IHS Holding (IHS) Risk Factors

Many emerging and less developed markets, including those in which we operate or may operate, face periods of political and economic uncertainty, particularly around the times leading up to elections and/or other political change, including uncertainty as to the manner in which the relevant governing authorities would seek to address the issues facing the relevant country and whether they would alter or reverse certain reforms and actions taken by predecessors or even by incumbents seeking to garner increased favor. Such issues may give rise to uncertainty in the investing community and are likely to reduce inbound investment. Frequent and intense periods of political instability make it difficult to predict future trends in governmental policies. For example, the Arab Spring of 2010 and 2011 caused substantial political turmoil across the Middle East and North Africa, particularly in Egypt. During this period of instability in Egypt, the government temporarily dissolved the parliament, suspended the constitution and shut down the internet. Any similar shut-down in the countries in which we operate in the future will negatively affect our business and results of operations. In addition, if government or regulatory policies in a market in which we operate were to change or become less business-friendly, our business could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the economic instability experienced in Brazil between 2020 and 2022 contributed to a decline in market confidence in the Brazilian economy as well as to a deteriorating political environment. Despite a reduction in inflation in 2023, following a smooth governmental transition that year, the Brazilian government has in the past intervened in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. For instance, the Brazilian government's actions to control inflation and implement macroeconomic policies have often involved increases in interest rates, wage and price controls, currency devaluations, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing capital controls and limits on imports, among other things. In addition, various ongoing investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, have negatively impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment and have adversely impacted the image and reputation of those companies that have been implicated. We do not have any control over, and are unable to predict, which measures or policies the Brazilian government may adopt in the future. In addition, in South Africa, presidential elections are expected to take place in 2024, the outcome of which could adversely affect the economy, hinder or delay progress in minimizing the energy crisis, and ultimately impact our growth and operations in the country. Moreover, some planned reforms may disadvantage certain existing stakeholders, who may seek to curtail such reforms. For example, planned privatization of state-owned enterprises has in some cases been met with strikes or threats of strikes in anticipation of job losses and price increases. Any significant changes in the political climate in the countries in which we operate, including changes affecting the stability of the government or involving a rejection, reversal or significant modification of policies against nationalization or expropriation of privately owned assets, favoring the privatization of state-owned enterprises, reforms in the telecommunications, power, banking and oil and gas sectors or other reforms, may have negative effects on the economy, government revenue or foreign reserves and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Corruption is a significant issue in many of the markets in which we operate, as in many other emerging and less developed markets. For example, Nigeria, Cameroon and Zambia placed 145, 140 and 98, respectively, out of 180 countries in Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index. Despite certain reform efforts, however, corruption continues to be a serious problem impacting some of the countries in which we operate, as reflected by several high-profile convictions. Brazil has also experienced recent political instability, including various investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, which have negatively impacted the Brazilian economy and political environment. In addition, South Africa and Nigeria (since February 2023) and Cameroon (since June 2023) were added by the Financial Action Task Force's ("FATF") to the "grey list" of countries that need to do more to improve their ability to fight financial crime.  The addition to the "grey list" will likely increase the cost of doing business in South Africa and Nigeria, as there is additional scrutiny on transactions by international counterparties in grey list countries. Corruption has many implications for a country, including difficulty in collecting revenue and controlling expenditure, increasing the risk of political instability, distorting decision-making processes and adversely affecting its international reputation. Failure to address these issues, continued corruption in the public sector and any future allegations of, or perceived risk of, corruption in the markets in which we operate could have adverse effects on their respective economies and may have a negative effect on the ability of these countries to attract foreign investment and, as a result, may have a material adverse effect on our and our customers' business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

The South African government established a legislative framework for the promotion of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment ("B-BBEE"). Achievement of B-BBEE objectives is measured by a scorecard which establishes a weighting for the various components of B-BBEE which relate to ownership, enterprise and supplier development and socio-economic development. B-BBEE objectives are pursued, in significant part, by requiring parties who contract with corporate, governmental and state-owned enterprises in South Africa to achieve B-BBEE compliance through satisfaction of an applicable scorecard. Scorecards are independently reviewed by accredited verification agencies which issue a certificate that presents an entity's B-BEE contributor level. This B-BBEE verification process is conducted on an annual basis. As part of the MTN SA Acquisition, we agreed to achieve and maintain certain B-BBEE contributor levels from the fiscal year 2023. We are also required, including by the Competition Commission of South Africa, to achieve 30% B-BBEE ownership by May 2024, as defined in the regulations governing the B-BBEE program, in our South African businesses. Failing to achieve or maintain the applicable B-BBEE requirements could jeopardize our ability to continue to do business or to secure future business in South Africa and/or lead to a termination of our contractual arrangements with MTN SA in circumstances where we would have failed to obtain the necessary extension or waiver from MTN SA and/or the Competition Commission, as applicable.

