be exacerbated during periods when there is low demand for an ETP, the markets in the underlying investments are closed, market conditions are extremely volatile or trading is disrupted. This could result in limited growth or a reduction in the overall ETP market and could slow our revenue growth or even lead to a decline in revenues.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
Withdrawals or broad changes in investments in our ETPs by investors with significant positions may negatively impact revenues and operating margins.
We have had in the past, and may have in the future, investors who maintain significant positions in one or more of our ETPs. If such an investor were to broadly change or withdraw its investments in our ETPs because of a change to its investment strategy, market conditions or any other reason, it may significantly change the amount and mix of our AUM, which may negatively affect our revenues and operating margins.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
Responding to actions of activist stockholders against us has been costly and the possibility that activist stockholders may wage proxy contests or contested solicitations or seek representation on our Board of Directors in the future may be disruptive and cause uncertainty about the strategic direction of our business.
Activist stockholders may from time to time attempt to effect changes in our strategic direction, and in furtherance thereof, may seek changes in how the Company is governed. Our Board of Directors and management strive to maintain constructive, ongoing communications with our stockholders and welcome their views and opinions with the goal of enhancing value for all stockholders. However, an activist campaign that seeks to replace or remove members of our Board of Directors or changes in our strategic direction could have an adverse effect on us because:
- responding to actions by activist stockholders is costly and may be disruptive, time-consuming and divert the attention of our Board of Directors and senior management from the pursuit of business strategies, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition;- perceived uncertainties about our future direction as a result of changes to the composition of our Board of Directors, or senior management team, including our Chief Executive Officer, or changes to our stockholder base may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of the business, instability or lack of continuity, which may be exploited by our competitors, may result in the loss of potential business opportunities and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners;- these types of actions could cause significant fluctuations in our stock price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business; and - if individuals are elected to our Board of Directors with a specific agenda, it may adversely affect our ability to effectively implement our business strategy and to create additional value for our stockholders.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
A change of control of our Company would automatically terminate our investment management agreements relating to the WisdomTree U.S. listed ETFs and Digital Funds, unless the Board of Trustees of the WisdomTree Trust, WisdomTree Digital Trust and shareholders of each voted to continue the agreements. A change in control could occur if a third party were to acquire a controlling interest in our Company.
Under the Investment Company Act, an investment management agreement with a fund must provide for its automatic termination in the event of its assignment. The fund's board must vote to continue such an agreement following any such assignment and the shareholders of the WisdomTree Trust and WisdomTree Digital Trust must approve the assignment. The cost of obtaining such shareholder approval can be significant and ordinarily would be borne by us. Similarly, under the Investment Advisers Act, a client's investment management agreement may not be "assigned" by the investment adviser without the client's consent.
An investment management agreement is considered under both acts to be assigned to another party when a controlling block of the adviser's securities is transferred. Under both acts, there is a presumption that a stockholder beneficially owning 25% or more of an adviser's voting stock controls the adviser and conversely a stockholder beneficially owning less than 25% is presumed not to control the adviser. In our case, an assignment of our investment management agreements may occur if a third party were to acquire a controlling interest in our Company. We cannot be certain that the Trustees of the WisdomTree Trust and WisdomTree Digital Trust would consent to assignments of our investment management agreements or approve new agreements with us if a change of control occurs. And even if such approval were obtained, approval from the shareholders of the WisdomTree Trust and WisdomTree Digital Trust would be required to be obtained; such approval could not be guaranteed and even if obtained, likely would result in significant expense. This restriction may discourage potential purchasers from acquiring a controlling interest in our Company.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5
Our revenues could be adversely affected if the Independent Trustees of the WisdomTree Trust or WisdomTree Digital Trust, as applicable, do not approve the continuation of our advisory agreements or determine that the advisory fees we receive from the WisdomTree U.S. listed ETFs or Digital Funds should be reduced.
Our revenues are derived primarily from investment advisory agreements with related parties. Our advisory agreements with the WisdomTree Trust and WisdomTree Digital Trust, and the fees we collect from the WisdomTree U.S. listed ETFs and Digital Funds are subject to review and approval by the Independent Trustees of the WisdomTree Trust and WisdomTree Digital Trust, as applicable. The advisory agreements are subject to initial review and approval. After the initial two-year term of the agreement for each ETF or Digital Fund, the continuation of such agreement must be reviewed and approved at least annually by a majority of the Independent Trustees. In determining whether to approve the agreements, the Independent Trustees consider factors such as the nature and quality of the services provided by us, the fees charged by us and the costs and profits realized by us in connection with such services, as well as any ancillary or "fall-out" benefits from such services, the extent to which economies of scale are shared with the WisdomTree U.S. listed ETFs or Digital Funds, and the level of fees paid by other similar funds. Our revenues would be adversely affected if the Independent Trustees do not approve the continuation of our advisory agreements or determines that the advisory fees we charge to any particular fund are too high, resulting in a reduction of our fees.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6
The market price of our common stock has been fluctuating significantly and may continue to do so, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
The market price of our common stock has been fluctuating significantly and may continue to do so, depending upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:
- actions of activist stockholders against us, which have been costly and may be disruptive and may cause uncertainty about the strategic direction of our business;- decreases in our AUM;- variations in our quarterly operating results;- differences between our actual financial operating results and those expected by investors and analysts;- publication of research reports about us or the investment management industry;- changes in expectations concerning our future financial performance and the future performance of the ETP industry and the asset management industry in general, including financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts;- our strategic moves and those of our competitors, such as acquisitions or consolidations;- changes in the regulatory framework of the ETP industry and the asset management industry in general and regulatory action, including action by the SEC to lessen the regulatory requirements or shorten the process under the Investment Company Act to become an ETP sponsor;- the level of demand for our stock, including the amount of short interest in our stock;- changes in general economic or market conditions; and - realization of any other of the risks described elsewhere in this section.
In addition, stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Furthermore, in the past, market fluctuations and price declines in a company's stock have led to securities class action litigations or other derivative stockholder lawsuits. If such a suit were to arise, it could cause substantial costs to us and divert our resources regardless of the outcome.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7
If equity research analysts issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock relies in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. We do not control the opinions of these analysts. The price and trading volume of our common stock could decline if one or more equity analysts issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common stock or cease publishing reports about us or our business.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8
Future issuances of our common stock or equity-linked securities could lower our stock price and dilute the interests of existing stockholders.
We may issue additional shares of our common stock or equity-linked securities in the future, either in connection with an acquisition or for other business reasons. The issuance of a substantial amount of common stock or equity-linked securities could have the effect of substantially diluting the interests of our current stockholders. In addition, the sale of a substantial amount of common stock or equity-linked securities in the public market, either in the initial issuance or in a subsequent resale by the target company in an acquisition which received such common stock as consideration or by investors who acquired such common stock in a private placement, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 9
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may prevent or delay an acquisition of our Company, which could decrease the market value of our common stock.
Provisions of Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and our by-laws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable. These provisions may also prevent or delay attempts by stockholders to replace or remove our current management or members of our Board of Directors. These provisions include:
- limitations on the removal of directors;- advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations;- the inability of stockholders to act by written consent or to call special meetings;- the ability of our Board of Directors to make, alter or repeal our by-laws; and - the authority of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock with such terms as our Board of Directors may determine.
In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits business combination transactions with stockholders of 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock that our Board of Directors has not approved. These provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if some stockholders may consider the transaction beneficial to them.
As a result, these provisions could limit the price that investors are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. These provisions might also discourage a potential acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition proposal or tender offer is at a premium over the then current market price for our common stock.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 10
Our stockholder rights plan, or "poison pill," includes terms and conditions that could discourage a takeover or other transaction that stockholders may consider favorable.
Our Stockholder Rights Agreement, dated March 17, 2023 and subsequently amended on May 4, 2023, May 10, 2023, March 18, 2024, March 25, 2024 and April 30, 2024 (as amended, the "Stockholder Rights Agreement"), by and between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, was adopted by our Board of Directors and ratified by our stockholders in response to stockholder activism concerns. The Stockholder Rights Agreement is intended to protect the Company and its stockholders from efforts by a single stockholder or group of stockholders to obtain control of the Company without paying a control premium through a number of recognized stockholder protections. Generally, the Stockholder Rights Agreement works by causing substantial dilution to any person or group (other than specified exempt persons) that acquires 10% (or 20% in the case of passive stockholders) or more of our shares of common stock without the approval of the Board of Directors (such person or group, an "Acquiring Person") through the issuance of "Rights" to stockholders of record as of, and subsequent to, the close of business on March 28, 2023, which Rights entitle the registered holders thereof (other than the Acquiring Person) to receive additional shares of our common stock upon exercise of such Rights. As a result, the overall effect of the Stockholder Rights Agreement may be to render more difficult or discourage a merger, tender or exchange offer or other business combination involving our Company that is not approved by the Board of Directors even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders. The Rights will expire at the close of business on March 17, 2025, unless previously redeemed or exchanged by the Company. See Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Accounting & Financial Operations2 | 3.1%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
The payment of dividends to our stockholders and our ability to repurchase our common stock is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and may be limited by our financial condition and any applicable laws.
Any determination as to the payment of dividends or stock repurchases, as well as the level of such dividends or repurchases, will depend on, among other things, general economic and business conditions, our level of AUM, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, limitations associated with new credit facilities or other agreements that could limit the amount of dividends we are permitted to pay or the stock we may repurchase, and any applicable laws, including the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes an excise tax that would impose a 1% surcharge on stock repurchases. If, as a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we are unable to generate sufficient income from our business, we may need to reduce or eliminate the payment of dividends on our common stock or cease repurchasing our common stock. Any change in our stock repurchases or the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could adversely affect our stock price.
