tiprankstipranks
Icici Bank (IBN)
:IBN
US Market
Holding IBN?
Track your performance easily

Icici Bank (IBN) Risk Factors

786 Followers
Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.

Icici Bank disclosed 63 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Icici Bank reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.

Risk Overview Q1, 2022

Risk Distribution
63Risks
48% Finance & Corporate
19% Legal & Regulatory
19% Macro & Political
5% Tech & Innovation
5% Production
5% Ability to Sell
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.

Risk Change Over Time

S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Icici Bank Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.

The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.

Risk Highlights Q1, 2022

Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 30 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 30 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
63
-4
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
63
-4
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
1Risks added
5Risks removed
8Risks changed
Since Mar 2022
1Risks added
5Risks removed
8Risks changed
Since Mar 2022
Number of Risk Changed
8
-3
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
8
-3
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of Icici Bank in the last period.

Risk Word Cloud

The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.

Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 63

Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 30/63 (48%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights9 | 14.3%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
You will not be able to vote your ADSs and your ability to withdraw equity shares from the depositary facility is subject to delays and legal restrictions.
Our ADS holders themselves have no voting rights unlike holders of our equity shares who have voting rights. The ceiling on voting rights for holders of equity shares is 26.0% of the total voting rights of a Bank. See also “Major Shareholders”. If you wish, you may withdraw the equity shares underlying your ADSs and seek to exercise your voting rights under the equity shares you obtain from the withdrawal. However, for foreign investors, this withdrawal process may be subject to delays. For a discussion of the legal restrictions triggered by a withdrawal of the equity shares from the depositary facility upon surrender of ADSs, see also “Restriction on Foreign Ownership of Indian Securities”.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
Your holdings may be diluted by additional issuances of equity and any dilution may adversely affect the market prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
In August 2020, we raised Rs. 150.00 billion (US$ 2.0 billion) of equity capital through a Qualified Institutions Placement. We may in the future conduct additional equity offerings to fund the growth of our business. In addition, up to 10.0% of our issued equity shares from time to time, may be granted in accordance with our Employee Stock Option Scheme. We constantly evaluate different financing options and any future issuance of equity shares or ADSs or exercise of employee stock options would dilute the positions of investors in equity shares and ADSs and could adversely affect the market prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
You may be unable to exercise pre-emptive rights available to other shareholders.
A company incorporated in India must offer its holders of equity shares pre-emptive rights to subscribe and pay for a proportionate number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentages prior to the issuance of any new equity shares, unless these rights have been waived by at least 75.0% of the company’s shareholders present and voting at a shareholders’ general meeting. United States investors in ADSs may be unable to exercise these pre-emptive rights for equity shares underlying ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) is effective with respect to such rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. Our decision to file a registration statement will depend on the costs and potential liabilities associated with any such registration as well as the perceived benefits of enabling investors in ADSs to exercise their preemptive rights and any other factors we consider appropriate at such time. To the extent that investors in ADSs are unable to exercise pre-emptive rights, their proportional ownership interests in us would be reduced.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
Your ability to sell in India any equity shares withdrawn from the depositary facility, the conversion of rupee proceeds from such sale into a foreign currency and the repatriation of such foreign currency may be subject to delays if specific approval of the Reserve Bank of India is required.
ADS holders seeking to sell in India any equity shares withdrawn upon surrender of ADSs, convert the rupee proceeds from such sale into a foreign currency or repatriate such foreign currency may need the Reserve Bank of India’s approval for each such transaction. See also “Restriction on Foreign Ownership of Indian Securities”. We cannot guarantee that any such approval will be obtained in a timely manner or at terms favorable to the investor. Because of possible delays in obtaining the requisite approvals, investors in equity shares may be prevented from realizing gains during periods of price increases or limiting losses during periods of price declines.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5
Certain shareholders own a large percentage of our equity shares and their actions could adversely affect the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
The Life Insurance Corporation of India, the General Insurance Corporation of India and other government-owned general insurance companies, all of which are directly controlled by the Indian government, are among our principal shareholders. At March 31, 2022, the Life Insurance Corporation of India held 6.4% of our outstanding equity shares. See also “Major Shareholders”. Any substantial sale of our equity shares by these or other large shareholders could adversely affect the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. The Reserve Bank of India, in exercise of powers conferred by the Banking Regulation Act has notified a ceiling on voting rights in a banking company for single shareholder of 26.0%. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas held 19.0% of our equity shares at March 31, 2022 and must vote these shares as directed by our Board of Directors.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6
Conditions in the Indian securities market may adversely affect the price or liquidity of our equity shares and ADSs.
The Indian securities markets are smaller and more volatile than securities markets in developed economies. In the past, the Indian stock exchanges have experienced high volatility and other problems that have affected the market price and liquidity of the listed securities, including temporary exchange closures, broker defaults, settlement delays and strikes by brokers. Following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020, the benchmark S&P BSE Sensex declined during the three months ended March 31, 2020 by 28.6%, from 41,254 level at December 31, 2019 to 29,468 at March 31, 2020. During this period, several listed securities were impacted, including us. The index has subsequently recovered and at June 30, 2022, the S&P BSE Sensex closed at 58,568. In the past as well volatility in the Indian stock markets have created temporary concerns regarding our exposure to the equity markets. In recent years, there have been changes in laws and regulations regulating the taxation of dividend income, which have impacted the Indian equity capital markets. See also “Dividends”. Similar problems or changes in the future could adversely affect the market price and liquidity of our equity shares and ADSs.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7
Settlement of trades of equity shares on Indian stock exchanges may be subject to delays.
The equity shares represented by ADSs are currently listed on the BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited. Settlement on those stock exchanges may be subject to delays and an investor in equity shares withdrawn from the depositary facility upon surrender of ADSs may not be able to settle trades on such stock exchanges in a timely manner. See also “—Risks Relating to ADSs and Equity Shares—Conditions in the Indian securities market may adversely affect the price or liquidity of our equity shares and ADSs.”
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8
Because the equity shares underlying ADSs are quoted in rupees in India, you may be subject to potential losses arising out of exchange rate risk on the Indian rupee.
Investors who purchase ADSs are required to pay for ADSs in U.S. dollars and are subject to currency fluctuation risk and convertibility risks since the equity shares underlying ADSs are quoted in rupees on the Indian stock exchanges on which they are listed. Dividends on the equity shares will also be paid in rupees and then converted into U.S. dollars for distribution to ADS investors. Investors who seek to convert the rupee proceeds of a sale of equity shares withdrawn upon surrender of ADSs into foreign currency and repatriate the foreign currency may need to obtain the approval of the Reserve Bank of India for each such transaction. See also “—Risks Relating to ADSs and Equity Shares—Your ability to sell in India any equity shares withdrawn from the depositary facility, the conversion of rupee proceeds from such sale into a foreign currency and the repatriation of such foreign currency may be subject to delays if specific approval of the Reserve Bank of India is required” and “Exchange Controls.”
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 9
There may be less company information available in Indian securities markets than in securities markets in the United States.
There is a difference between India and the United States in the level of regulation and monitoring of the securities markets and the activities of investors, brokers and other market participants. SEBI is responsible for improving disclosure and regulating insider trading and other matters for the Indian securities markets. There may however, be less publicly available information about Indian companies than is regularly made available by public companies in the United States.
