Our applications and services are subject to various complex laws and regulations on the federal, state, local, and foreign levels, including those governing data security and privacy, which have become significant compliance issues globally. The regulatory framework for privacy of personal data is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Many federal, state and foreign government bodies and agencies have adopted or are considering adopting laws and regulations regarding the collection, use and disclosure of personal information. In the United States, these include numerous state-level consumer privacy laws, such as California's CCPA and Texas' Data Privacy and Security Act, Illinois' IBIPA, rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of the Federal Trade Commission, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, the ACA, the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (the "GLBA"), the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), federal and state labor and employment laws, state data breach notification laws, and state cybersecurity laws such as the New York Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security (SHIELD) Act. As we continue to expand our operations outside the United States, our applications and services are or will be subject to additional laws governing data security and privacy in relevant jurisdictions, such as Canada's PIPEDA and Mexico's Federal Law on the Protection of Personal Data held by Private Parties, as well as the GDPR, which is applicable in the European Economic Area and the United Kingdom.
Many of these newer state-level consumer privacy laws give consumers located in those states certain rights to be informed of, opt-out of, and request deletion of the personal information that we hold, similar to those rights provided by the European Union's GDPR. Notably, the GLBA is enforced under the authority of the Federal Trade Commission and requires our payment card services to adhere to a privacy notice and take certain measures to protect related personal information from unauthorized use and threats to data security. The FCRA places certain requirements and duties on our business as a furnisher of information to certain consumer reporting agencies with which we share limited amounts of data. Because some of our clients are located in Mexico and other clients have establishments internationally, Canada's PIPEDA, Mexico's Federal Law on the Protection of Personal Data, and other foreign data privacy laws, such as the GDPR, may impact our processing of certain client and employee information. Failure to comply with data protection and privacy laws and regulations could result in regulatory scrutiny and increased exposure to the risk of litigation or the imposition of consent orders, injunctions against data processing or data exporting, or civil and criminal penalties, including fines, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, allegations of non-compliance with privacy laws, whether or not true, could be costly, time consuming, distracting to management, and cause reputational harm. The landscape of privacy laws applicable to our various products and services is evolving quickly. The CPRA, which expands upon the CCPA, went into effect in 2023. Fourteen other states have now enacted their own consumer data privacy statutes, many of which are modeled on the CCPA. New data privacy statutes are slated to go into effect later this year in Delaware, Iowa, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and New Jersey. In addition, there are a number of other legislative proposals worldwide for comprehensive privacy laws affecting consumer and employee personal information, which could impose additional and potentially conflicting obligations in areas affecting our business. Newly-passed legislative and regulatory initiatives may adversely affect the ability of our clients to process, handle, store, use and transmit demographic and personal information from their employees, which could reduce demand for our services.
In addition to government regulation, privacy advocates and industry groups may propose and adopt new and different self-regulatory standards. Because the interpretation and application of many privacy and data protection laws are still uncertain, it is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our existing data management practices or the features of our solution. Any failure to comply with government regulations that apply to our applications, including privacy and data protection laws, could subject us to liability. In addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits and other claims, we could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our solution, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. Any inability to adequately address privacy concerns and claims, even if unfounded, or inability to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations and policies, could result in additional cost and liability to us, damage to our reputation, reductions in our sales and other adverse effects on our business, operating results or financial condition.
Furthermore, privacy concerns may cause our clients' employees to resist providing the personal data necessary to allow our clients and their employees to use our applications and services effectively. Even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may inhibit market adoption of our applications and services in certain industries.
Certain of our products and services use data-driven insights to help our clients manage their businesses more efficiently. Our business increasingly relies on AI and machine learning to model and create these insights. Use of these methods has recently come under increased regulatory scrutiny. New laws, guidance and court decisions in this area may limit our ability to use AI tools, or require us to make changes to our application or services that may decrease our operational efficiency, result in an increase to operating costs and hinder our ability to improve our services. For example, rules on the use of automated decision-making under enacted and proposed data protection laws may require us to disclose the existence of automated decision-making to the data subject with an explanation of the logic used in such decision-making, and may require us to implement certain safeguards, including the right to obtain human intervention and to contest any decision. Regulatory and legislative authorities in the United States and other countries have proposed similar types of legislation that imposes or would impose restrictions on the development of generative AI and machine learning. Our ability to provide data-driven insights using generative AI or machine learning may be constrained by current or future regulatory requirements, statutes or ethical considerations that could restrict or impose burdensome and costly requirements on our ability to leverage data in innovative ways. As we continue to pursue such new technologies, our failure to adequately address legal risks relating to the use of generative AI and machine learning in our applications could result in litigation or private action that could result in liability for the Company. Any actual or alleged noncompliance with these new laws and regulations, or failure to meet client expectations with respect to the use of generative AI and machine learning, could also result in negative publicity or harm to our reputation, subject us to investigations and expose us to significant fines, penalties and other damages.