Arrow Electronics (ARW) Risk Analysis

The company is subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations worldwide that differ among jurisdictions and affect our operations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (the "EAR"), U.S. Customs regulations, and various other trade laws, regulations, and sanctions administered by the U.S. Departments of State, Commerce, and Treasury, as well as other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies. Products the company sells which are either manufactured in the United States or based on U.S. technology ("U.S. Products") are subject to the EAR when exported and re-exported to and from all international jurisdictions, in addition to the local jurisdiction's export regulations applicable to individual shipments. If a regulator determines, even in error, that the company or its subsidiaries are not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations or designates the company or its subsidiaries as sanctioned entities or otherwise prohibits third-parties from transacting with them, such determination could result in negative impacts to the company's sales, customer relationships, and reputation that could have a material negative impact on the company's business and financial condition. For example, on October 8, 2025, three of the company's subsidiaries in China were added to the "Entity List" of the BIS, which restricted their ability to receive exports of U.S. technology from suppliers. On October 17, 2025, the BIS informed the company that it will remove these subsidiaries from the Entity List and granted a temporary authorization to resume normal business activities with these entities; however, during the intervening time period, the subsidiaries were unable to receive shipments from many suppliers and fulfill corresponding customer orders, which had an adverse impact on the Company's operating results for the fourth quarter of 2025 and may continue to have an adverse impact beyond 2025. In addition, licenses or proper license exemptions may be required by local jurisdictions' export regulations, including EAR, for the shipment of certain U.S. Products to certain countries, including China, India, and other countries in which the company operates. The company may not be able to effectively monitor the activities of all of its employees involved in regulated export or shipment activities, which may lead to the company's failure to prevent violations of such regulations. Non-compliance with the EAR, OFAC regulations, or other applicable export regulations can result in a wide range of penalties including the denial or restriction of export privileges, significant fines, criminal penalties, and the seizure of inventories, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the company's business. The company's distribution process also includes the use of third parties that operate outside of the company's direct control. Noncompliance with applicable import, export, and other laws and regulations by these third parties may result in substantial liability to the company and harm the company's reputation. Further, the company is also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, and other national and sub-national anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which it conducts business. Anti-corruption laws have been enforced aggressively in recent years and are interpreted broadly. The company can be held liable under these laws for the corrupt or other illegal activities of its employees, agents, contractors, counterparties, and third parties it engages to provide services, even if it does not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities. Any violations of the laws and regulations described above may result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties, imprisonment, the loss of export or import privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm, and other consequences. The company's global business also could be negatively affected by trade barriers, such as tariffs, and other governmental protectionist measures, which may decrease demand for the company's products. Such measures can be imposed suddenly and unpredictably and may increase the prices of many of the products that the company purchases from its suppliers. Tariffs and other protectionist measures, and the additional operational costs incurred in minimizing the number of products subject to them, could adversely affect the operating profits for certain of the company's businesses and customer demand for certain products, which could have an adverse effect on its business and results of operations. In the event that the company pays tariffs for products it imports from China, which are then re-exported to other locations outside of the United States, the company may be eligible for refunds of certain tariffs. In order to qualify for these tariff drawbacks, the company must provide data and documentation to the U.S. government that it must obtain from third-party sources, such as its suppliers. There is no guarantee the company will be able to obtain this additional data and documentation from those other sources, which could result in the U.S. government rejecting the drawback requests. There have been, and there could be, additional administrative costs in furtherance of these efforts.

The company has in the past and may in the future be subject to claims, investigations, regulatory proceedings, and lawsuits in and outside the ordinary course of business, including related to product liability and warranties, investigations by governmental agencies, litigation alleging the infringement of intellectual property rights, securities and shareholder litigation, and litigation related to employee matters and commercial disputes. Such matters are unpredictable. Managing, defending, and responding to claims, investigations, and lawsuits may divert management's attention, damage the company's reputation, and cause the company to incur significant expenses, even if there is no evidence that the company is at fault. In addition, the company may be required to pay damage awards, penalties, fines, or settlements, or become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, which could have a material adverse effect on the company's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, any insurance or indemnification rights that the company has may be insufficient or unavailable to protect the company against potential loss exposures. Certain of the company's products and services include intellectual property owned primarily by the company's third-party suppliers and, to a lesser extent, the company itself, and risk of litigation regarding these intellectual property rights exists. Third parties (including companies which acquire patents for the purpose of seeking artificial licensing revenue and not actually developing technology) may assert patent, copyright and/or other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to the company's business, for which the company may not be able to obtain indemnification. In addition, the company is exposed to potential liability either for technology it develops or when it combines multiple technologies of its suppliers for which the company may have limited or no indemnification protection. The company may also be required to indemnify and defend a customer in the event it becomes a target of intellectual property litigation. Any infringement or indemnification claim brought against the company, regardless of the duration, outcome, or size of damage award, could result in substantial cost to the company, including potential for damage awards; be time consuming and costly to defend; or cause product shipment delays. Moreover, in the event of an adverse determination, the company may be required to seek royalty or license arrangements, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or may be unavailable entirely. In such circumstance, the company would be required to stop selling certain products or technologies, which could negatively affect the company's ability to compete effectively. The payment of any such damages or royalties may significantly increase the company's operating expenses and materially harm the company's operating results and financial condition.