In addition, our Board of Directors is authorized, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with such terms as our Board of Directors may, in its discretion, determine. Our Board of Directors could, therefore, issue preferred stock with dividend rights superior to that of the common stock, which could also limit the payment of dividends on the common stock.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
Fluctuations in the amount and mix of our AUM may negatively impact revenues and operating margins.
The level of our revenues depends on the amount and mix of our AUM. Our revenues are derived primarily from advisory fees based on a percentage of the value of our AUM and vary with the nature of the ETPs, which have different fee levels. Fluctuations in the amount and mix of our AUM may be attributable in part to market conditions outside of our control that have had, and in the future could have, a negative impact on our revenues and operating margins.
Debt & Financing7 | 10.8%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
Declining prices of securities, gold and other precious metals and other commodities and changes in interest rates and general market conditions can adversely affect our business by reducing the market value of the assets we manage or causing WisdomTree ETP investors to sell their fund shares and trigger redemptions.
We are subject to risks arising from declining prices of securities, gold and other precious metals and other commodities, which may result in a decrease in demand for investment products, a higher redemption rate and/or a decline in AUM. The financial markets are highly volatile and prices for financial assets may increase or decrease for many reasons, including general economic conditions, trade uncertainties, rising or falling interest rates, the strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar, events such as a pandemic or war, geopolitical conflicts, political events, acts of terrorism and other matters beyond our control. A significant portion of our revenues is derived from advisory fees earned on our AUM, in both the international and U.S. markets. As a result, our business can be expected to generate lower revenues in declining market environments or general economic downturns. Such adverse conditions would likely cause the value of our AUM to decrease, which would result in lower advisory fees, or cause investors in the WisdomTree ETPs to sell their shares in favor of investments they perceive to offer greater opportunity or lower risk, thus triggering redemptions that would also result in decreased AUM and lower fees.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Added
Ceres’ performance is subject to risks associated with investments in direct real estate-related assets
Ceres provides investment advisory services
to, and manages, private funds, and a separate pooled investment vehicle that invests its assets in farmland real estate, Ceres Farms.
Investments in direct real estate-related assets are subject to various risks, including without limitation: the cyclical nature of the
real estate market and changes in national or local economic or market conditions; the financial condition of the buyers and sellers of
properties; government regulation and increases in trade tariffs; changes in supply of, or demand for, properties in a geographic area;
illiquidity of farmland investments; various forms of competition; fluctuations in lease rates; changes in interest rates and in the availability,
cost and terms of financing; promulgation and enforcement of governmental regulations, including rules relating to zoning, land use and
environmental protection; impact of third-party mineral rights ownership on properties; changes in real estate tax rates, energy prices
and other operating expenses; changes in applicable laws and increased governmental regulation; and various uninsured or uninsurable risks
and losses.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
We depend on Apex Financial Services (Alternative Funds) Limited in respect of the products issued by our Jersey-domiciled issuers, or ManJer Issuers, of ETCs (except WisdomTree Issuer X Limited), JTC Trust Company Jersey in respect of products issued by WisdomTree Issuer X Limited, APEX IFS Limited in respect of the products issued by WMAI and State Street Fund Services (Ireland) Limited in respect of the WisdomTree UCITS ETFs to provide us with critical administrative services to those products. The failure of any of those providers to adequately provide such services could materially affect our operating business and harm investors in those products.
We depend on Apex Financial Services (Alternative Funds) Limited in respect of the products issued by the ManJer Issuers (except WisdomTree Issuer X Limited), JTC Trust Company Jersey in respect of products issued by WisdomTree Issuer X Limited, APEX IFS Limited in respect of the products issued by WMAI and State Street Fund Services (Ireland) Limited in respect of the WisdomTree UCITS ETFs, to provide fund accounting, administration and, transfer agency services, as well as custody services in the case of the WisdomTree UCITS ETFs. The failure of any service provider to successfully provide these services could result in financial loss to the products, us and investors in those products. In addition, because each of the service providers provides a multitude of important services, changing these vendor relationships would be challenging. It might require us to devote a significant portion of management's time to negotiate a similar relationship with other vendors or have these services provided by multiple vendors, which would require us to coordinate the transfer of these functions to another vendor or vendors.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
We depend on HSBC and JP Morgan to provide us with critical physical custody services for precious metals that back our ETCs. The failure of HSBC and JP Morgan to adequately safeguard the physical assets could materially adversely affect our business and harm investors in our products.
We depend on HSBC and JP Morgan to provide us with critical physical custody services for precious metals that back our ETCs. Such products that are backed by physical metal are subject to risks associated with the custody of physical assets, including the risk that access to the metal held in the secure facilities managed by HSBC and JP Morgan could be restricted by a pandemic (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), natural events (such as an earthquake) or human actions (such as a terrorist attack). In addition, there is a risk that the physical metal could be lost, stolen, damaged or restricted. The failure of HSBC and JP Morgan to successfully provide us with these services could result in financial loss to us and investors in our products and our recovery of any losses from a custodian, sub-custodian or insurer may be inadequate.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
Many of our ETPs have a limited track record and poor investment performance could cause our revenues to decline.
Many of our ETPs have a limited track record upon which an evaluation of their investment performance can be made. Certain investors limit their investments to ETPs with track records of ten years or more. Furthermore, as part of our strategy, we continuously evaluate our product offerings to ensure that all our funds are useful, compelling and differentiated investment offerings, to align our overall product line more competitively in the current ETP landscape and to reallocate our resources to areas of greater client interest. As a result, we may further adjust our product offerings, which may result in closing some of our ETPs, changing their investment objective or offering new funds. The investment performance of our products is important to our success. While strong investment performance could stimulate sales of our ETPs, poor investment performance, on an absolute basis or as compared to third-party benchmarks or competitive products, could lead to a decrease in sales or stimulate redemptions, thereby lowering AUM and reducing our revenues. Our Modern Alpha strategies are designed to provide the potential for better risk-adjusted investment returns over full market cycles and are best suited for investors with a longer-term investment horizon. However, the investment approach of our equity products may not perform well during certain shorter periods of time during different points in the economic cycle.
Debt & Financing - Risk 6
We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the Convertible Notes, repurchase the Convertible Notes upon a fundamental change, or refinance our Convertible Notes upon maturity.
We currently have outstanding $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026, $25.8 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 and $345.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029, which we collectively refer to as the Convertible Notes. Holders of the Convertible Notes have the right to require us to repurchase their notes upon the occurrence of certain change of control transactions or liquidation, dissolution or common stock delisting events (each, a "fundamental change"), at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, as described in the respective indentures between us and the trustee. In addition, upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, we will be required to make cash payments in respect of the notes being converted as described in the indentures. However, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of notes surrendered therefor or notes being converted. In addition, our ability to repurchase the notes or to pay cash upon conversions of the notes may be limited by law, regulatory authority or agreements governing our future indebtedness. Our failure to refinance our convertible notes upon maturity, repurchase notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the applicable indenture or to pay any cash payable on future conversions of the notes as required by the applicable indenture would constitute a default under such indenture.
Debt & Financing - Risk 7
The conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and liquidity.
The conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Notes, if triggered, will entitle holders to convert the notes at any time during specified periods at their option, as described in the indentures. If one or more holders elect to convert their notes, we would be required to settle any converted principal through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity.
Corporate Activity and Growth4 | 6.2%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
We have pursued, and may continue to pursue, acquisitions and other strategic transactions. Any strategic transactions that we are a party to will result in increased demands on our management and other resources, may be significant in size relative to our assets and operations, result in significant changes in our business and materially and adversely affect our stock price. If we were unable to manage our strategic initiatives, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have pursued, and may continue to pursue, acquisitions and other strategic transactions. These initiatives have placed increased demands on our management and other resources and may continue to do so in the future. We may not be able to manage our operations effectively or achieve our desired objectives on a timely or profitable basis. To do so may require, among other things:
- continuing to retain, motivate and manage our existing employees and/or attract and integrate new employees;- developing and enhancing our operational, financial, accounting, reporting and other internal systems and controls on a timely basis; and - maintaining and expanding support functions, including human resources, information technology, legal and corporate communications.
If we are unable to manage these initiatives effectively, there could be a material adverse effect on our ability to maintain or increase revenues and profitability.
Managing strategic initiatives may require continued investment in personnel, information technology infrastructure and marketing activities, as well as further development and implementation of financial, operational and compliance systems and controls. We may not be successful in implementing all of the processes that are necessary. Unless such initiatives result in an increase in our revenues that is at least proportionate to the increase in the costs associated with implementing them, our future profitability will be adversely affected.
In addition, future strategic transactions could involve issuing significant equity or debt, which may dilute stockholders or require substantial borrowings. Such transactions may result in changes in our board and/or management team, constitute a change of control of our Company, lead to significant changes in our product offering, business operations and earning and risk profiles, and/or result in a decline in the price of our common stock.
Our ability to complete such transactions depends upon a number of factors that are not entirely within our control, including our ability to identify suitable merger or acquisition candidates, negotiate favorable terms, conclude satisfactory agreements and secure necessary financing. Our failure to successfully execute or integrate these transactions could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
Our risk management policies and procedures, and those of our third-party vendors upon which we rely, may not be fully effective in identifying or mitigating risk exposure, including employee misconduct. If our policies and procedures do not adequately protect us from exposure to these risks, we may incur losses that would adversely affect our financial condition, reputation and market share.