Accounting & Financial Operations2 | 3.2%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
Added
Our failure to establish, maintain and apply an adequate internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse affect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation and fair presentation of our published Indian GAAP consolidated financial statements and disclosures relating to U.S. GAAP net income reconciliation, stockholders’ equity reconciliation and other disclosures as required by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and applicable GAAP. Our management is required to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclose whether such internal controls are effective. Our independent registered public accounting firm has to conduct an audit to evaluate and then render an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. See “Management—Summary Comparison of Corporate Governance Practices—Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. We have established internal controls over financial reporting, as well as policies and procedures for evaluating those controls, in order to provide reasonable assurance of the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements. However, these controls may not prevent or detect errors. Any evaluation of effectiveness of future periods is subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. To the extent any issues are identified through the foregoing processes, there can be no assurance that we will be able to resolve them in a timely manner or at all. If this occurs, our reputation may be damaged, which could lead to a decline in investor confidence in us and may adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
Adoption of a different basis of accounting or new accounting standards may result in changes in our reported financial position and results of operations for future and prior periods.
The financial statements and other financial information included or incorporated by reference in this annual report are based on our unconsolidated and consolidated financial statements under Indian GAAP. Indian corporations have transitioned to Ind AS, a revised set of accounting standards, which largely converges the Indian accounting standards with International Financial Reporting Standards, as per the roadmap provided to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, which is the law making authority for adoption of accounting standards in India. Some of our group non-banking finance companies have transitioned to Ind AS. For banking and insurance companies, the implementation of Ind AS has been deferred until further notice. Ind AS 109 - Financial Instruments (Standard equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standard 9) would have a significant impact on the way financial assets and liabilities are classified and measured, resulting in volatility in profit or loss and equity. See also “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Convergence of Indian accounting standards with International Financial Reporting Standards”.
Debt & Financing16 | 25.4%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
If the level of our non-performing assets increases and the overall quality of our loan portfolio deteriorates, our business will suffer.
In recent years, banks, including us, have focused on growing their retail and small business lending portfolios. While we expect the retail and small business segment to remain a key driver of growth, a slowdown in economic growth, investment, consumption or employment or any increase in unemployment, due to a pandemic or otherwise, could have an adverse impact on the quality of our retail loan portfolio. Our portfolio includes lending under a special guarantee scheme introduced by the government to mitigate the adverse impact of Covid-19 pandemic for identified stressed sectors or borrowers that may carry higher risks compared to our portfolio. Our portfolio also includes purchases of retail asset pools of home finance companies and non-banking finance companies, that may expose us to additional risks, including the failure of the underlying borrowers to perform as anticipated, risks arising out of weakness in the financial position or operations of the originators, who are generally responsible for collections and servicing, and additional mark-to-market provisions where the purchases are structured as securitized instruments classified as investments. In addition, challenges in certain sectors like real estate, and the inability of real estate developers to complete and deliver residential properties for which we have provided loans to customers, may impact the repayment behavior of the customers and result in higher delinquencies and non-performing loans. See also “—Risks Relating to India and Other Economic and Market Risks—A prolonged slowdown in economic growth in India could cause our business to suffer” and “—Risks Relating to India and Other Economic and Market Risks—A significant change in the Indian government’s policies, including economic policies, fiscal policies and structural reforms, could adversely affect our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs”. The Reserve Bank of India has substantially expanded its guidance relating to the identification of non-performing assets over the last few years, which has resulted in an increase in our loans classified as non-performing and an increase in provisions. Nevertheless, these provisions may not be adequate to cover further increases in the amount of non-performing loans or further deterioration in our non-performing loan portfolio. In addition, the Reserve Bank of India’s annual supervisory process may assess higher provisions than we have made. In the event that additional provisioning is required by the Reserve Bank of India, our net income, balance sheet and capital adequacy could be affected, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, future financial performance, shareholders’ equity and the price of our equity shares and ADSs. The Reserve Bank of India also requires banks to disclose the divergence in asset classification and provisioning between what banks report and what the Reserve Bank of India assesses through the Reserve Bank of India’s annual supervisory process. There are also disclosures required relating to restructuring. There can be no assurance that such disclosures in the future will not impact us, our reputation, our business and future financial performance. Our subsidiaries and affiliates are also regulated by their respective regulatory bodies. Similar to us, there may arise a requirement for additional disclosures from our subsidiaries and affiliates in the future, which may have an adverse impact on us. If the level of our non-performing assets increases and the overall quality of our loan portfolio deteriorates, our provisioning costs could increase, our net interest income and net interest margin could be negatively impacted due to non-accrual of income on non-performing loans, our credit ratings and liquidity may be adversely impacted, we may become subject to enhanced regulatory oversight and scrutiny, and our reputation, our business, our future financial performance and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs could be adversely impacted. The Covid-19 pandemic and any adverse economic, regulatory and legal developments could cause further increases in the level of our non-performing assets and have a material adverse impact on the quality of our loan portfolio and business. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our loan portfolio includes long-term project finance loans, which are particularly vulnerable to completion and other risks” and “—Risks Relating to Our Business—We have a high concentration of loans to certain customers, borrower groups and sectors and if a substantial portion of these loans become non-performing, the overall quality of our loan portfolio, our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs could be adversely affected”.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
We have a high concentration of loans to certain customers, borrower groups and sectors and if a substantial portion of these loans become non-performing, the overall quality of our loan portfolio, our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.
Our loans and advances to the retail finance segment constituted 53.2% of our gross advances (gross loans) at March 31, 2022. Our loans and advances to the rural finance segment were 8.4%, services-finance sector were 7.6%, the infrastructure sector (excluding power) were 3.3%, the wholesale/retail trade segment were 3.1%, and the power sector were 2.1% of our gross loans and advances at March 31, 2022. Since April 1, 2019, banks have been subject to the Reserve Bank of India’s framework for large exposures with limits on exposure of banks to single counterparty and a group of connected counterparties. As per this framework, the sum of all the exposure values of a bank to a single counterparty must not be higher than 20% of the bank’s available eligible capital base at all times and the sum of all the exposure values of a bank to a group of connected counterparties must not be higher than 25% of the bank’s available eligible capital base at all times. Since April 1, 2019, banks have also been subject to the Reserve Bank of India’s guidelines proposing that large borrowers should reduce reliance on banks for their additional funding and access market borrowings and other funding sources. Borrowers to be considered for this purpose would be those having an aggregate fund-based credit limit of Rs. 250.0 billion at any time during fiscal 2018 and gradually reduced to Rs. 150.0 billion in fiscal 2019 and to Rs. 100.0 billion from fiscal 2020 onwards. Loans from banks in excess of 50.0% of the incremental funds raised by these borrowers attracts higher risk weights and provisioning since April 1, 2018. Eligible capital base represents the Bank’s Tier I capital as per the last audited balance sheet. Banks may, in exceptional circumstances, with the approval of their boards, consider enhancement of the exposure to a single counterparty further by 5.0% (i.e., 25.0% of the Tier I capital fund). The limit is applicable to total exposure, including off-balance sheet exposures. Off-balance sheet items are required to be converted into credit exposure equivalents through the use of credit conversion factors as per the standardized approach for credit risk for risk based capital requirements, with a floor of 10%. At year-end fiscal 2022, we were in compliance with these guidelines. At year-end fiscal 2022, our largest single counterparty accounted for 16.3% of our Tier I capital fund. The largest group of connected counterparties accounted for 26.5% of our Tier I capital fund. These guidelines, and our focus on controlling and reducing concentration risk, may restrict our ability to grow our business with some customers, thereby impacting our earnings. Although the Bank has significantly strengthened its enterprise risk management and risk appetite framework since fiscal 2016 for managing concentration risk, including limits/thresholds with respect to single borrower and group exposure, there can be no assurance that our strategy of reducing concentration risk will be successful and that we will be able to successfully grow our operating profits while controlling non-performing loans and provisions through this approach.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
The value of our collateral may decrease or we may experience delays in enforcing our collateral when borrowers default on their obligations to us which may result in failure to recover the expected value of collateral security exposing us to a potential loss.