The company's effective tax rate may be adversely affected by fluctuations in the geographic distribution of earnings, which may subject earnings to different or multiple statutory tax rates. Shifts in the business environment or changes in tax laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which the company operates may also adversely affect the company's effective tax rate. For further details on the company's deferred tax assets and liabilities and uncertain tax positions, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In recent years, numerous domestic and international tax proposals have been issued and enacted which have increased the tax burden on large multinational companies. For example, the OECD has advanced new tax proposals affecting international taxation, including the establishment of a global minimum tax of 15%, which many countries are either considering implementing or have already implemented. Any new tax legislation could impact the company's tax obligations in the countries where it operates, leading to increased taxation of its international earnings. Moreover, changes to U.S. or foreign tax laws could have broader implications, including indirect effects on the economy, currency markets, inflation, or competitive dynamics, which are difficult to predict and may negatively impact the company. Such tax developments could further increase uncertainty and have a material adverse impact on the company's cash flows, effective tax rate, and financial results. The company is regularly audited by U.S. and foreign tax authorities. Although the company provisions for income taxes and tax estimates, the final resolution of these audits may differ, in some cases materially, from the estimates reflected in the company's financial results. Additionally, economic and political pressures to increase tax revenue by various jurisdictions may make resolving tax disputes more challenging than in the past.

As a distributor, the company sells its components or services at prices that are significantly lower than the cost of the equipment or other goods in which they are incorporated. As a result, the company may face claims for damages (such as consequential damages) that are disproportionate to the revenues and profits it receives from the components involved in such claims. Further, the company's ability to avoid such liabilities pursuant to defective product provisions in its supplier agreements may be limited as a result of differing factors, such as the inability to exclude such damages due to third party contractual provisions or the laws of some of the countries where the company does business. The company's business could be materially adversely affected as a result of a significant quality or performance issue in the products sold by the company if it is required to pay for the associated damages. The company's product liability insurance is limited in coverage and amount and may not be sufficient to cover all possible claims. Further, when relying on contractual liability exclusions, the company could lose customers if their claims are not addressed to their satisfaction. In the company's rendering of integration services, the company may be exposed to increased risks associated with product defects. Defects arising from integration services could lead to product liability claims, recalls, fines, and penalties. These risks are particularly pronounced in applications for aerospace, automotive, and medical products, where product failures could result in serious harm to end users. Any such adverse events could affect our financial condition, operating results, and reputation.

A substantial portion of the company's inventory is purchased from suppliers with which the company has entered into non-exclusive distribution agreements. These agreements are typically cancellable at any time or on short notice (generally 30 to 90 days). Some of the company's businesses rely on a limited number of suppliers to provide a high percentage of their revenues. For example, sales of products from one of the company's suppliers accounted for approximately 8% of the company's consolidated sales in 2024. To the extent that the company's significant suppliers reduce the number of products they sell through distribution or cease selling their products through distribution entirely, experience disruptions in their supply chains, cease to continue doing business with the company, or are unable to continue to meet or significantly alter their obligations, the company's business could be materially adversely affected. In addition, to the extent the company's suppliers modify the terms of their contracts to the detriment of the company, limit supplies due to capacity constraints or other factors, or cancel such contracts or exercise remedies thereunder due to the company's breach of contract terms, there could be a material adverse effect on the company's business. Further, the supplier landscape has continued to experience a consolidation, which could negatively impact the company if the surviving, consolidated suppliers decide to exclude the company from their supply chains, and which could expose the company to increased pricing and dependence on a smaller number of suppliers, among other risks. Increasing consolidation in the industries where the company's suppliers operate may occur as companies combine to achieve further economies of scale and other synergies, which could result in reduced supplies, as companies seek to eliminate duplicative product lines and services, and increased prices, which could have a material adverse effect on the company's business.