We have developed risk management policies and procedures and we continue to refine them as we conduct our business. Many of our procedures involve oversight of third-party vendors that provide us with critical services such as portfolio management, custody, fund accounting and administration, and index calculation as further described in "Third-Party Provider Risks" above. However, our policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage risks may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure. Deficiencies in the risk management policies and procedures, internal systems and controls of our third-party vendors may adversely affect our systems and controls. Moreover, we are subject to the risks of errors and misconduct by our employees, including fraud and non-compliance with policies. These risks are difficult to detect in advance and deter, and could harm our business, results of operations or financial condition. Although we maintain insurance and use other traditional risk-shifting tools, such as third-party indemnification, to manage certain exposures, they are subject to terms such as deductibles, coinsurance, limits and policy exclusions, as well as risk of counterparty denial of coverage, default or insolvency. If our policies and procedures do not adequately protect us from exposure and our exposure is not adequately covered by insurance or other risk-shifting tools, we may incur losses that would adversely affect our financial condition and could cause a reduction in our revenues as investors in our products shift their investments to the products of our competitors.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
Added
Risks Related to the Acquisition of Ceres Partners, LLC
We have made certain assumptions relating to the Ceres
Acquisition which may prove to be materially inaccurate, and we may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.
We have made certain assumptions relating to
the Ceres Acquisition, which may prove to be materially inaccurate. Our failure to identify, or understand the magnitude of, the problems,
liabilities or other challenges associated with the Ceres Acquisition could result in incorrect expectations of future results and increased
risk of unanticipated or unknown issues or liabilities. Our mitigation strategies for such risks that are identified may be ineffective.
These assumptions relate to numerous matters, including:
?opportunities for revenue, earnings and growth in the short- and long-term that may be realized by acquiring
Ceres and entering the private asset markets;
?rates of growth in revenue, earnings, margin and AUM;
?demand for and performance of private investments, particularly in real estate and farmland;
?opportunities in strategic adjacencies in demand for solar energy, AI data infrastructure and water;
?Ceres’ ability to raise additional capital into Ceres’ funds;
?general economic and business conditions, and the performance of the Ceres business against this backdrop;
?potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen delays or regulatory conditions associated with the Ceres
Acquisition;
?faulty assumptions or incorrect expectations regarding the process of integrating the Ceres business
with ours, including unanticipated delays, costs or inefficiencies;
?the anticipated benefits and synergies, including timing for when such benefits and synergies may be
realized through combining the Ceres business with ours;
?the amount of attention and resources needed to successfully align our and Ceres’ business practices
and operations, which may disrupt our business;
?the complexities associated with managing the combined businesses; and
?other financial and strategic risks of the Ceres Acquisition.
51
We cannot guarantee that we will achieve our
goals or meet our expectations with respect to the Ceres Acquisition. The full benefits of the Ceres Acquisition, including the anticipated
financial benefits and the synergies and growth opportunities, may not be realized as expected or may not be achieved within the anticipated
timeframe, or at all. Such benefits may not be fully realized for various reasons, including, among others, changes in the assumptions
described above.
In addition, we caution you not to place undue
reliance on our current expectations regarding the financial impact of the Ceres Acquisition because they are based solely on information
provided to us by Ceres in the due diligence process and our internal estimates, which are based on numerous factors, including specifically
identified financial benefits and growth avenues. Our experience integrating and operating Ceres may change our expectations with respect
to the financial impact of the Ceres Acquisition. In addition, the financial impact of the Ceres Acquisition may differ from our expectations
based on numerous other factors, including our failure to fully realize the expected financial benefits as described in the risk factors
set forth in this Report. We can provide no assurance that the actual financial impact of the Ceres Acquisition will be consistent with
our current expectations.
If our assumptions are inaccurate or we are
unable to meet our expectations (including our expectations regarding financial targets and growth rates), our business, financial performance
and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”
above.
Completion of the Ceres Acquisition is subject to conditions,
and if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Ceres Acquisition will not be completed.
On July 31, 2025, we agreed to acquire Ceres
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. Completion of the Ceres Acquisition is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions
in the Purchase Agreement. These conditions include, among others, obtaining regulatory approvals, required consents, and financing. In
addition, completion of the Ceres Acquisition is conditioned upon (i) employment agreements with certain key employees of Ceres being
in full force and effect, (ii) Ceres delivering executed consents from both Ceres, as general partner of Ceres Farms, LLC (“Ceres
Farms”), and a majority of the investors in Ceres Farms, (iii) the Closing Revenue Run-Rate being no less than 85% of the Base Revenue
Run-Rate (each as defined in the Purchase Agreement) and (iv) tail coverage for the insurance coverages currently in effect for the directors,
managers and officers of the acquired companies being in full force and effect. Our obligation to consummate the Ceres Acquisition is
further subject to the condition that, during the period between July 31, 2025 and the closing of the Ceres Acquisition, there has not
been a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Purchase Agreement). The Purchase Agreement will terminate if the closing of the Ceres
Acquisition has not occurred on or prior to December 31, 2025, subject to the parties agreeing to extend such date, as well as for material
breaches not cured prior to December 31, 2025. If we terminate the Purchase Agreement, subject to certain other conditions, we will reimburse
Ceres for its Eligible Expenses (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) subject to a $2.0 million cap.
The failure to satisfy all of the required conditions
in the Purchase Agreement could delay the completion of the Ceres Acquisition or prevent it from occurring. Any delay in completing the
Ceres Acquisition could cause us not to realize some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve if the Ceres Acquisition is successfully
completed within the expected timeframe. There can be no assurance that the conditions to the closing of the Ceres Acquisition will be
satisfied or waived or that the Ceres Acquisition will be completed, or as to whether the Ceres Acquisition will be completed on terms
other than those set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
Failure to complete the Ceres Acquisition could negatively
affect the price of our common stock, as well as our future business and financial results.
If the Ceres Acquisition is delayed or not completed,
we may be adversely affected by, among other things, the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities during the pendency of the Ceres
Acquisition, the failure to obtain the anticipated benefits of completing the Ceres Acquisition, and the focus of our management on the
Ceres Acquisition rather than on normal business operations or opportunities. We may experience negative reactions from the financial
markets, including negative impacts on the market price of our common stock. The manner in which industry contacts, business partners
and other third parties perceive us may be negatively affected, which in turn could affect our marketing operations or our ability to
compete more broadly.
Additionally, even if the Ceres Acquisition
is not completed, we will be responsible for certain transaction costs associated with the Ceres Acquisition including financial advisory,
legal, accounting, consulting and other advisory fees and expenses. If we terminate the Purchase Agreement, subject to certain other conditions,
we will reimburse Ceres for its Eligible Expenses (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) subject to a $2.0 million cap. Any of these factors,
among others, could have a material impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
52
Completion of the Ceres Acquisition will mark our entry into
the private asset markets, specifically farmland, and this may result in changes in our business. Our failure to integrate and manage
Ceres successfully could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If the Ceres Acquisition is completed, we will
face numerous risks, including, among others:
•failure to achieve financial, operating or business objectives and synergies;
•failure to integrate successfully and in a timely manner any operations, products, services or technology;
•diversion of the attention of management and other personnel;
•failure to raise additional capital into Ceres’ funds;
•failure to integrate Ceres into our compliance and internal control systems, including regulatory compliance applicable to registered
investment advisers and broker-dealers;
•failure to retain personnel;
•unforeseen liabilities or expenses;
•failure of counterparties to indemnify us against liabilities arising from the transaction;
•potential loss of, or harm to, our relationship with our and the counterparties’ employees, customers and suppliers due to the
integration of a new business;
•accounting charges;
•assumption of the liabilities, and exposure to unforeseen liabilities, of Ceres and its subsidiaries, including liabilities subject
to indemnification;
•unfavorable market conditions that could negatively impact the acquired or combined businesses; and
•legal proceedings which may result in expenses and/or have a material adverse effect on our business.
We could be prevented from, or significantly
delayed in, achieving our strategic goals if we are unable to successfully integrate Ceres. Integration may be more difficult, time-consuming
or costly than expected. Our failure to integrate and manage Ceres successfully could materially and adversely affect our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 4
Added
Ceres may not be successful in pursuing new business opportunities, including in solar, artificial intelligence (“AI”) data infrastructure and water rights, which could adversely affect its financial performance and strategic objectives.
Ceres continues to evaluate opportunities
to grow its business, including through the acquisition and leasing of properties for solar energy generation and AI data infrastructure, and the monetization of water rights. While Ceres currently leases and enters into option
agreements with respect to certain properties for solar energy development and use and may expand such arrangements, there can be no
assurance that it will be able to identify, negotiate or execute additional opportunities on favorable terms or at all.
Ceres’ efforts to pursue strategic adjacencies or enter new markets may be hindered by a variety of factors, including
regulatory or permitting challenges, lack of demand, competition, technological or infrastructure constraints or insufficient
capital investment. There can be no assurance that Ceres’ initiatives to explore new business opportunities, enter new
markets or make investments or acquisitions will benefit our or its business operations, generate sufficient revenues to offset
related costs, or produce the anticipated benefits of past or future investments.
Production
Total Risks: 15/65 (23%)Above Sector Average
Manufacturing4 | 6.2%
Manufacturing - Risk 1
Fork risks
Blockchain software is generally open-source. Any user can download the software, modify it and then propose that the blockchain network adopt the modification. When a modification is introduced and a substantial majority of users consent to the modification, the change is implemented and the blockchain network remains uninterrupted. However, if less than a substantial majority of users consent to the proposed modification, and the blockchain consensus mechanism, such as that used by Ethereum, allows for the modification to nonetheless be implemented by some users and the modification is not compatible with the software prior to its modification, the consequence would be what is known as a "fork" (i.e., "split") of the blockchain network (and the blockchain), with one version running the pre-modified software and the other running the modified software. The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two (or more) versions of the blockchain network running in parallel, but with each version's native asset lacking interchangeability. Additionally, a fork could be introduced by an unintentional, unanticipated software flaw in the multiple versions of otherwise compatible software users run. If a fork occurs, the original blockchain and the forked blockchain could potentially compete with each other for users and other participants, leading to a loss of these for the original blockchain. A fork could adversely affect our digital assets business.
