Origin Agritech (SEED) Risk Factors

All of our assets and all of our operations are in the PRC. The PRC legal system is based on written statutes. Prior court decisions may be cited for reference but are not binding on subsequent cases and have limited precedential value. Since 1979, the PRC legislative bodies have promulgated laws and regulations dealing with such economic matters as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce, taxation and trade. However, because of the limited volume of published decisions and their non-binding nature, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations involve uncertainties. The laws in the PRC differ from the laws in the United States and may afford less protection to our non-PRC shareholders. Investors in our securities should consider the uncertainties of the legal system within China as part of their evaluation of whether or not to invest or retain their investment in the Company.

SAFE promulgated regulations that require registration with local SAFE offices in connection with direct or indirect offshore investment by PRC residents, including PRC individual residents and PRC corporate entities. These regulations apply to our shareholders who are PRC residents and also apply to our prior and future offshore acquisitions. In particular, the SAFE regulations require PRC residents to file with competent SAFE offices information about offshore companies in which they have directly or indirectly invested and to make follow-up filings in connection with certain material transactions involving such offshore companies, such as increases or decreases in investment amount, transfers or exchanges of shares, mergers or divisions, long-term equity or debt investments, or external guarantees or other material events that do not involve return investment. The SAFE regulations required prior registration of direct or indirect investments previously made by PRC residents in offshore companies. If a PRC resident with a direct or indirect stake in an offshore parent company fails to make the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of such offshore parent company may be prohibited from making distributions of profit to the offshore parent and from paying the offshore parent proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation in respect of the PRC subsidiaries. Further, failure to comply with various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for foreign exchange evasion. We believe our major shareholders who are PRC residents, or whose shares are beneficially owned by PRC residents, have completed foreign exchange registration with the local foreign exchange bureau according to these SAFE regulations. However, with these regulations there is uncertainty concerning the reconciliation of the new regulations with other approval requirements, it is unclear how the regulations, and any future legislation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted, amended and implemented by the relevant government authorities. We cannot assure you that all of our shareholders who are PRC residents will comply with our request to make or obtain any applicable registrations or approvals required by the regulations or other related legislation. The failure or inability of our PRC resident shareholders to receive any required approvals or make any required registrations may subject us to fines and legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our PRC subsidiary to make distributions or pay dividends or affect our ownership structure. As a result, our business operations and our ability to distribute a dividend to you could be adversely affected.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, require an overseas vehicles formed for listing purposes through acquisitions of PRC domestic companies and controlled by PRC companies or individuals to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such special purpose vehicle's securities on an overseas stock exchange. If CSRC approval is required, it is uncertain whether it would be possible for us to obtain the approval, and any failure to obtain or delay in obtaining CSRC approval for this offering would subject us to sanctions imposed by the CSRC and other PRC regulatory agencies. It should be noted that the regulations are unclear and our ordinary shares were listed on Nasdaq in 2004. At this time, we believe that no permission is required from any Chinese authorities (including the CSRC and the CAC) for or continued listing or any offering that may be made under a current or future registration statement and the listing of the ordinary shares on NASDAQ given that: (i) the CSRC currently has not issued any definitive rule or interpretation concerning whether any offering contemplated by the Company is subject to the M&A Rules; (ii) the date of our original listing, and (iii) our PRC subsidiaries were either incorporated as wholly foreign-owned enterprises by means of direct investment or by merger or acquisition of equity interest or assets of a PRC domestic company not subject to the M&A Rules. There can be no assurance that the relevant PRC government agencies, including the CSRC, would reach the same conclusion. The recently issued Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities call for strengthened regulation over illegal securities activities and supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies and propose to take effective measures, such as promoting the development of relevant regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies. There are still uncertainties regarding the interpretation and implementation of these opinions, and further explanations or detailed rules and regulations with respect to these opinions may be issued in the future. There is still substantial uncertainty as to whether or not these opinions will impose additional requirements on us. In addition, the Data Security Law was promulgated on June 10, 2021, and became effective in September 2021. The Personal Information Protection Law was promulgated on August 20, 2021, and officially implemented on November 1, 2021. The Data Security Law, among other things, provides for security review procedures for data activities that may affect national security. The Personal Information Protection Law stipulates that critical information infrastructure operators and personal information processors that process personal information up to the number prescribed by the national cyberspace administration must store personal information and important data collected and generated within the territory of the PRC. If it is necessary to provide it overseas, the organization is required to pass the security assessment organized by the national cybersecurity and information department. Furthermore, Measures for Cybersecurity Review, which became effective on June 1, 2020, set forth the cybersecurity review mechanism for critical information infrastructure operators, and provide that critical information infrastructure operators who intend to purchase internet products and services that affect or may affect national security will be subject to a cybersecurity review. Although we do not believe we are a critical information infrastructure provider, the PRC authorities could interpret such term broadly. If our company is deemed to be a critical information infrastructure operator under such rules, we could be subject to cybersecurity review by the CAC and other relevant PRC regulatory authorities and be required to change our existing practices in data privacy and cybersecurity matters at substantial costs. During such cybersecurity review, we may be required to stop providing services to our customers, and such review could also result in negative publicity to us and diversion of our managerial and financial resources. In addition, the draft amendment to the Measures for Cyber Security Review, or draft measures, published by the Cyberspace Administration of China in July 2021 provides that an application for cyber security review should be made by an issuer who is a "critical information infrastructure operator (CIIO)" or a "data processing operator" as defined therein when an issuer's securities are listed in a foreign country if the issuer possesses personal information of more than one million users, and that the relevant governmental authorities in the PRC may initiate cyber security review if such governmental authorities determine an operator's cyber products or services, data processing or potential listing in a foreign country affect or may affect national security. If the CSRC or other PRC regulatory body subsequently determines that we need to obtain the CSRC's approval for any offering we may make or our continued listing on NASDAQ or if the CSRC or any other PRC government authorities promulgates any interpretation or implements rules that would require us to obtain CSRC or other governmental approvals, we may not be able to proceed with any offering and other overseas offerings, continued listing overseas of our ordinary shares, or face adverse actions or sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. In any such event, these regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in China, limit our operating privileges in China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds of any offering into the PRC or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as our ability to complete this offering. As of the date of this prospectus, the scope of CIIOs and important data under the current laws, regulations and regulatory regime are being developed, and the authorities may have wide discretion in the interpretation and enforcement of the related laws and regulations. To date, given the current nature of our business in China, we do not believe we are either a "CIIO" or a "data processing operator" holding personal information of more than one million users who is required to file for a cybersecurity review pursuant to the draft measures. However, we cannot guarantee that the relevant PRC regulatory authority will take a view that is not contrary to or otherwise from the opinion stated above. Currently, the measures have not materially affected our business and operations. If we are deemed as a CIIO, or as an operator who collects, uses and processes important data according to the Data Security Law, Personal Information Protection Law and other relevant laws and regulations, we may need to perform or be subject to certain prescribed obligations. If we were found to be in violation of these applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to administrative penalties, including fines and service suspension. To date, we have not been involved in any investigations on cybersecurity review initiated by the CAC, and we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions in such respect or any regulatory objections to this offering. As there are still uncertainties regarding the further enactment of new laws and regulations as well as the revision, interpretation and implementation of those existing laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with such regulations in all respects, and we may be ordered to rectify, suspend or terminate any actions or services that are deemed illegal or incompliant by the regulatory authorities and become subject to fines and/or other penalties. If we are unable to address such issue in a timely manner, or at all, we may be required to suspend or terminate our related businesses or face other penalties, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially harmed.

