tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Linkage Global Inc (LGCB)
NASDAQ:LGCB
US Market

Linkage Global Inc (LGCB) Risk Analysis

Compare
34 Followers
Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.

Linkage Global Inc disclosed 71 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Linkage Global Inc reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q3, 2024

Risk Distribution
71Risks
34% Finance & Corporate
30% Legal & Regulatory
11% Production
11% Macro & Political
10% Tech & Innovation
4% Ability to Sell
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.

Risk Change Over Time

S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Linkage Global Inc Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.

The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.

Risk Highlights Q3, 2024

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 24 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 24 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
71
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
71
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 32
Recent Changes
1Risks added
2Risks removed
19Risks changed
Since Sep 2024
1Risks added
2Risks removed
19Risks changed
Since Sep 2024
Number of Risk Changed
19
+19
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 4
19
+19
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 4
See the risk highlights of Linkage Global Inc in the last period.

Risk Word Cloud

The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 71

Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 24/71 (34%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights14 | 19.7%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
The disclosures in our reports and other filings with the SEC and our other public pronouncements are not subject to the scrutiny of any regulatory bodies in the PRC.
We are regulated by the SEC, and our reports and other filings with the SEC are subject to SEC review in accordance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Our SEC reports and other disclosure and public pronouncements are not subject to the review or scrutiny of any PRC regulatory authority. For example, the disclosure in our SEC reports and other filings are not subject to the review by the CSRC, a PRC regulator that is responsible for oversight of the capital markets in China. Accordingly, you should review our SEC reports, filings, and our other public pronouncements with the understanding that no local regulator has done any review of us, our SEC reports, other filings, or any of our other public pronouncements.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
If we cease to qualify as a foreign private issuer, we would be required to comply fully with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, and we would incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses that we would not incur as a foreign private issuer.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States domestic issuers, and we are not required to disclose in our periodic reports all of the information that United States domestic issuers are required to disclose. If we cease to qualify as a foreign private issuer in the future, we would incur significant additional expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
If we cannot continue to satisfy the continued listing requirements and other rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, our securities may be delisted, which could negatively impact the price of our securities and your ability to sell them.
In order to maintain our listing on the Nasdaq Stock Market, we are required to comply with certain rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, including those regarding minimum stockholders' equity, minimum share price, minimum market value of publicly held shares, and various additional requirements. We may not be able to continue to satisfy these requirements and applicable rules. If we are unable to satisfy the Nasdaq Stock Market criteria for maintaining our listing, our securities could be subject to delisting. On October 31, 2024, we received a notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC ("Nasdaq") notifying the Company that based upon the closing bid price of the Class A ordinary shares of the Company for the last 30 consecutive business days, the Company no longer meets the continued listing requirement of Nasdaq under Nasdaq Listing Rules 5550(a)(2) to maintain a minimum bid price of $1 per share. The notification has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of the Company's Class A ordinary shares on Nasdaq. Nasdaq has provided the Company with an 180 calendar days compliance period, or until April 29, 2025, in which to regain compliance with Nasdaq continued listing requirement. If at any time during the Compliance Period, the closing bid price per share of the our Class A Ordinary Shares is at least $1.00 for a minimum of ten (10) consecutive business days, Nasdaq will provide us with a written confirmation of compliance and the matter will be closed. In the event that the Company does not regain compliance in the compliance period, the Company may be eligible for an additional 180 calendar days, should the Company meet the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards for The Nasdaq Capital Market, with the exception of the bid price requirement, and is able to provide written notice of its intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period, by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary. However, if it appears that the Company will not be able to cure the deficiency, or if the Company is otherwise not eligible, Nasdaq will provide notice that the Company's securities will be subject to delisting. The Company is currently evaluating options to regain compliance and intends to timely regain compliance with Nasdaq's continued listing requirement. Although the Company will use all reasonable efforts to achieve compliance with Rule 5550(a)(2), there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to regain compliance with that rule or will otherwise be in compliance with other Nasdaq continued listing requirement. If the Nasdaq Stock Market subsequently delists our securities from trading, we could face significant consequences, including: - a limited availability for market quotations for our securities;- reduced liquidity with respect to our securities;- a determination that our Class A Ordinary Shares are a "penny stock," which will require brokers trading in our Class A Ordinary Shares to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our Class A Ordinary Shares;- limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and - a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
Anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association may discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control.
Some provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association may discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of our Company or management that shareholders may consider favorable, including, among other things, the following: - provisions that authorize our board of directors to issue shares with preferred, deferred, or other special rights or restrictions without any further vote or action by our shareholders; and - provisions that restrict the ability of our shareholders to call meetings and to propose special matters for consideration at shareholder meetings.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5
The laws of the Cayman Islands may not provide our shareholders with benefits comparable to those provided to shareholders of corporations incorporated in the United States.
We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with limited liability. Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (Revised) of the Cayman Islands and by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law in the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands and from English common law. Decisions of the Privy Council (which is the final Court of Appeal for British Overseas Territories such as the Cayman Islands) are binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. Decisions of the English courts, and particularly the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal are generally of persuasive authority but are not binding in the courts of the Cayman Islands. Decisions of courts in other Commonwealth jurisdictions are similarly of persuasive but not binding authority. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws relative to the United States. Therefore, our public shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests in the face of actions by our management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States. Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of the register of members of these companies (other than copies of our memorandum and articles of association, register of mortgages and charges, and any special resolutions passed by our shareholders). Under Cayman Islands law, the names of our current directors can be obtained from a search conducted at the Registrar of Companies. Our directors have discretion under our articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest. As a result of all of the above, public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by our management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States. For a discussion of significant differences between the provisions of the Companies Act of the Cayman Islands and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders, see "Item 10. Additional Information - B. Memorandum and Articles of Association - Differences in Corporate Law."
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6
You may be unable to present proposals before annual general meetings or extraordinary general meetings not called by shareholders.
Cayman Islands law does not provide shareholders with any right to requisition a general meeting or put any proposal before a general meeting. These rights, however, may be provided in a company's articles of association. Our articles of association allow our shareholders holding shares representing in aggregate not less than 10% of our voting share capital in issue, to requisition a general meeting of our shareholders, in which case our directors are obliged to call such meeting. Advance notice of at least 21 clear days is required for the convening of our annual general shareholders' meeting and at least 14 clear days is require for any other general meeting of our shareholders. A quorum required for a meeting of shareholders consists of at least one shareholder present or by proxy, representing not less than one-third of the total issued shares carrying the right to vote at a general meeting of our Company. For these purposes, "clear days" means that period excluding (a) the day when the notice is given or deemed to be given and (b) the day for which it is given or on which it is to take effect.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7
Since we are a "controlled company" within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing rules, we may follow certain exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that could adversely affect our public shareholders.
Our CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Zhihua Wu, owns voting power of 84.02% of our issued and outstanding Ordinary Shares. As a result, Mr. Zhihua Wu, as our controlling shareholder, has the ability to determine any matter required to be passed by an ordinary resolution, which will be adopted when approved by a simple majority of votes cast by the shareholders of the Company.  Our controlling shareholders have the ability to at least significantly influence, or in certain cases, control the outcome of a matter required to be passed by a special resolution, which will be adopted when approved by not less than two-thirds of votes cast by the shareholders of the Company. Under the Nasdaq listing rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group, or another company is a "controlled company" and is permitted to phase in its compliance with the independent committee requirements. Although we do not intend to rely on the "controlled company" exemptions under the Nasdaq listing rules, even if we are deemed a "controlled company," we could elect to rely on these exemptions in the future. If we were to elect to rely on the "controlled company" exemptions, a majority of the members of our board of directors might not be independent directors and our nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees might not consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, if we rely on the exemptions, during the period we remain a controlled company and during any transition period following a time when we are no longer a controlled company, you would not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8
Changed
Substantial future sales of our Class A Ordinary Shares or the anticipation of future sales of our Class A Ordinary Shares in the public market could cause the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our Class A Ordinary Shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares to decline. An aggregate of 21,500,000 Class A Ordinary Shares are issued and outstanding as of the date of this annual report. Sales of these shares into the market could cause the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares to decline.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 9
Changed
The market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance.
The market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including: - actual or anticipated fluctuations in our revenue and other operating results;- the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections;- actions of securities analysts who initiate or maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our Company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;- announcements by us or our competitors of significant products or features, technical innovations, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments;- price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the economy as a whole;- lawsuits threatened or filed against us; and - other events or factors, including those resulting from war or incidents of terrorism, or responses to these events. In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. Share prices of many companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In the past, stockholders have filed securities class litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business, and adversely affect our business.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 10
Changed
Recent joint statement by the SEC and the PCAOB, rule changes by Nasdaq, and the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act all call for additional and more stringent criteria to be applied to emerging market companies upon assessing the qualification of their auditors, especially the non-U.S. auditors who are not inspected by the PCAOB. These developments could add uncertainties to our ability to continue being listed on Nasdaq.
On April 21, 2020, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton and PCAOB Chairman William D. Duhnke III, along with other senior SEC staff, released a joint statement highlighting the risks associated with investing in companies based in or have substantial operations in emerging markets including China. The joint statement emphasized the risks associated with lack of access for the PCAOB to inspect auditors and audit work papers in China and higher risks of fraud in emerging markets. On May 18, 2020, Nasdaq filed three proposals with the SEC to (i) apply a minimum offering size requirement for companies primarily operating in a "Restrictive Market," (ii) adopt a new requirement relating to the qualification of management or the board of directors for Restrictive Market companies, and (iii) apply additional and more stringent criteria to an applicant or listed company based on the qualifications of the company's auditor. On October 4, 2021, the SEC approved Nasdaq's revised proposal for the rule changes. On May 20, 2020, the U.S. Senate passed the HFCA Act requiring a foreign company to certify it is not owned or controlled by a foreign government if the PCAOB is unable to audit specified reports because the company uses a foreign auditor not subject to PCAOB inspection. If the PCAOB is unable to inspect the company's auditors for three consecutive years, the issuer's securities are prohibited to trade on a national exchange. On December 2, 2020, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the HFCA Act. On December 18, 2020, the HFCA Act was signed into law. On March 24, 2021, the SEC announced the adoption of interim final amendments to implement the submission and disclosure requirements of the HFCA Act. In the announcement, the SEC clarifies that before any issuer will have to comply with the interim final amendments, the SEC must implement a process for identifying covered issuers. The announcement also states that the SEC staff is actively assessing how best to implement the other requirements of the HFCA Act, including the identification process and the trading prohibition requirements. On September 22, 2021, the PCAOB adopted a final rule implementing the HFCA Act, which provides a framework for the PCAOB to use when determining, as contemplated under the HFCA Act, whether the board of directors of a company is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. On December 2, 2021, the SEC adopted amendments to finalize rules implementing the submission and disclosure requirements in the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which became effective on January 10, 2022. The rules apply to registrants that the SEC identifies as having filed an annual report with an audit report issued by a registered public accounting firm that is located in a foreign jurisdiction and that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by an authority in foreign jurisdictions. For example, on December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report on its determinations that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and in Hong Kong, because of positions taken by PRC authorities in those jurisdictions. On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report on its determinations that the Board is unable to inspect or investigate completely PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and in Hong Kong, because of positions taken by PRC authorities in those jurisdictions. The Board made these determinations pursuant to PCAOB Rule 6100, which provides a framework for how the PCAOB fulfills its responsibilities under the HFCA Act. Our auditor of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, HTL, the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included elsewhere in this annual report, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. Our auditor of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2023 and 2022, TPS, is headquartered in Sugar Land, Texas, and has been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis, with the last inspection in September 2022. The PCAOB currently has access to inspect the working papers of our auditors and our auditors are not subject to the determinations announced by the PCAOB on December 16, 2021, which determinations were vacated on December 15, 2022. However, the recent developments would add uncertainties to our offering and we cannot assure you whether the national securities exchange we apply to for listing or regulatory authorities would apply additional and more stringent criteria to us after considering the effectiveness of our auditors' audit procedures and quality control procedures, adequacy of personnel and training, or sufficiency of resources, geographic reach, or experience as it relates to our audit. In addition, the HFCA Act, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which requires that the PCAOB be permitted to inspect an issuer's public accounting firm within two years, may result in the delisting of our Company or prohibition of trading in our Class A Ordinary Shares in the future if the PCAOB is unable to inspect our accounting firm at such future time. On June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the AHFCAA, and on December 29, 2022, legislation entitled the "Consolidated Appropriations Act" was signed into law by President Biden, which contained, among other things, an identical provision to the AHFCAA and amended the HFCA Act by requiring the SEC to prohibit an issuer's securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges if its auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three, thus reducing the time period for triggering the prohibition on trading. On August 26, 2022, the CSRC, the MOF, and the PCAOB signed the Protocol governing inspections and investigations of accounting firms based in mainland China and Hong Kong, taking the first step toward opening access for the PCAOB to inspect and investigate registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. Pursuant to the fact sheet with respect to the Protocol disclosed by the SEC, the PCAOB shall have independent discretion to select any issuer audits for inspection or investigation and has the unfettered ability to transfer information to the SEC. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB Board determined that the PCAOB was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong and voted to vacate its previous determinations to the contrary. However, should PRC authorities obstruct or otherwise fail to facilitate the PCAOB's access in the future, the PCAOB Board will consider the need to issue a new determination.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 11
Changed
The price of our Class A Ordinary Shares could be subject to rapid and substantial volatility. Such volatility, including any stock run-ups, may be unrelated to our actual or expected operating performance and financial condition or prospects, making it difficult for prospective investors to assess the rapidly changing value of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
There have been instances of extreme stock price run-ups followed by rapid price declines and strong stock price volatility with recent initial public offerings, especially among those with relatively smaller public floats. As a relatively small-capitalization company with a relatively small public float, we may experience greater stock price volatility, extreme price run-ups, lower trading volume, and less liquidity than large-capitalization companies. In particular, our Class A Ordinary Shares may be subject to rapid and substantial price volatility, low volumes of trades, and large spreads in bid and ask prices. Such volatility, including any stock run-ups, may be unrelated to our actual or expected operating performance and financial condition or prospects, making it difficult for prospective investors to assess the rapidly changing value of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, if the trading volumes of our Class A Ordinary Shares are low, persons buying or selling in relatively small quantities may easily influence the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. This low volume of trades could also cause the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares to fluctuate greatly, with large percentage changes in price occurring in any trading day session. Holders of our Class A Ordinary Shares may also not be able to readily liquidate their investment or may be forced to sell at depressed prices due to low volume trading. Broad market fluctuations and general economic and political conditions may also adversely affect the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. As a result of this volatility, investors may experience losses on their investment in our Class A Ordinary Shares. A decline in the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional shares of Class A Ordinary Shares or other of our securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future. No assurance can be given that an active market in our Class A Ordinary Shares will develop or be sustained. If an active market does not develop, holders of our Class A Ordinary Shares may be unable to readily sell the shares they hold or may not be able to sell their shares at all.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 12
Changed
Because we are a foreign private issuer and have opted to take advantage of exemptions from certain Nasdaq corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. issuers, you have less protection than you would have if we were a domestic issuer.
