DIRTT Environmental Solutions (DRTTF) Risk Analysis

We rely on a combination of contract, copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and other measures to protect our intellectual property. There is no guarantee that our various contractual rights, patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets will offer sufficient protection of our products and services or prevent misappropriation of our proprietary rights in our products, software or processes. We also may not be granted patents, copyrights registrations or trademark registrations on our pending or proposed applications, and granted applications may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented in the future. Despite our best efforts to maintain and enforce our intellectual property, monitoring unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult and costly, and the steps we have taken may not be sufficient to effectively prevent third parties from infringing, misappropriating, diluting or otherwise violating our intellectual property rights. Despite our precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to use information that we regard as proprietary to create products or services that compete with ours. We enforce our intellectual property rights where appropriate, but the cost of doing so may be substantial and could outweigh the potential benefits, and we may be unsuccessful in our enforcement efforts. Failure to protect or maintain the proprietary nature of our intellectual property could adversely affect our ability to sell original products and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, our competitors or other third parties may own, or claim to own, intellectual property in technology areas relating to our technology, including ICE Software, manufacturing processes, and DIRTT Solutions. Although we do not believe that our software or DIRTT Solutions infringe or misappropriate the proprietary rights of any third parties, litigation related to such claims, whether or not meritorious, may subject us to significant liabilities, require us to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable terms, prevent us from assembling certain of our products or licensing certain of our intellectual property, subject us to injunctions restricting our sale of products or services, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the marketplaces in which we compete, or require us to satisfy indemnification commitments with our clients, including contractual provisions under various license arrangements. A damages award against us could include an award of royalties or lost profits and, if a court finds willful infringement, treble damages and attorneys' fees. This may cause us to expend significant costs and resources, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We rely on certain key suppliers for raw materials and components, including aluminum, glass, wood, paint, and hardware. We maintain multiple suppliers for key materials, although for the year ended December 31, 2025, (i) one supplier accounted for approximately 78% of our aluminum supply and two additional suppliers provided approximately 9% each, (ii) two suppliers accounted for approximately 64% and 26% of our wood supply, (iii) one supplier accounted for 100% of our paint, and (iv) one supplier accounted for approximately 45% of our hardware supply and one additional supplier provided 20%. While we believe there are other vendors for most of our key requirements, certain materials and components meeting our quality standards are available only through a limited number of vendors. If we are required to obtain another source for these materials or components, we may not be able to obtain pricing on as favorable terms or on terms comparable to our competitors. Any failure or delay in obtaining the necessary raw materials or components in the quantities and quality required may result in increased costs and delays in manufacturing or distributing our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations. A vendor may also choose, subject to existing contracts, to modify its relationship with us due to general economic concerns or specific concerns relating to that vendor or us, at any time. These modifications might include additional requirements from our suppliers that we provide them additional security in the form of prepayments or with letters of credit. Any significant change in the terms that we have with our key suppliers could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.

DIRTT has identified the need to upgrade its inventory management and cost accounting systems at some point in the future to enable scalable growth, and other information technology investments may be required in the future. The Company is currently unable to estimate the costs and timeline related to such upgrades. However, the success, in whole or in part, of such investments cannot be guaranteed. If the Company does not successfully or timely upgrade its inventory management and cost accounting systems, it may experience unforeseen challenges to its inventory and pricing strategies.

Our revenues and expenses are collected and paid in different currencies, including the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar. Fluctuations in the relative values of any such currency expose us to foreign exchange risk and could have a material and adverse effect on our cash flows, revenues and results of operations. We also have currency exchange exposure to the extent of a mismatch between foreign-currency denominated revenues and expenditures – in particular, where U.S. dollar revenues do not equal U.S. dollar expenditures. We are not currently using exchange rate derivatives to manage currency exchange rate risks. There are currently no significant restrictions on the repatriation of capital and distribution of earnings to foreign entities from any of the jurisdictions in which we operate. There can be no assurance that such restrictions will not be imposed in the future. Most of DIRTT's debt is on fixed interest rates. The Fifth Extended RBC Facility (as defined below) is subject to market interest rates. We are not currently using interest rate derivatives to manage interest rate risks. If interest rates rise, this could have a material and adverse effect on our cash flows, revenues and results of operations and may adversely affect our ability to access financing. We are currently undrawn on our Fifth Extended RBC Facility. Compliance with new or amended tax laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business. We base our tax positions upon our understanding of the tax laws (including, applicable tax treaties) of the countries in which we have assets or conduct business activities. However, our tax positions are subject to review and possible challenges by taxing authorities, including as to the computation and allocation of income, transfer pricing and other complex issues. This includes adverse changes to the manner in which Canada, the United States and other countries tax local and foreign corporations and interpret or change their tax laws and applicable tax treaties, including in light of the increased focus by the U.S. Congress, the Canadian government, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and other government agencies in jurisdictions where we do business on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations. We cannot determine in advance the extent to which such jurisdictions may amend their tax laws, review our tax positions, or assess additional taxes or interest and penalties on such taxes. In addition, our effective tax rate may be increased by changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, our cash management strategies, local tax rates, or interpretations of tax laws.