Manufacturing - Risk 2
Blockchain infrastructure risks
The consensus or governance mechanisms of blockchain networks are subject to change and malfunctions and may not receive adequate adoption from users and miners, which could negatively impact the blockchain network's ability to scale and improve programmability, transparency, auditability and security. In addition, blockchain networks face significant challenges in connection with the volume, speed, security and cost of transactions, and their efforts to increase or enhance such characteristics of the blockchain network may not be successful or adversely affect other characteristics of the blockchain network. If the digital asset awards for verifying and confirming transactions on a blockchain network are not sufficiently high to incentivize miners, miners may cease to verify and confirm such transactions or otherwise demand higher fees, which could negatively affect the value of a digital asset.
Manufacturing - Risk 3
New product risks
We have and may continue to spend substantial time and resources developing our digital assets product offerings and services. If these products and services are not successful, or their implementation or launches are delayed, including in connection with our inability to obtain new product regulatory approvals, we may not be able to offset their costs, which could have an adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition and operating results.
Our digital assets business subjects us to risks similar to those associated with any new product offerings, including, but not limited to, our ability to accurately anticipate market demand and adoption, technical issues with the operation of the products, and legal and regulatory risks as discussed herein. Substantial risks and uncertainties are associated with the introduction of new products and services, including rapid technological change in the industry, significant and ongoing investments required to bring new products and services to market in a timely manner at competitive prices, protection of intellectual property and other confidential information, the competition for employees with the necessary expertise and experience, and producing sales and other materials that fully and accurately describe the product or service and its underlying risks and that are compliant with applicable regulations. New products or services may fail to operate or perform as expected and may not produce anticipated efficiencies, savings or benefits. Our failure to manage these risks and uncertainties also exposes us to enhanced risk of operational lapses and third-party claims, which may result in the recognition of financial statement liabilities.
Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of our digital assets business could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition and operating results.
Manufacturing - Risk 4
We instruct trades and perform other operational processes in respect of crypto basket ETPs that we have launched in Europe. Operational failures could materially affect our business and harm investors in these products.
We have launched products in Europe that are indexed to baskets of cryptocurrencies or that may allow for staking. We have outsourced the administrator, transfer agent and custodial functions for these products. While we typically outsource portfolio management services to third-party sub-advisers for our products, in this case, we instead act as determination agent and place buy and sell orders directly with a broker to rebalance these crypto basket ETPs in line with the indices. These rebalances typically occur quarterly. Expanding trading volumes may increase the risk of trading errors. The failure of any of our vendors to provide us and our products with the outsourced services and our failure to correctly place trade orders could lead to operational issues and result in financial loss to us and/or investors in our products. For products through which we derive additional revenue by staking, we operationally delegate the relevant assets to validators in our role as determination agent. Operational errors in the process could materially affect our business and harm investors in these products. In addition, staking features, such as lock-up periods, staking reward payout periods and reward amounts, are not necessarily fixed over time and can cause liquidity risk or delay the standard settlement period. This may cause redemptions to be delayed and may result in a financial loss to investors.
Employment / Personnel1 | 1.5%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
Our ability to operate effectively could be impaired if we fail to retain or recruit key personnel.
The success of our business is highly dependent on our ability to attract, retain and motivate skilled employees across operations, product development, research, technology, sales and marketing. Our U.S. employees generally may voluntarily terminate their employment at any time. The market for these individuals is extremely competitive and is likely to become more so as additional investment management firms enter the ETP industry and as the digital assets market continues to develop. Our compensation methods may not enable us to recruit and retain required personnel. For example, price volatility in our common stock may impact our ability to effectively use equity grants as an employee compensation incentive. Also, we may need to increase compensation levels, which would decrease our net income or increase our losses. If we are unable to retain and attract key personnel, it could have an adverse effect on our business, our results of operations and financial condition.
Supply Chain6 | 9.2%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
Third-party service provider risks
We rely on third-party service providers in connection with different facets of our digital assets business, including but not limited to custodial arrangements, blockchain and wallet infrastructure, banking relationships, cloud computing, payment platforms and processors, data infrastructure, customer support, compliance support and product development, including mobile application development, all of which are critical to the success of our digital assets business. In addition, we have partnered with a financial institution to provide co-branded debit cards to retail customers. The loss of, or interruption of service from, a critical third-party service provider could adversely impact our digital assets business, operating results and financial condition. We may incur significant costs to resolve any such disruptions in service. In addition, such third-party service providers may be subject to financial, legal, regulatory and labor issues, data security and cybersecurity incidents, denial-of-service attacks, sabotage, privacy breaches or violations, fraud and other misconduct, which could directly or indirectly have an impact on our digital assets products and services. If any third-party service provider fails to adequately or appropriately render services or fails to meet its contractual requirements, including compliance with applicable laws and regulations, we could be subject to regulatory enforcement actions and claims from third parties, including our customers, and suffer economic and reputational harm that could have an adverse effect on our digital assets business, operating results and financial condition.
Supply Chain - Risk 2
We depend on Swissquote Bank Ltd and Coinbase Custody Trust LLC to provide us with critical custody services for digital currencies that back WisdomTree digital assets. The failure of Swissquote and/or Coinbase to adequately safeguard these digital assets could materially adversely affect our business and harm investors in this product.
We depend on Swissquote Bank Ltd and Coinbase Custody Trust LLC to provide us with critical custody services for digital currencies that back WisdomTree digital assets. Products that are backed by digital currencies are subject to the risks associated with the custody of digital assets, including the risk that the digital currencies or the blockchain infrastructure could be impacted by hacks or other malicious actions. WisdomTree Issuer X Limited is reliant on the security procedures and infrastructure of the custodian to safeguard the underlying digital currency cryptographic keys. There is no guarantee that the arrangements of the custodian will fully protect from loss of assets. Damage to the infrastructure or loss of these assets may render the digital currency inaccessible and adversely impact the value of an investment in digital assets. The digital currencies may also be exposed to the Internet briefly before reaching the secure accounts of the custodian. There are additional risks involved with an investment backed by digital currencies such as changes to the protocol (such as forks) which could damage the reputation of digital assets or result in losses for investors. The risks associated with digital currencies and the failure of the custodian to safeguard the underlying assets could result in financial loss to us and investors in our products and our recovery of any losses from a custodian may be inadequate. The custodians perform additional services to crypto ETPs that may derive additional revenue by delegating a part of our assets to validate transactions on the relevant blockchain ("staking"). There are certain operational and technological risks associated with staking such as penalties due to bad validator behavior. Operational and technical errors in the context of staking could damage the reputation of digital assets or result in losses for investors.
Supply Chain - Risk 3
The WisdomTree UCITS ETFs primarily depend on either of Assenagon Asset Management S.A. or Irish Life Investment Managers Limited to provide portfolio management services and other third parties to provide many critical services to operate the WisdomTree UCITS ETFs. The failure of key vendors to adequately provide such services could materially affect our operating business and harm investors in the WisdomTree UCITS ETFs.
The WisdomTree UCITS ETFs depend on third-party vendors to provide many services that are critical to operating our business, including Assenagon Asset Management S.A. and Irish Life Investment Managers Limited as investment managers that provide us with portfolio management services and third-party providers of index calculation services. The failure of any of these key vendors to provide the WisdomTree UCITS ETFs with these services could lead to operational issues and result in financial loss to us and investors in the WisdomTree UCITS ETFs.
Supply Chain - Risk 4
Failure of third-party vendors to maintain sufficient internal controls could adversely affect us.
If a third-party vendor fails to develop and maintain sufficient internal control processes or adequate data privacy controls and security systems, such failure could adversely affect us. For example, in the past, we were notified of a deficiency in the internal controls of a third-party vendor of software we utilize in our accounting processes. We identified sufficient mitigating controls to alleviate the deficiency and do not believe the third-party's deficiency had a material impact on our operations or financial reporting. Any internal control failures that may arise in the future could adversely affect us if not sufficiently mitigated.
Supply Chain - Risk 5
The products issued by our European business are subject to counterparty risks.
The products issued by our European business depend on the services of counterparties, custodians and other agents and are therefore subject to a variety of counterparty risks, which are detailed above. Products issued by WMAI, certain WisdomTree UCITS ETFs and certain products issued by the ManJer Issuers are backed by swap, derivative or similar arrangements, which are subject to risks associated with the creditworthiness of their counterparties, including the risk that a counterparty will not settle a transaction in accordance with its terms and conditions because of a dispute over the terms of the relevant arrangement (whether or not bona fide) or because of a credit, liquidity, regulatory, tax or operational problem. Any deterioration of the credit or downgrade in the credit rating of a counterparty, or the custodian holding the collateral, could cause the associated products to trade at a discount to the value of the underlying assets.
The terms of contracts with counterparties are generally complex, often customized and often not subject to regulatory oversight. A voluntary or involuntary default by a counterparty may occur at any time without notice. In the event of any default by, or the insolvency of, any counterparty, the relevant products may be exposed to the under-segregation of assets, fraud or other factors that may result in the recovery of less than all of the property of our issuers that was held in custody or safekeeping in the case of physically backed products or the recovery of property that is insufficient in value to cover all amounts payable to holders of the applicable products upon their redemption.
The impact of market stress or counterparty financial condition may not be accurately foreseen or evaluated and, as a result, we may not take sufficient action to reduce counterparty risks effectively. Any losses due to a counterparty's failure to perform its contractual obligations will be borne by the relevant product issuer and there could be a substantial delay in recovering assets due from counterparties or it may not be possible to do so at all. Defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, the solvency of counterparties may increase operational risks or transaction costs, which may negatively affect the investment performance of the relevant products and have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
Supply Chain - Risk 6
We primarily depend on Mellon Investments Corporation, Newton Investment Management North America, LLC and Voya Investment Management Co., LLC to provide portfolio management services, The Bank of New York Mellon to provide us with critical administrative services to operate our business and our U.S. listed ETFs, and other third parties to provide many other critical services to operate our business and our U.S. listed ETFs. The failure of key vendors to adequately provide such services could materially affect our operating business and harm investors in our products.