Our status as a foreign private issuer exempts us from compliance with certain Nasdaq corporate governance requirements if we instead choose to comply with the statutory requirements applicable to a Cayman Islands exempted company. The corporate governance practice in our home country, the Cayman Islands, does not require a majority of our board to consist of independent directors. Thus, although a director must act in the best interests of our Company, it is possible that fewer board members will be exercising independent judgment and the level of board oversight on the management of our Company may decrease as a result. In addition, Nasdaq listing rules also require U.S. domestic issuers to have a compensation committee, a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors, and an audit committee with a minimum of three members. We, as a foreign private issuer, are not subject to these requirements. Nasdaq listing rules may require shareholder approval for certain corporate matters that our home country's rules do not. Cayman Islands governance practices, as opposed to the requirements applicable to a U.S. company listed on Nasdaq, provide less protection to you than would otherwise be the case.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 13
Changed
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they publish a negative report regarding our Class A Ordinary Shares, the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares and trading volume could decline.
Any trading market for our Class A Ordinary Shares may depend in part on the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade us, the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our Company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares and the trading volume to decline.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 14
Added
Our dual class structure may be dilutive to the voting power of Class A Ordinary Shareholders.
On October 11, 2024, at the annual general meeting, to implement a dual class structure, our shareholders approved (i) an ordinary resolution that the Company's authorized share capital be amended from US$50,000 divided into 200,000,000 Shares of a par value of US$0.00025 each to US$50,000 divided into 195,000,000 Class A ordinary shares of par value US$0.00025 each and 5,000,000 Class B ordinary shares of par value US$0.00025 each, and (ii) a special resolution that the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company to substitute the Company's then-effective Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. The dual class structure of our ordinary shares has the effect of concentrating voting control with holders of Class B Ordinary Shares. Our Class B Ordinary Shares have stronger voting power than our Class A Ordinary Shares and certain existing shareholders have substantial influence over our Company and their interests may not be aligned with the interests of our other shareholders.
Accounting & Financial Operations2 | 2.8%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
Changed
If we fail to implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls or fail to remediate the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that have been identified, we may fail to meet our reporting obligations or be unable to accurately report our results of operations or prevent fraud, and investor confidence and the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares may be materially and adversely affected.
We have identified a material weakness with respect to our internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness identified relates to (i) the lack of formal internal control policies and internal independent supervision functions to establish formal risk assessment process and internal control framework; (ii) the lack of accounting staff and resources with appropriate knowledge of generally accepted U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting and compliance requirements to design and implement formal period-end financial reporting policies and procedures to address complex U.S. GAAP technical accounting issue in accordance with U.S. GAAP and the SEC requirements. Following the identification of the material weaknesses and control deficiencies, we have taken the following remedial measures: (i) hiring additional qualified accounting and financial personnel with appropriate knowledge and experience in U.S. GAAP accounting and SEC reporting; and (ii) organizing regular training for our accounting staffs, especially training related to U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements. We also plan to adopt additional measures to improve our internal control over financial reporting, including, among others, creating U.S. GAAP accounting policies and procedures manual, which will be maintained, reviewed and updated, on a regular basis, to the latest US GAAP accounting standards, and establishing an audit committee and strengthening corporate governance. However, the implementation of these measures may not fully address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Our failure to correct the material weaknesses or our failure to discover and address any other material weaknesses or control deficiencies could result in inaccuracies in our financial statements and could also impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and related regulatory filings on a timely basis. As a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares, may be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, ineffective internal control over financial reporting significantly hinders our ability to prevent fraud. We are a public company in the United States subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include a report of management on our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F beginning with our second annual report after becoming a public company. In addition, once we cease to be an "emerging growth company," as such term is defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue a report that is qualified, if it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated, or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us. In addition, after we become a public company, our reporting obligations may place a significant strain on our management, operational, and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be unable to complete our evaluation testing and any required remediation in a timely manner.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, you may only receive a return on your investment in our Class A Ordinary Shares if the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares increases.
Debt & Financing4 | 5.6%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
We have engaged in substantial transactions with related parties, and such transactions present possible conflicts of interest that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
We have entered into a substantial number of transactions with certain related parties, including Ms. Xiaoyu Qi, the spouse of Zhihua Wu, our chief executive officer and director, Mr. Fuyunishiki Ryo, our director, Mr. Zhihua Wu, our chief executive officer and director, Shunyu Wu, head of our digital marketing sales department, and Ishiyama Real Estate Co. Ltd., an investee of our company. As of September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (i) the amounts due to related parties were $314,544, $1,413,604, and $1,273,832, respectively, consisting of expenses paid by certain related parties on our behalf and proceed of interest-free loan from related parties; and (ii) the amounts due from related parties were nil, nil and $34,552, respectively, consisting of repayment to (receivable from) related parties. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022, expenses paid on behalf of the Company by related parties were $446,469, $1,728,398 and $1,424,460, respectively, and proceed of interest-free loan from related parties were $3,031,467, nil and nil, respectively. In addition, repayment to (receivable from) related parties were $4,593,092, $35,990 and $34,552, respectively. For details, see "Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions - A. Related Party Transactions." We may in the future enter into additional transactions with entities in which members of our management, board of directors and other related parties hold ownership interests. Transactions with these related parties present potential for conflicts of interest, as the interests of related parties may not align with the interests of our shareholders. Conflicts of interest may also arise in connection with the exercise of contractual remedies under these transactions, such as the treatment of events of default. The audit committee within our board of directors is responsible for reviewing and approving all material related party transactions. We rely on the laws of the Cayman Islands, which provides that directors owe a duty of care and a duty of loyalty to our Company. Under the laws of the Cayman Islands, our directors have a duty to act honestly, in good faith and with a view to our best interests. Our directors also have a duty to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonable prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. See "Item 10. Additional Information -B. Memorandum and Articles of Association - Differences in Corporate Law" for additional information. Nevertheless, we may have achieved more favorable terms if such transactions had not been entered into with related parties and these transactions, individually or in the aggregate, may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations or may result in government enforcement actions or other litigation.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Changed
To the extent cash or assets in the business are in the PRC or a PRC entity, the funds or assets may not be available to fund operations or for other use outside of the PRC due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations on the ability of our Company or our subsidiaries by the PRC government to transfer cash or assets.
As a holding company, we may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our subsidiaries, including those based in mainland China, for our cash and financing requirements. The ability of our PRC subsidiaries to distribute dividends is based upon their distributable earnings. Current relevant PRC laws and regulations permit the companies in the PRC to pay dividends only out of their respective retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Additionally, each of the companies in the PRC are required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a statutory reserve until such reserve reaches 50% of its registered capital. The companies in the PRC are also required to further set aside a portion of their after-tax profits to fund the employee welfare fund, although the amount to be set aside, if any, is determined at their discretion. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Furthermore, in order for us to pay dividends to our shareholders, we will rely on receipt of funds from the Hong Kong subsidiaries. Linkage Holding will rely on payments made from Linkage Electronic, HQT NETWORK, and Linkage Network. Linkage Network relies on payments made from Chuancheng Digital and its subsidiary. If Chuancheng Digital and its subsidiary, Chuancheng Internet, incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. Our cash dividends, if any, will be paid in U.S. dollars. If we are considered a tax resident enterprise of the PRC for tax purposes, any dividends we pay to our overseas shareholders may be regarded as China-sourced income and as a result may be subject to PRC withholding tax. See "- Risks Relating to Doing Business in Mainland China - Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, we may be classified as a PRC ‘resident enterprise' for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. Such classification would likely result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment." The PRC government also imposes controls on the convertibility of RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of the PRC. The majority of the PRC subsidiaries' income is received in RMB and shortages in foreign currencies may restrict our ability to pay dividends or other payments, or otherwise satisfy our foreign currency denominated obligations, if any. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments, and expenditures from trade-related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange ("SAFE") as long as certain procedural requirements are met. Approval from appropriate government authorities is required if RMB is converted into foreign currency and remitted out of the PRC to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may, at its discretion, impose restrictions on access to foreign currencies for current account transactions and if this occurs in the future, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders. As of the date of this annual report, there are no restrictions or limitations imposed by the Hong Kong government on the transfer of capital within, into, and out of Hong Kong (including funds from Hong Kong to mainland China), except for the transfer of funds involving money laundering and criminal activities. However, there is no guarantee that the Hong Kong government will not promulgate new laws or regulations that may impose such restrictions or limitations in the future. As a result of the above, to the extent cash or assets in the business are in the PRC or a PRC entity, such funds or assets may not be available to fund operations or for other use outside of the PRC, due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations on the ability of our Company or our subsidiaries by the competent government to the transfer of cash or assets.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.
In February 2015, SAT issued a Public Notice Regarding Certain Corporate Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-Tax Resident Enterprises, or "SAT Circular 7." SAT Circular 7 provides comprehensive guidelines relating to indirect transfers of PRC taxable assets (including equity interests and real properties of a PRC resident enterprise) by a non-resident enterprise. In addition, in October 2017, SAT issued an Announcement on Issues Relating to Withholding at Source of Income Tax of Non-resident Enterprises, or "SAT Circular 37," effective in December 2017, which, among others, amended certain provisions in SAT Circular 7 and further clarify the tax payable declaration obligation by non-resident enterprise. Indirect transfer of equity interest and/or real properties in a PRC resident enterprise by their non-PRC holding companies are subject to SAT Circular 7 and SAT Circular 37. SAT Circular 7 provides clear criteria for an assessment of reasonable commercial purposes and has introduced safe harbors for internal group restructurings and the purchase and sale of equity through a public securities market. As stipulated in SAT Circular 7, indirect transfers of PRC taxable assets are considered as reasonable commercial purposes if the shareholding structure of both transaction parties falls within the following situations: (i) the transferor directly or indirectly owns 80% or above equity interest of the transferee, or vice versa; (ii) the transferor and the transferee are both 80% or above directly or indirectly owned by the same party; and (iii) the percentages in bullet points (i) and (ii) shall be 100% if over 50% the share value of a foreign enterprise is directly or indirectly derived from PRC real properties. Furthermore, SAT Circular 7 also brings challenges to both foreign transferor and transferee (or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer) of taxable assets. Where a non-resident enterprise transfers PRC taxable assets indirectly by disposing of the equity interests of an overseas holding company, which is an indirect transfer, the non-resident enterprise as either transferor or transferee, or the PRC entity that directly owns the taxable assets, may report such indirect transfer to the relevant tax authority and the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding, or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a rate of 10% for the transfer of equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise. Both the transferor and the transferee may be subject to penalties under PRC tax laws if the transferee fails to withhold the taxes and the transferor fails to pay the taxes. According to SAT Circular 37, where the non-resident enterprise fails to declare the tax payable pursuant to Article 39 of the EIT Law, the tax authority may order it to pay the tax due within required time limits, and the non-resident enterprise shall declare and pay the tax payable within such time limits specified by the tax authority. If the non-resident enterprise, however, voluntarily declares and pays the tax payable before the tax authority orders it to do so within required time limits, it shall be deemed that such enterprise has paid the tax in time. We face uncertainties as to the reporting and assessment of reasonable commercial purposes and future transactions where PRC taxable assets are involved, such as offshore restructuring, sale of the shares in our offshore subsidiaries, and investments. In the event of being assessed as having no reasonable commercial purposes in an indirect transfer transaction, we may be subject to filing obligations or taxed if we are a transferor in such transactions, and may be subject to withholding obligations (to be specific, a 10% withholding tax for the transfer of equity interests) if we are a transferee in such transactions, under SAT Circular 7 and SAT Circular 37. For transfer of shares by investors who are non-PRC resident enterprises, the PRC subsidiaries may be requested to assist in the filing under the SAT circulars. As a result, we may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with the SAT circulars or to request the relevant transferors from whom we purchase taxable assets to comply with these circulars, or to establish that we should not be taxed under these circulars, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited, and our failure to raise capital when needed could prevent us from growing.
We may require additional cash capital resources in order to fund future growth and the development of our businesses, including expansion of our e-commerce platform, our third-party logistics services and any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our cash resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to issue additional equity or debt securities or obtain new or expanded credit facilities. Our ability to obtain external financing in the future is subject to a variety of uncertainties, including our future financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, share price performance, liquidity of international capital and lending markets, governmental regulations over foreign investment and the e-commerce and logistics services industries. In addition, incurring indebtedness would subject us to increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in a timely manner or in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Any failure to raise needed funds on terms favorable to us, or at all, could severely restrict our liquidity as well as have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, any issuance of equity or equity-linked securities could result in significant dilution to our existing shareholders.
Corporate Activity and Growth4 | 5.6%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business, financial condition and operating results could be harmed.
As we continue to expand, our continued growth could strain our existing resources, and we could experience ongoing challenges, including (i) managing our operational, administrative and financial capabilities and other resources; (ii) managing our brand portfolio, including further expanding our private label offerings, products and services; (iii) expanding marketing channels and deepening end customer outreaches; (iv) staying abreast of the evolving industry demands and market developments and catering to consumers' changing tastes; (v) developing and applying technologies necessary to support our expanded operations; (vi) responding to changes in the regulatory environment; (vii) exploring new market opportunities such as new monetization channels; and (viii) addressing other challenges resulting from our expansion. All efforts to address the potential challenges on our way to expansion require significant managerial, financial and human resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively or timely address operating difficulties and challenges to keep up with our growth. If we are unable to successfully address these difficulties, risks and uncertainties, our business, financial conditions and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
If HQT NETWORK fails to maintain the relationship with Google, its digital marketing services could be materially affected, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022, all the revenue in digital marketing services came from the commissions of Google was $0.31 million, $1.53 million, $3.95 million, accounting for approximately 3.03%, 11.99% and 17.91% of our total revenue for the respective years. HQT NETWORK typically enters into agency agreement with Google with a term of one year, and its currently effective agency agreement with Google expires on January 1, 2025. Pursuant to the agency agreement currently in effect, HQT NETWORK is responsible for identifying and procuring Merchants who then purchase ad inventory from the Google platforms, facilitating the transaction process, and assisting with advertisement deployment in Mainland China and Hong Kong. As Google's authorized agency, HQT NETWORK's relationship with Google is mainly governed by the agency agreement which provides for, among other things, credit periods and the commission polices offered to HQT NETWORK. Either party to the agency agreement may terminate the agreement upon a 30-day advance written notice, and Google may unilaterally terminate the agreement if HQT NETWROK fails to perform certain obligations specified therein. Any failure to enter into a new agency agreement with Google upon expiration of the current term or any termination of the agreement with Google may have a material adverse impact on the results of HQT NETWORK's digital marketing services, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. For a detailed description of the material terms of our agency agreement with Google and the commissions offered by Google, see "Item 4. Information on the Company -B. Business Overview - Digital Marketing - Agency agreement with Google." There are a number of factors, including HQT NETWORK's performance, which could cause the loss of, or decrease in the volume of digital marketing business from. Even though we believe HQT NETWORK has a strong record of performance in digital marketing services, we cannot assure you that HQT NETWORK will continue to maintain the business cooperation with Google at the same level, or at all. The loss of business from Google, or any downward adjustment of the rates of commissions paid by Google, could materially and adversely affect HQT NETWORK's digital marketing services, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if Google terminates its relationship with HQT NETWORK, we cannot assure you that HQT NETWORK will be able to secure an alternative arrangement with comparable media in a timely manner, or at all.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
The Operating Entities may not be successful in optimizing their warehouse and fulfillment network.