Our co-founders and former executives, Mogens Smed and Barrie Loberg, have started an interior construction and manufacturing company that we believe competes with us. They, along with a number of our former employees and Construction Partners who have joined their company, have in-depth knowledge about our business, including our customers, employees, products and prospects, and we may be adversely affected by increased competition arising out of this business venture. We are engaged in litigation with Messrs. Smed and Loberg, entities with which they are involved, and other individuals relating to, among other things, enforcement of non-competition and non-solicitation obligations, and alleged misappropriation of proprietary information by them or by us. If Messrs. Smed and Loberg further engage in a competitive business against us or if we are not successful in litigation, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. See Item 3. "Legal Proceedings."

Societal expectations on companies to address, environmental and social impacts and investor, regulatory and societal expectations regarding voluntary and mandatory ESG-related disclosures may result in increased costs, reduced demand for our customers' products, reduced profits, increased investigations and litigation, negative impacts on our stock price and reduced access to capital markets. Moreover, while we may publish voluntary disclosures from time to time, certain statements in those voluntary disclosures may be based on expectations, assumptions and hypothetical scenarios that may or may not be representative of current or actual risks or events or forecasts of expected risks or events, including the costs associated therewith. Mandatory ESG-related disclosure is also emerging as an area where we may be, or may become, subject to required disclosures in certain jurisdictions, and any such mandatory disclosures may similarly necessitate the use of hypothetical, projected or estimated data, some of which is not controlled by us and is inherently subject to imprecision. Disclosures reliant upon such expectations, assumptions and hypothetical scenarios are necessarily uncertain and may be prone to error or subject to misinterpretation given the long timelines involved and the lack of an established single approach to identifying, measuring and reporting on many ESG matters. Further, we have announced various voluntary ESG targets in our annual Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) report outlining our commitments to sustainability, the environment, health and safety, and social initiatives, which are often aspirational. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to meet such voluntary targets in the manner or on such a timeline as initially contemplated, including, but not limited to, any unforeseen costs, changes to relevant accounting methodologies or technical difficulties associated with achieving such results. Any actual or perceived failure to meet our ESG targets could adversely impact our reputation and our customers' image of our products and result in the loss of business or impede our growth initiatives. Adverse publicity regarding ESG issues and similar matters, whether or not justified, could have a negative impact on our reputation and may result in the loss of customers and our inability to secure new customer relationships. Further, our customers may be more selective for products that meet their ESG goals or standards, such as increasing demand for goods that result in lower emissions, and our products could be less competitive if we are unable to meet these standards. Despite our efforts to adapt to and address these concerns, our efforts may be insufficient. Additionally, the implementation of these initiatives may increase our costs. It is difficult to predict how our efforts with respect to social and sustainability matters will be evaluated by current and prospective investors or by our customers or business partners. Despite our voluntary actions, we may receive pressure from certain investors, lenders, or other groups to adopt more aggressive ESG-related goals or policies, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to pursue or implement such goals because of potential costs or technical or operational obstacles. Furthermore, our reputation, as well as our stakeholder relationships, could be adversely impacted as a result of stakeholder perceptions of statements made by us, our employees and executives, agents, or other third parties or public pressures from investors or policy groups to change our policies. Certain statements with respect to ESG matters are becoming increasingly subject to heightened scrutiny from public and governmental authorities related to the risk of potential "greenwashing," i.e., misleading information or false claims overstating potential ESG benefits. For example, the SEC has recently taken enforcement actions against companies for ESG-related misconduct, including greenwashing. The SEC, various state agencies, non-governmental organizations and other private actors have also filed lawsuits under various securities and consumer protection laws alleging that certain ESG-statements, goals or standards were misleading, false or otherwise deceptive. Additionally, certain employment practices and social initiatives are the subject of scrutiny by both proponents and detractors of such policies, including by government actors, and the complex regulatory and legal frameworks applicable to such initiatives continue to evolve. We cannot be certain of the impact of such regulatory, legal and other developments on our business. Recent political developments in the U.S. may result in increased criticism or litigation risks, including from U.S. governmental agencies. These sentiments may focus on the Company's environmental commitments (such as reducing GHG emissions), its pursuit of certain employment practices or its social initiatives that are alleged to be political or polarizing in nature or are alleged to violate laws based, in part, on changing priorities of, or interpretations by, federal agencies or state governments. Consideration of ESG-related factors in the Company's decision-making could be subject to increased scrutiny and objection from such anti-ESG parties. As a result, we may face increased litigation risks from private parties and governmental authorities related to our ESG efforts. Moreover, any alleged claims of greenwashing against us or others in our industry may lead to negative sentiment. To the extent that we are unable to respond timely and appropriately to any negative publicity, our reputation could be harmed. Damage to our overall reputation could have a negative impact on our financial results and require additional resources to rebuild our reputation. Additionally, to the extent ESG matters negatively impact our reputation, we may not be able to compete as effectively to recruit or retain employees, which may adversely affect our operations. Such ESG matters may also impact our customers, which may result in reduced demand for certain of our products and services. As a result of amendments to the Competition Act (Canada), certain public representations by a business regarding the benefits of the work it is doing to protect or restore the environment or mitigate the environmental and ecological causes or effects of climate change may violate the Competition Act (Canada)'s deceptive marketing practices provisions. These amendments include substantial financial penalties. Uncertainty surrounding the interpretation and enforcement of this legislation may expose the Company to increased litigation and financial penalties, the outcome and impacts of which can be difficult to assess or quantify and may have a material adverse effect on DIRTT's business, reputation, financial condition, and results.