The Nasdaq Marketplace Rules permit foreign private issuers to elect not to be governed by all the corporate governance rules. We have elected to avail ourselves of the exemption provided by Nasdaq, and we have elected to be governed by only the British Virgin Island laws and the terms of our memorandum and articles, which for example do not require us to hold an annual meeting each year. Consequently, investors may not have the ability to express their opinion on our business and the actions of directors through the voting process for directors. In other respects, we do follow the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, such as having a nominations and compensation committee, but these are voluntary and may be eliminated at any time.

On March 15, 2019, the National People's Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which took effect on January 1, 2020. Since it is relatively new, substantially uncertainties exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation. The Foreign Investment Law does not explicitly classify whether VIEs that are controlled through contractual arrangements would be deemed as foreign invested enterprises if they are ultimately "controlled" by foreign investors. However, it has a catch-all provision under definition of "foreign investment" that includes investments made by foreign investors in China through other means as provided by laws, administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions of the State Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, at which time it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment in the PRC and if yes, how our contractual arrangements should be dealt with. The Foreign Investment Law grants national treatment to foreign-invested entities, except for those foreign-invested entities that operate in industries specified as either "restricted" or "prohibited" from foreign investment in the Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access jointly promulgated by the Ministry of Commerce and the National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, and took effect in July 2020. The Foreign Investment Law provides that (i) foreign-invested entities operating in "restricted" industries are required to obtain market entry clearance and other approvals from relevant PRC government authorities;(ii) foreign investors shall not invest in any industries that are "prohibited" under the Negative List. If our control over the VIE through contractual arrangements are deemed as foreign investment in the future, and any business of the VIE is "restricted" or "prohibited" from foreign investment under the Negative List effective at the time, we may be deemed to be in violation of the Foreign Investment Law, the contractual arrangements that allow us to have control over the VIE may be deemed as invalid and illegal, and we may be required to unwind such contractual arrangements and/or restructure our business operations, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business operation. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure and business operations.