As of September 30, 2024, the Operating Entities had one warehouse in Japan. Failures to adequately predict Customers demand or otherwise optimize and operate the Operating Entities' fulfillment network successfully from time to time result in excess or insufficient fulfillment capacity, increased costs and impairment charges, any of which could materially harm the Operating Entities' business. As the Operating Entities continue to add warehouses and fulfillment capability, their fulfillment and logistics networks become increasingly complex and operating them becomes more challenging. There can be no assurance that the Operating Entities will be able to operate their networks effectively. In addition, failure to optimize inventory in the Operating Entities' fulfillment network increases their net shipping costs by requiring long-zone or partial shipments. The Operating Entities may be unable to adequately staff their warehousing network and customer service centers. As the Operating Entities maintain the inventory of other companies, the complexity of tracking inventory and operating their fulfillment network has further increased. The Operating Entities' failure to properly handle such inventory or the inability of the other businesses on whose behalf the Operating Entities' perform inventory fulfillment services to accurately forecast product demand may result in the Operating Entities being unable to secure sufficient storage space or to optimize their warehouses and fulfillment network or cause other unexpected costs and other harm to the Operating Entities' business and reputation.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 4
Changed
Our historical performance may not be sustainable or indicative of our future growth and financial results. We cannot guarantee that we will grow our businesses.
Our revenues decreased from $22.03 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 to $12.73 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 and further decreased to $10.29 million for the year ended September 30, 2024, primarily attributable to the decrease of cross-border sales. Our revenues may further decline for a number of possible reasons, some of which are beyond our control, including decreasing consumer spending, increasing competition, declining growth of our overall market or industry, the emergence of alternative business models and changes in rules, regulations, government policies or general economic conditions. Our revenues could be negatively affected by inflationary pressure and changes in the global economic conditions. It is difficult to evaluate our prospects, as we may not have sufficient experience in addressing the risks to which companies operating in rapidly evolving markets may be exposed. If our growth rate declines, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 21/71 (30%)Above Sector Average
Regulation14 | 19.7%
Regulation - Risk 1
PRC regulation of parent/subsidiary loans and direct investment by offshore holding companies to PRC entities may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of offshore offerings to make loans or additional capital contributions to the PRC subsidiaries, which could materially and adversely affect their liquidity and their ability to fund and expand their business.
We are an offshore holding company conducting our operations in China through the PRC subsidiaries, to which we can make loans and make additional capital contributions. Most of these loans or contributions are subject to PRC regulations and approvals or registration. For example, any loans to the PRC subsidiaries, which are treated as foreign-invested enterprises under PRC law, are subject to PRC regulations and foreign exchange loan registrations. Furthermore, loans made by us to the PRC subsidiaries to finance their activities cannot exceed statutory limits and must be registered with the local counterpart of SAFE, or filed with SAFE in its information system. Pursuant to relevant PRC regulations, we may provide loans to the PRC subsidiaries up to the larger amount of (i) the balance between the registered total investment amount and registered capital of these entities, or (ii) twice the amount of the net assets of these entities calculated in accordance with the Circular on Full-Coverage Macro-Prudent Management of Cross-Border Financing, or the "PBOC Circular 9." Moreover, any medium or long-term loan to be provided by us to the PRC subsidiaries, or other domestic PRC entities must also be filed and registered with the National Development and Reform Commission (the "NDRC"). We may also decide to finance the PRC subsidiaries by means of capital contributions. These capital contributions are subject to registration with the SAMR or its local branch, reporting of foreign investment information with the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC (the "MOFCOM"), or registration with other governmental authorities in China. On March 30, 2015, SAFE issued the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Administrative Approach Regarding the Settlement of the Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or "SAFE Circular 19," which took effect and replaced previous regulations effective on June 1, 2015, and was amended on December 30, 2019. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 19, up to 100% of foreign currency capital of a foreign-invested enterprise may be converted into RMB capital according to the actual operation, and within the business scope, of the enterprise at its will. Although SAFE Circular 19 allows for the use of RMB converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital for equity investments in the PRC, the restrictions continue to apply as to foreign-invested enterprises' use of the converted RMB for purposes beyond their business scope, for entrusted loans or for inter-company RMB loans. On June 9, 2016, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Foreign Exchange Settlement Management Policy of Capital Account, or "SAFE Circular 16," effective on June 9, 2016, which reiterates some rules set forth in SAFE Circular 19, but changes the prohibition against using RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company to issue RMB entrusted loans to a prohibition against using such capital to issue loans to non-affiliated enterprises. SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to transfer any foreign currency we hold, including the net proceeds from our offshore offerings, to the PRC subsidiaries, which may adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business in China. On October 23, 2019, SAFE issued the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Facilitating Cross-border Trade and Investment, or "SAFE Circular 28," which, among other things, expanded the use of foreign exchange capital to domestic equity investment area. Non-investment foreign-funded enterprises are allowed to lawfully make domestic equity investments by using their capital on the premise without violation to prevailing Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investments (Edition 2021), or the "Negative List," and the authenticity and compliance with the regulations of domestic investment projects. However, since SAFE Circular 28 is newly promulgated, it is unclear how SAFE and competent banks will carry it out in practice. In light of the various requirements imposed by PRC regulations on loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies, including SAFE Circular 19, SAFE Circular 16, and other relevant rules and regulations, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans or capital contributions to the PRC subsidiaries. As a result, uncertainties exist as to our ability to provide prompt financial support to the PRC subsidiaries when needed. If we fail to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals, our ability to use the proceeds we received or expect to receive from our offshore offerings and to capitalize or otherwise fund our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could materially and adversely affect the PRC subsidiaries' business, including their liquidity and their ability to fund and expand their business.
Regulation - Risk 2
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.
We intend to facilitate the overseas business development. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Practices in the local business communities of many countries outside the United States have a level of government corruption that is greater than that found in the developed world. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws and we have established policies and procedures designed to monitor compliance with these anti-bribery law requirements; however, we cannot assure you that our policies and procedures will protect us from all potential reckless or criminal acts committed by individual employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for anti-bribery law violations, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Regulation - Risk 3
Chinese regulatory authorities could disallow our holding company structure, which may result in a material change in our operations and/or a material change in the value of our securities, including that it could cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or become worthless.
We indirectly hold the equity of the PRC subsidiaries through Linkage Holding, and thus the PRC subsidiaries are directly or indirectly foreign-invested enterprises. Although the PRC government has increasingly open attitude towards absorbing foreign investment in general, it still implements the Negative List, which restricts or prohibits overseas enterprises from holding the equity of Chinese companies whose operations are included in the Negative List. As the boundaries stipulated in the Negative List are relatively vague, they are subject to further determination and clarification by the Chinese government. As of the date of this annual report, the business operated by the PRC subsidiaries has not been included in the Negative List, but we cannot fully guarantee that the Chinese government will not make a different interpretation, so as to disallow our holding corporate structure. Moreover, the Chinese government revises the Negative List from time to time; although the scope of the Negative List is narrowing as a whole, it remains uncertain whether our existing business or future business will be included in future revisions. If the business of the PRC subsidiaries is deemed as a restricted or prohibited business based on the Negative List, our existing corporate structure may be considered illegal and required to be restructured by the Chinese government, which may adversely affect our operations and the value of our securities. On July 4, 2014, SAFE issued the SAFE Circular 37, which requires PRC residents, including PRC individuals and institutions, to register with SAFE or its local branches in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore special purpose vehicle, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents' legally owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests. In addition, such PRC residents must update their foreign exchange registrations with SAFE or its local branches when the offshore special purpose vehicles in which such residents directly hold equity interests undergo material events relating to any changes of basic information (including changes of such PRC individual shareholders, names, and operation terms), increases or decreases in investment amount, share transfers or exchanges, or mergers or divisions. As of the date of this annual report, our current shareholders who are subject to the SAFE Circular 37 have completed the initial registrations with the qualified banks as required by the regulations. However, we may not be fully informed of the identities of all our shareholders or beneficial owners who are PRC residents, and therefore, we may not be able to identify all our shareholders or beneficial owners who are PRC residents to ensure their compliance with the SAFE Circular 37 or other related rules. In addition, we cannot provide any assurance that all of our shareholders and beneficial owners who are PRC residents will comply with our request to make, obtain, or update any applicable registrations or comply with other requirements required by the SAFE Circular 37 or other related rules in a timely manner. Even if our shareholders and beneficial owners who are PRC residents comply with such request, we cannot provide any assurance that they will successfully obtain or update any registration required by the SAFE Circular 37 or other related rules in a timely manner. If any of our shareholders who is a PRC resident as determined by SAFE Circular 37 fails to fulfill the required foreign exchange registration, it will be deemed to be illegal for such shareholders to directly or indirectly hold our equity under the PRC laws. Furthermore, if PRC authorities disallow such shareholders to own our equity, the PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing dividends to us or from carrying out other subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities, and we may be restricted in our ability to contribute additional capital to the PRC subsidiaries, which may adversely affect our operations and the values of our securities. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations, or provisions mandate further actions to be taken by us or the PRC subsidiaries with respect to our existing corporate structure, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, resulting in a material change in our operations and/or a material change in the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares, including that it could cause the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares to significantly decline or become worthless.
Regulation - Risk 4
The M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations establish complex procedures for certain acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.
The M&A Rules and recently adopted PRC regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time consuming and complex. For example, the M&A Rules require that MOFCOM be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise, if (i) any important industry is concerned, (ii) such transaction involves factors that have or may have impact on the national economic security, or (iii) such transaction will lead to a change in control of a domestic enterprise which holds a famous trademark or PRC time-honored brand. Mergers or acquisitions that allow one market player to take control of or to exert decisive impact on another market player must also be notified in advance to MOFCOM when the threshold under the Provisions on Thresholds for Prior Notification of Concentrations of Undertakings, or the "Prior Notification Rules," issued by the State Council in August 2008 is triggered. In addition, the Provisions of the Ministry of Commerce on the Implementation of the Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (the "Security Review Rules") issued by MOFCOM that became effective in September 2011 specify that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise "national defense and security" concerns and mergers and acquisitions through which foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic enterprises that raise "national security" concerns are subject to strict review by MOFCOM, and the Security Review Rules prohibit any activities attempting to bypass a security review, including by structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement. In the future, we may grow our business by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from MOFCOM or its local counterparts may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions. It is clear that the PRC subsidiaries' business would not be deemed to be in an industry that raises "national defense and security" or "national security" concerns. MOFCOM or other government agencies, however, may publish explanations in the future determining that the PRC subsidiaries' business is in an industry subject to the security review, in which case our future acquisitions in the PRC, including those by way of entering into contractual control arrangements with target entities, may be closely scrutinized or prohibited. The PRC subsidiaries' ability to expand their business or maintain or expand their market share through future acquisitions would as such be materially and adversely affected.
Regulation - Risk 5
The approval of and the filing with the CSRC or other PRC government authorities may be required in connection with our future offerings, and, if required, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such approval, in which case we may face sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies for failure to seek the CSRC approval for our future offerings.
The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or the "M&A Rules," adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, requires an overseas SPV formed for listing purposes through acquisitions of PRC domestic companies and controlled by PRC companies or individuals to obtain the approval of the CSRC, prior to the listing and trading of such SPV's securities on an overseas stock exchange. In September 2006, the CSRC published a notice on its official website specifying documents and materials required to be submitted to it by an SPV seeking the CSRC approval of its overseas listings. The application of the M&A Rules remains unclear. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, which became effective on March 31, 2023. On the same date of the issuance of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, the CSRC circulated No. 1 to No. 5 Supporting Guidance Rules, the Notes on the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, the Notice on Administration Arrangements for the Filing of Overseas Listings by Domestic Enterprises and the relevant CSRC Answers to Reporter Questions on the official website of the CSRC, or collectively, the Guidance Rules and Notice. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures, together with the Guidance Rules and Notice, reiterate the basic supervision principles as reflected in the draft rules by providing substantially the same requirements for filings of overseas offering and listing by domestic companies, yet made the following updates compared to the draft rules: (a) further clarification of the circumstances prohibiting overseas issuance and listing; (b) further clarification of the standard of indirect overseas listing under the principle of substance over form, and (c) adding more details of filing procedures and requirements by setting different filing requirements for different types of overseas offering and listing. Under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and the Guidance Rules and Notice, domestic companies conducting overseas securities offering and listing activities, either in direct or indirect form, shall complete filing procedures with the CSRC pursuant to the requirements of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures within three working days following its submission of initial public offerings or listing application. The companies that have already been listed on overseas stock exchanges or have obtained the approval from overseas supervision administrations or stock exchanges for its offering and listing and will complete their overseas offering and listing prior to September 30, 2023 are not required to make immediate filings for its listing yet need to make filings for subsequent offerings in accordance with the Overseas Listing Trial Measures. The companies that have already submitted an application for an initial public offering to overseas supervision administrations prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures but have not yet obtained the approval from overseas supervision administrations or stock exchanges for the offering and listing may arrange for the filing within a reasonable time period and should complete the filing procedure before such companies' overseas issuance and listing. Under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and the Guidance Rules and Notice, where a domestic company seeks to directly or indirectly offer and list securities in overseas markets, the issuer shall file with the CSRC. Direct overseas offering and listing by domestic companies refers to such overseas offering and listing by a joint-stock company incorporated domestically. Indirect overseas offering and listing by domestic companies refers to such overseas offering and listing by a company in the name of an overseas incorporated entity, whereas the company's major business operations are located domestically and such offering and listing is based on the underlying equity, assets, earnings or other similar rights of a domestic company. Any overseas offering and listing made by an issuer that meets both the following conditions will be determined as indirect (i) 50% or more of the issuer's operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in its audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent accounting year is accounted for by domestic companies; and (ii) the main parts of the issuer's business activities are conducted in mainland China, or its main places of business are located in mainland China, or the senior managers in charge of its business operation and management are mostly Chinese citizens or domiciled in mainland China. If a PRC domestic company fails to complete required filing procedures or conceals any material fact or falsifies any major content in its filing documents, such PRC domestic company may be subject to administrative penalties, such as an order to rectify, warnings, fines, and its controlling shareholders, actual controllers, the person directly in charge and other directly liable persons may also be subject to administrative penalties, such as warnings and fines. Our PRC legal counsel, AllBright, has advised us, based on its understanding of the current PRC law, rules, and regulations, that the CSRC's approval is not required under the M&A Rules for the continued listing and trading of our Class A Ordinary Shares on the Nasdaq Stock Market, given that (i) the CSRC currently has not issued any definitive rule or interpretation concerning whether our offerings are subject to the M&A Rule; and (ii) we did not acquire any equity interests or assets of a "PRC domestic company" as such terms are defined under the M&A Rules. Our PRC legal counsel, however, has further advised us that there remains some uncertainty as to how the M&A Rules will be interpreted or implemented in the context of an overseas offering and its opinions summarized above are subject to any new laws, rules and regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations in any form relating to the M&A Rules. We cannot assure you that relevant PRC governmental agencies, including the CSRC, would reach the same conclusion as we have. If it is determined that the CSRC approval is required for our offerings in the U.S., we may face sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies for failure to seek the CSRC approval for our offerings in the U.S. These sanctions may include fines and penalties on our operations in the PRC, limitations on our operating privileges in the PRC, delays in or restrictions on the repatriation of the proceeds from our future offerings in the U.S. into the PRC, restrictions on or prohibition of the payments or remittance of dividends by the PRC subsidiaries, or other actions that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation, and prospects, as well as the trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. The CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies may also take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for us, to halt our offerings in the U.S. before the settlement and delivery of the Class A Ordinary Shares that we offer. Consequently, if you engage in market trading or other activities in anticipation of and prior to the settlement and delivery of the shares we may be offering in the future, you would be doing so at the risk that the settlement and delivery may not occur.
