tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
KBR Inc (KBR)
NYSE:KBR

KBR (KBR) AI Stock Analysis

Compare
541 Followers

Top Page

KBR

KBR

(NYSE:KBR)

Select Model
Select Model
Select Model
Neutral 69 (OpenAI - 5.2)
,
Neutral 69 (OpenAI - 5.2)
,
Neutral 69 (OpenAI - 5.2)
,
Neutral 69 (OpenAI - 5.2)
,
Neutral 69 (OpenAI - 5.2)
,
Neutral 69 (OpenAI - 5.2)
,
Neutral 69 (OpenAI - 5.2)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
$40.00
▲(7.76% Upside)
Action:DowngradedDate:02/27/26
The score is driven primarily by solid financial performance (improving profitability and strong free cash flow) and a constructive earnings outlook with clear FY2026 guidance and backlog momentum. These positives are tempered by high leverage and weak technical trend signals (below key moving averages with negative MACD). Valuation is supportive but not a major catalyst.
Positive Factors
Strong free cash flow and conversion
KBR generates robust free cash flow (FCF grew ~10% in 2026 and FCF tracks ~83%–92% of net income). High cash conversion funds shareholder returns, supports the planned spin and strategic M&A, and provides durable capacity to service debt or reinvest without relying on volatile project billing.
Sustained margin expansion and improving profitability
Profitability has meaningfully improved with gross margin expansion and net margin rising (net margin ~5.3% in 2026). Management targets higher-margin STS (20%+) and stable MTS (~10%+), indicating structural mix improvement and sustained earnings quality driven by tech/licensing and services.
Large backlog and deep bid pipeline provide revenue visibility
Work-under-contract covers ~63% of STS and ~82% of MTS 2026 guidance, with high repeat-customer exposure (~80%) and a multi-billion pipeline. This backlog and bid activity deliver durable revenue visibility, supporting steady utilization and margin retention across business cycles.
Negative Factors
Elevated leverage relative to peers
KBR's meaningful leverage amplifies earnings volatility in a cyclical, project-driven industry and constrains financial flexibility. Operating cash flow covers only a modest portion of total debt (~0.26–0.33), so deleveraging will require sustained FCF generation and could limit capital allocation options.
Award timing, protests and program concentration risk
Dependence on large government awards creates binary revenue outcomes: protest delays or losses can produce near-term revenue cliffs and backlog uncertainty. Concentration in mission programs increases downside if key recompetes are delayed or lost, making near-term guidance sensitive to adjudications.
Spin transition costs and ERP execution risk
Large one-time spin and IT transition expenses will consume cash and may push leverage higher in the near term. Concurrent ERP rollouts introduce execution risk; implementation issues could elevate costs or disrupt project delivery, pressuring margins and operational consistency during the structural transition.