We outsource to third-party vendors to provide us with many services that are critical to operating our business, including Mellon Investments Corporation, Newton Investment Management North America, LLC and Voya Investment Management Co., LLC as sub-advisers providing portfolio management services, and The Bank of New York Mellon, or BNY Mellon, to provide custody services, fund accounting, administration, transfer agency and securities lending services. We also rely on third-party providers to license indexes to certain of our U.S. listed ETFs, perform index calculation services for our indexes and a third-party distributor for our products. The failure of any of these key vendors to provide us and our products with these services could lead to operational issues and result in financial loss to us and investors in our products.
Costs4 | 6.2%
Costs - Risk 1
Declining commodity prices, and gold prices in particular, including as a result of changes in demand for commodities and gold as an investment, could materially and adversely affect our business.
At December 31, 2024, approximately 13% of our AUM were in ETPs backed by gold and approximately 9% were in ETPs backed by other commodities. Precious metals such as gold are often viewed as "safe haven" assets as they tend to attract demand during periods of economic and geopolitical uncertainty. Accommodative monetary policies are also favorable as the opportunity cost of forgoing investment in interest-bearing assets is low. Market conditions that are not conducive to investment in precious metals, such as a rising interest rate environment, may lead to declining prices that are linked to our ETPs and thereby adversely affect our AUM and revenues. We cannot provide any assurance that our products backed by precious metals will benefit from favorable market conditions. In addition, changes in long-term demand cycles for commodities generally and cyclicality in demand for commodities as an investment asset, could reduce demand for certain of our products, limit our ability to successfully launch new products and also may lead to redemptions by existing investors.
Also, a portion of the advisory fee revenues we receive on our ETPs backed by gold are paid in gold ounces. While we may readily sell the gold that we earn under these advisory contracts, we still may maintain a position. We currently do not enter into arrangements to hedge against fluctuations in the price of gold and any hedging we may undertake in the future may not be cost-effective or sufficient to hedge against this gold exposure.
Costs - Risk 2
Added
Ceres Farms’ revenues is subject to risks associated with growing crops and the performance of the agricultural industry.
Ceres Farms’ investment strategy is to
acquire and manage farmland which may also include directly managing the operations of these farms. Ceres Farms’ properties grow
corn, soybeans, wheat and other primary crops, and specialty crops including seed corn and vegetables. As these crops are commodities,
they are subject to wide fluctuations in price. If the value of these crops declines, it could negatively impact the level of rent that
Ceres Farms can charge to tenant farmers and cause Ceres Farms to operate at a loss. In circumstances where Ceres Farms’ revenue
from a farm is based on a share of crop production, in addition to risks associated with commodity price fluctuations, adverse weather
conditions such as flooding or drought, or pest or plant disease problems could damage or destroy the crops and may cause Ceres Farms
to operate unprofitably. The value of and revenues from farmland in which Ceres Farms invests will be largely dependent on the performance
of the agricultural industry, which is historically cyclical. Crop yields can be affected by numerous factors beyond the control of Ceres
Farms, including reductions in the market prices for the farmers’ products, adverse weather and growing conditions, pest and disease
problems, and new government regulations regarding farming and the marketing of agricultural products.
Costs - Risk 3
Added
Ceres is subject to concentration risks arising from its concentration in real estate.
Given the cyclical nature of the
real estate market, changes in national or local economic or market
conditions could have an adverse effect on Ceres. In addition, changes in the financial condition of tenants, buyers and sellers of property,
competition, fluctuations in lease rates, the length of leases, and in the availability of financing will have a significant impact on
Ceres’ performance. The geographic concentration of Ceres Farms’ properties in the U.S. Midwest makes its operations more
vulnerable to local economic downturns and adverse farm-specific risks, such as adverse weather events, changes in the local climate,
access to water and plant disease, than those of larger, more diversified companies.
Costs - Risk 4
Our expenses are subject to fluctuations that could materially affect our operating results.
Our results of operations are impacted by the magnitude of our expenses and may fluctuate as a result of inflation, as well as discretionary spending, including additional headcount, accruals for incentive compensation, marketing, advertising, sales and other expenses we incur in our operations. As we continue to invest in our digital assets business, related expenses may exceed initial expectations in both the near and long term. Accordingly, fluctuations in our expenses could materially affect our operating results and may vary from quarter to quarter.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 10/65 (15%)Below Sector Average
Regulation4 | 6.2%
Regulation - Risk 1
Compliance with extensive, complex and changing regulation imposes significant financial and strategic costs on our business, and non-compliance could result in fines and penalties.
We are subject to extensive regulation of our business and operations. Two of our U.S. subsidiaries, WTAM and WT Digital Management, are registered investment advisers and are subject to oversight by the SEC pursuant to its regulatory authority under the Investment Advisers Act. We also must comply with certain requirements under the Investment Company Act with respect to the WisdomTree U.S. listed ETFs for which WTAM acts as investment adviser and with respect to our Digital Funds for which WT Digital Management acts as an investment adviser. WTAM is also a member of the NFA and registered as a commodity pool operator for certain of our ETFs. As a commodity pool operator, we are subject to oversight by the NFA and the CFTC pursuant to regulatory authority under the Commodity Exchange Act. In addition, the content and use of our marketing and sales materials and the conduct of our sales force in the U.S. regarding our U.S. listed ETFs and Digital Funds are subject to the regulatory authority of FINRA. The SEC also has recently adopted rule amendments that are designed to modernize sales and marketing materials and, as a result, could impact our marketing materials. We are also subject to foreign laws and regulatory authorities with respect to operational aspects of our products that invest in securities of issuers in foreign countries, in the marketing, offer and/or sales of our products in foreign jurisdictions and in our offering of investment products domiciled outside of the U.S., such as our ETPs issued by the ManJer Issuers, UCITS ETFs and ETPs issued by WMAI.
Each of the regulatory bodies with jurisdiction over us has regulatory powers over many aspects of our business, including the authority to grant, and, in specific circumstances to cancel, permissions to carry on particular businesses. Our ETPs' and Digital Funds' failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations has in the past, and could in the future, result in fines, censure, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of our registration as an investment adviser. For example, in August 2024, WTAM received a Wells Notice from the Staff of the SEC advising WTAM that the Staff had made a preliminary determination to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against WTAM alleging violations of certain provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws relating to three exchange-traded series of WisdomTree Trust managed by WTAM that pursued ESG-focused strategies. In October 2024, without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, WTAM agreed to resolve the matter by consenting to the entry of an order by the SEC, in which WTAM agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act, Rules 206(4)-7 and 206(4)-8 thereunder, and Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act, and to pay a civil money penalty of $4.0 million. See Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Even if a sanction imposed against us, our personnel or our ETPs or Digital Funds is small in monetary amount, the adverse publicity arising from the imposition of sanctions against us, our personnel or our ETPs or Digital Funds by regulators could harm our reputation and thus result in redemptions from our products and impede our ability to retain and attract investors in WisdomTree ETPs and Digital Funds, all of which may reduce our revenues.
We face the risk of significant intervention by regulatory authorities, including extended investigation activity, adoption of costly or restrictive new regulations and judicial or administrative proceedings that may result in substantial penalties. Among other things, we have been and could be fined or be prohibited from engaging in some of our business activities. The requirements imposed by our regulators are designed to ensure the integrity of the financial markets and to protect investors in our products and our advisory clients and are not designed to protect our stockholders. Consequently, these regulations often serve to limit our activities, including through investor protection and market conduct requirements.
The regulatory environment in which we operate also is subject to modifications and further regulation. Concerns have been raised at various times about ETFs' possible contribution to market volatility as well as the disclosure requirements applicable to certain types of more complex ETFs. In addition, the SEC approved a broad set of rules regarding data reporting and fund liquidity, fund valuation and funds' use of derivatives, which impose additional expense and require additional administrative services and requirements, among other matters, to comply with these rules. New laws or regulations, or changes in the enforcement of existing laws or regulations, applicable to us or investors in our products also may adversely affect our business, and our ability to function in this environment will depend on our ability to constantly monitor and react to these changes. Compliance with new laws and regulations may result in increased compliance costs and expenses.
Specific regulatory changes also may have a direct impact on our revenues. In addition to regulatory scrutiny and potential fines and sanctions, regulators continue to examine different aspects of the asset management industry. New regulations, revised regulatory or judicial interpretations, revised viewpoints, outcomes of lawsuits against other fund complexes or growth in our ETP and Digital Fund assets and/or profitability related to the annual approval process for investment advisory agreements may result in the reduction of fees under these agreements, which would mean a reduction in our revenues or otherwise may lead to an increase in costs or expenses.
Our operations outside the U.S. are subject to the laws and regulations of various non-U.S. jurisdictions and non-U.S. regulatory agencies and bodies. As we have expanded our international presence, a number of our subsidiaries and international operations have become subject to regulatory systems in various jurisdictions, comparable to those covering our operations in the U.S. Regulators in these non-U.S. jurisdictions may have broad authority with respect to the regulation of financial services including, among other things, the authority to grant or cancel required licenses or registrations.
Regulation - Risk 2
Regulatory risks
The digital assets industry is rapidly evolving at an unprecedented rate. There is a high degree of regulatory uncertainty associated with the digital assets industry, which means that the products and services our digital assets business provides or may provide in the future could subject us to enhanced regulatory scrutiny or otherwise materially impact the quality or nature of such products or services. Recent changes in the U.S. administration, Congress and U.S. federal agencies may result in significant regulatory and policy developments relating to digital assets, including those that may affect our operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways by changing the costs of doing business, the scope of permissible activities and competitive factors in the digital assets industry. The effect of any future legal or regulatory change or interpretation both domestically and internationally is unknown and such change could be substantial and adverse to our digital assets business.