The market for the company's products and services is subject to rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, changes in end-market demand, evolving customer expectations and demands, oversupply of product, and regulatory requirements, which can contribute to the decline in value or the obsolescence of the company's inventory. Although many of the company's suppliers provide the company with certain protections from the loss in value of inventory (such as price protection and certain rights of return), the company cannot be sure that (i) such protections will fully compensate it for the loss in value, (ii) the suppliers will choose to, or be able to, honor such agreements, or (iii) the company will be able to continue to secure such protections in the future. For example, many of the company's suppliers will not allow products to be returned after they have been held in inventory beyond a certain amount of time, and, in most instances, the return rights are limited to a certain percentage of the amount of products the company purchased in a particular time frame. Therefore, the company is not fully protected from a decline in the value of the company's inventory, and such decline could have a material adverse effect on the company's business. The company, within its ECS reportable segment, has multi-year distribution agreements under which it has non-cancellable payment obligations through 2030, giving the company the right to sell a broad set of IT solutions. If the company is unable to sell sufficient IT solutions under these agreements to cover our purchase obligations, it could have a material adverse effect on the company's business.

The company's industry is subject to rapid and significant technological changes, and the company's ability to meet its customers' needs and expectations is key to the company's ability to grow sales and earnings. The company's customers and suppliers increasingly expect the company's platforms to include digital technologies to facilitate distribution of components and electronic computing solutions over time. For example, the ability of customers to access their accounts, place orders, and otherwise interface with the company using digital technology is an important aspect of the distribution industry, and distribution companies are rapidly introducing new digital and other technology-driven products and services that aim to offer a better customer experience and reduce costs. If the company is unable to maintain and enhance its digital platforms, cloud platforms, and artificial intelligence related tools to keep pace with competitors and align with evolving customer and supplier expectations and demands, it could adversely impact the company's sales revenues and ability to retain existing, and attract new, customers. Additionally, the company has made, and may continue to make, acquisitions of, or investments in new services or technologies to expand its current service offerings and product lines, which may involve risks that may differ from those traditionally associated with the company's core distribution business.  See also "Acquisitions, divestitures, or joint ventures may cause the company to experience operating difficulties and other consequences that may negatively impact the company's business, financial condition, and operating results, and the company may not be able to successfully consummate favorable transactions or integrate acquired businesses". The company's sales are also partially dependent on continued innovations in components and electronic computing solutions by its suppliers, the competitiveness of its suppliers' offerings, and the company's ability to partner with new and emerging technology providers. The company may have difficulty offering customers components, services, and solutions that anticipate and respond to rapid and continuing changes in technology and which meet their evolving demands. See also "The competitive pressures the company faces, such as pricing and margin reductions, could have a material adverse effect on the company's business".

The company's information technology systems could be subject to significant cyber security and privacy incidents, including, but not limited to, invasion, malicious intrusion, inducement (fraudulent or otherwise) by third parties to obtain information from employees, customers, or suppliers; cyber-attacks; ransom demands; or cybersecurity breaches caused by third parties as well as employees and others with authorized access; social engineering; nation-state attacks; exploitation of unpatched or unmanaged vulnerabilities; destruction or other misuse of data that could harm the company, operations, or the company's competitive position. The company and its service providers have been, and continue to be, the subject of cyber-attacks. While cybersecurity incidents have not caused any material interruption to the company's business, strategy, results of operations, or financial condition, there can be no assurance that such incidents will not have a material adverse impact on the company in the future. Any such incident, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in, without limitation, disruption to the company's operations; loss or compromise of, or damage to, the company's or any of its customers' or suppliers' data, confidential information; significant legal, regulatory, and financial exposure; damage to the company's reputation; significant costs related to rebuilding internal systems, managing company brand and reputation, litigation, fines, damages, responding to regulatory inquiries, and taking other remedial steps; loss of competitive advantage; and a loss of confidence in the security of the company's information technology systems, any of which could have an adverse impact on the company's business, including by impairing the company's ability to sell its products and services. Because the techniques used to cause these incidents and gain unauthorized access to, disable, or sabotage the company's information technology systems and data stored on those systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched, the company may be unable to anticipate them or to implement adequate preventive or protective measures to guard against them. Further, third parties, such as hosted solution providers, are a source of risk because they could be subject to the same or other similar types of incidents, for example in the event of a failure of their own systems and infrastructure or if they experience their own privacy or security event, which could create risks similar to those described above. These third parties could include organizations in the company's supply chain, which if subject to an incident, could adversely impact the company's ability to service its customers and suppliers.