Foreign ownership in entities that directly and indirectly provide food and agricultural products is subject to restrictions under current PRC laws and regulations. Specifically, foreign ownership may not exceed 49%. We are a British Virgin Islands company and our PRC subsidiaries are considered to be a foreign-invested enterprise. To ensure compliance with the PRC laws and regulations, we conduct part of our foreign investment-restricted business, generally the seed development aspects of the business in China, through a variable interest enterprise, or a VIE and part of our business through wholly owned and partly owned subsidiaries for the businesses that are not restricted. The VIE currently holds the seed development business license and other licenses necessary for the operation of the agricultural restricted business, based on a series of contractual arrangements with the shareholders of that entity. These contractual agreements enable us, we believe, to (i) exercise contractual control over the VIE, (ii) receive the economic benefits of the VIE, and (iii) have an exclusive call option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in the VIE when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. As a result of these contractual arrangements, we exert control over the VIE and consolidate financial results of the VIE in our financial statements under U.S. GAAP. In the opinion of our PRC legal counsel, when the overall structure was developed in 2004, (i) the ownership structures of the VIE in China were not then in violation of mandatory provisions of applicable PRC laws and regulations; and (ii) the agreements under the contractual arrangements among the VIE and its shareholders governed by PRC law are valid and binding upon each party to such agreements and enforceable against each party thereto in accordance with their terms and applicable PRC laws and regulations currently in effect. However, we understand that that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current or future PRC laws and regulations that may be applicable to the VIE. Thus, the PRC government may ultimately find that we are in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations or lack the necessary permits or licenses to operate our business, the relevant governmental authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violation, including, without limitation: - revoking the business licenses and/or operating licenses of our PRC entities;- imposing fines on us;- confiscating any of our income that they deem to be obtained through illegal operations, or imposing other requirements with which we or the VIE may not be able to comply;- discontinuing or placing restrictions or onerous conditions on our operations;- placing restrictions on our right to collect revenues;- requiring us to restructure the ownership structure or operations of the Company, including terminating the contractual arrangements with the VIE and deregistering the equity rights of the VIE, which in turn would affect our ability to consolidate, derive economic interests from, or exert contractual control over the VIE and its subsidiary;- restricting or prohibiting our use of the proceeds from any securities offering we may make or other of our financing activities to finance the business and operations of the VIE and the other of our subsidiaries and joint ventures; or - taking other regulatory or enforcement actions that could be harmful to our business. Any of these events could cause significant disruption to our overall business operations and severely damage our reputation, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our overall business, financial condition, prospects and results of operations. If occurrences of any of these events results in our inability to direct the activities of the VIE and the other subsidiaries and joint ventures that most significantly impact their economic performance, and/or our failure to receive the economic benefits and residual returns from the VIE and the other subsidiaries and joint ventures, and we are not able to restructure our ownership structure and operations in a satisfactory manner, we may not be able to consolidate the financial results of the VIE and its subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As a result, our ordinary shares would likely decline in value or become valueless.

Foreign regulatory and legislative requirements will impact the development and distribution of our seed products in the global market. Certain markets require rigorous testing and pre-approval prior to a market release of the GM seeds. For example, prior to the entry into the United States market, importers of non-United States seeds will need to obtain regulatory approval from various federal and state governmental agencies. The United States Department of Agriculture has to determine if there are any "plant pest" issues with the specific crop and traits. Further, some products may have to be submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") to determine if there are any pesticide-related traits that are subject to regulation. There may also have to be submitted a Microbial Commercial Activity Notice (MCAN) to the EPA, which includes detailed information describing the seed's characteristics and genetic construction, health and environmental effects, and other data, before GM seeds can be used in the United States for commercial purposes. Finally, even if a seed product has the required certificates and permits, there will be continuous Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") regulation compliance about food safety, which place responsibility on the seed producer to assure the safety of the GM seed in the food chain and proof that GM crop seeds are "substantially equivalent" to non-modified versions of the seed. In the United States, there is also substantive state regulations applying to seeds: for example, some states have required specific labeling, banned planting and cultivation, and imposed additional certification requirements for use of GM seeds. These types of central and local government regulation and restrictions exist in many other countries around the world. Obtaining and maintaining permits and certificates for production and sales, and obtaining and maintaining testing, planting and import approvals for our GM seeds, can be time-consuming and costly, with no guarantee of success. In addition, regulatory and legislative requirements may change over time which may affect sales and profitability in those markets. The failure to receive necessary permits or approvals could have long-term effects on our ability to enter into foreign markets.