Investing in securities of issuers in emerging and less developed markets generally involves a higher degree of risk than investments in securities of corporate or sovereign issuers from more developed countries and carries risks that are not typically associated with investing in more mature markets. These risks include, but are not limited to, the types of risk noted in the Risk Factor entitled ""- Our current and future markets involve additional risks compared to more developed markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations". Investors should exercise particular care in evaluating the risks involved and must decide for themselves whether, in light of those risks, their investment is appropriate. Generally, investment in securities of issuers operating in emerging and less developed markets is only suitable for sophisticated investors who fully appreciate the significance of the risks involved and investors are urged to consult their own legal and financial advisors before making an investment in our ordinary shares. Investors should also note that emerging and less developed markets such as those in which we operate are subject to rapid change and that the information set forth in this Annual Report may become outdated relatively quickly. Moreover, financial turmoil in any emerging market or less developed market or country tends to adversely affect prices in the financial markets of such markets, as investors move their money to more stable, developed markets. As has happened in the past, financial problems or an increase in the perceived risks associated with investing in other emerging economies could dampen foreign investment in the countries in which we operate and adversely affect the economies of such countries. In addition, during such times, companies that operate in emerging and less developed markets can face severe liquidity constraints as foreign funding sources, including availability of credit or debt financing, are withdrawn. Thus, even if the economies of the countries in which we operate remain relatively stable, financial turmoil in any emerging or less developed market or country could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

As described below under "- Risks Relating to the Markets in which We Operate?-?Financial authorities in the markets in which we operate may intervene in the currency markets by drawing on external reserves, and their currencies are subject to volatility," central banking authorities in the countries in which we operate may intervene in the currency markets or adopt policies that may impact the applicable exchange rates and/or amounts of foreign currency that may be obtained. In markets where there are multiple exchange rates available and/or referenced by the applicable banking authorities, there may be differences among the exchange rates companies use pursuant to accounting standards, contracted rates, rates quoted for other foreign exchange transactions, and ‘official' central bank rates. If such differences exist, we may encounter issues relating to the interpretation or enforcement of our contracts with our customers. We may also be required to change the exchange rate applied to the translation of the local currency books of our operating subsidiaries to U.S. dollars for our consolidated group reporting purposes. This has been particularly relevant to our operations in Nigeria in the past, where a significant portion of our operations are based. Following the significant depreciation of the Naira against the U.S. dollar in 2016, as described in "Risks Relating to Our Business?-?We and our customers face foreign exchange risks, which may be material," in a continuing effort to improve U.S. dollar liquidity in Nigeria and to assist investors and exporters in accommodating foreign exchange transactions, the CBN introduced a new foreign exchange window for investors and exporters in April 2017 (the I&E window (now referred to as NAFEM), from which the NAFEX rate is also derived). This resulted in a situation where there were differing exchange rates in the market and we were required to regularly monitor and evaluate which exchange rate was most appropriate to apply in the translation of the Naira books of our Nigerian operations to U.S. dollars for our consolidated group reporting purposes. Until the CBN ceased publishing the CBN official rate in May 2021, there existed a divergence between the two rates, with the CBN official rate (against the U.S. dollar) usually being lower than the NAFEX rate. Although  the CBN ultimately implemented steps to unify the Nigerian foreign exchange market in June 2023, by replacing the old regime of multiple exchange rate segments into a single NAFEM window within which foreign exchange transactions would be determined by market forces, it is possible that in the future, official exchange rates in Nigeria or our other markets of operation may diverge again from prevailing market exchange rates due to future government interventions. We currently use the USD/NGN rate published by Bloomberg, which is approximately aligned to the NAFEM window rate, for reporting purposes. The determination of the most appropriate rate to use at the relevant time we produce financial information will depend on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, availability and liquidity in the market generally. The foreign exchange rate that we determine to be the most appropriate for the translation of our results for group reporting purposes may, therefore, differ from the conversion rates contained within our contracts. For example, in Nigeria, following the Naira depreciation in 2016 and the existence of multiple rates in the market, we began to translate the results of our subsidiaries in Nigeria into our presentation currency, U.S. dollars, at rates more reflective of the NAFEX. Prior to the agreements that we subsequently reached with our Key Customers in Nigeria to update the reference exchange rate in our contracts to the prevailing market rate available on Bloomberg, because the NAFEX rate used for accounting purposes had historically been higher than the CBN official rate used in our contracts, notwithstanding any underlying performance, our financial results for the relevant periods would have shown a related decline in performance in case of devaluation of the NAFEX where the CBN official rate remained at the same level. While our contracts with certain of our Key Customers in Nigeria were amended to resolve that anomaly, and notwithstanding the action taken by the CBN in June 2023 to unify the Nigerian foreign exchange market, there can be no assurance that such a divergence between the applicable market rate or translation rate for our financial results, and the exchange rate reflected in our contracts with customers, will not occur again in Nigeria, or that the prevailing market rate on Bloomberg will not diverge from other exchange rates in the market (including NAFEM), or that a similar situation would not occur in other countries in which we operate, any of which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations, notwithstanding any underlying performance. In addition, other measures taken by the relevant central banks or similar, including the manner in which various exchange rates are published, may further impact the rates available in the market, and we may need to consider such measures for the purposes of our accounts. Potential investors should, therefore, bear this in mind when considering an investment in our ordinary shares, and the potential impact on the future trading and/or market price of our ordinary shares based on a decline in reported financial and/or operational performance based on such factors.

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, 49% and 52%, respectively, of our revenue was linked to the U.S. dollar or in euro-pegged currencies. The manner in which this revenue is linked to the U.S. dollar or the euro differs across our MLAs and jurisdictions of operation. Our U.S. dollar-linked revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars in the relevant MLAs, but paid to us in local currency through contractual mechanisms. In such cases, including the majority of our MLAs in Nigeria, our MLAs may contain a formula for periodically determining the U.S. dollar to local currency exchange rate. Such MLAs typically have U.S. dollar-denominated components and local currency components of pricing, and the U.S. dollar components are converted to the local currency for settlement at a fixed conversion rate for a stated period of time, which conversion rates are reset monthly, quarterly and semi-annually. As a result, in the event of devaluation, such as the one that occurred in June 2023 in Nigeria, there is a risk of a delay between the timing of the devaluation and the next contractual reset, which may be significant. During the period between the date of the devaluation and the date of the reset, all of our revenue (i.e., both revenue that is contractually linked to the U.S. dollar and that is contractually linked to local currency) would reflect the new, devalued foreign exchange rate. When the reset is effected, the amount relating to the portion of the lease fees linked to the U.S. dollar, which is invoiced in local currency, is adjusted upward at the relevant time. Furthermore, our ability to maintain or enter into such contractually linked foreign exchange protection mechanisms with our current and new customers in the future is not assured, which may in turn reduce our protection against fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. In addition, the conversion rates included in our MLAs may also be