Regulation - Risk 6
The PRC subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on paying dividends or making other payments to us, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.
We are a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. We may need dividends and other distributions on equity from the PRC subsidiaries to satisfy our liquidity requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders and service any debt we may incur. If the PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. Current PRC regulations permit the PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, the PRC subsidiaries are required to set aside at least 10% of their respective accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds until the total amount set aside reaches 50% of their respective registered capital. The PRC subsidiaries may also allocate a portion of their respective after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to employee welfare and bonus funds at their discretion. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. These limitation on the ability of the PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments, or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.
Regulation - Risk 7
Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations and changes in policies, rules, and regulations in China, which may be quick with little advance notice, could limit the legal protection available to you and us.
The PRC legal system is based on written statutes. Unlike common law systems, it is a system in which legal cases have limited value as precedents. In the late 1970s, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing economic matters in general. The legislation over the past three decades has significantly increased the protection afforded to various forms of foreign or private-sector investment in China. The PRC subsidiaries are subject to various PRC laws and regulations generally applicable to companies in China. Since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, however, the interpretations of many laws, regulations, and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations, and rules involve uncertainties. From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, however, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy in the PRC legal system than in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies, internal rules, and regulations (some of which are not published in a timely manner or at all) that may have retroactive effect and may change quickly with little advance notice. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. Such uncertainties, including uncertainties over the scope and effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual property), and procedural rights, and any failure to respond to changes in the regulatory environment in China could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.
Regulation - Risk 8
The Opinions recently issued by the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council may subject us to additional compliance requirements in the future.
Recently, the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued the Opinions, which were made available to the public on July 6, 2021. The Opinions emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over illegal securities activities and the supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies. These opinions proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of relevant regulatory systems, to deal with the risks and incidents facing China-based overseas-listed companies and the demand for cybersecurity and data privacy protection. On December 24, 2021, the CSRC published draft rules for the regulation of overseas offering and listing by Chinese companies for public consultation. The draft rules included two pieces of rules: the Management Regulations on Overseas Offering and Listing by Domestic Enterprises of the State Council, which provided for a general filing regulatory framework, and the Management Rules for the Filing Work of Overseas Offering and Listing by Domestic Enterprises of the CSRC, which set out more detailed terms and procedures of the filing requirements. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, which became effective on March 31, 2023. On the same date of the issuance of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, the CSRC circulated the Guidance Rules and Notice. See "Item 4. Information on the Company -B. Business Overview - Regulations - Regulations Relating to Overseas Listings." The Overseas Listing Trial Measures, together with the Guidance Rules and Notice, reiterate the basic supervision principles as reflected in the draft rules by providing substantially the same requirements for filings of overseas offering and listing by domestic companies, yet made the following updates compared to the draft rules: (a) further clarification of the circumstances prohibiting overseas issuance and listing; (b) further clarification of the standard of indirect overseas listing under the principle of substance over form, and (c) adding more details of filing procedures and requirements by setting different filing requirements for different types of overseas offering and listing. Under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and the Guidance Rules and Notice, where a domestic company seeks to directly or indirectly offer and list securities in overseas markets, the issuer shall file with the CSRC. Direct overseas offering and listing by domestic companies refers to such overseas offering and listing by a joint-stock company incorporated domestically. Indirect overseas offering and listing by domestic companies refers to such overseas offering and listing by a company in the name of an overseas incorporated entity, whereas the company's major business operations are located domestically and such offering and listing is based on the underlying equity, assets, earnings or other similar rights of a domestic company. Any overseas offering and listing made by an issuer that meets both the following conditions will be determined as indirect (i) 50% or more of the issuer's operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in its audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent accounting year is accounted for by domestic companies; and (ii) the main parts of the issuer's business activities are conducted in mainland China, or its main places of business are located in mainland China, or the senior managers in charge of its business operation and management are mostly Chinese citizens or domiciled in mainland China. Our PRC legal counsel, AllBright, has advised us, based on its understanding of the current PRC law, rules, and regulations, that we are not required to complete the filing procedures with the CSRC for our future offerings of our Class A Ordinary Shares, given that (i) we are not a China domestic company; and (ii) any such offering would not be determined to be an indirect overseas offering, because the operating revenue, total profit, total assets, or net assets, as documented in our audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, accounted for by the PRC subsidiaries are all under 50%.
Regulation - Risk 9
PRC regulations relating to offshore investment activities by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident beneficial owners or the PRC subsidiaries to liability or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into the PRC subsidiaries, limit the PRC subsidiaries' ability to increase their registered capital or distribute profits to us, or may otherwise adversely affect us.
On July 4, 2014, SAFE issued the Circular on Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control over the Overseas Investment and Financing and Round-trip Investment by Domestic Residents via Special Purpose Vehicles, or "SAFE Circular 37." According to SAFE Circular 37, prior registration with the local SAFE branch is required for PRC residents, (including PRC individuals and PRC corporate entities, as well as foreign individuals that are deemed to be PRC residents for foreign exchange administration purpose), in connection with their direct or indirect contribution of domestic assets or interests to offshore special purpose vehicles, or "SPVs." SAFE Circular 37 further requires amendments to the SAFE registrations in the event of any changes with respect to the basic information of the offshore SPV, such as a change of a PRC individual shareholder, SPV name, and operation term, or any significant changes with respect to the offshore SPV, such as an increase or decrease of capital contribution, share transfer or exchange, or mergers or divisions. SAFE Circular 37 is applicable to our shareholders who are PRC residents and may be applicable to any offshore acquisitions that we make in the future. In February 2015, SAFE promulgated a Circular on Further Simplifying and Improving Foreign Exchange Administration Policy on Direct Investment, or "SAFE Circular 13," effective in June 2015. Under SAFE Circular 13, applications for foreign exchange registration of inbound foreign direct investments and outbound overseas direct investments, including those required under SAFE Circular 37, will be filed with qualified banks instead of SAFE. The qualified banks will directly examine the applications and accept registrations under the supervision of SAFE. In addition to SAFE Circular 37 and SAFE Circular 13, our ability to conduct foreign exchange activities in China may be subject to the interpretation and enforcement of the Implementation Rules of the Administrative Measures for Individual Foreign Exchange promulgated by SAFE in January 2007 (as amended and supplemented, the "Individual Foreign Exchange Rules"). Under the Individual Foreign Exchange Rules, any PRC individual seeking to make a direct investment overseas or engage in the issuance or trading of negotiable securities or derivatives overseas must make the appropriate registrations in accordance with SAFE provisions, the failure of which may subject such PRC individual to warnings, fines, or other liabilities. As of the date of this annual report, our current shareholders who are subject to SAFE Circular 37 or SAFE Circular 13 have completed the initial registrations with the qualified banks as required by the regulations. We may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents holding direct or indirect interests in our Company, however, and we have no control over any of our future beneficial owners. Thus, we cannot provide any assurance that our current or future PRC resident beneficial owners will comply with our request to make or obtain any applicable registrations or continuously comply with all registration procedures set forth in these SAFE regulations. Such failure or inability of our PRC residents beneficial owners to comply with these SAFE regulations may subject us or our PRC resident beneficial owners to fines and legal sanctions, restrict our cross-border investment activities, or limit the PRC subsidiaries' ability to distribute dividends to or obtain foreign-exchange-denominated loans from us, or prevent us from being able to make distributions or pay dividends, as a result of which our business operations and our ability to distribute profits to you could be materially and adversely affected.
Regulation - Risk 10
Failure to obtain and maintain required licenses and permits or to comply with regulations regarding liquor, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, secondhand goods, or other regulations could lead to the loss of the Operating Entities' liquor, pharmaceutical, and other licenses and, thereby, harm the Operating Entities' business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The sale of liquor, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and secondhand products are subject to various government regulations in the markets in which the Operating Entities' products are sold. In addition, such regulations are subject to change from time to time. See "Item 4. Information on the Company -B. Business Overview - Regulations." The failure to obtain and maintain licenses, permits, and approvals relating to such regulations could adversely affect the Operating Entities' business, financial condition, or results of operations. Licenses may be revoked, suspended, or denied renewal for cause at any time if governmental authorities determine that the Operating Entities' conduct violates applicable regulations. Difficulties or failure to maintain or obtain the required licenses, permits, and approvals could adversely affect the Operating Entities, which could adversely affect the Operating Entities' business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Regulation - Risk 11
The enactment of Law of the PRC on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the "Hong Kong National Security Law") could impact the Hong Kong subsidiaries.
On June 30, 2020, the Standing Committee of the PRC National People's Congress adopted the Hong Kong National Security Law. This law defines the duties and government bodies of the Hong Kong National Security Law for safeguarding national security and four categories of offences - secession, subversion, terrorist activities, and collusion with a foreign country or external elements to endanger national security - and their corresponding penalties. On July 14, 2020, the former U.S. President Donald Trump signed the Hong Kong Autonomy Act, or HKAA, into law, authorizing the U.S. administration to impose blocking sanctions against individuals and entities who are determined to have materially contributed to the erosion of Hong Kong's autonomy. On August 7, 2020, the U.S. government imposed HKAA-authorized sanctions on eleven individuals, including the HKSAR chief executive Carrie Lam. On October 14, 2020, the U.S. State Department submitted to relevant committees of Congress the report required under HKAA, identifying persons materially contributing to "the failure of the Government of China to meet its obligations under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law." The HKAA further authorizes secondary sanctions, including the imposition of blocking sanctions, against foreign financial institutions that knowingly conduct a significant transaction with foreign persons sanctioned under this authority. The imposition of sanctions may directly affect the foreign financial institutions as well as any third parties or customers dealing with any foreign financial institution that is targeted. It is difficult to predict the full impact of the Hong Kong National Security Law and HKAA on Hong Kong and companies located in Hong Kong. If the Hong Kong subsidiaries are determined to be in violation of the Hong Kong National Security Law or the HKAA by competent authorities, the Hong Kong subsidiaries' business operations, financial position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Regulation - Risk 12
Changed
Given the Chinese government's significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of the PRC subsidiaries' business, the Chinese government may intervene or influence their operations at any time, which could result in a material change in the PRC subsidiaries' operations and/or the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
The Chinese government has significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of the PRC subsidiaries' business and may intervene or influence their operations at any time as the government deems appropriate to further regulatory, political, and societal goals, which could result in a material change in the PRC subsidiaries' operations and/or the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares. The Chinese government has recently published new policies that significantly affected certain industries, such as internet industries, and we cannot rule out the possibility that it will in the future release regulations or policies regarding the e-commerce and cross-border trade industry that could adversely affect the PRC subsidiaries' business, financial condition, and results of operations. Furthermore, if China adopts more stringent standards with respect to certain areas such as corporate social responsibilities, the PRC subsidiaries may incur increased compliance costs or become subject to additional restrictions in their operations. Certain areas of the law, including intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections, in China may also not be as effective as in the United States or other countries. In addition, the PRC subsidiaries cannot predict the effects of future developments in the PRC legal system on their business operations, including the promulgation of new laws, or changes to existing laws or the interpretation or enforcement thereof. These uncertainties could limit the legal protections available to us and our investors, including you.
Regulation - Risk 13
Changed
The enforcement of laws and rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little advance notice. Additionally, the PRC laws and regulations and the enforcement thereof that apply or are to be applied to Hong Kong can change quickly with little or no advance notice. As a result, the Hong Kong legal system embodies uncertainties which could limit the availability of legal protections, which could result in a material change in the Hong Kong subsidiaries' operations and/or the value of our securities.
As one of the conditions for the handover of the sovereignty of Hong Kong to China, China accepted conditions such as Hong Kong's Basic Law. The Basic Law ensured Hong Kong will retain its own currency (the Hong Kong Dollar), legal system, parliamentary system and people's rights and freedom for fifty years from 1997. This agreement has given Hong Kong the freedom to function with a high degree of autonomy. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is responsible for its own domestic affairs including, but not limited to, the judiciary and courts of last resort, immigration and customs, public finance, currencies and extradition. Hong Kong continues using the English common law system. However, if the PRC attempts to alter its agreement to allow Hong Kong to function autonomously, this could potentially impact Hong Kong's common law legal system and may in turn bring about uncertainty in, for example, the enforcement of the Hong Kong subsidiaries' contractual rights. This could, in turn, materially and adversely affect the Hong Kong subsidiaries' business and operations. Additionally, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections in Hong Kong may not be as effective as in the United States or other countries. Accordingly, we cannot predict the effect of future developments in the Hong Kong legal system, including the promulgation of new laws, changes to existing laws or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, or the preemption of local regulations by national laws. These uncertainties could limit the legal protections available to us, including the ability to enforce agreements with Customers and/or Merchants.
Regulation - Risk 14
Changed
Because we are an "emerging growth company," we may not be subject to requirements that other public companies are subject to, which could affect investor confidence in us and our Class A Ordinary Shares.