Even though we believe biotechnology is important in agricultural applications in China, and the Chinese government has supported and approved some uses of genetically modified seeds, we cannot predict whether or when the government will approve the full commercialization of GM seeds, including genetically modified corn such as we develop. We have received research grants in the past that are related to our GM research, which we believe demonstrates support for at least some GM seed use in the future. Notwithstanding expressions of government support, it is still possible that the government may not approve the full commercialization of GM seeds, including GM corn, and it may even ultimately conclude to limit or ban commercialization and/or research relating to genetically modified corn and other seed products. Local governments in China may also seek to evaluate GM seed products and issue their own interpretations and regulations. Any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our future development, and we would not be able to recover our research and development costs spent in developing biotechnology products.

We are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and our PRC operating subsidiaries are formed under PRC law. Substantially all of our assets are located in the PRC. In addition, many of our directors and executive officers reside within the PRC, and substantially all of the assets of these persons are located within the PRC. It may not be possible to affect service of process within the United States or elsewhere outside the PRC upon our directors, or executive officers and experts, including effecting service of process with respect to matters arising under United States federal securities laws or applicable state securities laws. The PRC does not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the United States and many other countries. As a result, recognition and enforcement in the PRC of judgments of a court in the United States or many other jurisdictions in relation to any matter, including securities laws, may be difficult or impossible. Furthermore, an original action may be brought in the PRC against our assets and our subsidiaries, our directors and executive officers and experts only if the actions are not required to be arbitrated by PRC law and only if the facts alleged in the complaint give rise to a cause of action under PRC law. In connection with any such original action, a PRC court may award civil liability, including monetary damages. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for a non-resident person of China to bring such an action may be difficult and expensive, with no or little chance of being able to pursue an action to conclusion. Investors should consider the foregoing limitations when making a decision to invest or retain an investment in the Company.

Under the current Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the New EIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China with "de facto management bodies" within China is considered a "resident enterprise," meaning that it can be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules of the EIT Law define de facto management as "substantial and overall management and control over the production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties" of the enterprise. In April 2009, the SAT issued a circular, known as Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the "de facto management body" of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. Although this circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners like us, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the SAT's general position on how the "de facto management body" text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises. According to Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its "de facto management body" in China and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met: (i) the primary location of the day-to-day operational management is in the PRC; (ii) decisions relating to the enterprise's financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in the PRC; (iii) the enterprise's primary assets, accounting books and records, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions, are located or maintained in the PRC; and (iv) at least 50% of voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in the PRC. However, it is unclear how tax authorities will determine tax residency based on the facts of each case. If the PRC tax authorities determine that our British Virgin Islands holding company is a "resident enterprise" for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. We may be subject to enterprise income tax on our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. We may be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises. In addition to the uncertainty in how the "resident enterprise" classification could apply, it is also possible that the rules may change in the future, possibly with retroactive effect.

Origin has several joint venture subsidiaries and directly owned subsidiaries and VIE arrangements through which it operates its business. These differing kinds of ownerships and arrangements may not provide preferential tax rates as had been applicable in the past. Therefore, our overall tax liabilities could be greater than in the past when the Company had the benefit of reduced corporate tax rates.

Beijing Origin is entitled to a preferential enterprise income tax rate of 15% as a result of having the qualification of a "high and new technology enterprise". This qualification is subject to an annual evaluation by the relevant government authorities in China. The termination of any of our preferential tax treatments could materially increase our tax obligations.