different from the rates at which our financial results are translated into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. If we are required to use a higher rate for accounting purposes than that of our contracts, notwithstanding any underlying performance, it is likely that our financial results for the relevant periods in the future will show a related decline in performance. For example, as described below under "- The existence of multiple foreign exchange markets with different exchange rates may impact the rate at which our operating subsidiaries' financial results are translated into U.S. dollars for group reporting purposes, which may impact our financial condition and/or results of operations," in April 2017 the CBN introduced a new foreign exchange window for investors and exporters (the I&E window, now referred to as NAFEM), and while certain of our contracts in Nigeria contain contractually linked foreign exchange protection mechanisms that are intended to protect against foreign exchange fluctuations, such contracts historically only protected against changes in the official CBN exchange rate. While we reached  agreement with our Key Customers in Nigeria to update the reference exchange rate in our contracts to the prevailing market rate available on Bloomberg (which is currently approximately aligned to the NAFEM rate), should these and similar circumstances arise again (where there is a divergence between the applicable market rate or translation rates for our financial results, and the exchange rate reflected in our contracts with customers), there is no guarantee that we will be able to renegotiate these contracts or enter into new contracts to fully protect against such foreign exchange risks, which could materially impact our results of operations. For instance, in June 2023, the CBN announced the unification of all segments of the foreign exchange market by replacing the old regime of multiple exchange rate "windows" for different purposes with, in effect, a market rate. The unification of the Nigeria foreign exchange market was aimed at eliminating multiple "windows" and to allow foreign exchange transactions to be determined by market forces via a single I&E window (now referred to as NAFEM). Despite these efforts, the Naira depreciated significantly against the U.S. dollar and from June 14, 2023 to December 31, 2023, the NAFEM rate depreciated by 47.7%, from approximately ?474.0 to $1.00 to approximately ?907.1 to $1.00, while the Bloomberg rate depreciated by 48.2%, from approximately ?472.3 to $1.00 to approximately ?911.7 to $1.00 during the same period. In addition, some of our contracts, particularly in Latin America, South Africa and Kuwait, are based on local currency pricing with no direct foreign exchange link or conversion mechanism, and therefore any depreciation in local currency rates against the U.S. dollar would similarly impact our financial results when they are translated into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes, notwithstanding any underlying performance. Certain of our other MLAs have revenue components linked to hard currencies, such as the U.S. dollar or the euro, because the MLAs are in local currencies that maintain a fixed exchange rate, or are "pegged," to such currencies, such as those in Côte d'Ivoire and Cameroon. In addition, it was announced in 2019 that the CFA Franc used in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEMOA), which includes Côte d'Ivoire, and which has a fixed exchange rate to the euro, would be replaced by a new currency called the Eco, and in June 2021, the heads of state of fifteen West African countries, including Côte d'Ivoire, comprising the Economic Community of West African States adopted a roadmap for the launch of the Eco in 2027. If such fixed or linked exchange rates are not maintained or are "de-pegged," it could result in fluctuations and/or devaluations of these currencies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. In addition, even though our MLAs may have foreign currency-linked revenue components, or have use fees expressed in foreign currencies, the actual currency of settlement of a significant portion of our revenue is in local currencies, and we therefore remain exposed to foreign exchange risks. There may also be regulatory actions or pressure based on, among other things, socioeconomic or political reasons or events, to enforce local currency-based pricing, which would dilute any protection we may seek to include in our contracts to protect against local currency devaluations. Most of our expenses are in the local currencies of the relevant jurisdiction of operation, except for certain of our borrowings, which are predominantly in U.S. dollars. For example, our Notes and some of our other indebtedness (for example, the IHS Holding 2022 Term Loan and certain Nigerian letters of credit) are denominated in U.S. dollars, with an aggregate principal amount outstanding of approximately $2,618 million as of December 31, 2023. Certain other components of our capital expenditures may also be linked to foreign currency-based pricing elements. Diesel, which is one of our most significant expenses, may be considered as linked to U.S. dollars given the international pricing of oil, and can be paid for in U.S. dollars when purchased offshore or in local currency when purchased locally. See "- Any increase in operating expenses, particularly increased costs for diesel or an inability to pass through or mitigate against increased diesel costs, could erode our operating margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations." Should the relevant local currencies depreciate against the U.S. dollar, the cost of buying diesel in the relevant local currency may increase, but the impact on our results is less notable when translated back into U.S. dollars at a higher foreign exchange rate. There may, however, be instances where our suppliers face foreign exchange pressure in the importation of certain materials, or as a result of the exchange rate at which they are able to source (or which applies to items for which charges are based on) foreign currency and import certain materials. This could in turn result in pressure from our suppliers to increase amounts payable by us. We hold U.S. dollar cash balances in some of our jurisdictions of operation and/or convert local currencies to the relevant foreign currencies for payment obligations. We are also party to certain instruments and/or facilities (such as letters of credit) from time to time, where there may be requirements to hold or deposit foreign-currency linked amounts (including local currency equivalents) to back-up debt or other obligations (including, but not limited to, as collateral). Accordingly, we are subject to fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange between the local currencies and the relevant foreign currency, as well as availability to source the relevant foreign currency in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and such fluctuations and/or availability could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. We may also be required to post additional foreign-currency linked amounts as collateral or otherwise to reflect such fluctuations. There may also be limited availability of U.S. dollars in the market at the time when we convert the relevant local currency to U.S. dollars, in which case we may need to convert the relevant local currency into U.S. dollars at a less favorable currency exchange rate. See also "Risks Relating to the Markets in which We Operate?-?Shortage of U.S. dollar, euro or other hard currency liquidity in the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our ability to service our foreign currency liabilities." In addition, our major customers may also face foreign exchange risks where their revenue is denominated in local currency, but their costs, including the fees they pay to us, are denominated in, or linked to, a foreign currency such as the U.S. dollar. When the local currency depreciates against the relevant foreign currency (such as the significant depreciations of the Naira against the U.S. dollar in 2016 (when the Naira depreciated from approximately ?196.5 to $1.00 as of January 1, 2016 to ?304.5 to $1.00 as of December 31, 2016), in 2023 (when the Naira depreciated from approximately ?461.5 to $1.00 as of January 1, 2023 to ?911.7 to $1.00 as of December 31, 2023), and again in January 2024, with the Naira having depreciated to ?1,400.0 to $1.00 as of February 1, 2024)), it may impact the ability of our customers to make payments to us on a timely basis or at all, and our customers may either raise prices for their customers or cut back on capital and operational expenditures, both of which could reduce future demand for our services, or result in requests to renegotiate contract terms with us prior to the relevant MLA end date. Fluctuations in exchange rates, including volatility related to events affecting the global economy or to geopolitical events or conflicts, depreciation of local currencies and/or a lack of sufficient availability of hard/international currencies, as required, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. See "- Financial authorities in the markets in which we operate may intervene in the currency markets by drawing on external reserves, and their currencies are subject to volatility" and "- The existence of multiple foreign exchange markets with different exchange rates may impact the rate at which our operating subsidiaries' financial results are translated into U.S. dollars for group reporting purposes, which may impact our financial condition and/or results of operations."