A substantial portion of our loans to corporate and retail customers is secured by collateral. See also “Business—Loan Portfolio—Collateral—Completion, Perfection and Enforcement”. Changes in asset prices may cause the value of our collateral to decline, and we may not be able to realize the full value of our collateral as a result of delays in bankruptcy and foreclosure proceedings, delays in the creation of security interests, defects or deficiencies in the perfection of collateral (including due to inability to obtain approvals that may be required from various persons, agencies or authorities), fraudulent transfers by borrowers and other factors, including depreciation in the value of the collateral and illiquid market for disposal of and volatility in the market prices for the collateral, current legislative provisions or changes thereto and past or future judicial pronouncements. In India, foreclosure on collateral consisting of property can be undertaken directly by lenders by fulfilling certain procedures and requirements (unless challenged in courts of law) or otherwise by a written petition to an Indian court or tribunal. An application, when made (or a legal challenge to the foreclosure undertaken directly), may be subject to delays or administrative requirements that may result in, or be accompanied by, a decrease in the value of collateral. These delays can last for several years and might lead to deterioration in the physical condition or market value of the collateral. In the event, a corporate borrower is in financial difficulty and unable to sustain itself, it may opt for the process of voluntary winding up. Corporate borrowers may voluntarily, or by creditor action be admitted to the insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. During the period of resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, there is a standstill applicable on foreclosure and other recovery proceedings by the lenders. In some cases, we may foreclose on collateral in lieu of principal and interest dues but may experience delays in liquidating the collateral. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code enacted in 2016 provides for a time-bound mechanism to resolve stressed assets. Further, the new prudential framework for resolution of stressed assets, initially introduced in February 2018 and subsequently amended in June 2019 by the Reserve Bank of India, requires banks to implement a plan to resolve any overdue account within timelines as approved by the board and may include legal proceedings for insolvency or recovery. The process of resolution of accounts referred under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is still evolving, with periodic amendments being incorporated in the framework through both legislation and judicial decisions. A few large accounts were resolved under the Code since fiscal 2019. However, uncertainties continue and there are delays in the resolution of accounts referred under the Code. Should the resolution of accounts not be achieved and the borrowers go into liquidation, the market value of the collateral may come down thus impacting the recovery of dues by lenders. There can be no assurance of the level of recovery even in cases where a resolution is achieved. The Government of India has empowered the Committee of Creditors, which comprises of all financial creditors, to decide on the manner of distribution of resolution proceeds and provided an order of priority for the distribution of assets in case of a liquidation, giving priority to financial creditors ahead of operational creditors. In addition, for collateral we hold in jurisdictions outside India, the applicable laws and regulations in such jurisdictions may impact our ability to foreclose on collateral and realize its value. Failure to recover the expected value of collateral could expose us to potential losses, which could adversely affect our future financial performance, our stockholders’ equity and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
Our banking and trading activities are particularly vulnerable to interest rate risk and volatility in interest rates could adversely affect our net interest margin, the value of our fixed income portfolio, our income from treasury operations, the quality of our loan portfolio and our financial performance.
Interest rates in India are impacted by a range of factors including inflation, fiscal deficit and government borrowing, monetary policy and market liquidity. As a result of certain reserve requirements of the Reserve Bank of India, we are more structurally exposed to interest rate risk than banks in many other countries. See also “Supervision and Regulation—Legal Reserve Requirements”. These requirements result in our maintaining a large portfolio of fixed income Government of India securities, and we could be materially adversely impacted by a rise in interest rates, especially if the rise were sudden or sharp. Realized and marked-to-market gains or losses on investments in fixed income securities, including Government of India securities, are an important element of our profitability and are impacted by movements in market yields. A rise in yields on government securities reduces our profits from this activity and the value of our fixed income portfolio. For instance, in fiscal 2019, yields on government securities increased sharply due to tight liquidity conditions between September and December 2018 which resulted in significant losses in the treasury book for most Indian banks, including for us, during the quarter ended December 31, 2018. In April 2018, the Reserve Bank of India advised banks to create an Investment Fluctuation Reserve, equivalent to at least 2.0% of the held-for-trading and available-for-sale portfolio, on a continuing basis, from fiscal 2019 and draw down any balance available in excess of 2.0% of the portfolio. The requirement to maintain a large portfolio of government securities also has a negative impact on our net interest income and net interest margin because we earn interest on a portion of our assets at rates that are generally less favorable than those typically received on our other interest-earning assets. We are also exposed to interest rate risk through our treasury operations as well as the operations of certain of our subsidiaries and affiliates, including ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company, which have a portfolio of fixed income securities, and ICICI Securities Primary Dealership, which is a primary dealer in Government of India securities. In our asset management business, we manage money market, debt and hybrid mutual fund schemes whose performance is impacted by a rise in interest rates, which adversely impacts our revenues and profits from this business. See also “—Risks Relating to India and Other Economic and Market Risks—A prolonged slowdown in economic growth in India could cause our business to suffer.” If the yield on our interest-earning assets does not increase at the same time or to the same extent as our cost of funds, or if our cost of funds does not decline at the same time or to the same extent as the decrease in yield on our interest-earning assets, our net interest income and net interest margin would be adversely impacted. Any systemic decline in low cost funding available to banks in the form of current and savings account deposits would adversely impact our net interest margin. A slower growth in low cost deposits compared to total deposits would result in an increase in the cost of funds and could adversely impact our net interest margin if we are not able to pass on the increase to borrowers. Revisions in deposit interest rates, or introduction of higher interest rates, by banks with whom we compete may also lead to revisions in our deposit rates to remain competitive and this could adversely impact our cost of funds. The Reserve Bank of India has been releasing guidelines on computation of lending rates by banks. Since April 1, 2016, the marginal cost of funds based methodology was applicable on incremental lending, which led to lower lending rates, and led to more frequent revisions in lending rates due to the prescribed monthly review of cost of funds. In February 2018, the Reserve Bank of India proposed to harmonize the methodology of determining benchmark rates by linking the earlier base rate to the marginal cost based lending rate. Further, in December 2018, the Reserve Bank of India announced the linking of new floating rate retail loans and floating rate loans to micro and small enterprises to an external benchmark. This has been applicable since October 1, 2019. From April 1, 2020, floating rate loans to medium enterprises were also linked to an external benchmark. Since our funding is primarily fixed rate, volatility in external benchmarks underlying loan pricing may cause volatility in or compress our net interest margin. If there are increases in our cost of funds and if we are unable to pass on the increases fully into our lending rates, our net interest margins and profitability would be adversely impacted. Such revisions in external benchmark lending rates may impact the yield on our interest-earning assets, our net interest income and net interest margin. At year-end fiscal 2022, approximately 47.7% of the Bank’s domestic loan portfolio was linked to external benchmarks. The recent economic challenge of rising inflation during the three months ended June 30, 2022 led the Reserve Bank of India to increase the repo rate by 90 basis points and tighten systemic liquidity conditions by increasing the cash reserve ratio requirement of banks from 4.0% to 4.5% of net demand and time liabilities. The Reserve Bank of India also introduced a standing deposit facility rate as the floor of the liquidity adjustment facility compared to the earlier reverse repo rate. Any sudden withdrawal of or volatility in systemic liquidity or increase in interest rates may impact our liquidity and profitability. High and increasing interest rates or greater interest rate volatility would adversely affect our ability to grow, our net interest margins, our net interest income, our income from treasury operations and the value of our fixed income securities portfolio as well as the operations of certain of our subsidiaries.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
Our inability to effectively manage credit, market and liquidity risk and inaccuracy of our valuation models and accounting estimates may have an adverse effect on our earnings, capitalization, credit ratings and cost of funds.