In addition, we are actively engaged with a variety of U.S. federal and state regulators (e.g., the SEC, FINRA, NYDFS and other state regulators) to secure, as necessary, or maintain the appropriate regulatory, registration and/or licensing approvals for various business initiatives and operations, including but not limited to: a New York state-chartered limited purpose trust company; money services and money transmitter business; limited purpose broker-dealer; transfer agent; investment adviser; and investment funds. For example, we are licensed as a money transmitter or the equivalent in many U.S. states and the District of Columbia, but we may be unable to obtain such licenses in all U.S. states or may experience significant delays, and this could have an adverse effect on our digital assets business. As we seek to expand globally, similar approvals and/or reliance on exemptions will be required in applicable foreign markets, which also may involve approvals specific to a digital assets or related business. As we secure the appropriate regulatory, registration and/or licensing approvals, or otherwise rely on, seek or confirm exemptions therefrom, in connection with our digital assets business, we are and will be subject to a myriad of complex and evolving global policy frameworks and associated regulatory requirements that we need to comply with, or otherwise be exempt from, to ensure our digital assets products and services are successfully brought to different markets in a compliant manner. Failure to secure and/or comply with any such approvals and exemptions could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, private litigation, administrative enforcement actions, sanctions, civil and criminal liability, and constraints on our ability to continue to operate our digital assets business, and have an adverse effect on our digital assets business.
Regulation - Risk 3
Added
Adverse changes in government policies and regulations related to farming could affect the prices of crops and the profitability of farming operations, which could materially and adversely affect the value of Ceres Farms’ properties and its results of operations.
There are a number of government policies and
programs that directly or indirectly affect the profitability of farm operators. These include marketing, export, renewable fuel and insurance
policies and programs. Government policies and regulations affecting the agricultural industry, such as taxes, tariffs, duties, subsidies,
incentives, and import and export restrictions on agricultural commodities and commodity products, can influence the planting of certain
crops, the location and size of crop production, whether unprocessed or processed commodity products are traded, the volume and types
of imports and exports, the availability and competitiveness of feedstocks as raw materials, and industry profitability. Government policies
and regulations may adversely affect the supply of, demand for, and prices of agricultural products. In addition, international trade
disputes can adversely affect agricultural commodity trade flows by limiting or disrupting trade between countries or regions. Significant
changes to or the elimination of programs and policies could adversely affect crop prices and the profitability of farming operations,
including farms owned by Ceres Farms, and adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill
Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law, enacting changes to U.S. agricultural policy, including updates to commodity support programs,
crop insurance and trade promotion funding. The legislation poses risks to Ceres’ business. The OBBBA raises statutory reference
prices for major commodities, including corn and soybeans, with further annual escalations beginning in 2031. These changes may incentivize
increased domestic production, potentially leading to oversupply and downward pressure on market prices, particularly if global demand
does not rise proportionately. The OBBBA allocates $2.2 billion toward agricultural trade promotion, which may be deemed a subsidy by
international trading partners, potentially triggering retaliatory measures or disputes under World Trade Organization rules and
restricting market access for U.S. corn and soybean exports. Delays or inconsistencies by federal agencies in administering new reference
prices, crop insurance enhancements, or trade programs could create uncertainty for the agricultural industry. In addition, certain tax
provisions of the OBBBA may adversely impact Ceres Farms’ tenant farmers who own small farms.
Federal, state and county governments have implemented
laws and regulations in connection with farming operations, including those relating to taxes, trade, environmental, labor, immigration
and food safety, among others. For example, labor and immigration regulations seek to provide for minimum wages and minimum and maximum
work hours, as well as to restrict the hiring of illegal immigrants. If one of Ceres Farms’ tenants is accused of violating, or
found to have violated such regulations, it could have a material adverse effect on the tenant’s operating results, which could
adversely affect its ability to make its rental payments to Ceres Farms. Increased enforcement of federal immigration policy could adversely
affect the overall farming labor market, which could result in upward pressure on wages for farm labor and adversely affect Ceres Farms’
tenants’ profitability and ability to pay rent. In addition, certain states, including Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Missouri and
Kansas, in which a substantial amount of primary crop farmland is located, have laws that prohibit or restrict, to varying degrees, the
ownership of agricultural land by corporations or business entities similar to Ceres Farms. Additional states may, in the future, pass
similar or more restrictive laws, and Ceres Farms may not be legally permitted, or it may become overly burdensome or expensive, to acquire
farms in these states, which could impede the growth of Ceres Farms’ portfolio and its ability to diversify geographically in states
that might otherwise offer compelling investment opportunities.
Regulation - Risk 4
Added
In addition to the updated risk factor and other
information set forth below and elsewhere in this Report, you should carefully consider the information set forth in Part 1, Item 1A.
“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities2 | 3.1%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Anti-Money Laundering ("AML") risks
The decentralized infrastructure and anonymous or pseudonymous nature of digital assets could facilitate and create the opportunity for money laundering and terrorist financing activities, thereby circumventing certain anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing laws and regulations designed to prevent financial crimes which could negatively impact our digital assets business. In addition, certain aspects of our digital assets business will have significantly greater anti-money laundering risk, including risk of fines or sanctions, than our historical ETP business due to the greater number of potential customers, which may also include customers considered to be higher risk and/or customer types considered to be higher risk, for which anti-money laundering and related obligations will apply.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 2
From time to time, we may be involved in legal proceedings that could require significant management time and attention, possibly resulting in significant expense or in an unfavorable outcome, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
From time to time, we may be subject to litigation. In any litigation in which we are involved, we may be forced to incur costs and expenses to defend ourselves or to pay a settlement or judgment or comply with any injunctions in connection therewith if there is an unfavorable outcome. The expense of defending litigation may be significant. The amount of time to resolve lawsuits is unpredictable and defending ourselves may divert management's attention from the day-to-day operations of our business, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, an unfavorable outcome in any such litigation, including actual and potential claims by investors in our WisdomTree WTI Crude Oil 3x Daily Leveraged ETP totaling approximately €27.4 million ($28.5 million), could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. See Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Taxation & Government Incentives2 | 3.1%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
Added
Ceres Farms pays real estate taxes on its properties and such taxes may increase.
Ceres Farms pays real estate taxes on its properties
and such taxes may increase. Ceres Farms acquires real properties primarily by borrowing new funds secured by a mortgage on the purchased
real estate, and incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in
lenders initiating foreclosure.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2
Added
The failure of Ceres Farmland, LLC to maintain qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes would subject it to U.S. federal income tax on taxable income at regular corporate rates, which could adversely impact its business, results of operations and financial condition.
Ceres Farmland, LLC, a subsidiary of Ceres Farmland
Holdings, LP, has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. To maintain qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), Ceres Farmland,
LLC must meet various requirements set forth in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) concerning, among
other things, the ownership of its outstanding interests, the nature of its assets, the sources of its income and the amount of its distributions.
There can be no assurance that Ceres Farmland, LLC will remain qualified as a REIT. We believe that the current organization and method
of operation will enable Ceres Farmland, LLC to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, at any time, new laws, interpretations or court
decisions may change the U.S. federal tax laws relating to, or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of, qualification as a REIT. Ceres
Farmland, LLC’s Board of Directors may at any time, in its sole discretion, determine that it is no longer in Ceres Farmland, LLC’s
best interest to qualify as a REIT. Failure of Ceres Farmland, LLC in any taxable year to qualify as a REIT will, among other things,
subject Ceres Farmland, LLC’s taxable income to tax at regular corporate rates and distributions to members of Ceres Farmland, LLC
in any non-qualifying years will not be deductible by Ceres Farmland, LLC. If Ceres Farmland, LLC’s status as a REIT is terminated
or revoked, it may not be eligible to elect REIT status again prior to the fifth taxable year following the year in which it fails to
qualify under the Code as a REIT unless certain relief provisions apply. The requirements for qualification as a REIT are extremely complex,
and Ceres Farmland, LLC’s compliance with such requirements may depend on factors that are outside of its control or upon the resolution
of legal issues for which guidance is lacking. Losing its REIT status would reduce its net earnings available for investment or distribution
because of the additional tax liability, which could substantially reduce its ability to pay performance fees to Ceres. Even if Ceres
Farmland, LLC qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to federal income tax in certain circumstances. In addition, any taxable REIT subsidiary
of Ceres Farmland, LLC will be subject to federal, state and local income taxes at the applicable corporate rates. To remain qualified
as a REIT and to avoid the payment of U.S. federal income and excise taxes, Ceres Farmland, LLC may be forced to borrow funds, use proceeds
from the issuance of securities, pay taxable dividends of stock or debt securities or sell assets to make distributions, which may result
in Ceres Farmland, LLC distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for operations.
Environmental / Social2 | 3.1%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
Added
Potential liability for environmental matters could materially and adversely affect Ceres’ business, results of operations and financial condition.
Ceres is subject to the risk of liability under federal, state and local environmental laws applicable to agricultural properties, including those related to wetlands, groundwater
and water runoff. Some of these laws could subject Ceres to responsibility and liability for: the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous
substances released on its properties, generally without regard to Ceres’ knowledge of or responsibility for the presence of the
contaminants; the costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous substances or chemical releases at disposal facilities for
persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of these substances; and claims by third parties for damages resulting from environmental
contaminants. Ceres’ costs of investigation, remediation or removal of hazardous substances may be substantial. In addition, the
presence of hazardous substances on one of Ceres’ properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could
adversely affect Ceres’ ability to sell or lease the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. Ceres may be subject
to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a property.
Additionally, Ceres could become subject to new, stricter environmental regulations, which could diminish the utility of its properties
and have a material adverse impact on its business, results of operations and financial condition. The potential of finding endangered
species on or near Ceres Farms’ properties could restrict certain activities on its properties under federal, state and local laws
and regulations intended to protect threatened or endangered species.