KBR (KBR) vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

KBR Business Overview & Revenue Model

Company DescriptionKBR, Inc. provides scientific, technology, and engineering solutions to governments and commercial customers worldwide. The company operates through Government Solutions and Sustainable Technology Solutions segments. The Government Solutions segment offers life-cycle support solutions to defense, intelligence, space, aviation, and other programs and missions for military and other government agencies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Its services cover research and development, advanced prototyping, acquisition support, systems engineering, cyber analytics, space domain awareness, test and evaluation, systems integration and program management, global supply chain management, and operations readiness and support, as well as command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance services. This segment also provides various professional advisory services to deliver high-end systems engineering, systems assurance, and technology to customers across the defense, energy, and critical infrastructure sectors. The Sustainable Technology Solutions segment holds a portfolio of approximately 70 proprietary process technologies for ammonia/syngas/fertilizers, chemical/petrochemicals, clean refining, and circular process/circular economy solutions. This segment also includes advisory and consulting practices that focuses on energy transition and net-zero carbon emission consulting; and provides engineering, design, and professional services, as well as industrial solutions through KBR INSITE, a proprietary, digital, and cloud-based operations and maintenance platform that identifies opportunities for clients to achieve sustainable improvements in production, reliability, environment impact, energy efficiency, and profitability. KBR, Inc. was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
How the Company Makes MoneyKBR makes money mainly by delivering contracted services and project work to government and commercial clients, generating revenue based on the terms of each contract. In its Government Solutions business, revenue is largely driven by U.S. government and allied-government contracts for services such as logistics and base operations support, mission and IT services, engineering and technical support, and program management. These contracts commonly include reimbursable elements (where allowable costs are billed back to the customer) plus fees or margins (e.g., fixed-fee, incentive-fee, or time-and-materials/labor-hour structures), meaning KBR earns profit through negotiated fees, labor margins, and performance-based incentives while passing through certain direct costs. In its Sustainable Technology Solutions business, KBR earns revenue from (1) professional services (advisory/consulting, engineering, and technical services) and (2) project execution (EPC or EPCM-type delivery where KBR manages engineering/procurement/construction activities). Depending on project structure, revenue can be earned via fixed-price arrangements (profit tied to executing below cost and managing risk) or reimbursable/cost-plus arrangements (profit earned through negotiated fees and labor margins). A key component of this segment is KBR’s process-technology portfolio, where it can monetize proprietary technologies by licensing them to customers (often for refining, petrochemicals, ammonia, and related process applications) and by providing associated engineering design, catalysts/consumables, and technical services over the life of a plant; these technology-related fees and follow-on services can provide recurring or repeatable revenue tied to customer production assets. Across both segments, earnings are influenced by contract mix (fixed-price versus reimbursable), volume of labor and project activity, timing of project milestones, performance against cost and schedule, and the ability to win and recompete long-duration government programs and commercial frameworks. Significant partnerships or specific customer arrangements beyond these general contracting relationships are not available here and are therefore null.

KBR Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Any
Any
Revenue by Geography
Revenue by Geography
Breaks down revenue across different regions, revealing where the company is strongest and where it may face risk or growth potential due to local economic conditions or market share shifts.
Chart InsightsKBR's revenue in the United States shows a steady upward trend, reflecting strong domestic operations. Europe, however, faces a downturn, possibly due to economic pressures. Despite flat overall revenue growth, KBR's strategic contract wins and improved EBITDA margins highlight resilience. The Middle East and Australia show potential with consistent growth, while Asia's decline raises concerns. The earnings call underscores challenges like government shutdowns and NASA budget uncertainties, but the robust book-to-bill ratio and increased backlog suggest a positive long-term outlook.
Data provided by:The Fly