For as long as we remain an "emerging growth company," as defined in the JOBS Act, we will elect to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies," including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Because of these lessened regulatory requirements, our shareholders would be left without information or rights available to shareholders of more mature companies. Further, we elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that we (1) are no longer an emerging growth company or (2) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, these financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates. If some investors find our Class A Ordinary Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A Ordinary Shares and our share price may be more volatile.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities3 | 4.2%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Changed
You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments, or bringing actions in China against us or our management named in this annual report based on foreign laws. It may also be difficult for you or overseas regulators to conduct investigations or collect evidence within China.
As a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, we conduct a portion of operations through our subsidiaries in China. Aside from EXTEND's assets, which are located in Japan, the rest of the Operating Entities' assets are located in China. In addition, except for one director and executive officer, Mr. Ryo Fuyunishiki, who is a resident of Japan, the rest of directors and executive officers are residents of China and a substantial majority of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process upon those persons inside China. It may be difficult for you to enforce judgements obtained in U.S. courts based on civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors who do not currently reside in the U.S. or have substantial assets in the U.S. Even if you obtain a judgment against us, our directors or executive officers in a U.S. court or other court outside the PRC, you may not be able to enforce such judgment against us or them in the PRC. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands or the PRC would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S. or any state. The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other forms of written arrangement with the United States that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, the PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security, or public interest. As a result, it is uncertain whether and on what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States. It may also be difficult for you or overseas regulators to conduct investigations or collect evidence within China. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to obtaining information needed for shareholder investigations or litigation outside China or otherwise with respect to foreign entities. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with counterparts of another country or region to monitor and oversee cross border securities activities, such regulatory cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States may not be efficient in the absence of a practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, or "Article 177," which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigations or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. Article 177 further provides that Chinese entities and individuals are not allowed to provide documents or materials related to securities business activities to foreign agencies without prior consent from the securities regulatory authority of the State Council and the competent departments of the State Council. While a detailed interpretation of or implementing rules under Article 177 have yet to be promulgated, the inability for an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within China may further increase difficulties faced by you in protecting your interests.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 2
The Operating Entities may be subject to product liability claims if Customers are harmed by the products sold through the Operating Entities' distribution channels.
The Operating Entities sell products manufactured by third parties, some of which may be defectively designed or manufactured. Sales and distributions of products to Customers could expose the Operating Entities to product liability claims relating to quality and may require product recalls or other actions. Third parties that suffered such injury may bring claims or legal proceedings against the Operating Entities as the seller of the products. See "Item 4. Information on the Company -B. Business Overview - Regulations - Regulations on Consumer Protection." Although the Operating Entities would have legal recourse against the manufacturers or suppliers of such products under Japanese law, attempting to enforce our rights against the manufacturers or suppliers may be expensive, time-consuming, and ultimately futile. Defective, inferior, or counterfeit products or negative publicity as to personal injury caused by products the Operating Entities sell may adversely affect consumer perceptions of our Company or the Operating Entities' products, which could harm our reputation and brand image. In addition, the Operating Entities do not currently maintain any third-party liability insurance or product liability insurance with respect to the products they sell. As a result, any material product liability claim or litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Operating Entities' business, financial condition, and results of operations. Even unsuccessful claims could result in the expenditure of funds and management time and effort in defending them and could have a negative impact on the Operating Entities' reputation and results of operations.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 3
The Operating Entities are subject to legal and regulatory proceedings from time to time in the ordinary course of their business.
The Operating Entities have not been subject to any material allegations or complaints in the past, but they may be involved in legal and other disputes in the ordinary courses of their business, including allegations against the Operating Entities for potential infringement of third-party copyrights or other intellectual property rights, as well as Customers' complaints in relation to the Operating Entities' refund policy, the quality of their services, data security and other dissatisfaction. The Operating Entities might also be involved in governmental investigations for advertisements or content posted on the Operating Entities' websites or Linkage ERP System or accounts or other aspect of the Operating Entities' business operation in the future. Any claims against the Operating Entities, with or without merit, could be time-consuming and costly to defend or litigate, divert the Operating Entities' management's attention and resources or harm their brand equity. If a lawsuit or governmental proceeding against the Operating Entities is successful, they may be required to pay substantial damages or fines. The Operating Entities may also lose, or be limited in, the rights to offer some of the Operating Entities' products and services or be required to make changes to the Operating Entities' product and service offerings or business model. As a result, the scope of the Operating Entities' product and service offerings could be reduced, which could adversely affect the Operating Entities ability to attract new Customers and Merchants, harm the Operating Entities' reputation and have a material adverse effect on the Operating Entities' business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, now that we have become a public company , we expect our public profile to increase, which may result in increased litigation as well as increased public awareness of any such litigation. There is substantial uncertainty regarding the scope and application of many of the laws and regulations to which we or the Operating Entities are subject, which increases the risk that we or the Operating Entities will be subject to claims alleging violations of those laws and regulations. In the future, the Operating Entities may also be accused of having, or be found to have, infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated third-party intellectual property rights.
Taxation & Government Incentives3 | 4.2%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
There are significant uncertainties under the EIT Law relating to the withholding tax liabilities of the PRC subsidiaries, and dividends payable by the PRC subsidiaries to our offshore subsidiaries may not qualify to enjoy certain treaty benefits.
Under the EIT Law and its implementation rules, the profits of a foreign-invested enterprise generated through operations, which are distributed to its immediate holding company outside the PRC, will be subject to a withholding tax rate of 10%. Pursuant to the Double Tax Avoidance Arrangement, a withholding tax rate of 10% may be lowered to 5% if the enterprise in mainland China is at least 25% held by a Hong Kong enterprise for at least 12 consecutive months prior to distribution of the dividends and is determined by the relevant PRC tax authority to have satisfied other conditions and requirements under the Double Tax Avoidance Arrangement and other applicable PRC laws. However, based on the Circular on Certain Issues with Respect to the Enforcement of Dividend Provisions in Tax Treaties, or the "SAT Circular 81," which became effective on February 20, 2009, if the relevant PRC tax authorities determine, in their discretion, that a company benefits from such reduced income tax rate due to a structure or arrangement that is primarily tax-driven, such PRC tax authorities may adjust the preferential tax treatment. According to Circular on Several Issues regarding the "Beneficial Owner" in Tax Treaties, which became effective as of April 1, 2018, when determining an applicant's status as the "beneficial owner" regarding tax treatments in connection with dividends, interests, or royalties in the tax treaties, several factors will be taken into account. Such factors include whether the business operated by the applicant constitutes actual business activities, and whether the counterparty country or region to the tax treaties does not levy any tax, grant tax exemption on relevant incomes, or levy tax at an extremely low rate. This circular further requires any applicant who intends to be proved of being the "beneficial owner" to file relevant documents with the relevant tax authorities. Linkage Network is wholly owned by Linkage Holding. However, we cannot assure you that our determination regarding our qualification to enjoy the preferential tax treatment will not be challenged by the relevant PRC tax authority or we will be able to complete the necessary filings with the relevant PRC tax authority and enjoy the preferential withholding tax rate of 5% under the Double Tax Avoidance Arrangement with respect to dividends to be paid by Linkage Network to our Hong Kong subsidiary, Linkage Holding, in which case, we would be subject to the higher withdrawing tax rate of 10% on dividends received.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2
Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, we may be classified as a PRC "resident enterprise" for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. Such classification would likely result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.
Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law (the "EIT Law"), which became effective in January 2008, an enterprise established outside the PRC with "de facto management bodies" within the PRC is considered a "resident enterprise" for PRC enterprise income tax purposes and is generally subject to a uniform 25% enterprise income tax rate on its worldwide income. Under the implementation rules to the EIT Law, a "de facto management body" is defined as a body that has material and overall management and control over the manufacturing and business operations, personnel and human resources, finances, and properties of an enterprise. In April 2009, the State Administration of Taxation (the "SAT") issued the Circular on Issues Concerning the Identification of Chinese-Controlled Overseas Registered Enterprises as Resident Enterprises in Accordance with the Actual Standards of Organizational Management, or "SAT Circular 82," which was amended in December 2017. SAT Circular 82 specifies that certain offshore incorporated enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups will be classified as PRC resident enterprises if the following are located or resident in the PRC: senior management personnel and departments that are responsible for daily production, operation and management; financial and personnel decision-making bodies; key properties, accounting books, company seal, and minutes of board meetings and shareholders' meetings; and half or more of the senior management or directors having voting rights. In addition to SAT Circular 82, the SAT issued the Measures for the Administration of Enterprise Income Tax of Chinese-Controlled Overseas Registered Enterprises as Resident Enterprises (for Trial Implementation), or "SAT Bulletin 45," which took effect in September 2011 and was amended in April 2015, to provide more guidance on the implementation of SAT Circular 82 and clarify the reporting and filing obligations of such "Chinese-controlled offshore incorporated resident enterprises." SAT Bulletin 45 provides procedures and administrative details for the determination of resident status and administration on post-determination matters. Although both SAT Circular 82 and SAT Bulletin 45 only apply to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreign individuals, the determining criteria set forth in SAT Circular 82 and SAT Bulletin 45 may reflect the SAT's general position on how the "de facto management body" test should be applied in determining the tax resident status of offshore enterprises, regardless of whether they are controlled by PRC enterprises, PRC enterprise groups, or by PRC or foreign individuals. If the PRC tax authorities determine that the actual management organ of Linkage Cayman is within the territory of China, Linkage Cayman may be deemed to be a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes and a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we will be subject to the uniform 25% enterprise income tax on our world-wide income, which could materially reduce our net income. In addition, we will also be subject to PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. Finally, dividends payable by us to our investors and gains on the sale of our shares may become subject to PRC withholding tax, at a rate of 10% in the case of non-PRC enterprises or 20% in the case of non-PRC individuals (in each case, subject to the provisions of any applicable tax treaty), if such gains are deemed to be from PRC sources. It is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of our Company would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in our shares. Although up to the date of this annual report, Linkage Cayman has not been notified or informed by the PRC tax authorities that it has been deemed to be a resident enterprise for purposes of the EIT Law, we cannot assure you that it will not be deemed to be a resident enterprise in the future.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 3
Changed
If we are classified as a PFIC, United States taxpayers who own our Class A Ordinary Shares may have adverse United States federal income tax consequences.
A non-U.S. corporation such as ourselves will be classified as a PFIC, which is known as a PFIC, for any taxable year if, for such year, either - At least 75% of our gross income for the year is passive income; or - The average percentage of our assets (determined at the end of each quarter) during the taxable year which produce passive income or which are held for the production of passive income is at least 50%. Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, rents and royalties (other than rents or royalties derived from the active conduct of a trade or business), and gains from the disposition of passive assets. If we are determined to be a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. taxpayer who holds our Class A Ordinary Shares, the U.S. taxpayer may be subject to increased U.S. federal income tax liability and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. It is possible that, for our 2024 taxable year or for any subsequent year, more than 50% of our assets may be assets which produce passive income, in which case we would be deemed a PFIC, which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. taxpayers who are shareholders. We will make this determination following the end of any particular tax year. For purposes of the PFIC analysis, in general, a non-U.S. corporation is deemed to own its pro rata share of the gross income and assets of any entity in which it is considered to own at least 25% of the equity by value. For a more detailed discussion of the application of the PFIC rules to us and the consequences to U.S. taxpayers if we were or are determined to be a PFIC, see "Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences - Passive Foreign Investment Company ("PFIC") Consequences."
Environmental / Social1 | 1.4%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
Some of our subsidiaries are subject to various evolving Hong Kong laws and regulations regarding data security or antimonopoly, which could subject them to government enforcement actions and investigations, fines, penalties, and suspension or disruption of their operations.
The Hong Kong subsidiaries, including Linkage Holding, Linkage Electronic and HQT NETWORK, operate in Hong Kong and are thus subject to laws and regulations in Hong Kong in respect of data privacy, data security, and data protection. The main legislation in Hong Kong concerning data security is the PDPO, which regulates the collection, usage, storage, and transfer of personal data and imposes a statutory duty on data users to comply with the six data protection principles contained therein. Pursuant to section 33 of the PDPO, the PDPO is applicable to the collection, holding, processing and using of personal data if such activities take place in Hong Kong, or if the personal data is controlled by a data user whose principal place of business is in Hong Kong. As of the date of this annual report, we and the Hong Kong subsidiaries have complied with the laws and requirements in respect of data security in Hong Kong. Our directors confirm that: (i) none of our directors nor any of the Hong Kong subsidiaries has been involved in any litigation or regulatory action relating to breach of the PDPO; and (ii) they are not aware of any non-compliance incidents relating to any breach of the PDPO since the date of incorporation of the Hong Kong subsidiaries. Since the PRC subsidiaries conduct substantially all of their business operations in mainland China, we believe that the incumbent data security statutory requirements under Hong Kong laws do not materially affect their business. However, the laws on cybersecurity and data privacy are constantly evolving and can be subject to varying interpretations, resulting in uncertainties about the scope of our responsibilities in that regard. Failure to comply with the cybersecurity and data privacy requirements in a timely manner, or at all, may subject us or the Hong Kong subsidiaries to consequences including but not limited to government enforcement actions and investigations, fines, penalties, and suspension or disruption of the Hong Kong subsidiaries' operations. The Competition Ordinance (Cap. 619 of the Laws of Hong Kong) prohibits and deters undertakings in all sectors from adopting anti-competitive conduct which has the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in Hong Kong. It provides for general prohibitions in three major areas of anti-competitive conduct described as the first conduct rule, the second conduct rule, and the merger rule. The first conduct rule prohibits undertakings from making or giving effect to agreements or decisions or engaging in concerted practices that have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition in Hong Kong. The second conduct rule prohibits undertakings that have a substantial degree of market power in a market from engaging in conduct that has as its object or effect the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition in Hong Kong. The merger rule prohibits mergers that have or are likely to have the effect of substantially lessening competition in Hong Kong. The scope of application of the merger rule is limited to carrier licenses issued under the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap. 106 of the Laws of Hong Kong). As of the date of this annual report, we and the Hong Kong subsidiaries have complied with all three areas of anti-competition laws and requirements in Hong Kong to the extent they are applicable to the Hong Kong subsidiaries. The Hong Kong subsidiaries have not engaged in any concerted practices that have an object or effect to prevent, restrict, or distort competition in Hong Kong. Additionally, neither we nor our Hong Kong subsidiaries possess a substantial degree of market power in the Hong Kong market that could trigger the second conduct rule. The merger rule is equally not applicable to us nor to the Hong Kong subsidiaries since neither we nor the Hong Kong subsidiaries hold any carrier licenses issued under the Telecommunications Ordinance. Accordingly, the data security or antimonopoly laws and regulations in Hong Kong currently in effect do not restrict our ability to accept foreign investment or impose limitations on our continued listing on any U.S. stock exchange. However, in the event that the data security or antimonopoly laws and regulations in Hong Kong change or evolve in the future, and we and/or our subsidiaries become subject to or impacted by such newly enacted laws and regulations, our business operations, financial condition and results of operations may be negatively and adversely affected.