Our risk management strategies may not be effective because in a difficult or less liquid market environment other market participants may be attempting to use the same or similar strategies to deal with difficult market conditions. In such circumstances, it may be difficult for us to reduce our risk positions due to the activity of such other market participants. Our derivatives businesses may expose us to unexpected market, credit and operational risks that could cause us to suffer unexpected losses or enhanced regulatory scrutiny. Severe declines in asset values, unanticipated credit events, or unforeseen circumstances that may cause previously uncorrelated factors to become correlated may create losses resulting from risks not appropriately taken into account in the development, structuring or pricing of a derivative instrument. In addition, some derivative transactions are not cleared and settled through a central clearing house or exchange, and they may not always be confirmed or settled by counterparties on a timely basis. In these situations, we are subject to heightened credit and operational risk, and in the event of a default, we may find the contract more difficult to enforce. Further, as new and more complex derivative products are created, disputes regarding the terms or the settlement procedures of the contracts could arise, which could force us to incur unexpected costs, including transaction and legal costs, and impair our ability to manage effectively our risk exposure to these products. Many of our hedging strategies and other risk management techniques have a basis in historic market behavior, and all such strategies and techniques are based to some degree on management’s subjective judgment. To the extent any of the instruments and strategies we use to hedge or otherwise manage our exposure to market or credit risk are not effective, we may not be able to mitigate effectively our risk exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk. Our balance sheet growth is dependent upon economic conditions, as well as upon our ability to securitize, sell, purchase or syndicate particular loans or loan portfolios. Our trading revenues and interest rate risk are dependent upon our ability to properly identify, and mark-to-market, changes in the value of financial instruments caused by changes in market prices or rates. Our earnings are dependent upon the effectiveness of our management of migrations in credit quality and risk concentrations, the accuracy of our valuation models and our critical accounting estimates and the adequacy of our allowances for loan losses. The Covid-19 pandemic, climate change and related economic disruption have significantly complicated risk management for banks, including us, and we may not be able to effectively mitigate the changes in our risk exposures. To the extent our assessments, assumptions or estimates prove inaccurate or not predictive of actual results, we could suffer higher than anticipated losses and enhanced regulatory scrutiny. The successful management of credit, market and operational risk is an important consideration in managing our liquidity risk because it affects the evaluation of our credit ratings by domestic and international rating agencies. Rating agencies may reduce or indicate their intention to reduce the ratings at any time. See also “—Risks Relating to India and Other Economic and Market Risks—Any downgrade of India’s debt rating or the rating on our senior unsecured foreign currency debt by an international rating agency could adversely affect our business, liquidity and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs”. The rating agencies can also decide to withdraw their ratings altogether, which may have the same effect as a reduction in our ratings. We are rated by certain Indian rating agencies, which include CRISIL, CARE and ICRA, with a long-term rating of AAA and a stable outlook. However, there is no assurance that we will always be able to maintain the highest rating and any significant decline in our business or capital position or increase in non-performing loans could impact our rating or outlook. Any reduction in our ratings (or withdrawal of ratings) may increase our borrowing costs, limit our access to capital markets and adversely affect our ability to sell or market our products, engage in business transactions particularly longer-term, and derivatives transactions, or retain our customers. Conditions in the international and Indian debt markets may adversely impact our access to financing and liquidity. This, in turn, could reduce our liquidity and negatively impact our operating results and financial condition. For more information, relating to our ratings, see also “Business—Risk Management—Market Risk—Liquidity Risk.”
Debt & Financing - Risk 6
Our funding is primarily short-term and if depositors do not roll over deposited funds upon maturity, our business could be adversely affected.
Most of our incremental funding requirements are met through short-term funding sources, primarily in the form of deposits including deposits from corporate customers and inter-bank deposits. Our customer deposits generally have a maturity of less than one year. However, a large portion of our assets have medium- or long-term maturities, creating the potential for funding mismatches. For instance, our project finance and mortgage loans typically have longer-term maturities compared to our funding profile. Negative rumors have been previously circulated about our financial position which resulted in concerns being expressed by depositors and higher than normal withdrawal levels for a few days. Our international branches are primarily funded by debt capital market issuances and syndicated/bilateral loans, while our international subsidiaries generally raise deposits in their local markets. Volatility in the international debt markets may constrain our international capital market borrowings. There can be no assurance that our international branches and subsidiaries will be able to obtain funding from the international debt markets or other sources in a timely manner on terms acceptable to them or at all. This may adversely impact our ability to replace maturing borrowings and fund new assets. In addition, borrowers who have taken foreign currency loans from us may face challenges in meeting their repayment obligations on account of market conditions and currency movements. See also “—Risks Relating to India and Other Economic and Market Risks—Financial instability in other countries, particularly countries where we have established operations, could adversely affect our business.”