Although we generally seek and obtain the requisite federal, national, state and/or local approvals prior to the commencement of tower construction, it is often unclear whether certain, particularly local, permits are required and, in some circumstances, local authorities have imposed permit requirements retrospectively. In instances where we acquire assets from third parties, the prior owners of those assets may not have had the requisite federal, national, state and local approvals for certain of the sites we are acquiring. There is sometimes a long lead-time required for processing applications for approvals and licenses from the local authorities, including construction and building permits required from certain state authorities to construct or build any structure and environmental approvals. See Item 4.B. "Business Overview ?-?Permits and Regulation?-?License to operate." Although we make payments in relation to the relevant permits when required, the delay encountered in receiving the permits, licenses or certificates means that we may, therefore, in limited instances, proceed with and complete tower construction and base transmission sites installation for Tenants before all required approvals and licenses have been formally issued by local authorities. As we look to expand our offering to further include and expand on services like fiber connectivity, rural offerings and other verticals, we may be subject to increased regulatory, license and permit obligations (including in respect of active telecommunications elements that may comprise part of the arrangements with customers, such as for rural offerings, which may be based on an "open RAN" architecture). We may or may not be able to meet any and all such obligations. Although we believe these practices are customary in the telecommunications industry in the countries in which we operate, there can be no assurance that the relevant authorities will issue the licenses or approvals, if required, or that they will be issued in a timely manner or as expected. If such approvals and licenses are required and not obtained, the local or state authorities may impose penalties, such as reprimands, warnings and fines, for non-compliance with the relevant licensing and approval requirements. In addition, in some jurisdictions, federal, national, state and local authorities charge taxes and levies in relation to similar services, for example tenement rates and environmental permits for our sites. This leads to confusion over which authority should be paid the relevant levy and in many cases we must wait for a demand to be made before we can make the payment. Additionally, certain authorities have recently become more aggressive in setting of permit fees, the enforcement of permits and collection of payments, or may become more so in the event the profile of a business is perceived to have increased. In an extreme case, local authorities may prevent us from entering our sites or demand that we dismantle the unlicensed towers, which has occurred in certain limited cases. For example, in Nigeria, it was publicly reported in 2019 that the NCAA threatened to decommission and dismantle a number of Glo towers for safety violations including failure to obtain the statutory aviation height clearance certificate. It is reported that while no towers were ultimately decommissioned or dismantled by the NCAA, this was due to the affected operators complying with demands. In addition, in December 2019 the Federal Capital Development Authority, or FCDA, stopped the issuance of permits to communications infrastructure companies in the Federal Capital Territory while it sought to review and increase fees. The FCDA briefly resumed issuing new permits in 2021 which, following a further stoppage, resumed again during 2022 following the intervention of the regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission, or NCC. However, while permit issuance has resumed and an agreement in principle has been reached with the FCDA, the final outcome of the intervention is still awaited as the approval of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory is pending.  A new Minister of the Federal Capital Territory was appointed by the new President following his inauguration in May 2023 but his approval or denial is pending. During previous periods when new permit issuances were on hold, the development and expansion of our business operations in Abuja (where we had 641 Towers as of December 31, 2023) was impacted, which consequently impacted the quality of service of remaining towers in operation in the area. If we are required to pay additional levies, penalties or fees, or relocate a material number of our Towers and cannot locate replacement sites that are acceptable to our customers, this could adversely affect revenue and cash flow, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Our operations are subject to the requirements of various environmental and occupational safety and health laws and regulations, including those relating to the management, use, storage, disposal, emission and remediation of, and exposure to, hazardous and non-hazardous substances, materials, waste, as well as items related to our day-to-day operations such as transport and construction. As an operator of communications infrastructure that has a heavy reliance on diesel, we may purchase diesel in large quantities that is then stored at our facilities. As the owner, lessee or operator of these facilities, we may be liable for substantial costs or remediation under health, safety and environment laws in the event that there is leakage or spillage from these storage facilities. As the owner, lessee or operator of communications sites, we may be liable for the substantial costs of remediating soil and groundwater contaminated by hazardous materials, without regard to whether we, as the owner, lessee or operator, knew of or were responsible for the contamination. Many of these laws and regulations contain information reporting and record-keeping requirements, which may be burdensome for us or have high costs associated with compliance, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. There can be no assurance that we are or will be in full compliance with all environmental requirements at all times. For example, many of our sites rely on the use of carbon-emitting power systems, and at the time of acquisition, certain towers acquired from other companies may not be compliant with environmental regulations or may lack certain environmental permits. We may be subject to potentially significant fines, penalties or criminal sanctions if we fail to comply with any of these requirements. The requirements of these laws and regulations are complex, change frequently, and could become more stringent in the future. It is possible that liabilities will arise in the future in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. Failure to provide a safe and healthy working environment in accordance with the relevant applicable legislation, including as a result of health pandemics or epidemics (such as COVID-19) and any related measures imposed in the markets in which we operate, may result in government authorities forcing closure of sites on a temporary or permanent basis or refusing lease or license applications. Working conditions, including aspects such as weather and temperature, can add to the inherent dangers. While we have invested, and will continue to invest, substantial resources in our occupational health, safety and security programs, there can be no assurance that we will avoid significant liability exposure. We may not be able to deliver a sustained improvement in safety performance if management interventions and training initiatives fail to translate into behavioral change by all employees, contractors and/or suppliers. Non-compliance with critical controls is a common failure in safety incidents which can lead to loss of life, workplace injuries and safety-related stoppages, all of which immediately impact operational performance and, in the long term, threaten our ability to operate as intended. Given the high degree of operational risk in our industry, we have suffered fatalities in the past and may suffer additional fatalities in the future. Serious accidents, including fatalities, may subject us to civil or criminal fines and penalties, liability to employees and third parties for injury, illness, or death and other financial consequences, which may be significant. In addition, if our safety record were to deteriorate over time or we were to suffer substantial penalties or criminal prosecution for violation of health and safety regulations, our customers could cancel our contracts and elect to procure future services from other providers. Unsafe work sites also have the potential to increase employee turnover, increase the costs of projects for our customers, and raise our operating costs. We could also suffer impairment to our reputation, industrial action or difficulty in recruiting and retaining skilled employees and contractors. Any future changes in laws, regulations or community expectations governing safety of our operations could result in increased compliance and remediation costs. Any of the foregoing developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and/or financial condition. Moreover, there has been increasing public focus, including by investors, customers, environmental activists, the media and governmental and nongovernmental organizations, on a variety of environmental, social and other sustainability matters. This emphasis on environmental, social and other sustainability matters has resulted and may result in the adoption of new laws and regulations, including new reporting requirements as well as our adoption of new voluntary reporting. If we fail to comply with new laws, regulations or reporting requirements or there are inaccuracies in our reporting or we fail to achieve expected or anticipated metrics, targets or sustainability initiatives, our reputation and business could be materially adversely impacted.