Production
Total Risks: 8/71 (11%)Above Sector Average
Employment / Personnel2 | 2.8%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
Changed
Increases in labor costs in the PRC may adversely affect the PRC subsidiaries' business and profitability.
China's economy has experienced increases in labor costs in recent years. China's overall economy and the average wage in China are expected to continue to grow. The average wage level for the PRC subsidiaries' employees has also increased in recent years. We expect that their labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will continue to increase. Unless the PRC subsidiaries are able to pass on these increased labor costs to their customers by increasing prices for their products or services, their profitability and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, the PRC subsidiaries have been subject to stricter regulatory requirements in terms of entering into labor contracts with their employees and paying various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance, and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of their employees. Pursuant to the PRC Labor Contract Law, or the "Labor Contract Law," that became effective in January 2008 and its amendments that became effective in July 2013 and its implementing rules that became effective in September 2008, employers are subject to stricter requirements in terms of signing labor contracts, minimum wages, paying remuneration, determining the term of employees' probation, and unilaterally terminating labor contracts. In the event that the PRC subsidiaries decide to terminate some of their employees or otherwise change their employment or labor practices, the Labor Contract Law and its implementation rules may limit their ability to effect those changes in a desirable or cost-effective manner, which could adversely affect their business and results of operations. As the interpretation and implementation of labor-related laws and regulations are still evolving, we cannot assure you that the PRC subsidiaries' employment practices do not and will not violate labor-related laws and regulations in China, which may subject the PRC subsidiaries to labor disputes or government investigations. If the PRC subsidiaries are deemed to have violated relevant labor laws and regulations, they could be required to provide additional compensation to their employees and their business, and, in such case, our financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Employment / Personnel - Risk 2
If the Operating Entities cannot retain, attract, and motivate key personnel, the Operating Entities may be unable to effectively implement their business plan.
The Operating Entities' success depends in large part upon their ability to retain, attract, and motivate highly skilled management, research and development, marketing, and sales personnel. The loss of and failure to replace key technical management and personnel could adversely affect multiple development efforts. Recruitment and retention of senior management and skilled technical, sales and other personnel is very competitive, and we may not be successful in either attracting or retaining such personnel. The Operating Entities may lose key personnel to other high technology companies, and many larger companies with significantly greater resources than us may aggressively recruit, key personnel. In addition, due to the intense competition for qualified employees, the Operating Entities may be required to, and have had to, increase the level of compensation paid to existing and new employees, which could materially increase the Operating Entities' operating expenses.
Supply Chain2 | 2.8%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
Changed
If the Operating Entities fail to maintain and expand our relationships with suppliers, our revenues and results of operations will be harmed.
The Operating Entities have no long-term supply agreements arrangements with major suppliers and, therefore, the Operating Entities' success depends on maintaining good relationships with their major suppliers. The Operating Entities' business depends to a significant extent on the willingness and ability of their suppliers to supply them with a sufficient selection and volume of products to stock product collection. Some of their suppliers that have many other clients may not have the capacity to supply the Operating Entities with sufficient merchandise to keep pace with their growth plans. Any of the Operating Entities' suppliers could in the future decide to scale back or end its relationship with the Operating Entities and strengthen its relationship with the Operating Entities' competitors, which could negatively impact the revenue we earn from the sale of products from such supplier. If the Operating Entities fail to maintain strong relationships with their existing suppliers, or fail to continue acquiring and strengthening relationships with additional suppliers, the Operating Entities' ability to obtain a sufficient amount and variety of merchandise on reasonable terms may be limited, which could have a negative impact on their competitive position. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, two suppliers accounted for approximately 15.39% and 10.74% of the Operating Entities' total purchases. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, three suppliers accounted for approximately 17.52%, 17.02% and 11.04% of the Operating Entities' total purchases, respectively. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, two suppliers accounted for approximately 20.59% and 15.97% of the Operating Entities' total purchases, respectively. The loss of or a reduction in the amount of merchandise made available to the Operating Entities by any one of these key suppliers, or by any of their other suppliers, could have an adverse effect on the Operating Entities' business.
Supply Chain - Risk 2
The Operating Entities rely on third-party manufacturers to produce their private label smart products and problems with, or loss of, these manufacturers could harm the Operating Entities' business and operating results.
The Operating Entities entrust third parties to manufacture their private label smart products which the Operating Entities sell to Customers. The Operating Entities offer approximately 211 SKUs of private label smart electronics from qualified third-party manufacturers in a timely and efficient manner. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, we were materially dependent upon two third-party manufacturers for the production of private label smart products; namely, Dongguan Pinmi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. ("Dongguan Pinmi"), and Shenzhen Huajue Communication Co., Ltd. ("Shenzhen Huajue") each contributing to more than 5% of our total manufacturing fees paid during the reporting period. And for the fiscal year ended September 302023 and 2022, we were materially dependent upon three third-party manufacturers for the production of private label smart products; namely, Shenzhen Luoxi Technology Co., Ltd. ("Shenzhen Luoxi"), Shenzhen Huajue Communication Co., Ltd. ("Shenzhen Huajue"), and Shenzhen Weiermei Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. ("Shenzhen Weiermei"), each contributing to more than 5% of our total manufacturing fees paid during each of the reporting periods. Political and economic instability, global or regional adverse conditions, such as pandemics or other disease outbreaks or natural disasters, the financial stability of third-party manufacturers, third-party manufacturers' ability to meet the Operating Entities' standards, labor problems experienced by third-party manufacturers, the availability or cost of raw materials, merchandise quality issues, currency exchange rates, trade tariff developments, transport availability and cost, including import-related taxes, transport security, inflation, and other factors relating to the Operating Entities' third-party manufacturers are beyond their control. Under certain circumstances, the agreements entered into with such third-party manufacturers may lapse, in the event the third-party manufacturers determine not to renew such agreements. For example, our agreements with the major third-party manufacturers identified above, namely Shenzhen Huajue, Shenzhen Luoxi and Shenzhen Weiermei, will be automatically renewed for additional one-year terms, unless a party has provided a three-month advance written notice to the other party prior to the expiration of the term. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview - Business Model - Product Selection - Product Offerings - Our Private Label Smart Electronics" for detailed descriptions of the material terms of our agreements with major third-party manufacturers. In the event that any of such third parties determines to not to renew by providing such advance written notice, there can be no assurance that the Operating Entities will be able to obtain a replacement in a timely manner, or at all, which may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The Operating Entities' ability to develop and maintain relationships with reputable third-party manufacturers and offer high quality merchandise to Customers is critical to the Operating Entities' success. If the Operating Entities are unable to develop and maintain relationships with third-party manufacturers that would allow them to offer a sufficient amount and variety of quality merchandise on acceptable commercial terms, the Operating Entities' ability to satisfy Customers' needs, and therefore the Operating Entities' long-term growth prospects, may be materially adversely affected. We also are unable to predict whether any of the countries in which the Operating Entities' products are currently manufactured or may be manufactured in the future will be subject to new, different, or additional trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or foreign governments or the likelihood, type or effect of any such restrictions. Any event causing a disruption or delay of exports from products, including the imposition of additional export restrictions, restrictions on the transfer of funds or increased tariffs or quotas, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of merchandise available to Customers and materially adversely affect the Operating Entities' financial performance as well as their reputation and brand.
Costs4 | 5.6%
Costs - Risk 1
The Operating Entities' insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all the risks which their operations are exposed to and therefore the Operating Entities are susceptible to significant liabilities.
The Operating Entities have purchased property insurance covering their warehouse in Japan and to insure the authenticity and quality of products and maintain a few other insurances to manage unexpected risks during their operations. See "Item 4. Information on the Company -B. Business Overview - Insurance." However, we cannot assure you that the Operating Entities' insurance coverage is sufficient to prevent the Operating Entities from any losses or that the Operating Entities will be able to successfully claim for losses under the Operating Entities' current insurance policies on a timely basis, or at all. In addition, the Operating Entities do not maintain business interruption insurance, product liability insurance, general third-party liability insurance or key man insurance. Any uninsured risks may result in substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could adversely affect the Operating Entities' results of operations and financial condition.
Costs - Risk 2
The PRC subsidiaries have not made adequate social insurance and housing provident fund contributions for all employees, as required by PRC regulations, which may subject them to penalties.
According to the PRC Social Insurance Law and the Administrative Regulations on the Housing Funds, companies operating in China are required to participate in pension insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance (collectively known as "social insurance"), and housing funds plans, and the employers must pay all or a portion of the social insurance premiums and housing funds for their employees. For more details, see "Item 4. Information on the Company -B. Business Overview - Regulations - Regulations Related to Labor and Social Welfare - Social Insurance and Housing Provident Funds." The requirements to make contributions with respect to the social insurance and housing provident funds have not been implemented consistently by the local governments in China, given the different levels of economic development in different locations. The PRC subsidiaries have been making social insurance payments for employee benefits of at least the minimum wage level for all eligible employees; however, the applicable PRC laws and regulations regarding employee benefits stipulate that employers shall be responsible for making payments based on the actual wages paid to employees. With respect to the underpaid employee benefits, the PRC subsidiaries may be required to make up the social insurance contributions as well as to pay late fees at the rate of 0.05% per day of the outstanding amount from the due date. If they fail to make up for any shortfall within the prescribed time limit, the relevant administrative authorities will impose a fine of one to three times the outstanding amount upon the PRC subsidiaries. With respect to housing fund plans, the PRC subsidiaries may be required to pay and deposit housing provident funds in full and on time within the prescribed time limit. If the PRC subsidiaries fail to do so, the relevant authorities could file applications to competent courts for compulsory enforcement of payment and deposit. As of the date of this annual report, the PRC subsidiaries have not received any notices from local authorities or any requests from the employees in this regard. However, if the relevant PRC authorities determine that the PRC subsidiaries in China shall be required to make supplemental social insurance and housing fund contributions or that the PRC subsidiaries in China are subject to fines and legal sanctions in relation to their failure to make social insurance and housing fund contributions in full for their employees, their business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Costs - Risk 3
The Operating Entities' business may be affected by increases in rental expenses or the termination of leases of their warehouse and offices.
The Operating Entities' lease properties to operate all of warehouse and offices. The Operating Entities may also not be able to successfully extend or renew such leases prior to expiration, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and may be forced to relocate the affected operations. Such relocation may disrupt the Operating Entities' operations and result in significant relocation expenses, which could adversely affect the Operating Entities' business, financial condition and results of operations. The Operating Entities may not be able to locate desirable alternative sites for their facilities as their business continues to grow and failure in relocating their operations when required could adversely affect their business and operations. In addition, the Operating Entities compete with other businesses for premises at certain locations or of desirable sizes. Even if the Operating Entities are able to extend or renew the respective leases, rental payments may significantly increase as a result of the high demand for the leased properties.
Costs - Risk 4
Changed
We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur substantial increased costs as a result of being a public company.
We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses as a public company that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq, impose various requirements on the corporate governance practices of public companies. Compliance with these rules and regulations increases our legal and financial compliance costs and makes some corporate activities more time-consuming and costlier. We have incurred additional costs in obtaining director and officer liability insurance. In addition, we incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. It may also be more difficult for us to find qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the JOBS Act and will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior year end, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 in the assessment of the emerging growth company's internal control over financial reporting and permission to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. After we are no longer an "emerging growth company," or until five years following the completion of our initial public offering, whichever is earlier, we expect to incur significant additional expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC. For example, as a public company, we have been required to increase the number of independent directors and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we cannot predict or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 8/71 (11%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment3 | 4.2%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
Changed
Any actions by the Chinese government, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of the PRC subsidiaries or to exert control over any offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of the PRC subsidiaries, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.
The Chinese government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. The ability of our subsidiaries to operate in China may be impaired by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to taxation, environmental regulations, land use rights, foreign investment limitations, and other matters. The central or local governments of China may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts for the PRC subsidiaries to ensure their compliance with such regulations or interpretations. As such, the PRC subsidiaries may be subject to various government and regulatory interference in the provinces in which they operate in China. They could be subject to regulation by various political and regulatory entities, including various local and municipal agencies and government sub-divisions. They may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply. Furthermore, it is uncertain when and whether we will be required to obtain permission from the PRC government to list on U.S. exchanges in the future, and even when such permission is obtained, whether it will be later denied or rescinded. Although we believe the Company and the PRC subsidiaries are currently not required to obtain permission from any Chinese authorities and have not received any notice of denial of permission to list on the U.S. exchange as of the date of this annual report, our operations could be adversely affected, directly or indirectly, by existing or future laws and regulations relating to our business or industry, particularly in the event permission to list on U.S. exchanges may be later required, or withheld or rescinded once given. Accordingly, government actions in the future, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of the PRC subsidiaries at any time or to exert control over an offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of the PRC subsidiaries, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and/or may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
Changes in China's economic, political, or social conditions or government policies could have a material adverse effect on the PRC subsidiaries' business and operations.
The PRC subsidiaries' assets and operations are currently located in China. Accordingly, their business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by political, economic, and social conditions in China generally. The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the level of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange, and allocation of resources. Although the Chinese government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, including the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in China is still owned by the government. In addition, the Chinese government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The Chinese government also exercises significant control over China's economic growth by allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy, and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. While the Chinese economy has experienced significant growth over the past decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in China, in the policies of the Chinese government, or in the laws and regulations in China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China. Such developments could adversely affect the PRC subsidiaries' business and operating results, reduce demand for their products, and weaken their competitive position. The Chinese government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall Chinese economy, but may have a negative effect on the PRC subsidiaries. For example, the PRC subsidiaries' financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations. In addition, in the past the Chinese government has implemented certain measures, including interest rate adjustments, to control the pace of economic growth. These measures may cause decreased economic activities in China, which may adversely affect the PRC subsidiaries' business and operating results. Furthermore, the Company, the PRC subsidiaries, and our investors may face uncertainty about future actions by the government of China that could significantly affect the PRC subsidiaries' financial performance and operations. As of the date of this annual report, neither the Company nor the PRC subsidiaries have received or were denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges. However, there is no guarantee that the Company or the PRC subsidiaries will receive or not be denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges in the future.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3
There are some political risks associated with conducting business in Hong Kong.