Environmental / Social - Risk 2
Data privacy risks
In connection with the products or services offered by our digital assets business, we may collect, store, process, or transmit nonpublic information (including personally identifiable information and sensitive personally identifiable information) of a customer or consumer to a significantly greater extent than in our historical ETP business. Any change or failure to comply with data privacy laws or regulations related to the collection, processing, use and storage of such nonpublic information could materially affect our digital assets business and overall financial health.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 7/65 (11%)Above Sector Average
Competition2 | 3.1%
Competition - Risk 1
Competition risks
Competition in the digital assets industry on a global basis is increasing, ranging from large, established financial incumbents to smaller, early-stage financial technology providers and companies. There are jurisdictions with more stringent and robust regulatory and compliance requirements than others which could impact a company's ability to compete in the digital assets industry. Our ability to successfully compete will depend largely on offering innovative products through digital asset exposures (and more broadly in blockchain-enabled finance, including savings and payments), having strong internal controls and risk management infrastructure to enable customer trust, embracing regulation, developing strategic partnerships with participants in the digital assets ecosystem and broader financial services ecosystem, promoting thought leadership and consumer education or awareness, building upon our brand and attracting and retaining talented employees. Failure to do so could negatively impact the success of our digital assets business.
Competition - Risk 2
The asset management business is intensely competitive, and we may experience pressures on our pricing and market share, which could reduce revenues and profit margins.
The asset management industry is intensely competitive, with significant challenges across product offerings, fees, brand recognition and service quality. We face direct competition from other ETP sponsors and mutual fund companies, as well as indirect competition from larger financial institutions, including banks, insurance companies and diversified investment firms with broader distribution channels, greater resources and multiple revenue streams. Many of these larger competitors operate extensive sales networks and attract clients through retail bank and broker-dealer channels, which may not be as accessible to us.
The adoption of Rule 6c-11, known as the ETF Rule, has further intensified competition by removing the need for exemptive relief filings to issue ETFs, reducing barriers to entry in the ETP space. We anticipate that more firms, including both new entrants and established asset managers, will continue to enter and expand within the ETP market. Additionally, the introduction of non-transparent active ETFs-which are not required to disclose holdings daily-may allow traditional mutual fund sponsors to compete more effectively against ETFs by preserving their proprietary strategies.
Price competition spans both commoditized offerings, such as traditional, market cap-weighted index products, and more specialized categories, like factor-based or thematic ETPs. In recent years, larger firms have trended toward fee reductions, offering some products at lower prices or as loss leaders, supported by alternative revenue sources. New entrants often seek to differentiate themselves by offering low-fee ETPs; as a result, funds priced at 20 basis points or less have captured approximately 80% of global net flows over the past three years. This fee compression trend continues, with many of our competitors well-positioned to benefit.
Some of our competitors maintain a larger market share, a broader product range and greater financial resources. Certain financial institutions also operate in more favorable regulatory environments and/or have proprietary products, revenue sources and distribution channels, which may provide competitive advantages, including in pricing ETPs as loss leaders. Further industry consolidation may also heighten competitive pressures.
Given these evolving industry dynamics, we have experienced-and may continue to experience-pricing and market share pressures, which could reduce our revenues and profit margins.
Demand3 | 4.6%
Demand - Risk 1
Added
Risks Related to the Business of Ceres Partners, LLC
Our acquisition of Ceres and entry into the private asset markets,
specifically farmland, subject us to increased operational, regulatory, financial and other risks.
If the Ceres Acquisition is completed, we will
face increased operational, regulatory, financial, compliance and reputational risks. The expansion of our business also may place significant
demands on our existing infrastructure and employees. The failure of our compliance and internal control systems to properly mitigate
such additional risks, or of our operating infrastructure to support such expansion, could result in operational failures and regulatory
fines or sanctions. If our products and operations experience any negative consequences, it may harm our reputation in the markets in
which we operate.
For example, upon the closing of the Ceres Acquisition,
we will acquire Ceres, a registered investment adviser regulated by the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and
Ceres Securities, LLC (“Ceres Securities”), a limited purpose broker-dealer registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and a member of FINRA. The successful integration of Ceres and Ceres Securities into our existing compliance
and internal control frameworks will require significant attention and resources. Any failure to do so in a timely and effective manner,
or any failure by Ceres or Ceres Securities to maintain compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, could subject Ceres
and us to heightened regulatory scrutiny, including potential investigations or enforcement actions by the SEC or FINRA. Such actions
could result in fines, censures, suspensions of personnel, or other sanctions, including the possible revocation of registration. These
risks, if realized, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We are entering the private asset markets for the first time
and may not be successful.
Acquiring Ceres, an alternative asset management
firm specializing in farmland investments, will mark our entry into the private asset markets, specifically farmland. There is high competition
in the private asset markets and real estate industry. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in the private assets market,
that Ceres will be able to raise additional capital into Ceres’ funds, that Ceres will achieve its objectives and operate successfully,
that we will have a suitable return on our investment in Ceres or that we will be able to recover the costs we have incurred in acquiring
Ceres. Our management team currently does not have experience in private asset markets or farmland investments and will be largely dependent
on the experience and performance of key employees of Ceres. Although we have entered into employment agreements with certain key employees
of Ceres, which will become effective as of the closing of the Ceres Acquisition, there can be no assurance that such employees will continue
their employment with us. Loss of key employees of Ceres could have a material adverse effect on our ability to implement our business
strategy and to achieve our objectives with respect to the Ceres Acquisition.
Demand - Risk 2
Added
Ceres’ business is dependent in part upon the profitability of Ceres Farms’ tenants’ farming operations, and a sustained downturn in the profitability of their farming operations could have a material adverse effect on the amount of rent Ceres Farms can collect and, consequently, its cash flow and net profits, and Ceres’ results of operations.
Ceres Farms depends on its tenants to operate
the farms it owns in a manner that generates revenues sufficient to allow them to meet their obligations to Ceres Farms, including their
obligations to pay rent, maintain certain insurance coverage and maintain the properties generally. The ability of Ceres Farms’
tenants to fulfill their obligations under their leases depends, in part, upon the overall profitability of their farming operations,
which could be adversely impacted by, among other things, adverse weather conditions, crop prices, crop disease, pests and unfavorable
or uncertain political, economic, business, trade or regulatory conditions. Ceres is susceptible to any decline in the profitability of
Ceres Farms’ tenants’ farming operations, to the extent that it would impact the tenants’ abilities to pay rents. In
addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may affect the successful operation of
the farm. We can provide no assurances that, if a tenant defaults on its obligations to Ceres Farms under a lease, Ceres Farms will be
able to lease or re-lease that farm on economically favorable terms in a timely manner, or at all. In addition, Ceres Farms may experience
delays in enforcing its rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting its investment. As a result, any downturn in
the profitability of the farming operations of Ceres Farms’ tenants, or a downturn in the farming industry as a whole, could have
a material adverse effect on Ceres’ business, results of operations and financial condition.
Demand - Risk 3
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from a limited number of products and, as a result, our operating results are particularly exposed to investor sentiment toward investing in the products' strategies and our ability to maintain the AUM of these products, as well as the performance of these products.
At December 31, 2024, 55% of our AUM was concentrated in ten of our WisdomTree ETPs with approximately 21% in three of our domestic equity ETFs, 15% in the WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund, or USFR, 10% in three of our precious metal products, 6% in two of our international developed market equity ETPs and 3% in one of our emerging markets ETFs. As a result, our operating results are particularly exposed to the performance of these funds and our ability to maintain the AUM of these funds, as well as investor sentiment toward investing in the funds' strategies. If the AUM in these funds were to decline, either because of declining market values or net outflows from these funds, our revenues would be adversely affected.
Sales & Marketing1 | 1.5%
Sales & Marketing - Risk 1
We rely on third-party distribution channels to sell our products, and increased competition, a failure to maintain business relationships and other factors could adversely impact our business.
We rely on various third-party distribution channels, including registered investment advisers, wirehouse and institutional channels to sell our products. Increasing competition, a failure to maintain business relationships and other factors could impair our distribution capabilities and increase the cost of conducting business. In addition, several of the largest custodial platforms and online brokerage firms eliminated trading commissions for ETFs. Any inability to access and successfully sell our products through our distribution channels could have a negative effect on our AUM levels and adversely impact our business.
Brand / Reputation1 | 1.5%
Brand / Reputation - Risk 1
Damage to our reputation could adversely affect our business.
We believe we have developed a strong brand and a reputation for innovative, thoughtful products, favorable long-term investment performance and excellent client services. The WisdomTree name and brand is a valuable asset and any damage to it could hamper our ability to maintain and grow our AUM and attract and retain employees, thereby having a material adverse effect on our revenues. Risks to our reputation may range from regulatory issues to unsubstantiated accusations. Managing such matters may be expensive, time-consuming and difficult.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 6/65 (9%)Above Sector Average
Trade Secrets2 | 3.1%
Trade Secrets - Risk 1
We may from time to time be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights, which could harm our business.
Third parties may assert against us alleged patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights to intellectual property that is important to our business. Any claims that our products or processes infringe the intellectual property rights of others, regardless of the merit or resolution of such claims, could cause us to incur significant costs in responding to, defending and resolving such claims, and may divert the efforts and attention of our management from our business. As a result of such intellectual property infringement claims, we could be required or otherwise decide that it is appropriate to:
- pay third-party infringement claims;- discontinue selling the particular funds subject to infringement claims;- discontinue using the processes subject to infringement claims;- develop other intellectual property or products not subject to infringement claims, which could be time-consuming and costly or may not be possible; or - license the intellectual property from the third party claiming infringement, which license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.