Debt & Financing - Risk 7
We are subject to the directed lending requirements of the Reserve Bank of India, which may also involve buying related certificates at a premium to meet the annual targets, and any shortfall in meeting these requirements may be required to be invested in Government of India schemes that yield low returns, thereby impacting our profitability. We may also experience a higher level of non-performing assets in our directed lending portfolio, which could adversely impact the quality of our loan portfolio, our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Under the directed lending norms of the Reserve Bank of India, banks in India are required to lend 40.0% of their adjusted net bank credit to certain eligible sectors, categorized as priority sectors. Of this, banks have sub-targets for lending to key segments or sectors. A proportion of 9.0% of adjusted net bank credit is required to be lent to small and marginal farmers and 7.5% to micro-enterprises. The balance of the priority sector lending requirement can be met by lending to a range of sectors, including small businesses, medium-sized enterprises, renewable energy, social infrastructure and residential mortgages satisfying certain criteria. The Reserve Bank of India has directed banks to maintain direct lending to non-corporate farmers at the banking system’s average level for the last three years and has notified a target of 12.73% of adjusted net bank credit for this purpose for fiscal 2022. Loans to identified weaker sections of society must comprise 11.0% of adjusted net bank credit. Starting fiscal 2022, the targets for lending to small and marginal farmers and weaker sections has been increased in a phased manner by the Reserve Bank of India. The target for lending to small and marginal farmers will increase from 9.0% in fiscal 2022 to 9.5% in fiscal 2023 and to 10.0% in fiscal 2024. The target for lending to identified weaker sections of society has been increased from 11.0% in fiscal 2022 to 11.5% in fiscal 2023 and 12.0% in fiscal 2024. These requirements were assessed on a quarterly average basis till fiscal 2021 and failure to comply with these requirements would attract penalties. From fiscal 2022, the priority sector achievements are computed based on the weightage assigned to the incremental priority sector credit in the identified districts. The necessary adjustments for weightage of districts and calculation of achievement will be done by the Reserve Bank of India on the basis of data submitted by banks on a quarterly basis. These requirements apply to ICICI Bank on a standalone basis. During fiscal 2022, the Bank met most of the targets, except the average lending to the agriculture sector, which was Rs. 1,226.5 billion constituting 17.8% of adjusted net bank credit against the requirement of 18.0% of adjusted net bank credit. The Reserve Bank of India allows banks to sell and purchase priority sector lending certificates in the event of excess/shortfall in meeting priority sector targets, which may help in reducing the shortfall in priority sector lending. These instruments are issued by banks that have a surplus in priority sector lending or any of its individual sub-segments and are purchased by banks having a shortfall, through a trading portal, without the transfer of risks or loan assets. The cost of purchasing such certificates may increase substantially depending on the demand and supply scenario. Any shortfall after taking into account transactions in priority sector lending certificates may be required to be allocated to investments yielding sub-market returns. The Bank also purchases priority sector lending certificates to meet directed lending requirements, the cost of which may vary based on the demand for and supply of such certificates. Going forward, the phased increase in sub-segment targets and growth in our domestic loan portfolio could lead to a significant increase in our priority sector lending target amounts. In view of the continuing shortfall in agriculture lending sub-targets and weaker section loans, the Bank may have to significantly increase the purchase of priority sector lending certificates. Shortfalls in priority sector lending achievement, after taking into account the priority sector lending certificates purchased, may increase and may be required to be invested in instruments yielding sub-market returns. Any shortfall in meeting the priority sector lending requirements may be required to be invested at any time, at the Reserve Bank of India’s request, in Government of India schemes that yield low returns, determined depending on the prevailing bank rate and on the level of shortfall, thereby impacting our profitability. At March 31, 2022, our total investments in such schemes on account of past shortfalls in achieving the required level of priority sector lending were Rs. 264.2 billion. Our investments in Government of India schemes are expected to increase in view of the continuing shortfall in agriculture lending sub-targets. These investments count towards overall priority sector target achievement. Investments at March 31 of the preceding year are included in the adjusted net bank credit which forms the base for computation of the priority sector and sub-segment lending requirements. The Reserve Bank of India has from time to time issued guidelines on priority sector lending requirements that restrict the ability of banks to meet the directed lending obligations through lending to specialized financial intermediaries, specify criteria to be fulfilled for investments by banks in securitized assets and outright purchases of loans and assignments to be eligible for classification as priority sector lending and regulate the interest rates charged to ultimate borrowers by the originating entities in such transactions. Any revision to the definition or classification of segments eligible for priority sector lending could also impact our ability to meet priority sector lending requirements. See also “Supervision and Regulation—Regulations Relating to Advancing Loans—Directed Lending”. As a result of priority sector lending requirements, we may experience a higher level of non-performing assets in our directed lending portfolio, particularly due to loans to the agricultural sector and small enterprises, where we are less able to control the portfolio quality and where economic difficulties are likely to affect our borrowers more severely. The Bank’s gross non-performing assets in the priority sector loan portfolio were 2.3% in fiscal 2020, 3.4% in fiscal 2021 and 2.7% in fiscal 2022. In fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019, some states in India announced schemes for waiver of loans taken by farmers. While the cost of such schemes is borne by the state governments, such schemes or borrower expectations of such schemes result in higher delinquencies including in the kisan credit card portfolio for banks, including us. Under the Reserve Bank of India’s guidelines, these and other specified categories of agricultural loans are classified as non-performing when they are overdue for more than 360 days, as compared to 90 days for loans in general. Thus, the classification of overdue loans as non-performing occurs at a later stage in respect of such loans than the loan portfolio in general. Any future changes by the Reserve Bank of India to the directed lending norms may result in our continued inability to meet the priority sector lending requirements as well as require us to increase our lending to relatively riskier segments and may result in an increase in non-performing loans. We have participated in the financial inclusion mission of the Government of India, which involves opening a bank account for every household along with credit and insurance facilities. The expansion into these markets involves significant investments and recurring costs. The profitability of these operations depends on our ability to generate business volumes in these centers and from these customers, and the level of non-performing loans in the portfolio of loans to such customers.
Debt & Financing - Risk 8
We are subject to capital adequacy requirements stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India, including Basel III, as well as general market expectations regarding the level of capital adequacy large Indian private sector banks should maintain, and any inability to maintain adequate capital due to changes in regulations, a lack of access to capital markets, or otherwise may impact our ability to grow and support our businesses.
Banks in India are subject to the Basel III capital adequacy framework as stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India. The Basel III guidelines, among other things, require a minimum common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 5.5% and a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.0%, a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 9.0%, and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the minimum requirements to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The Bank is also required to maintain a capital surcharge of 0.20% on account of being designated a domestic systemically important bank. The guidelines also establish eligibility criteria for capital instruments in each tier of regulatory capital, require adjustments to and deductions from regulatory capital, and provide for limited recognition of minority interests in the regulatory capital of a consolidated banking group. The Basel III guidelines were to be fully implemented by year-end fiscal 2019. However, the Reserve Bank of India deferred the implementation of the last tranche of 0.625% of capital conservation buffer from March 31, 2019 to March 31, 2020. The full implementation was further deferred to October 1, 2021 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the last tranche of 0.625% of the capital conservation buffer became applicable from October 1, 2021. Applying the Basel III guidelines, our capital ratios on a consolidated basis at March 31, 2022 were: common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 17.3%; Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 18.0%; and total risk-based capital ratio of 18.9%. The Reserve Bank of India has released guidelines on implementation of counter cyclical capital buffers, which propose higher capital requirements for banks, ranging from 0% to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, during periods of high economic growth. This capital requirement would be determined based on certain triggers such as deviation of long-term average credit-to-GDP ratio and other indicators. While these guidelines are already effective, the Reserve Bank of India has stated that current economic conditions do not warrant activation of the counter cyclical capital buffer. The Reserve Bank of India has also issued a leverage ratio framework which is measured as the ratio of a bank’s Tier 1 capital and total exposure. Since October 1, 2019, the Reserve Bank of India has required maintenance of a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0% for domestic systemically important banks, including us, and 3.5% for other banks. In April 2018, the Reserve Bank of India advised banks to create an Investment Fluctuation Reserve from fiscal 2019 with the aim of building adequate reserves to protect against sudden increase in Government of India bond yields. A minimum amount equal to either the net profit on sale of investments during the year or net profit for the year excluding mandatory appropriations, whichever is lower, would have to be transferred to the Investment Fluctuation Reserve and would cover at least 2.0% of the held-for-trading and available-for-sale portfolio of the bank, on a continuing basis. This reserve is eligible for inclusion in tier 2 capital. Regulatory changes may impact the amount of capital that we are required to hold. Our ability to grow our business and execute our strategy is dependent on our level of capitalization and we may be required to raise resources from the capital markets or to divest stake in one or more of our subsidiaries to meet our capital requirements. Any reduction in our regulatory capital ratios, changes to the capital requirements applicable to us on account of regulatory changes or otherwise, our inability to access capital markets or otherwise increase our capital base and our inability to meet stakeholder expectations of the appropriate level of capital for us, while also meeting expectations of return on capital may limit our ability to maintain our market standing and grow our business, and adversely impact our future performance and strategy. Debt and equity investors, rating agencies, equity and fixed income analysts, regulators and others would likely expect us to maintain capital adequacy ratios well above the regulatory stipulations, reflecting our position as a large private sector bank. Following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, a number of banks and other financial companies globally and in India raised capital. In August 2020, we raised Rs. 150.0 billion of equity capital through a Qualified Institutions Placement. We may seek to access the equity capital markets in the future, or make additional divestments of our investments in our subsidiaries and affiliates. Increases in our equity shares would dilute the shareholding of existing shareholders. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising the capital when required or that the timing for accessing the market or the terms of the capital raised would be attractive, and these may be subject to various uncertainties including liquidity conditions, market stability, or political or economic conditions. If we are unable to raise enough capital to satisfy our regulatory capital requirements, we will be subject to restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments, as well as other potential regulatory actions. In fiscal 2021, the Reserve Bank of India prohibited banks from making any dividend payouts from the profit pertaining to fiscal 2020 in order to conserve capital and to maintain their capacity to support the economy and absorb losses in an environment of heightened uncertainty caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Accordingly, we have not declared any dividend for fiscal 2020. We cannot guarantee that we will not be subject to similar restrictions in the future. The Reserve Bank of India’s Prompt Corrective Action framework for banks defines risk thresholds for indicators like capital adequacy, asset quality and leverage, and stipulates actions like restriction on dividend distribution/remittance of profits, restriction on branch expansion, domestic and/or overseas expansion, and restrictions on capital expenditure other than for technological upgradation. At year-end fiscal 2022, the Bank’s financial indicators did not breach the risk thresholds prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India. There can be no assurance that we will always remain within the thresholds prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India in the future. Our insurance, banking and home finance subsidiaries and affiliate are also subject to solvency and capital requirements imposed by their respective regulators. While we currently do not expect these entities to require significant additional equity capital or that we would make additional equity investments in these entities, any requirement for ICICI Bank to make additional equity investments in these entities in the event of an increase in their capital requirements due to regulation or material stress would impact our capital adequacy.
Debt & Financing - Risk 9
We are subject to liquidity requirements of the Reserve Bank of India, and any inability to maintain adequate liquidity due to changes in regulations, a lack of access to capital markets, or otherwise may impact our ability to grow and support our businesses.
The Reserve Bank of India has released guidelines on liquidity coverage ratio requirements under the Basel III liquidity framework that require banks to maintain and report the Basel III liquidity coverage ratio, which is a ratio of the stock of high quality liquid assets and total net cash outflows over the next 30 calendar days. The Reserve Bank of India has also defined categories of assets qualifying as high quality liquid assets and mandated a minimum liquidity coverage ratio, which has been 100.0% since January 1, 2019. Further, the Reserve Bank of India has issued final guidelines on the net stable funding ratio for banks and would require banks to maintain sufficient funds that are considered as reliable to cover the liquidity requirements and asset maturities coming up over the next one year on an ongoing basis. The guidelines on net stable funding ratio are applicable from October 1, 2021. These liquidity requirements together with the existing liquidity and cash reserve requirements may result in Indian banks, including us, holding higher amounts of liquidity, thereby impacting profitability. Any sudden increase in the demand for liquidity by banks to meet these regulatory liquidity requirements could have an adverse impact on the financial markets, and result in a sharp increase in short-term borrowing costs and a sudden increase in the cost of funding for banks, including us. Any reduction in our liquidity coverage or net stable funding ratios, increase in liquidity requirements applicable to us on account of regulatory changes or otherwise, changes in the composition of liquidity and any inability to access capital markets may limit our ability to grow our business or adversely impact our profitability and our future performance and strategy. In addition, as we and other banks manage these various liquidity requirements, there could be a sudden increase in demand for liquidity in the banking system, which could have an adverse impact in the financial markets, and result in an increase in our short term borrowing costs and a sudden increase in the bank’s cost of funds. Further, any tightening of liquidity and volatility in international markets may limit our access to international bond markets and result in an increase in our cost of funding for our international business. Continued volatility in international markets could constrain and increase the cost of our international market borrowings and our ability to replace maturing borrowings and fund new assets. Our overseas banking subsidiaries are also exposed to similar risks.
Debt & Financing - Risk 10
Changed
Additional capital requirements of our insurance subsidiary and affiliate or our inability to monetize a part of our shareholding in these companies may adversely impact our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
At March 31, 2022, we owned 51.4% of the equity shares of our life insurance subsidiary, ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company, and 48.1% of the equity shares of our general insurance affiliate, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company. Although our insurance businesses are profitable and we currently do not anticipate they would require capital, additional capital may be required to support the business which may, among other reasons, arise due to regulatory requirements or increased opportunities for growth or changes in loss experience and actuarial assumptions. See also “—Risks relating to our insurance subsidiary and affiliate—Loss reserves for our affiliate’s general insurance business are based on estimates as to future claims liabilities and adverse developments relating to claims could lead to further reserve additions and materially adversely affect the operation of our general insurance affiliate.” Our insurance subsidiary and affiliate may also explore mergers and acquisitions which may lead to issuance of equity shares. Issuance of additional equity shares for these or other reasons would reduce our shareholding, unless we invest additional capital in these businesses. Our ability to invest additional capital in these businesses is subject to the Reserve Bank of India’s regulations on capital adequacy and its guidelines on financial services provided by banks that prescribe limits for our aggregate investment in financial sector enterprises. All such investments require prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India. The Reserve Bank of India has announced a review of the guidelines pertaining to ownership, governance and corporate structure of private sector banks in India and has set up an internal working group to consider, among other things, holding of financial subsidiaries through a non-operative financial holding company. In November 2020, RBI released the report of the Internal Working Group to review the extant ownership and corporate structure guidelines for Indian private sector banks and sought feedback on the recommendations by January 15, 2021. In November 2021, the Reserve Bank of India accepted few recommendations made by the internal working group including a non-operative financial holding company structure for all new licenses issued for universal banks. The outcome of this report may result in changes to our group structure, the nature and impact of which we cannot currently predict, including a potential impact on our investment in our insurance businesses. Any reduction in our shareholding in our insurance businesses to below majority ownership would (including if arising on account of mergers and acquisitions), under applicable law, require us to reduce our shareholding to 30.0% or less, subject to regulatory and governmental approval to maintain a higher level of shareholding. Our general insurance affiliate, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company concluded the allotment of equity shares to the eligible shareholders of Bharti AXA General Insurance Company Limited as per their proportionate shareholding, following the approval from the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India and National Company Law Tribunal for a merger in September 2021. Following the completion of the transaction, the Bank’s shareholding in ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company decreased to 48.1%, and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company ceased to be a subsidiary of the Bank. The Bank has been granted time until September 2023 to reduce its shareholding in ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company to 30.0%, to comply with the requirements under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. There is no assurance that we will be able to undertake further monetization of our investments in our subsidiaries and affiliates, through public offering or otherwise, or of the level of valuation of the subsidiaries and affiliates at which such monetization may take place and the resultant impact on our net income and stockholders' equity. Any additional capital requirements of our insurance companies, restrictions on our ability to capitalize them and a requirement that we reduce our shareholding substantially could adversely impact their growth, our future capital adequacy, our financial performance and the prices of their equity shares and our equity shares and ADSs. See also “Business—Overview of Our Products and Services—Insurance” and “—Risks relating to our insurance subsidiary and affiliate—While our insurance businesses are an important part of our business, there can be no assurance of their future rates of growth or levels of profitability.”