We have two Operating Entities based in Hong Kong. Accordingly, these two Operating Entities' business operations and financial conditions will be affected by the political and legal developments in Hong Kong. During the period covered by the financial information incorporated by reference into and included in this annual report, we derive a portion of our revenue from operations in Hong Kong and, specifically, from Linkage Electronic and HQT NETWORK. Any adverse economic, social and/or political conditions, material social unrest, strike, riot, civil disturbance or disobedience, as well as significant natural disasters, may affect the market and may adversely affect the business operations of Linkage Electronic and HQT NETWORK. Hong Kong is a special administrative region of the PRC and the basic policies of the PRC regarding Hong Kong are reflected in the Basic Law, namely, Hong Kong's constitutional document, which provides Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy and executive, legislative and independent judicial powers, including that of final adjudication under the principle of "one country, two systems." However, there is no assurance that there will not be any changes in the economic, political and legal environment in Hong Kong in the future. Since Linkage Electronic's and HQT NETWORK's operations are based in Hong Kong, any change of such political arrangements may pose an immediate threat to the stability of the economy in Hong Kong, thereby directly and adversely affecting their results of operations and financial positions. The Hong Kong protests that began in 2019 were triggered by the introduction of the Fugitive Offenders amendment bill by the Hong Kong government. If enacted, the bill would have allowed the extradition of criminal fugitives who are wanted in territories with which Hong Kong does not currently have extradition agreements, including mainland China. This led to concerns that the bill would subject Hong Kong residents and visitors to the jurisdiction and legal system of mainland China, thereby undermining the region's autonomy and people's civil liberties. Under the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, Hong Kong is exclusively in charge of its internal affairs and external relations, while the government of the PRC is responsible for its foreign affairs and defense. As a separate customs territory, Hong Kong maintains and develops relations with foreign states and regions. Based on certain recent developments, including the Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region issued by the Standing Committee of the PRC National People's Congress in June 2020, the U.S. State Department has indicated that the United States no longer considers Hong Kong to have significant autonomy from China, and President Trump signed an executive order and the Hong Kong Autonomy Act, or HKAA, to remove Hong Kong's preferential trade status and to authorize the U.S. administration to impose blocking sanctions against individuals and entities who are determined to have materially contributed to the erosion of Hong Kong's autonomy. The United States may impose the same tariffs and other trade restrictions on exports from Hong Kong that it places on goods from mainland China. These and other recent actions may represent an escalation in political and trade tensions involving the U.S, China and Hong Kong, which could potentially harm our business. The Hong Kong subsidiaries' revenue is susceptible to the ongoing incidents or factors which affect the stability of the social, economic and political conditions in Hong Kong. Any drastic events may adversely affect the Hong Kong subsidiaries' business operations. Such adverse events may include changes in economic conditions and regulatory environment, social and/or political conditions, civil disturbance or disobedience, as well as significant natural disasters. Given the relatively small geographical size of Hong Kong, any of such incidents may have a widespread effect on the Hong Kong subsidiaries' business operations, which could in turn adversely and materially affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. It is difficult to predict the full impact of the HKAA on Hong Kong and companies with operations in Hong Kong such as the Hong Kong subsidiaries. Furthermore, legislative or administrative actions in respect of China-U.S. relations could cause investor uncertainty for affected issuers, including us, and the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares could be adversely affected.
International Operations2 | 2.8%
International Operations - Risk 1
We may be unsuccessful in expanding and operating our business internationally, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We plan to selectively launch our integrated e-commerce related services in other countries in Southeast Asia during the next two years, starting from markets such as Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The entry and operation of our business in these markets could cause us to be subject to unexpected, uncontrollable, and rapidly changing events and circumstances outside Japan and China. As we grow our international operations in the future, we may need to recruit and hire new product development, sales, marketing, and support personnel in the countries in which we will launch our services or otherwise have a significant presence. Entry into new international markets typically requires the establishment of new marketing channels. Our ability to continue to expand into international markets involves various risks, including the possibility that our expectations regarding the level of returns we will achieve on such expansion will not be achieved in the near future, or ever, and that competing in markets with which we are unfamiliar may be more difficult than anticipated. If we are less successful than we expect in a new market, we may not be able to realize an adequate return on our initial investment and our operating results could suffer. Our international operations may also fail due to other risks inherent in foreign operations, including: - varied, unfamiliar, unclear, and changing legal and regulatory restrictions, including different legal and regulatory standards applicable to cross-border e-commerce market;- compliance with multiple and potentially conflicting regulations in other countries in Southeast Asia;- difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;- longer collection cycles;- different intellectual property laws that may not provide consistent and/or sufficient protections for our intellectual property;- proper compliance with local tax laws, which can be complex and may result in unintended adverse tax consequences;- difficulties in enforcing agreements through foreign legal systems;- fluctuations in currency exchange rates that may affect service demand and may adversely affect the profitability in U.S. dollars, RMB, or JPY of services provided by us in foreign markets where payment for our services is made in the local currency;- changes in general economic, health, and political conditions in countries where our services are provided;- disruptions caused by acts of war;- potential labor strike, lockouts, work slowdowns, and work stoppages; and - different consumer preferences and requirements in specific international markets. Our current and any future international expansion plans will require management attention and resources and may be unsuccessful. We may find it impossible or prohibitively expensive to continue expanding internationally or we may be unsuccessful in our attempt to do so, and our results of operations could be adversely impacted.
International Operations - Risk 2
The Operating Entities' international operations are subject to a variety of legal, regulatory, political and economic risks.
We conduct a substantial majority of our operations through the Operating Entities established in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Japan and we operate one warehouse in Japan. We also plan to venture into the Southeast Asian market. See "Item 4. Information on the Company -B. Business Overview - Growth Strategies - Grow and Diversify Customer and Merchant Bases, and Seek More Authorized Agency Qualifications of Other Media." In certain international market segments, the Operating Entities have relatively little operating experience and may not benefit from any first-to-market advantages. It is costly to establish, develop, and maintain international operations, and promote our brand internationally. The Operating Entities' international operations may not become profitable on a sustained basis. In addition, the Operating Entities' international sales and operations are subject to a number of risks, mainly including (i) local economic, inflation and political conditions; (ii) government regulation (such as regulation of our product and service offerings and of competition); restrictive governmental actions (such as trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas and custom duties and tariffs); nationalization; and restrictions on foreign ownership; (iii) restrictions on sales or distribution of certain products or services and uncertainty regarding liability for products, services, and content, including uncertainty as a result of less Internet-friendly legal systems, local laws, lack of legal precedents, and varying rules, regulations, and practices regarding the physical and digital distribution of media products and enforcement of intellectual property rights; (iv) business licensing or certification requirements; (v) limitations on the repatriation and investment of funds and foreign currency exchange restrictions; (vi) limited fulfillment and technology infrastructure; (vii) shorter payable and longer inventory and receivable cycles and the resultant negative impact on cash flow; (viii) laws and regulations regarding consumer and data protection, privacy, network security, encryption, payments, advertising, and restrictions on pricing or discounts; (ix) lower levels of use of the Internet; (x) lower levels of consumer spending and fewer opportunities for growth compared to the China, Japan or other Asian nations; (xi) different employee/employer relationships and the existence of works councils and labor unions; (xii) laws and policies of the U.S. and other jurisdictions affecting trade, foreign investment, loans, and taxes; and (xiii) geopolitical events, including pandemics, war and terrorism. As international physical, e-commerce, and omni-channel retail and other services grow, competition will intensify, including through adoption of evolving business models. Local companies may have a substantial competitive advantage because of their greater understanding of, and focus on local customers, as well as their more established local brand names. The inability to hire, train, retain, and manage sufficient required personnel may limit the Operating Entities' international growth.
Capital Markets3 | 4.2%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and the value of your investment.
The value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions in China and by China's foreign exchange policies. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the RMB to the U.S. dollar, and the RMB appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the RMB has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar in the future. Some of our business is conducted in the PRC through Chuancheng Digital and Chuancheng Internet, and their books and records are maintained in RMB. The financial statements that we file with the SEC and provide to our shareholders are presented in U.S. dollars. Changes in the exchange rates between the RMB and U.S. dollar affect the value of their assets and results of operations, when presented in U.S. dollars. The value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in the PRC's political and economic conditions and perceived changes in the economy of the PRC and the United States. Any significant revaluation of the RMB may materially and adversely affect our cash flows, revenue, and financial condition. Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. As of the date of this annual report, we have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert RMB into foreign currency. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on your investment.
Capital Markets - Risk 2
Governmental control of currency conversion may affect the value of your investment and our payment of dividends.
The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive a small portion of our revenues in RMB. Under our current corporate structure, Linkage Cayman may rely on dividend payments from the PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, such as profit distributions and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. Therefore, the PRC subsidiaries are able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to us without prior approval from SAFE, subject to the condition that the remittance of such dividends outside of the PRC complies with certain procedures under PRC foreign exchange regulation, such as the overseas investment registrations by our shareholders or the ultimate shareholders of our corporate shareholders who are PRC residents. Approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is, however, required where the RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demand, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders.
Capital Markets - Risk 3
Fluctuation of the value of the Japanese yen against certain foreign currencies may have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations.
Some of our foreign operations' functional currencies are not the JPY, and the financial statements of such foreign operations prepared initially using their functional currencies are translated into JPY. Since the currency in which sales are recorded may not be the same as the currency in which expenses are incurred, foreign exchange rate fluctuations may materially affect our results of operations. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022, 60.14%, 31.29% and 25.03%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from markets outside of Japan. We expect that an increasing portion of our revenue and expenses in the future will be denominated in currencies other than the Japanese yen. Accordingly, our consolidated financial results and assets and liabilities may be materially affected by changes in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in which we conduct our business.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 7/71 (10%)Below Sector Average
Innovation / R&D1 | 1.4%
Innovation / R&D - Risk 1
The Operating Entities' efforts to launch new products or services may not be successful.
The Operating Entities' business success depends to some extent on their ability to launch new products and services and expand existing offerings into new geographies. For example, the Operating Entities expanded into Japan for our warehouse services in 2020, and launched Linkage ERP System in 2022. Launching new products and services or expanding internationally requires significant upfront investments, including investments in marketing, information technology, and additional personnel. Expanding the Operating Entities' service offerings internationally is particularly challenging because it requires the Operating Entities to gain country-specific knowledge about consumers, regional competitors and local laws, and customize portions of our technology for local markets. The Operating Entities may not be able to generate satisfactory revenues from these efforts to offset these costs. Any lack of market acceptance of the Operating Entities' efforts to launch new services or to expand their existing offerings could have a material adverse effect on the Operating Entities' business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, as the Operating Entities continue to expand their fulfillment capability or add new businesses with different requirements, the Operating Entities' warehouse networks become increasingly complex and operating them becomes more challenging. There can be no assurance that the Operating Entities will be able to operate their networks effectively. The Operating Entities have also entered and may continue to enter into new markets in which the Operating Entities have limited or no experience, which may not be successful or appealing to Customers. These activities may present new and difficult technological and logistical challenges, and resulting service disruptions, failures or other quality issues may cause Customers' dissatisfaction and harm the Operating Entities' reputation and brand. Further, the Operating Entities' current and potential competitors in new market segments may have greater brand recognition, financial resources, longer operating histories and larger customer bases than the Operating Entities do in these areas. As a result, the Operating Entities may not be successful enough in these newer areas to recoup our investments in them. If this occurs, the Operating Entities' business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Trade Secrets2 | 2.8%
Trade Secrets - Risk 1
If the Operating Entities cannot successfully protect their intellectual property and exclusive rights, the Operating Entities' brand and business would suffer.
The Operating Entities rely on a combination of trademark, copyright, domain name and trade secret protection laws in China and other jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect their intellectual property rights and other exclusive rights. The Operating Entities also enter into agreements containing confidentiality obligations with their employees and any third parties who may access the Operating Entities' proprietary technology and information, and the Operating Entities rigorously control access to their proprietary technology and information. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee that we can successfully protect the Operating Entities' intellectual property and exclusive rights from unauthorized usage by third parties or breach of confidentiality obligations by our counterparties. For example, there could be other online stores imitating or copying the Operating Entities' self-designed products without their prior consent, which may harm the Operating Entities' reputation and operations. Furthermore, a third-party may take advantage of the "first-to-file" trademark registration system in China to register the Operating Entities' brands in bad faith, which will cause the Operating Entities to incur additional costs for legal actions. Moreover, confidentiality obligations may be breached by counterparties, and there may not be adequate remedies available to the Operating Entities for any such breach. Accordingly, the Operating Entities may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights and exclusive rights or to enforce our contractual rights in China or elsewhere. In addition, policing any unauthorized use of the Operating Entities' intellectual property and exclusive rights is difficult, time-consuming and costly. The precaution steps the Operating Entities have taken for protecting their rights may be inadequate. In the event that the Operating Entities resort to litigation to enforce their intellectual property rights and exclusive rights, such litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our managerial and financial resources. We can provide no assurance that the Operating Entities will prevail in such litigation or that the Operating Entities would be able to halt any unauthorized use of their intellectual property and exclusive rights. In addition, the Operating Entities' trade secrets may be leaked to, or be independently discovered by, their competitors. Any failure in protecting or enforcing the Operating Entities' intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on the Operating Entities' business, financial condition and results of operations.
Trade Secrets - Risk 2
The Operating Entities may be accused of infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of third parties.
We cannot assure you that the Operating Entities' product design, offerings, or technologies do not or will not infringe upon copyrights or other intellectual property rights (including, but not limited to, trademarks, patents and know-how) held by third parties. For example, the design of third-party products and the Operating Entities' products may be similar and result in intellectual property disputes. Nor can we assure you that the Operating Entities' use of software or any other intellectual properties in business and operation will not be alleged by any third party as infringement resulting from lack of licenses. If any third-party infringement claims are brought against the Operating Entities, they may be forced to divert management's time and other resources from their business and operations to defend against these claims. The Operating Entities may also be prohibited from using such intellectual property or relevant content. As a result, the Operating Entities may incur licensing or usage fees, develop alternatives of our own, or even need to pay damages, legal fees and other costs. Even if such assertions against the Operating Entities are unsuccessful, they may cause the Operating Entities to lose existing and future business and incur reputational harm and substantial legal fees. As a result, the Operating Entities' reputation may be harmed and their business and financial performance may be materially and adversely affected.
Cyber Security2 | 2.8%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect the Operating Entities business by causing a disruption to their operations, a compromise or corruption of their confidential information, misappropriation of assets and/or damage to their business relationships, all of which could negatively impact their business and results of operations.