KBR Earnings Call Summary

Earnings Call Date:Feb 26, 2026
(Q4-2025)
|
% Change Since: |
Next Earnings Date:May 05, 2026
Earnings Call Sentiment Positive
The call emphasizes disciplined execution and improving quality of earnings despite a challenging external award environment. Key positives include margin expansion (up ~100–190 bps), strong cash conversion (110%), backlog growth (STS +5% YoY, MTS +15% YoY), a robust bids pipeline, strategic M&A (SWAT) and on-track spin preparations. Lowlights include a Q4 revenue decline (-$223M), award timing/protest risks (material awards under protest), market pressure in petrochemical and green projects, and near-term spin transition costs ($140M–$180M). Given the balance of stronger profitability, cash generation, backlog/pipeline momentum and clear 2026 guidance that offsets several the near-term headwinds, the highlights materially outweigh the lowlights and the overall tone is constructive.
Q4-2025 Updates
Positive Updates
Industry-leading Safety Performance
TRIR reached an all-time low of 0.033 and Zero Harm days hit an all-time high of 96%, demonstrating strong safety culture and operational discipline.
Margin Expansion and Profitability Improvement
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $12M in Q4 and by $100M for the full year; adjusted margins rose to 12.6% in Q4 (up 190 basis points) and to 12.4% for FY2025 (up >100 basis points year-over-year).
Strong Cash Generation and Conversion
Operating cash flow was $557M for FY2025, representing 110% conversion to adjusted net income; adjusted operating cash flow guidance for 2026 is $560M–$600M.
Record Capital Returned to Shareholders and Deleveraging
Returned $413M to shareholders in 2025 (highest in a decade) and ended the year with net leverage of 2.2x, supporting disciplined capital allocation into the spin.
STS Backlog, Book-to-Bill and Pipeline Momentum
Sustainable Tech backlog ended at $4.2B (up 5% YoY and >20% excluding Plaquemines); Q4 book-to-bill was 1.6x with trailing 12-month book-to-bill 1.2x; near-term pipeline (ex-LNG) ~ $5B with ~80% repeat customers; work under contract covers ~63% of STS 2026 guidance.
Mission Tech Backlog and Bid Activity
Mission Tech backlog and options were $19.1B (up 15% YoY) with ~40% funded (ex-PFIs); bids awaiting awards totaled $17B (80% new business); expect to bid >$25B in 2026 (up double digits YoY); work under contract covers ~82% of MTS 2026 guidance.
Strategic M&A and Technology Progress
Closed SWAT acquisition (BRIS) which more than doubled that JV's EBITDA contribution; launched INSITE 3.0 venture with Applied and advanced technologies (Mura, Hydro-PRT now producing on-spec product), supporting long-term OpEx/digital growth.
Conservative, Clear 2026 Financial Guide
FY2026 consolidated guidance: revenues $7.9B–$8.36B, adjusted EBITDA $980M–$1.04B, adjusted EPS $3.87–$4.22 (midpoint implies ~4% YoY growth); assumes STS low double-digit growth at 20%+ margins and MTS low single-digit growth at 10%+ margins.
Negative Updates
Revenue Decline in Q4
Q4 revenues were $1.85B, down $223M year-over-year (primarily due to award timing in MTS and reductions in EUCOM contingency scope).
Challenging Market Environment for STS
Sharp decline in petrochemicals CapEx and a pause in many green projects as customers prioritized affordability and energy security, pressuring certain STS end markets in 2025.
Mission Tech Award Delays and Reduced Contingency Activity
MTS faced award timing delays, reduced contingency activity (notably in Europe) and impacts from the U.S. government shutdown; lost the COSMOS recompete (a lower-margin loss) and experienced some recompete/protest activity.
Protests, Pending Awards and Concentration Risk
Several material awards are under protest (e.g., Mission Iraq ~ $1B and a classified K2A program); guidance assumes resolution of protests in H1 2026, creating upside/downside risk depending on outcomes.
Near-term Transition and Spin Costs
Expected spin-related transition costs of $140M–$180M (including one-time IT capital), and leverage may trend modestly higher in H1 2026 before improving—creating near-term cash consumption.
Pressure in Science & Space and Specific Project Uncertainty
Science & Space revenues were pressured (NASA budget headwinds) and certain projects (e.g., Energy Transfer Lake Charles) were paused/cancelled, raising uncertainty about future JV contributions and project timing.
Higher Tax Rate and Interest Expense
Adjusted EPS improvement was partially offset by higher interest expense and a projected FY2026 effective tax rate of 26%–28% (up due to a greater mix of work in the Global South).
ERP/Implementation Execution Risk (managed but present)
ERP (Microsoft Dynamics) rollouts are underway across STS geographies; management highlighted disciplined execution to date, but ERP implementations historically represent execution risk during transformation.
Company Guidance
KBR provided consolidated fiscal‑2026 guidance of $7.90–$8.36 billion in revenues, $980–1,040 million of adjusted EBITDA, $3.87–4.22 adjusted EPS and $560–600 million of adjusted operating cash flow (midpoint implying ~4% y/y growth), with transition/spin costs of $140–180 million included; capital expenditures of $40–50 million; an effective tax rate of 26–28%; an estimated adjusted share count of 127 million; and a 2026 dividend of $0.66 per share ($0.165 quarterly). Management expects revenues/adjusted EPS to be ~46% H1 / 54% H2, Q1 roughly in line with Q4 ’25, and noted first‑half comps include elevated EUCOM contingency of ~$60–70 million per quarter; modeling assumptions include resolution of outstanding protests in H1, all material programs remaining in place, modest improvement in interest rates in H2 and stable FX. They also framed segment expectations: STS assumed to grow low double‑digits at normative margins of 20%+, MTS low single‑digits at 10%+ (work‑under‑contract already covers ~63% of STS’s 2026 guide and ~82% of MTS’s), and the company will introduce adjusted operating and free cash flow metrics that add back spin‑related cash outflows.