We report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including (i) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act, (ii) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their share ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time and (iii) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of current reports on Form 8-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information, although we provide and intend to continue to provide comparable quarterly information on Form 6-K. In addition, foreign private issuers are not required to file their annual report on Form 20-F until 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are large accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from Regulation FD, which is intended to prevent issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. As a result of all of the above, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of a company that is not a foreign private issuer.

Our business activities may, at times, be subject to various export controls and trade and economic sanctions laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the U.S. Export Administration Regulations administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the U.S Department of Commerce, the trade and economic sanctions programs administered and enforced by the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, and the U.S. State Department's Nonproliferation Sanctions, collectively, "Trade Controls". Such Trade Controls may prohibit or restrict our ability to, directly or indirectly, conduct activities or dealings in or with certain countries or territories,  as well as with governments, individuals or entities that are the subject of Trade Controls. Further, our sales and services to certain customers may at times trigger reporting requirements under applicable Trade Controls. For instance, the U.S. government has imposed export control restrictions effectively barring sales of items (including components and software) that are subject to U.S. export controls to, among other parties, Huawei and certain other China-based technology companies with whom we conduct business. Although we maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to maintain compliance with Trade Controls applicable to us (including those that target Huawei and certain of our other counterparties) we cannot ensure that such policies and procedures will be effective in preventing violations of applicable Trade Controls. Furthermore, any sanctions imposed on us as a result of dealings with Huawei or other organizations that are the target of U.S. export controls (or indirectly as a result of our customers, suppliers and other third-party contractors having such dealings) could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. These restrictions, and similar or more expansive restrictions that may be imposed by the United States or other jurisdictions in the future, may also materially impact and could have a material adverse effect on certain of our customers' abilities to acquire technologies, systems, devices or components that may be critical to their technology infrastructure, service offerings and business operations, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. Although we have implemented compliance measures designed to comply with applicable Trade Controls, our failure or the failure of our customers, suppliers and third-party contractors to successfully comply with applicable Trade Controls may expose us to negative legal and business consequences, including civil or criminal penalties, government investigations, and reputational harm, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. See "- We rely on third-party contractors for various services, and any disruption in or non-performance of those services would hinder our ability to effectively maintain our tower infrastructure."

We operate and conduct business in various emerging and less developed markets (including Africa, the Middle East and Latin America), and we may expand into additional markets, which at times experience high levels of fraud, bribery and corruption. We are subject to the applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations of the markets in which we operate, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA, and the UK Bribery Act 2010, or the UK Bribery Act. The FCPA prohibits providing, offering, promising, or authorizing, directly or indirectly, including potentially through third party agents acting on our behalf, anything of value (such as cash and cash equivalents, travel expenses, gifts, entertainments, charitable donations, in-kind services and so on.) to non-U.S. government officials, political parties, or candidates for political office for the purposes of obtaining or retaining business or securing any improper business advantage. As part of our business, we are regularly required to deal with regulators, government ministries, departments and agencies to obtain permits and licenses to operate our business. We also periodically enter into joint ventures with government ministries, departments and agencies in the ordinary course of our business. The employees of these regulators and government ministries, departments and agencies may be considered government officials for the purposes of the FCPA. The provisions of the UK Bribery Act extend beyond bribery of government officials and are broader than the FCPA in a number of other respects, including jurisdiction, non-exemption of facilitation payments and penalties. In particular, the UK Bribery Act (unlike the FCPA) also applies to the active payment of bribes to private persons (i.e. non-government officials) as well as the passive receiving of bribes. Furthermore, unlike the vicarious liability regime under the FCPA, whereby corporate entities can be liable for the acts of its employees, the UK Bribery Act introduced a new offense applicable to corporate entities and partnerships which carry on part of their business in the United Kingdom that fail to prevent bribery, which can take place anywhere in the world, by associated persons who perform services for or on behalf of them, subject to a defense of having adequate procedures in place to prevent the bribery from occurring. This strict liability offense under the UK Bribery Act can render corporate entities criminally liable for the acts (including those with no criminal intent) of their employees, agents, joint venture partners, or commercial partners even if done without their knowledge. Public companies listed in the United States are required to maintain records that accurately and fairly represent their transactions and have an adequate system of internal accounting controls. We maintain internal controls, policies, procedures and training to ensure compliance by us and our directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants, and agents with the FCPA, UK Bribery Act and other applicable anti-corruption laws and make efforts to ensure their effectiveness. However, we can make no assurance that the controls, policies and procedures, even if enhanced, have been or will be followed at all times or effectively detect and prevent all violations of the applicable laws and every instance of fraud, bribery and corruption. As a result, we could be subject to potential civil or criminal penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures and legal expenses under the relevant applicable law, which could have material adverse effects on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations if we fail to prevent any such violations or are the subject of investigations into potential violations, which may result in a significant diversion of management's attention and resources and significant defense costs and other professional fees. In addition, such violations could also negatively impact our reputation and, consequently, our ability to win future business. Any such violation by competitors, if undetected, could give them an unfair advantage when bidding for contracts. The consequences that we may suffer due to the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Our tax treatment is subject to changes in tax laws, regulations, tax policy initiatives and reforms in jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, our tax treatment may also be affected by tax policy initiatives and reforms related to the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, or the OECD, the work of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Pillar One and Pillar Two of the base erosion and profit shifting BEPS project and other initiatives. Such changes may include (but are not limited to) the taxation of operating income, investment income, interest income, dividends received or dividends paid. We are unable to predict what tax reform may be proposed or enacted in the future, possibly with retroactive effect, or what effect such changes would have on us. Any such changes could affect our financial position and overall or effective tax rates in countries where we have operations, reduce post-tax returns to our shareholders, and increase the complexity, burden and cost of tax compliance. Legislation has been enacted or is currently under consideration in a number of jurisdictions to adopt and implement Pillar Two of the BEPS project to introduce a global minimum tax rate of 15% for certain multinational enterprises.  The UK government has legislated to implement the Pillar Two income inclusion rule by introducing a multinational top-up tax and the domestic top-up tax for certain large multinational enterprises for accounting periods beginning on or after December 31, 2023. This will apply to groups headed by UK resident companies with annual group revenue exceeding €750 million.  A tax liability may apply in cases where profits arise to group entities in jurisdictions which are taxed below the minimum rate of 15%.  In the case of IHS Holding Limited, this will apply for the year ended December 31, 2024 onwards. Further changes related to Pillar Two, when enacted by the other various jurisdictions in which we do business, may increase our liability to taxes in those countries.  As these changes are subject to implementation by each country, the timing and ultimate impact of any such changes on our tax obligations remains uncertain. In April 2023, the United Arab Emirates enacted legislation to introduce corporate income tax on certain categories of income which may apply to our companies resident in the United Arab Emirates from the year ended December 31, 2024 onwards.  The detailed application of the legislation is not yet certain and may be subject to future changes in interpretation and legislation, which could have further adverse implications.