The occurrence of any of the foregoing could result in unexpected expenses, reduce our revenues and adversely affect our business and financial results.
Trade Secrets - Risk 2
We have been issued trademark and other intellectual property rights but may not be able to enforce or protect such intellectual property rights, which may harm our business.
Although we have trademarks, including the marks WisdomTree, WisdomTree Prime and Modern Alpha, and other intellectual property rights that are registered in the U.S. and certain other countries, including a patent relating to our index methodology and the operation of our ETFs, our ability to enforce such intellectual property rights is subject to general litigation risks. If we cannot successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, we may lose the value of our brand and business reputation. If we seek to enforce our rights, we could be subject to litigation, including challenges to our registered intellectual property rights and claims that our intellectual property rights are invalid or are otherwise not enforceable in jurisdictions where our intellectual property rights are not registered. Furthermore, our assertion of intellectual property rights could result in the other party seeking to assert alleged intellectual property rights of its own or assert other claims against us, which could harm our business. If we are not ultimately successful in defending ourselves against these claims in litigation, we may be subject to the risks described in the immediately preceding risk factor entitled "We may from time to time be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights, which could harm our business." Additionally, unauthorized third parties may attempt to misuse our trademarks or brand identity, including through impersonation schemes or fraudulent activities in certain jurisdictions. While we take steps to address such misuse, our ability to prevent or mitigate these activities may be limited, and such fraudulent actions could harm our business, reputation, or customer relationships.
Cyber Security1 | 1.5%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
Cybersecurity risks
The use of various technologies is vital to our digital assets business and will become more prevalent, which will make us more susceptible to operational and data security risks resulting from a breach in cybersecurity, including cyberattacks. A breach in cybersecurity, intentional or unintentional, may have an adverse impact on our digital assets business in many ways, including but not limited to, the loss or destruction of proprietary information, theft or corruption of data, denial-of-service attacks on websites or network resources, and the unauthorized release or misuse of confidential information.
Technology3 | 4.6%
Technology - Risk 1
Blockchain technology risks
Blockchain technology is a relatively new, untested technology and rapidly evolving field that operates as a distributed ledger. Blockchain systems could be vulnerable to fraud, particularly if a significant minority of participants colluded to defraud the rest. Access to a given blockchain requires an individualized key, which if compromised, could result in loss due to theft, destruction or inaccessibility. There is little regulation of blockchain technology other than the intrinsic public nature of the blockchain system. Any future regulatory developments could affect the viability and expansion of our use of blockchain technology. There are currently a number of competing blockchain platforms with competing intellectual property claims. The uncertainty inherent in these competing technologies could cause companies to use alternatives to blockchain. In addition, blockchain networks may undergo technological developments, such as the Ethereum blockchain's change in September 2022 from proof-of-work mining to a blockchain based on proof-of-stake validation and the implementation of EIP-4844 in March 2024, which enhances data availability and reduces costs for rollups. These technological advancements may introduce new risks, including potential vulnerabilities in consensus mechanisms and data propagation challenges. Segments of the mining community were against the proof-of-stake validation change, which was complex and involved a merger of the then existing Ethereum blockchain with the new Ethereum blockchain, which could potentially lead to greater centralization. Further, certain miners and other users resisted adoption of the new Ethereum blockchain and it is possible that the two Ethereum blockchains (among potentially others) will endure and compete going forward, which may also slow or impede transactions. The risks associated with blockchain technology may not fully emerge until the technology is more widely adopted, which could adversely impact our digital assets business.
Technology - Risk 2
Any significant limitation or failure of our technology systems, or of our third-party vendors' technology systems, or any security breach of our information and cyber security infrastructure, software applications, technology or other systems that are critical to our operations could interrupt or damage our operations and result in material financial loss, regulatory violations, reputational harm or legal liability.
We are dependent upon the effectiveness of our own, and our vendors', information security policies, procedures and capabilities to protect the technology systems used to operate our business (including emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) programs), to protect the data that reside on or are transmitted through them and to maintain adequate internal controls. Information security risks for us and our third-party vendors have increased significantly in recent years, in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, including AI, the ubiquity of internet connections, and the increased sophistication and activities of threat actors. Although we and our third-party vendors take protective measures to secure information, our and our vendors' technology systems have experienced cybersecurity threats and may still be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other events that could result in inaccuracies in our information or system disruptions or failures, which could materially interrupt or damage our operations. These risks have increased with the launch of the WisdomTree Prime mobile application and may continue to increase in the future as the mobile application's availability expands. In addition, technology is subject to rapid change and we cannot guarantee that our competitors may not implement more advanced technology platforms for their products, which could affect our business. Any inaccuracies, delays, system failures or breaches, or advancements in technology, and the cost necessary to address them, could subject us to client dissatisfaction and losses or result in material financial loss, regulatory violations, reputational harm or legal liability, which, in turn, could cause a decline in our earnings or stock price.
Technology - Risk 3
A failure to effectively manage the development and use of AI, combined with an evolving regulatory environment, could have an adverse effect on our growth, reputation or business.
We use AI, including machine learning, in our business and expect to continue to expand our AI capabilities, including through generative AI. AI methods are complex and rapidly evolving, and their introduction into new or existing processes may result in new or enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, intellectual property or other litigation, data protection and confidentiality concerns, information security risks, social or ethical challenges, competitive harm or other complications. For example, datasets used to develop and test AI models, the content generated by AI systems, or AI-driven decision-making processes may be found to be insufficient, biased or harmful, or lead to adverse business decisions or operating errors. AI technologies, including generative AI, may also produce content that appears credible but is factually inaccurate or flawed or legally problematic, increasing regulatory, reputational and legal risks. In addition, intellectual property ownership and licensing rights, including copyright, surrounding AI technologies remain uncertain, as U.S. courts and regulatory bodies have yet to address key issues. Furthermore, AI-related regulations are evolving globally, with emerging frameworks such as the EU AI Act and increasing scrutiny from U.S. regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission and SEC. Efforts to incorporate AI technologies responsibly require continued investment in operational controls and procedures, development and implementation of appropriate protections and safeguards for data use, including with respect to data leakage, and compliance with evolving regulatory requirements. Any failure to successfully integrate AI technologies, respond to client or market demands or effectively manage AI-related risks could harm our growth and reputation, adversely impact product offerings, client interactions or business initiatives, and expose us to legal and regulatory liabilities and additional costs, including regulatory fines or sanctions, which may cause our AUM, revenues and earnings to decline.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 4/65 (6%)Below Sector Average
International Operations1 | 1.5%
International Operations - Risk 1
Our European business subjects us to increased operational, regulatory, financial and other risks.
We face increased operational, regulatory, financial, compliance, reputational and foreign exchange rate risks as a result of conducting our business internationally. The failure of our compliance and internal control systems to properly mitigate such additional risks, or of our infrastructure to support our European business, could result in operational failures and regulatory fines or sanctions. If our European products and operations experience any negative consequences or are perceived negatively in non-U.S. markets, it may also harm our reputation in other markets, including the U.S. market.
Natural and Human Disruptions2 | 3.1%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
Catastrophic and unpredictable events could have a material adverse effect on our business.
A terrorist attack, war, power failure, cyber-attack, natural disaster, pandemic event or other catastrophic or unpredictable event could adversely affect our revenues, expenses and operating results by: interrupting our normal business operations; inflicting employee casualties, including loss of our key employees; requiring substantial expenditures and expenses to repair, replace and restore normal business operations; and reducing investor confidence. We have a disaster recovery plan to address certain contingencies, but this plan may not be sufficient in responding or ameliorating the effects of all disaster scenarios. Similarly, these types of events could also affect the ability of the third-party vendors that we rely upon to conduct our business, including parties that provide us with sub-advisory portfolio management services, custodial, fund accounting and administration services or index calculation services, to continue to provide these necessary services to us, even though they may also have disaster recovery plans to address these contingencies. In addition, a failure of the stock exchanges on which our products trade to function properly could cause a material disruption to our business. If we or our third-party vendors are unable to respond adequately or in a timely manner, these failures may result in a loss of revenues and/or increased expenses, either of which would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 2
Other risks
The risk of loss in purchasing, selling, trading, using or holding digital assets can be substantial. The price and liquidity of digital assets may be subject to high degrees of volatility resulting in large deviations or fluctuations from normalized levels. There is also heightened custodial risk due to the unique safekeeping attributes associated with public and private keys of digital assets.
Capital Markets1 | 1.5%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
A significant portion of our AUM is held in products with exposure to U.S. and international developed markets, and we therefore have exposure to domestic and foreign market conditions and are subject to currency exchange rate risks.
At December 31, 2024, approximately 32% and 16% of our AUM was held in products with exposure to the U.S. and international developed markets, respectively. Therefore, the success of our business is closely tied to various conditions in these markets which may be affected by domestic and foreign political, social and economic uncertainties, monetary policies conducted in these regions and other factors.
In addition, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could reduce the revenues we earn from certain foreign invested products. This occurs because an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to non-U.S. currencies may result in a decrease in the dollar value of the AUM in these products, which, in turn, would result in lower revenues. Furthermore, investors may perceive certain foreign invested products, as well as certain of our currency and fixed income products to be a less attractive investment opportunity when the value of the U.S. dollar rises relative to non-U.S. currencies, which could have the effect of reducing investments in these products, thus reducing revenues. Our products exposed to the U.S. market may benefit from a rising U.S. dollar, but we can provide no assurance that this will be the case. Also, a weakening U.S. dollar relative to the euro or yen may make less attractive our international hedged equity products, as unhedged alternatives would benefit from the appreciation of the foreign currency or currencies while our products would not, which could result in redemptions in our funds.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.
FAQ
What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
1. Financial & Corporate
Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
2. Legal & Regulatory
Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
3. Production
Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
4. Technology & Innovation
Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
5. Ability to Sell
Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
6. Macro & Political
Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.