We could face adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that our technical service agreements between Origin Biotechnology and the other PRC operating subsidiaries (and possibly our former subsidiaries), were not entered into based on arm's length negotiations. If the PRC tax authorities make that determination, they may adjust our income and expenses for PRC tax purposes in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could result in a reduction, for PRC tax purposes, of deductions recorded by the operating subsidiaries, which could adversely affect us by: - increasing the PRC operating subsidiaries' tax liability without reducing Origin Biotechnology's tax liability, which could further result in late payment fees and other penalties to our PRC operating subsidiaries for under-paid taxes; or - limiting Origin Biotechnology's ability to maintain preferential tax treatment and government financial incentives, which, if the transfer pricing adjustment is significant, could result in Origin Biotechnology failing to qualify for those preferential tax treatments and government financial incentives. As a result, any transfer pricing adjustment could have an adverse impact on our financial condition.

We focus our seed business on biotechnology development in the seed industry. We conduct our own research and development efforts for genetically modified seeds, referred to as GM. We also collaborate with the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, the National Maize Improvement Center, China Agricultural University, and Zhejiang University in the PRC under various agreements for seed genetic modifications and other seed biotechnologies that give us the right to market the seeds and technologies they develop. We also seek other development and marketing arrangements with other entities in China and elsewhere. The length of time and the risk associated with seed breeding and biotech pipelines are similar and interlinked because both are required as a package for commercial success in markets where biotech traits are approved for growers. Regulatory requirements affect the development of our biotech products, including the GM crop testing of seeds containing the biotech traits. If we do not meet the regulatory requirements, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected. The testing procedures can be lengthy and costly, with no guarantee of success. It could have an adverse effect on our operations if our genetically modified products are unable to pass the safety evaluation for genetically modified agricultural organisms.

It continues to be difficult to predict how our continuing seed business will develop over the long term. Accordingly, we are still facing all of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies in the earlier stages of development, such as: - uncertain and continued market acceptance for our product extensions and our services;- evolving nature of the crop seed industry in the PRC, which is marked by seed company consolidation, changing aspects of government subsidies to farmers and becoming more limited, over production of crop seeds, and less adherence to the qualities of branded seeds, among other things;- highly competitive conditions from both other branded seeds and unbranded seeds and changing customer preferences or needs that will harm sales of our products;- the competitive landscape of e-commerce in the PRC and the evolving use of e-commerce by the Chinese population and their needs and preferences;- maintaining our competitive position in the PRC and competing with Chinese and international companies, many of which have longer operating histories and greater resources than us;- the aging technology of our seed products that do not reflect current agricultural and farmer needs and the continual need to develop new seed products;- the cost of our products compared to other sources of seeds for the same crop types;- maintaining our current licensing arrangements and entering into new ones to expand our product offerings in both our domestic market and sought after international markets;- using a joint venture model for our continuing business where we maintain only a simple majority stake;- continuing to offer commercially successful products to attract and retain a larger base of direct customers and ultimate users;- continuing our existing arrangements with farms that grow our crop seed products and entering into new arrangements with additional production farms;- maintaining effective control of our costs and expenses; and - retaining our management and skilled technical staff and recruiting additional key employees. If we are not able to meet the challenges of our businesses and managing our business plan, the likely result will be slowed growth, lower margins, additional operational costs and lower income, any of which will affect shareholder value.

GM seeds varieties need to be improved and altered over a relatively short time frame because the weeds and insects develop resistance to herbicides and pesticides, which often renders the benefits of a particular GM traits less effective. GM seeds need to be altered to tolerate higher doses and/or new varieties of herbicides and pesticides and other farming practices. Changing climatic conditions, such as changes in average rainfall and temperatures will require other modifications to GM seed so that they can be drought resistant. If our GM seed portfolio does not keep pace with these changes or goes in a direction that is not effective in the market, our position in the market would be adversely impacted. Alternatively, we believe that this characteristic of GM seeds gives us an opportunity to introduce our products into various seed markets needing new varieties. We will be required to continue to invest in new research to develop our portfolio of GM seeds so that our GM seeds can adapt to new herbicides and pesticides and differing soil, weather (drought) and growing conditions.

We believe we are a leader in biotechnology in China since we have been conducting our proprietary biotechnology research program for many years and have an internal biotech research center. However, as multinational corporations engaged in the crop seed business expand into the agricultural market in China, we anticipate that they will have a greater portfolio of seed products and more advanced technologies than us. Major multinational competitors have a long history in the research and commercialization of their products, sophisticated marketing capabilities, and strong intellectual property estates, all of which may give them competitive advantage over us. Any of these competitive advantages could cause our existing or future products to become less competitive or outdated, and adversely affect our product acceptance in the market place and our results of operations.