We are subject to direct and indirect taxes in numerous jurisdictions. We calculate and provide for such taxes in each tax jurisdiction in which we operate. The amount of tax we pay is subject to our interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file. We will seek to run IHS Holding Limited in such a way that it is and remains tax resident in the United Kingdom. We have taken and will continue to take tax positions based on our interpretation of tax laws, but tax and/or accounting often involves complex matters and judgement is required in determining our worldwide provision for taxes and other tax liabilities. Although we believe that we have complied with all applicable tax laws, there can be no assurance that a taxing authority will not have a different interpretation of the law and assess us with additional taxes (and possibly related interest and/or penalties). We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities have disagreed, and may in the future disagree, with our judgements. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits to determine the appropriateness of our tax liabilities. However, our judgements might not be sustained as a result of these audits, and the amounts ultimately paid could be different from the amounts previously recorded and such amounts could be material. In addition, our effective tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax laws. Tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate may change as a result of macroeconomic, political or other factors. Increases in the tax rate in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate could have a negative impact on our profitability. In addition, changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, may be unpredictable, particularly in the types of markets in which we operate (such as emerging markets), and could become more stringent, which could materially adversely affect our tax position. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

We engage third-party contractors to provide various services in connection with the site acquisition, construction, supply of equipment and spare parts, access management, security and preventative and corrective maintenance of tower sites, as well as power management, including the supply of diesel to certain of our sites, sometimes with a small number of contractors in the relevant jurisdiction. For example, we have outsourced power management, refurbishment, operations and maintenance and security functions for certain of our sites in Nigeria to certain key suppliers and may continue to do so in other markets (including any new markets which we may enter). Their power management functions include the supply of diesel to and deployment of alternative power technologies, such as hybrid and solar power technologies, on certain sites, to help reduce diesel consumption to a contracted volume. Across our 11 markets, as of December 31, 2023, we outsourced certain operations and maintenance activities at 80% of our Towers. We also engage third-party contractors and suppliers with respect to other systems we use to operate our business, including but not limited to information technology systems and services. We are exposed to the risk that the services rendered by our third-party contractors will not always be available, satisfactory or match our and/or our customers' targeted quality levels, as well as the risk that they may otherwise be unable to perform their obligations to some extent or at all, including as a result of labor disputes, insolvency, operational, access or transport restrictions or other limitations related to global or regional health events or outbreaks (such as COVID-19), geopolitical events (such as those related to political instability, conflicts or wars), or other events resulting in the imposition of economic or trade sanctions, export controls or similar restrictions. As a result, we may experience interruptions in our ability to provide services, our customers may be unsatisfied with our services, and we may be required to pay certain financial penalties under our contracts, or our customers may terminate their contracts in the event of a material breach, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and brand, as well as our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. Additionally, over the past few years the U.S. government has imposed economic and trade sanctions and export control restrictions on a number of entities in China, including certain China-based technology companies (such as Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., or Huawei, and certain of its affiliates), with whom we conduct business. It is possible that, in the future, there may be additional regulatory challenges or enhanced trade-related restrictions targeting Huawei or other China-based technology companies. Such potential restrictions or sanctions, as well as any associated inquiries or investigations or any other government actions, may be difficult or costly to comply with and may, among other things, delay or impede the development of the technology, products and solutions of China-based third-party contractors and/or suppliers with whom we are currently engaged or may become engaged with and hinder the stability of the supply chains of such contractors and suppliers, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations. In addition, if third-party contractors do not meet execution targets for both financial and operational performance, including not meeting our standards of service or complying with health, safety, employment or other laws and regulations, or are unable to perform to some extent or at all, we may have to step in and complete the process. If we are required to undertake this work ourselves, it could require extensive time and attention from our management and lead to increased future operating costs while the work is carried out, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Public perception of possible health risks, including any perceived connection between radio frequency emissions associated with cellular and other wireless communications technology and certain negative health effects, could interrupt or slow the growth of wireless companies. In particular, negative public perception of, and regulations regarding, these perceived health risks could increase opposition to the development and expansion of tower sites. There have been instances in certain telecommunication markets globally where towers have been vandalized due to perceived health risks associated with 5G technology, including potentially related to health pandemics or epidemics (such as during the COVID-19 outbreak) as well. The potential connection between radio frequency emissions and certain negative health effects has been the subject of substantial study by the scientific community in recent years, and numerous health-related lawsuits have been filed around the world against wireless carriers and wireless device manufacturers. If a scientific study or court decision resulted in a finding that radio frequency emissions posed health risks to consumers, it could negatively impact the market for wireless services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operation. We do not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.