Cyber incidents may result in disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs and litigation and damage to the Customers and the Merchants. As the Operating Entities' reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to their information systems, both internal and those the Operating Entities have outsourced. Any processes, procedures and internal controls that the Operating Entities implement, as well as their increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber-incident, do not guarantee that the Operating Entities' financial results, operations, business relationships, confidential information or price of the common stock will not be negatively impacted by such an incident. Insider or employee cyber and security threats are increasingly a concern for all companies, including the Operating Entities. In addition, social engineering and phishing are a particular concern for companies with employees. The Operating Entities are continuously working to deploy information technology systems and to provide employee awareness training around phishing, malware and other cyber risks to ensure that the Operating Entities are protected against cyber risks and security breaches. Such technology and training, however, may not be sufficient to protect the Operating Entities and the Customers and the Merchants from all risks. Currently, the Customers and the Merchants use third-party vendors to assist them with their network and information technology requirements. While the Customers and the Merchants carefully select these third-party vendors, we cannot control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including those resulting from breakdowns or other disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher volumes, cyber-attacks and security breaches at a vendor could adversely affect the Operating Entities business and results of operations. Our board of directors have adopted certain measures to address any cybersecurity threats and mitigate any cybersecurity risks, including, among other things, setting up internal cybersecurity risks control protocols, monitoring industry-wide cybersecurity incidents, monitoring our networks and systems in real time to detect and mitigate potential security threats and vulnerabilities, evaluating the qualifications of third-party business partners and any cybersecurity risks we bear that may result directly or indirectly from such third-party partners, holding regular internal training sessions to increase cybersecurity awareness, and periodically evaluating and enhancing the network security strategy to adapt to the evolving technological landscape. See "Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees - A. Directors and Senior Management - Board Oversight of Cybersecurity Risks." Notwithstanding the foregoing, we cannot assure you that these measures will be effective in addressing any cybersecurity threats or mitigating any cybersecurity risks we face. In the event that the Operating Entities are unable to adequately address the cybersecurity risks, their operations might suffer, and our results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.
Cyber Security - Risk 2
Changed
Recent greater oversight by the CAC over data security, particularly for companies seeking to list on a foreign exchange, could adversely impact the PRC subsidiaries' business.
On December 28, 2021, 13 governmental departments of the PRC, including the CAC, jointly promulgated the Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022. The Cybersecurity Review Measures provide that, in addition to CIIO that intend to purchase Internet products and services, net platform operators engaging in data processing activities that affect or may affect national security must be subject to cybersecurity review by the Cybersecurity Review Office of the PRC. According to the Cybersecurity Review Measures, a cybersecurity review assesses potential national security risks that may be brought about by any procurement, data processing, or overseas listing. The Cybersecurity Review Measures require that an online platform operator which possesses the personal information of at least one million users must apply for a cybersecurity review by the CAC if it intends to be listed in foreign countries. On November 14, 2021, the CAC published the Regulations for the Security Administration Draft. The Security Administration Draft provides that data processors shall apply for a cybersecurity review under certain circumstances, such as mergers, restructurings, and divisions of Internet platform operators that hold large amount of data relating to national security, economic development, or public interest which affects or may affect the national security, overseas listings of data processors that process personal data for more than one million individuals, Hong Kong listings of data processors that affect or may affect national security, and other data processing activities that affect or may affect the national security. The deadline for public comments on the Security Administration Draft was December 13, 2021. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received any notice from any authorities identifying the PRC subsidiaries as CIIOs or requiring us to go through cybersecurity review or network data security review by the CAC. In the course of the PRC subsidiaries' operations, the data collected is mainly the mailing addresses used by the Customers. Such data will be transmitted to the Linkage System in the PRC for use in subsequent shipments. Consequently, our PRC counsel, AllBright has advised that such practice may be interpreted as meaning that the PRC subsidiaries use the Internet to carry out data processing activities in the PRC, and thus, the PRC subsidiaries may be subject to cybersecurity review, and during the pendency of such review, in order to prevent certain risks, including the risks that activities may endanger critical information infrastructure security and national data security and disclosure of personal information, the PRC subsidiaries may be required to take technical measures and other necessary measures, such as ceasing transmission and deletion of data or information, and suspension of new user registration to prevent and mitigate risks in accordance with the requirements of the cybersecurity review. As of the date of this annual report, we and the PRC subsidiaries have not been involved in any investigations on cybersecurity review initiated by CAC, and we and the PRC subsidiaries have not received any warning, sanction or penalty in such respect. However, the Cybersecurity Review Measures (2021 version) were recently adopted and the Measures on Network Data Security Management (draft for public comments) are in the process of being formulated and the Opinions remain unclear on how it will be interpreted, amended and implemented by the relevant PRC governmental authorities. There remains uncertainty, however, as to how the Cybersecurity Review Measures and the Security Administration Draft will be interpreted or implemented and whether the PRC regulatory agencies, including the CAC, may adopt new laws, regulations, rules, or detailed implementation and interpretation related to the Cybersecurity Review Measures and the Security Administration Draft. If any such new laws, regulations, rules, or implementation and interpretation come into effect, we expect to take all reasonable measures and actions to comply and to minimize the adverse effect of such laws on us. We cannot assure you that PRC regulatory agencies, including the CAC, would take the same view as we do, and there is no guaranty that we can fully or timely comply with such laws should they be deemed to be applicable to the PRC subsidiaries' operations. There is no certainty as to how such review or prescribed actions would impact the PRC subsidiaries' operations and we cannot guarantee that any clearance can be obtained, or maintained, if approved, or any actions that may be required can be taken in a timely manner, or at all. In addition, on July 7, 2022, the CAC issued the Measures for the Security Assessment of Cross-border Transfer of Data, which stipulates that data processors who provide overseas the important data collected and generated during operations within the PRC and personal information that shall be subject to security assessment shall conduct a security assessment. Furthermore, if the data processor provides data overseas and meets one of the following circumstances, it shall require the security assessment: (i) where a data processor provides critical data abroad; (ii) where a key information infrastructure operator or a data processor processing the personal information of more than one million people provides personal information abroad; (iii) where a data processor has provided personal information of 100,000 people or sensitive personal information of 10,000 people in total abroad since January 1 of the previous year; and (iv) other circumstances prescribed by the CAC for which requirement for security assessment for outbound data transfers is required. Prior to declaring security assessment for cross-border transfer of data, the data processor shall conduct self-assessment on the risks of the outbound data transfer. For outbound data transfers that have been carried out before the effectiveness of the Outbound Data Transfer Security Assessment Measures, if it is not in compliance with these measures, rectification shall be completed within six months starting from September 1, 2022. As of the date of this annual report, the PRC subsidiaries have not carried out the activities of providing personal information outside the territory of the PRC. According to our PRC legal counsel, AllBright, we and the PRC subsidiaries are compliant with the PIPL. As of the date of this annual report, the PRC subsidiaries have not provided critical data and personal information outside the territory of the PRC. The data collected in the course of the PRC subsidiaries' operations is mainly the mailing addresses used by the Customers. Such data is stored within the territory of the PRC. Based on the foregoing analysis, our PRC legal counsel is of the view that we and the PRC subsidiaries are in compliance with the existing PRC laws and regulations on cybersecurity, data security and personal data protection in all material aspects, and we believe that we are in compliance with the regulations and policies that have been issued by the CAC as of the date of this annual report. Since the Measures for the Security Assessment of Cross-border Transfer of Data is new, there remain substantial uncertainties about its interpretation and implementation, and it is unclear whether the PRC subsidiaries shall declare a security assessment. If it is determined in the future that the PRC subsidiaries are required such security assessment, it is uncertain whether the PRC subsidiaries can or how long it will take them to complete such security assessment or rectification.
Technology2 | 2.8%
Technology - Risk 1
Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in the Operating Entities' services, software or technology could adversely affect their business, financial condition and results of operations.
Undetected real or perceived errors, failures, bugs or defects may be present or occur in the future in the Operating Entities' solutions, software or technology or the technology or software the Operating Entities license from third parties, including open-source software. Despite testing by the Operating Entities, real or perceived errors, failures, bugs or defects may not be found until Customers use the Operating Entities' services. Real or perceived errors, failures, bugs or defects in the Operating Entities' solutions could result in negative publicity, loss of or delay in market acceptance of the Operating Entities' services and harm to the Operating Entities' brand, weakening of their competitive position, claims by Customers for losses sustained by them or failure to meet the stated service level commitments in Customer agreements. In such an event, the Operating Entities may be required, or may choose, for customer relations or other reasons, to expend significant additional resources in order to help solve the problem. Any real or perceived errors, failures, bugs or defects in the Operating Entities' services could also impair their ability to attract new Customers, retain existing Customers or expand their use of the Operating Entities' services, which could adversely affect the Operating Entities' business, financial condition and results of operations.
Technology - Risk 2
System interruptions that impair access to the Operating Entities' software, or other performance failures in their technology infrastructure, could damage their reputation and results of operations.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of the Operating Entities' marketplace, software (Linkage ERP System and Honeybee product shelving software), and other technology infrastructures are critical to its reputation and ability to acquire and retain Customers, as well as maintain adequate Customer service levels. For example, if the Linkage ERP System fails or suffers an interruption or degradation of services, the Operating Entities could lose customer data, which could harm their business. The Operating Entities' systems and operations, including their ability to fulfill Customer orders through their logistics network, are also vulnerable to damage, breakdown, breach or interruption from inclement weather, fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist attacks, labor disputes, employee error or malfeasance, theft or misuse, cyber-attacks, denial-of-service attacks, computer viruses, ransomware or other malware, data loss, acts of war, break-ins, earthquake and similar events. In the event of a software failure, the failure to maintain back-up resources could take substantial time, during which time the Operating Entities' sites could be completely shut down. Further, the Operating Entities' back-up services may not effectively process spikes in demand, may process customers' requirement more slowly and may not support all of their sites' functionality. The Operating Entities may experience periodic system interruptions from time to time. In addition, to remain competitive, the Operating Entities are required to continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of their marketplace, which is particularly challenging, given the rapid rate at which new technologies, customer preferences and expectations and industry standards and practices are evolving in the e-commerce industry. Accordingly, the Operating Entities redesign and enhance various functions in their marketplace on a regular basis, and they may experience instability and performance issues as a result of these changes. Any slowdown, interruption or performance failure of the Operating Entities' marketplace and the underlying technology could harm their business, reputation and their ability to acquire, retain and serve Customers, which could materially adversely affect the Operating Entities' results of operations.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 3/71 (4%)Below Sector Average
Competition1 | 1.4%
Competition - Risk 1
The Operating Entities operate in a highly-competitive market and their failure to compete effectively could adversely affect their results of operations.
The cross-border e-commerce service provider industry in Japan and China is highly-competitive and rapidly evolving, with many new companies joining the competition in recent years and few leading companies. The Operating Entities primarily compete against offline and online supply chain provider, retailers, and wholesalers, but also increasingly face competition from advertising providers, software support service providers, and other cross-border e-commerce service provider. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Competition." The Operating Entities' current or future competitors may have longer operating histories, greater brand recognition, better supplier relationships, larger customer bases, more cost-effective fulfillment capabilities, or greater financial, technical, or marketing resources than they do. Competitors may leverage their brand recognition, experience, and resources to compete with us in a variety of ways, including investing more heavily in research and development and making acquisitions for the expansion of their products. Some of the Operating Entities' competitors may be able to secure more favorable terms from suppliers, devote greater resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing or inventory policies, and devote substantially more resources to their website and platform development than the Operating Entities. In addition, new and enhanced technologies may increase the competition in the cross-border e-commerce service provider market. Increased competition may reduce the Operating Entities' profitability, market share, customer base, and brand recognition. There can be no assurance that the Operating Entities will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, and such competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on their business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Brand / Reputation2 | 2.8%
Brand / Reputation - Risk 1
Damage to the Operating Entities' brand image could have a material adverse effect on their growth strategy and their business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Maintaining and enhancing the Operating Entities' brand is critical to expanding the Operating Entities' base of Customers and Merchants, including attracting more Customers and Merchants to use the Operating Entities' services. The ability to maintain and enhance the Operating Entities' brand depends largely on the Operating Entities' ability to maintain Customer and Merchant confidence in product and service offerings, including by offering good quality products for Customers to sell on third-party e-commerce platforms and providing high qualified comprehensive cross-border e-commerce services to them, or delivering satisfactory digital marketing service for the Merchants. If third-party e-commerce platforms, Customers, or Merchants do not have a satisfactory experience with the Operating Entities' products or services, such third-party e-commerce platforms, Customers or Merchants may seek out alternatives from the Operating Entities' competitors and may not return to the Operating Entities in the future, or at all. In addition, unfavorable publicity regarding, for example, the Operating Entities' practices relating to privacy and data protection, product quality, delivery problems, competitive pressures, litigation or regulatory activity, could seriously harm the Operating Entities' reputation. Such negative publicity also could have an adverse effect on the size, engagement, and loyalty of Customer and Merchant bases and result in decreased total revenues, which could adversely affect the Operating Entities' business, financial condition and results of operations. A significant portion of Customers' brand experience also depends on third parties outside of the Operating Entities' control, including third-party e-commerce platforms, carrier and freight service providers and other third-party delivery agents. If these third parties do not meet the Operating Entities' or Customers' expectations, the Operating Entities' brands may suffer irreparable damage. Customers and/or Merchants complaints or negative publicity about the Operating Entities' marketplace, products, services, delivery times, company practices, employees, customer data handling and security practices or customer support, especially on social media websites and in the Operating Entities' marketplace, could rapidly and severely diminish Customers, Merchants, and third-party e-commerce platforms confidence in the Operating Entities and result in harm to their brands.
Brand / Reputation - Risk 2
If we become directly subject to the scrutiny, criticism, and negative publicity involving U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we may have to expend significant resources to investigate and resolve the matter, which could harm our business operations, share price, and reputation.
U.S. public companies that have substantially most of their operations in China have been the subject of intense scrutiny, criticism, and negative publicity by investors, financial commentators, and regulatory agencies, such as the SEC. Much of the scrutiny, criticism, and negative publicity has centered on financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, a lack of effective internal controls over financial accounting, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result of the scrutiny, criticism, and negative publicity, the publicly traded stock of many U.S. listed Chinese companies sharply decreased in value and, in some cases, have become virtually worthless. Many of these companies are now subject to shareholder lawsuits and SEC enforcement actions and are conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations. It is not clear what effect this sector-wide scrutiny, criticism, and negative publicity will have on us, our business, and the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. If we become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or untrue, we will have to expend significant resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend our Company. This situation will be costly and time-consuming and could distract our management from developing our business. If such allegations are not proven to be groundless, we and our business operations will be severely affected and you could sustain a significant decline in the value of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
      They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
        It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
          How do companies disclose their risk factors?
          Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
            Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
              Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
                According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
                  How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
                  Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
                    You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
                      Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
                        A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
                          What are all the risk factor categories?
                          TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
                          1. Financial & Corporate
                          • Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
                          • Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
                          • Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
                          • Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
                          2. Legal & Regulatory
                          • Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
                          • Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
                          • Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
                          • Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
                          3. Production
                          • Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
                          • Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
                          • Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
                          • Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
                          4. Technology & Innovation
                          • Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
                          • Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
                          • Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
                          • Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
                          5. Ability to Sell
                          • Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
                          • Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
                          • Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
                          • Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
                          6. Macro & Political
                          • Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
                          • Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
                          • International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
                          • Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.
                          What am I Missing?
                          Make informed decisions based on Top Analysts' activity
                          Know what industry insiders are buying
                          Get actionable alerts from top Wall Street Analysts
                          Find out before anyone else which stock is going to shoot up
                          Get powerful stock screeners & detailed portfolio analysis