KBR Financial Statement Overview

Summary
Overall fundamentals are solid: profitability and margins have improved and free cash flow is a clear strength (FCF growing and closely tracking earnings). The main offsets are elevated leverage (debt-to-equity ~1.9) and a near-term revenue slowdown (2026 revenue -3.4%), which increase risk if project conditions weaken.
Income Statement
72
Positive
Profitability has improved materially versus earlier years, with net income turning solidly positive after prior losses (2020 and 2023). Gross margin has steadily expanded (about 11.0% in 2021 to ~14.8% in 2026), and net margin improved to ~5.3% in 2026 from ~4.8% in 2025. The main offset is top-line momentum: revenue growth was modestly positive in 2025 but turned slightly negative in 2026 (-3.4%), suggesting a near-term growth pause despite better margins.
Balance Sheet
58
Neutral
The company is generating strong returns for shareholders (return on equity in the mid-to-high 20% range in 2025–2026), but that is supported by meaningful leverage. Debt remains elevated relative to equity (debt-to-equity near ~1.9 in 2025–2026), and leverage has increased versus 2022 levels, which can amplify earnings volatility in a cyclical, project-driven industry. Asset levels are stable, but the balance sheet profile is more leveraged than conservative peers.
Cash Flow
81
Very Positive
Cash generation is a clear strength: operating cash flow and free cash flow stepped up in 2025 and again in 2026, with free cash flow growing ~10% in 2026. Free cash flow runs close to reported earnings (roughly 83%–92% of net income in 2025–2026), supporting earnings quality. A key watch item is that operating cash flow covers only a modest portion of total debt (roughly ~0.26–0.33), indicating debt paydown capacity exists but would take time without continued strong cash generation.
BreakdownDec 2025Dec 2024Dec 2023Dec 2022Dec 2021
Income Statement
Total Revenue7.79B7.74B6.96B6.56B7.34B
Gross Profit1.15B1.10B977.00M828.00M806.00M
EBITDA941.00M811.00M90.00M508.00M372.00M
Net Income415.00M375.00M-265.00M190.00M27.00M
Balance Sheet
Total Assets6.58B6.66B5.57B5.57B6.20B
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments500.00M231.00M304.00M282.00M254.00M
Total Debt3.12B2.85B2.06B1.98B2.12B
Total Liabilities5.07B5.20B4.17B3.93B4.52B
Stockholders Equity1.50B1.45B1.38B1.62B1.67B
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow482.00M385.00M251.00M325.00M248.00M
Operating Cash Flow524.00M462.00M331.00M396.00M278.00M
Investing Cash Flow4.00M-786.00M-70.00M40.00M-428.00M
Financing Cash Flow-391.00M384.00M-359.00M-402.00M87.00M

KBR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price37.12
Price Trends
50DMA
41.70
Negative
100DMA
41.73
Negative
200DMA
44.90
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-1.40
Positive
RSI
32.87
Neutral
STOCH
9.50
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in stock analysis to make informed investment decisions. For KBR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 37.12 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 39.79, below the 50-day MA of 41.70, and below the 200-day MA of 44.90, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.40 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 32.87 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.50 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for KBR.

KBR Risk Analysis

KBR disclosed 54 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. KBR reported the most risks in the "Finance & Corporate" category.
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
Latest Risks Added 0 New Risks

KBR Peers Comparison

Overall Rating
UnderperformOutperform
Sector (63)
Financial Indicators
Name
Overall Rating
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
ROE
Dividend Yield
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
74
Outperform
$24.04B42.4213.08%12.99%274.10%
74
Outperform
$7.59B24.3917.49%0.25%21.45%67.31%
69
Neutral
$4.69B12.5928.27%1.65%9.66%29.01%
68
Neutral
$11.62B42.3319.75%1.06%0.21%53.80%
68
Neutral
$15.31B30.1111.80%0.94%-23.00%-61.88%
63
Neutral
$10.79B15.437.44%2.01%2.89%-14.66%
55
Neutral
$6.55B-1.14%-1.81%1228.51%
* Industrials Sector Average
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
KBR
KBR
36.53
-14.02
-27.73%
ACM
Aecom Technology
90.15
-5.03
-5.28%
FLR
Fluor
45.64
7.40
19.35%
J
Jacobs Solutions
127.79
6.00
4.92%
MTZ
MasTec
303.07
177.10
140.59%
PRIM
Primoris Services
138.28
73.77
114.37%
Glossary
BuyA stock rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the stock is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other stocks in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldA stock rated as a "Hold" is expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the stock is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellA stock rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the stock may deliver lower returns compared to other stocks in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst Stock Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in stocks carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: Feb 27, 2026