The company relies on its information systems to support daily operations and generate timely, accurate, and reliable financial and operational data. The company's current global operations reside on multiple technology platforms, some of which are currently undergoing projects intended to streamline or optimize these platforms. The size and complexity of the company's information systems make them vulnerable to breakdown, defective software updates from the company's information-technology vendors, failure to keep software updated and current, and ransomware attacks. Failure to properly or adequately address such issues could impact the company's ability to perform necessary business operations, which could materially adversely affect the company's business. Technologies used in or integrated into the company's operations, such as cloud-based services, artificial intelligence, and automation, may cause an adverse shift in the way the company's existing business operations are conducted. In addition, AI algorithms may be flawed. Datasets used to train the models which support the company's AI offerings or internal use may be insufficient or contain biased information or lead to unexpected or unintended outcomes, which could erode trust in the company's AI systems and subject the company to competitive harm, regulatory action, and legal liability.

The company competes for both customers and suppliers in a highly competitive international environment against other large multinational and national electronic components and enterprise computing solutions distributors, as well as numerous other smaller, specialized competitors who generally focus on narrower market sectors, products, or industries. Such robust competition broadly, and within each market sector and geography, creates pricing and margin pressure and continuous demand for the company to improve service and product offerings. Additionally, some of the company's competitors may have more extensive customer and/or supplier bases than the company in one or more of its market sectors. Other competitive factors include rapid technological changes, product availability, credit availability, speed of delivery, ability to tailor solutions to changing customer needs, quality and depth of product lines and training, and increasing demand for customer service and support. The company also faces competition from its own suppliers and from companies in the logistics and product fulfillment, catalog distribution, e-commerce, design services, and supply chain services markets. Reduced pricing power and reduced margins, as well as a failure to adequately address evolving customer demand and otherwise respond to these competitive factors, could adversely impact the company's results of operations. As the company continues to expand its business into new areas in order to stay competitive in the market, the company may encounter increased competition from its current and/or new competitors, making it difficult to retain or increase its market share. Further, supplier consolidation may result in suppliers with greater scale, market presence, and purchasing power. As a result, distributors such as the company may experience difficulty maintaining favorable pricing and margins and experience related adverse impacts on operating results.

The company's business and financial performance depend on worldwide economic conditions and the demand for technology products and services in the markets in which the company competes. Ongoing economic weakness, uncertainty in markets throughout the world, and other adverse economic conditions, such as the recent downturn in the semiconductor market, have and may continue to result in decreased net revenue, gross margin, earnings, growth rates or cash flows, and increased expenses and difficulty managing inventory levels, collecting customer receivables, and accurately forecasting revenue, gross margin, cash flows and expenses. Political developments impacting international trade, trade disputes and increased tariffs, particularly between the United States and China; political instability, such as armed conflicts (including the conflicts in Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine, in Israel and the Gaza Strip, and in Syria); and the effects of epidemics, pandemics, and other public health crises each, or collectively may negatively impact markets and cause weaker macroeconomic conditions, weakening demand for the company's products and services, particularly due to the company's extensive international operations and business. Economic downturns also may lead to future restructuring actions and associated expenses, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the company's business.

In 2024, 2023, and 2022, approximately 65%, 66%, and 65%, respectively, of the company's sales came from its operations outside the United States. As a result of the significant extent of the company's international business and operations, the company is subject to a variety of risks, including the following: - import and export regulations that could erode profit margins or restrict exports;- the burden and cost of compliance with international laws, regulations, treaties, and technical standards, including, without limitation, with respect to tax;- potential restrictions on transfers of funds;- trade protection measures, import and export tariffs and other restrictions, duties, and value-added taxes;- transportation delays and interruptions;- uncertainties arising from local business practices and cultural considerations;- foreign laws that potentially discriminate against or disfavor companies headquartered outside the relevant jurisdiction;- stringent antitrust regulations in local jurisdictions;- volatility associated with sovereign debt of certain international economies;- various jurisdictions' environmental protection laws and regulations, including those related to climate change  and sustainability disclosures;- non-compliance with local laws;- potential social unrest, military conflicts, government shutdowns and disruptions, and other geopolitical risks and uncertainties; and - currency fluctuations. See also "The company is subject to U.S. and certain foreign export and import controls, sanctions, embargoes, anti-corruption laws, anti-bribery laws, and anti-money laundering laws and regulations, as well as tariffs and trade protectionism. In the event of non-compliance, the company can face serious consequences, which can harm its business." Refer to "Foreign Currency Exchange Risk" in Item 7.A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for a further discussion of the company's description of the impacts of foreign currency exchange rates on the company's results and projections.