The economies of some of the markets in which we operate may be highly dependent on commodities, such as oil or copper, and therefore on global prices and demand which impact these markets. Reductions in revenue from such commodities could adversely affect the economies of the markets in which we operate. For example, the Nigerian economy is highly dependent on oil production in Nigeria and global prices of oil. According to the Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics, in 2023, the oil sector represented 5.4% of total real GDP, a decrease from the 5.7% and 7.2% recorded in 2022 and 2021, respectively. Reductions in revenue from commodities (including but not limited to oil), particularly in light of measures related to global health events or outbreaks (such as COVID-19), or geopolitical tensions (such as outbreaks of violence or wars), could have a material adverse effect on the economies of certain markets in which we operate and in turn on our and our customers' business and our results of operations. Additionally, between 2014 and 2016, a fall in copper prices adversely affected Zambia's economy, along with increased tensions with mining companies due to related tax increases. Revenue from commodities is a function of the level of the relevant commodity's production in the relevant country and prevailing world commodity prices and demand. Commodity prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of, and demand for, such commodity, market uncertainty, and a variety of additional factors that are beyond the control of the relevant country. These factors include, but are not limited to, political conditions in other relevant regions, internal and political decisions of any regional or international bodies or organizations relating to such commodities, such as OPEC, and other nations producing the relevant commodity as to whether to decrease or increase production, domestic and foreign supplies of the commodity, consumer demand, such as the fall in demand resulting from the global response measures to contain the spread of COVID-19 (or any future coronavirus or other outbreaks or events with a wide-ranging regional or global impact), weather conditions, domestic and foreign government regulations, transport costs, the price and availability of alternatives and overall economic conditions. Declines in commodity prices and/or revenue on which certain of the economies in which we operate rely have had and will continue to have an impact on such economies, and may result in lower economic growth, high rates of unemployment, reduction in foreign exchange and government revenue. For example, the Nigerian government and certain other governments, such as in oil-producing countries in the Middle East, rely heavily on oil revenue to fund their budgets, and the decline in prices immediately following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 resulted in significantly decreased revenue. Oil prices have also been volatile following the geopolitical conflicts that took place in Europe from 2022 and in the Middle East from 2023, causing revenue instability in oil-reliant countries like those we operate in. Moreover, Nigeria, which has historically been one of the largest oil producers in Africa, produced an average of 2.0 million barrels per day in 2019; however, production levels have since declined to an average 1.37 million barrels per day in 2022, albeit slightly increased in 2023 to an average 1.43 million barrels per day as reported by the Nigerian Bureau of Statistics. The decline can be attributed to, among other things, leakage, militant attacks and decaying infrastructure. A reduction or fluctuation in commodity prices, such as a drop in oil prices, would likely negatively impact export earnings in the relevant country, government revenue, and national disposable income, and lead to budgetary constraints and reduced investment in key projects such as infrastructure. Further, any foreign exchange controls imposed in the jurisdictions in which we operate, whether as a result of reduced foreign exchange revenue from such commodities or related products or otherwise, may lead to a devaluation of our revenue which is received in local currencies and also affect our ability to obtain foreign currency required for some of our operations or to service some of our foreign currency obligations. See "- Financial authorities in the markets in which we operate may intervene in the currency markets by drawing on external reserves, and their currencies are subject to volatility" and "- Shortage of U.S. dollar, euro or other hard currency liquidity in the markets in which we operate may adversely affect our ability to service our foreign currency liabilities." Commodity production in the relevant economies may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a decline in global prices, which may affect the economic viability of certain producing assets, and the activities of vandals (such as in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria, in relation to the oil industry) may lead to significant disruptions in the production of commodities on which such economies or businesses there rely upon. For example, the level of oil production and oil revenue in Nigeria and certain other oil producing countries in the Middle East may also be adversely affected by other factors, including changes in oil production quotas by OPEC, the response of international oil companies to changes in the regulatory framework for oil production in the relevant country or region, and theft of crude oil from pipelines and tank farms. Any long-term shift away from certain commodities (such as fossil fuels), including from developed economies seeking to develop alternative sources of energy, could adversely affect commodity prices and demand and the resulting commodity-related revenue of economies in which we operate. Damage to such economies as a result of such downturns may harm our customers and increase costs (such as fuel costs), which may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Successfully managing communications towers in many of the types of markets in which we currently, or may in the future, operate (including emerging markets) is dependent on operational competency in power management, and unreliability of grid power presents significant challenges to managing our sites, uptimes and delivering quality service to customers. For example, despite the abundant energy resources in Nigeria, significant government reform efforts, and investments in the power sector in recent years, lack of sufficient and reliable electricity supply remains a serious impediment to the country's economic growth and development. Insufficient power generation, aging infrastructure, weak distribution networks, overloaded transformers, and acts of sabotage to pipelines and infrastructure by vandals result in frequent power outages, high transmission and distribution losses and poor voltage output. Only 59.5% of Nigeria's total population has access to the grid electricity supply (according to World Bank data from 2021) due to insufficient generation capacity and inadequate transmission and distribution networks. In addition, Zambia experienced power outages that adversely impacted its economic growth between 2014 and 2016, in 2019, 2020, 2022 and 2023. Similarly, in South Africa the national electricity grid has been under significant pressure over the last decade to meet growing demand given insufficient generation capacity due to underinvestment in new generation and maintenance of facilities. This has resulted in periodic periods of load shedding, where planned supply interruptions take place and are rotated across South Africa to reduce pressure on the electricity grid. New initiatives have been implemented by the government, including allowing the private sector to build their own power plants with up to 100 megawatts of generating capacity without requiring a license, in a bid to address the nation's failing electricity supply. Load shedding has also increasingly been experienced in some of our other markets, such as Zambia and Côte d'Ivoire. Despite initiatives by governments to resolve or mitigate such issues and/or ongoing investment from governments into power generation and transmission, load shedding is expected to continue to occur in the future (including, potentially, in additional markets in which we may operate), and which in turn, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and/or prospects. Despite the introduction of power sector reforms and recent incremental improvements in the sector in certain markets, failure to sustain and improve on these efforts in power generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure could lead to lower GDP growth and hamper the development of economies, as well as increase the underlying costs of operating in such markets, many of which may not be recoverable. Such challenges in grid connectivity and/or the consistent provision of power may also be caused by events outside the control of relevant authorities and/or providers, including as a result of the impact of climate-related events on power sources and/or distribution networks or infrastructure. Slow growth in the economies in which we operate may also lessen consumers' propensity to spend, which would negatively affect our customers. This, in turn, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and/or prospects. Unlike communication towers businesses in developed markets such as the United States and the European Union, where the electricity grid is comparatively extremely reliable, successfully managing communications towers in many of the types of markets in which we currently, or may in the future, operate is dependent on operational competency in power management. Given the intermittent and unreliable grid availability in Nigeria, for example, grid electricity has been rarely used as a source of power for our Towers, with 18% of Towers operated only with generators and 63% operated with hybrid solutions, which alternate between diesel generators and / or solar or battery systems, as of December 31, 2023. In our other African markets grid availability can also be unreliable and, as of December 31, 2023,13% of Towers (excluding South Africa) were powered only by the grid, with the remainder having either generator or hybrid power systems. The unreliability of the grid power presents significant challenges to managing our tower sites and power uptimes and delivering quality service to customers. Any inability to continue to deliver quality service could harm our relationships with our customers, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Our site portfolio consists primarily of ground-based towers constructed on land that is leased under long-term ground lease agreements. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 89% of the sites in our portfolio were operated under ground leases on land that we do not own. For sites on leased land, approximately 40% of the ground leases have an expiration date before the end of 2028 and, as of December 31, 2023, the average remaining life of our ground leases was 8.7 years. For various reasons, landowners or lessors may not want to renew their ground leases, may seek substantially increased rents, or they may lose their rights to the land (including, for example, if such land is subject to concession agreements) or transfer their land interests to third parties, which could affect our ability to renew ground leases on commercially viable terms or at all. In addition, we may not have the required available capital to extend these ground leases at the end of the applicable period. In the event that we cannot extend these ground leases, we will be required to dismantle and/or relocate these Towers and may lose the cash flows derived from such Towers, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. Real property interests relating to Towers consist primarily of leasehold interests, which in some cases relate to sites for which special access arrangements may be required, such as Towers located on or near airports, government facilities or rooftops. For various reasons, we may not always have the ability to access, analyze and verify all information regarding titles and other issues prior to entering into a ground lease, or we may be unable to contractually agree to amendments in relation to sensitive site access issues, all of which could affect the rights to access and operate the site. From time to time, we may also experience disputes with lessors regarding the terms of ground leases, which could affect our ability to access and operate a tower site. The termination of a ground lease may interfere with our ability to operate and generate revenue from the Tower. If this were to happen at a material number of sites, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. Our ability to access and operate our Towers or other communications infrastructure may also rely on right of use or other similar agreements with third parties. In the event that we cannot renew or continue to exercise our rights under these agreements, we will be required to dismantle and/or relocate these Towers or other communications infrastructure assets, and may lose the cash flows derived from such assets, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Our primary operating expenses include diesel fuel, site maintenance and security, salaries of engineers and security personnel, fees for licenses and permits and insurance. In addition, we incur ground lease costs and the continued development, expansion and maintenance of our tower site and other communications infrastructure requires ongoing capital expenditure. There is no assurance that our operating expenses, including those noted above, will not increase in the future or that we will be able to successfully pass any such increases in operating expenses to our customers. For example, we require a substantial amount of diesel to power our tower site operations. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the cost of power generation, which includes diesel, haulage and minimal electricity, accounted for 33.5% of our cost of sales, as compared to 36.2% of our cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2022. Diesel prices have fluctuated significantly over time, often in parallel to changes in oil prices, and may fluctuate in the future as a result of many factors, including but not limited to the impact of events with a wide-ranging regional or global impact (including health pandemics or epidemics), geopolitical conflicts and wars (including their consequences, for example on trade routes or supply chains), and any related economic sanctions, foreign exchange effects and/or climate change or related initiatives, and we are only able to pass through a component of the fuel costs at our sites to our customers under the terms of certain of our contracts. We therefore remain exposed to diesel price volatility, which may result in substantial increases in our operating costs and reduced profits if prices rise significantly. Further, our attempts to reduce power costs through the deployment of DC generators, hybrid battery and solar technologies, while presently successful, may not be successful in the future. On May 31, 2023, the Nigeria Federal Inland Revenue Service issued a letter to diesel suppliers in Nigeria, informing them that they would be required to pay a Value Added Tax (VAT) of 7.5% on imported diesel at the point of entry into the country. However, on October 1, 2023, the Federal Government of Nigeria suspended VAT on imported diesel for a period of six months effective from October 1, 2023 through to March 31, 2024. Our business could be directly impacted from the reinstatement of VAT as we might be unable to pass the cost through to our customers. Our ground lease costs are for a fixed duration, typically a 10-to-15-year term, paid for either on a monthly or quarterly basis or in advance for a multi-year portion of the overall term of the lease. Approximately 18% of our ground leases are due for renewal within the next 24 months. The renewal of a large proportion of our tower portfolio ground leases within a particular year may require a significant upfront rent payment made upon such renewal, which in turn could increase our cash outflows for that particular year. Any increases in operating expenses or lease costs referred to above would reduce our operating margins and may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Our ability to construct New Sites or to deploy other communications infrastructure in new or existing markets is affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including the availability of and access to suitable land that meets our requirements, including those of the initial customer, and the availability of construction equipment and skilled construction personnel. Delays brought on by a number of factors could also adversely affect our ability to deliver New Sites or to deploy other communications infrastructure in a timely and cost-effective manner, particularly in connection with timelines contractually agreed with customers. There can be no assurance that: - we will be able to enter into identified new markets in which we intend to deploy New Sites or other communications infrastructure;- every individual New Site or other communications infrastructure asset will be commercially viable or meet our investment criteria;- we will be able to overcome setbacks to new construction, including local opposition;- we will be able to maintain relationships with the regulatory authorities and to obtain any required governmental approvals for new construction;- the number of towers or other infrastructure planned for construction will be completed in accordance with the requirements of customers or the ability of our customers to obtain the requisite level of end users to support the level of capital expenditure spent to expand the network;- there will be a significant need for the construction of new towers or other communications infrastructure;- we will be able to agree to favorable revenue share models with our customers or other parties that make constructing new rural sites economical for all parties;- we will be able to finance the capital expenditures associated with construction or deployment of New Sites or other communications infrastructure;- we will be able to import the equipment necessary for the construction or deployment of New Sites or other communications infrastructure;- we will be able to purchase and/or import components necessary for the construction or deployment of New Sites or other communications infrastructure, including steel and fiber, or purchase such components at expected prices or that such components will be delivered in a timely fashion; or - we will be able to secure rights or access to the land necessary to execute customer orders for New Sites or other communications infrastructure. Although we are continuously examining the merits, risks and feasibility of and searching for strategic new site opportunities, such efforts may or may not result in profitable New Sites, including as a result of these uncertainties, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and/or results of operations. See "- We do not always operate with the required approvals and licenses for some of our sites, particularly where it is unclear whether a certain license or permit is required or where there is a significant lead time required for processing the application, and therefore may be subject to reprimands, warnings and fines for non-compliance with the relevant licensing and approval requirements" for more information.