Debt & Financing - Risk 11
Changed
The transition from LIBOR to other alternative reference rates may adversely affect our income from exposures or transactions currently referenced to LIBOR and also bring about the vagaries that such alternative reference rates may have.
The Chief Executive of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate or LIBOR, has stopped persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR to the administrator of LIBOR tenors, except for certain tenors of USD LIBOR, which will cease from June 30, 2023. While alternate reference rates for the different currencies have been identified and are in force, there is still lack of clarity about the use of these rates for all types of transactions that have referenced LIBOR. The impact of the transition to alternative reference rates in USD therefore has some uncertainty and could adversely affect loans, securities and other instruments that reference, or are indirectly affected by LIBOR. Currently, the manner and impact of the pending transition and related developments, as well as the effect of these developments on our funding costs, investment and trading securities portfolios and business, is unclear. In India, the Mumbai Inter-bank Forward Outright Rate (MIFOR) is calculated using rolling forward premia in percentage terms along with the USD LIBOR for the respective tenors up to 12 months. The Financial Benchmark India Private Limited has commenced publishing an Adjusted MIFOR from June 15, 2021, which will be used for legacy contracts and has also started publishing Modified MIFOR from June 30, 2021, which is being used for new contracts. On July 8, 2021, the Reserve Bank of India issued a roadmap for LIBOR transition advising banks to use alternate benchmarks instead of LIBOR/MIFOR benchmarks from December 31, 2021 except for managing risks pertaining to pre-existing exposures. The Bank has number of contracts referencing LIBOR/MIFOR including derivative and loans. While alternate reference rates for LIBOR in different currencies have been identified and are in force, there is still lack of clarity about the use of these rates for all types of transactions that have referenced LIBOR. The impact of the transition to alternative reference rates in USD therefore has some uncertainty and could adversely affect loans, securities and other instruments that reference, or are indirectly affected by USD LIBOR. The potential for reduced liquidity of these different LIBOR/ MIFOR contracts could adversely impact the Bank’s business and future financial performance. Currently, the manner and impact of the pending transition and related developments, as well as the effect of these developments on our funding costs, investment and trading securities portfolios and business, is unclear. We have identified our LIBOR transition exposures, including existing financial agreements that do not contain fallback provisions that adequately contemplate cessation of benchmark reference rates and that would require additional negotiation with the counterparties. The Bank has a program for its LIBOR transition, which includes governance framework, exposure assessment, tracking of fallback provisions and contract remediation programs and tracking of global developments. In addition, the Bank has been using alternate reference rates in new contracts after December 31, 2021 and had incorporated suitable benchmark replacement provisions in contracts linked to LIBOR originated prior to December 31, 2021. For further details, see “Business—Risk Management—Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk”. The Bank has implemented and continues to implement changes to the technology systems and infrastructure as part of the transition to the new benchmark regime. The Bank has conducted and continues to conduct information sharing sessions with clients on the LIBOR transition. However, the transition to alternative reference rates is complex, could bring about unanticipated challenges and vagaries, and could adversely impact our business, our future financial performance and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. There can be no guarantee that any efforts by the Bank will successfully mitigate the operational risks associated with the transition away from LIBOR to alternative reference rates.
Debt & Financing - Risk 12
Any downgrade of India’s debt rating or the rating of our senior unsecured foreign currency debt by an international rating agency could adversely affect our business, liquidity and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Any adverse revisions to India’s credit ratings by international rating agencies may adversely impact our business and limit our access to capital markets and adversely impact our liquidity position and market perception of the Bank. In June 2020, Moody’s had lowered the sovereign rating for India from Baa2 to Baa3, with a negative outlook due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Government of India’s fiscal position and the stress in the financial sector. We are rated by Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s. In April 2020, following the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, both rating agencies revised the outlook on our rating from stable to negative, while maintaining the rating on our senior unsecured foreign currency debt at BBB- by Standard and Poor’s and Baa3 by Moody’s. Further, in June 2020, Standard and Poor’s maintained the rating on our senior unsecured debt while downgrading certain other banks on the expectation that we would structurally improve our capital position over the next few months. In June 2021, Standard and Poor’s revised our outlook from negative to stable and reaffirmed our rating at BBB-, and in October 2021, Moody’s revised our outlook from negative to stable and reaffirmed our rating at Baa3. In June 2022, Moody’s revised our baseline credit assessment upwards from ba1 to baa3 citing improvements in asset quality, capital and profitability. Rating agencies may also change their methodology for rating banks or their assessment of specific parameters which may impact our ratings. In April 2020, Moody’s revised its assessment of government support for Indian private sector banks in view of the mechanism of resolution for a stressed private sector bank. Such revisions in assessment methodologies could adversely impact the rating of private sector banks compared to public sector banks. The rating of our foreign branches is impacted by the sovereign rating of the country in which the branch is located, particularly if the rating is below India’s rating. Any revision to the sovereign rating of the countries in which we operate to below India’s rating could impact the rating of our foreign branch in the jurisdiction and the bonds issued from these branches. Our subsidiary in the United Kingdom is rated by Moody’s and any change in our rating or outlook or in the financial position of the subsidiary could impact the rating or outlook of our subsidiary. Given the significant uncertainties caused by the ongoing pandemic and other global economic changes, there can be no assurance that rating agencies will change their views on India’s sovereign rating or that we and our subsidiaries and affiliates will be able to meet the expectations of rating agencies and maintain our credit ratings. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our inability to effectively manage credit, market and liquidity risk and inaccuracy of our valuation models and accounting estimates may have an adverse effect on our earnings, capitalization, credit ratings and cost of funds”.
Debt & Financing - Risk 13
Restrictions on deposit of equity shares in the depositary facility could adversely affect the price of our ADSs.
Under current Indian regulations, an ADS holder who surrenders ADSs and withdraws equity shares may deposit those equity shares again in the depositary facility in exchange for ADSs. An investor who has purchased equity shares in the Indian market may also deposit those equity shares in the ADS program. However, the deposit of equity shares may be subject to securities law restrictions and the restriction that the cumulative aggregate number of equity shares that can be deposited as of any time cannot exceed the cumulative aggregate number represented by ADSs converted into underlying equity shares as of such time. These restrictions increase the risk that the market price of our ADSs will be below that of the equity shares. The depositary facility pursuant to which the ADSs are issued may be amended. Such amendment could include changes in the size of the ADS program. Any such amendment could adversely affect the market price and liquidity of our equity shares and ADSs or adversely affect the ability to trade the ADSs.
Debt & Financing - Risk 14
Our exposure to the securities of asset reconstruction companies could generally affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We also have investments in security receipts arising from the sale of non-performing assets by us to reconstruction companies registered with the Reserve Bank of India. At March 31, 2022, the Bank had an outstanding net investment of Rs. 8.1 billion in security receipts issued by asset reconstruction companies. In September 2016, the Reserve Bank of India issued a framework for sale of stressed assets. As per this framework, with effect from April 1, 2017, provisions held for investment in security receipts is subject to a floor rate applicable to the underlying loans (the provisions the bank would have had to make if the loans had continued to be held in its books), if more than 50% of the security receipts are held by the bank that sold the loans. The threshold of 50% was reduced to 10% from April 1, 2018 as per the framework. Further, the framework requires banks to maintain an internal list of stressed assets identified for sale and review assets classified as ‘doubtful’ above a threshold amount on a periodic basis with a view to consider a sale or other disposition. There can be no assurance that reconstruction companies will be able to recover these assets and redeem our investments in security receipts and that there will be no reduction in the value of these investments. Any such inability to recover assets or redeem our investments without a diminution in value could generally affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In fiscal 2022, the Indian government set up a National Asset Reconstruction Company through equity participation by banks and financial institutions to manage stressed assets of banks.
Debt & Financing - Risk 15
Entry into new businesses or rapid growth in existing loan portfolios may expose us to increased risks that may adversely affect our business.
The rapid growth of our retail loan business and our rural initiative exposes us to increased risks within India including higher levels of non-performing loans in our unsecured retail credit portfolio, increased operational risk, increased fraud risk and increased regulatory and legal risk. We continue to focus on scaling up our retail lending volumes and have seen an increase in our retail unsecured portfolio and our lending to small businesses and entrepreneurs. Retail lending, including unsecured retail credit, has been an important driver of growth for the Indian banking system. Further, we are also focusing on scaling up our business and distribution network in rural areas. We have also entered into partnerships with technology companies with large customer bases to offer co-branded credit products and as well as with non-banking financial companies for co-origination and/or purchases of loans. We intend to continue to pursue similar partnerships. While we have taken measures to address the risks in these businesses, there can be no assurance that the businesses would perform according to our expectations or that there would not be any adverse developments in these businesses in the future. We use data analytics extensively in our lending to retail and small business customers, and there can be no assurance that these analytical models will perform as intended. Our recent focus on partnerships with other entities to grow our portfolio may not yield the desired results and may lead to additional risks. Our inability to manage such risks may have an adverse impact on our future business and strategy, our asset quality and profitability and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Debt & Financing - Risk 16
Our loan portfolio includes long-term project finance loans, which are particularly vulnerable to completion and other risks.
The quality of our project finance portfolio could be adversely impacted by several factors. The viability of these projects depends upon a number of factors, including market demand, government policies, the processes for awarding government licenses and access to natural resources and their subsequent judicial or other review, the financial condition of the government or other entities that are the primary customers for the output of such projects and the overall economic environment in India and the international markets. These projects are particularly vulnerable to a variety of risks, including risks of delays in regulatory approvals, environmental and social issues, judicial decisions, sudden disruptions in economic activity or lockdown measures, completion risk and counterparty risk, which could adversely impact their ability to generate revenues. In the past, we have experienced a high level of default and restructuring in our industrial and manufacturing project finance loan portfolio. Our loans to the power sector as a proportion of total loans has declined from 4.8% at March 31, 2018 to 2.1% at March 31, 2022. Power projects face a variety of risks, including access to fuel such as coal and gas, volatility in pricing of power and off-take of the power produced. In addition, power projects inherently have high leverage levels. Any reduction in the output of operational power plants or the projected output of newly commissioned or under-implementation power projects due to lower availability of fuel, higher fuel costs that cannot be passed through to purchasers and inability of state-owned power distribution utilities to purchase or pay for power due to their financial condition, or a decline in the price of power, may have an adverse impact on the financial condition of power producers and their ability to service their debt obligations, including to us. Our loan portfolio also includes project finance, corporate finance, and working capital loans to commodity-based sectors such as iron and steel, other metals and mining, which are subject to similar and additional risks, as well as global commodity price cycles. For instance, during fiscal 2016, due to a slowdown in global demand for steel, there was a sharp decline in global steel prices, which in turn impacted Indian steel companies. Capacity utilization of steel companies declined and profitability came under pressure. The Government of India announced certain policy measures, including a minimum price for procuring steel from overseas markets, which have benefited the Indian steel sector. However, we cannot be certain that such or any other measures will continue to be introduced by the Government of India in the future. Further, the growing focus on climate change and national commitments towards a low-carbon economy may impact the flow of capital to specific sectors and could lead to structural shifts in these sectors, and the overall economy. It is difficult to assess the impact of these changes, and can expose us to new risks and challenges in managing the loan portfolio. A slowdown in the Indian and global economy may exacerbate the risks for the projects that we have financed. Future project finance losses or high levels of loan restructuring could have a materially adverse effect on our profitability and the quality of our loan portfolio and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Corporate Activity and Growth3 | 4.8%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
There is operational risk associated with the financial industry which, when realized, may have an adverse impact on our business.
We, like all financial institutions, are exposed to many types of operational risk, including the risk of fraud or other misconduct by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees and third parties (including violation of regulations for prevention of corrupt practices, and other regulations governing our business activities), misreporting or non-reporting with respect to statutory, legal or regulatory reporting and disclosure obligations, or operational errors, including non-compliance with internal processes, clerical or recordkeeping and reconciliation errors or errors resulting from faulty computer or telecommunications systems. We have experienced significant growth in a fast changing environment, and management as well as our regulators, are aware that this may pose significant challenges to our control framework. As a result of our internal evaluations, we and our regulators have noted certain areas where our processes and controls could be improved. Our growth, particularly in retail lending, our rural initiative, our international business and our insurance businesses, exposes us to additional operational and control risks. Regulatory scrutiny of areas related to operational risk, including internal audit information, systems and data processing is increasing. The large size of our treasury and retail operations, which use automated control and recording systems as well as manual checks and recordkeeping, exposes us to the risk of errors in control, recordkeeping and reconciliation. The increasing size of our insurance business and the complexities of the products expose us to the risk that the models set up on actuarial software to compute the actuarial liabilities and deferred acquisition cost may contain errors or may require continuous improvement over a period of time. Given our high volume of transactions, certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. In addition, our dependence upon automated systems to record and process transactions may further increase the risk that technical system flaws, employee tampering, manipulation of those systems and deficiency in access control management will result in losses that are difficult to detect. We may also be subject to disruptions of our operating systems, arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond our control (including, for instance, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunication outages), which may give rise to deterioration in customer service and to loss or liability to us. We also outsource some functions, like collections, sourcing of retail loans and management of ATMs to other agencies and hence also exposed to the risk that external vendors may be unable to fulfil their contractual obligations to us (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as we are), and to the risk that our (or our vendors’) business continuity and data security systems prove not to be sufficiently adequate. We also face the risk that the design of our controls and procedures proves inadequate, or is circumvented, thereby causing delays in detection or errors in information. We are also exposed to operational risks from transactions with other financial institutions and intermediaries. Although we maintain a system of controls designed to keep operational risk at appropriate levels, like all banks and insurance companies we have suffered losses from operational risk and there can be no assurance that we will not suffer losses from operational risks in the future that may be material in amount, and our reputation could be adversely affected by the occurrence of any such events involving our employees, customers or third parties. In addition, regulators or governmental authorities or judiciary may also hold banks, including us, liable for losses on account of customer errors such as inadvertent sharing of confidential account related information. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system especially of controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error, circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures, in a fast changing environment or when entering new areas of business or expanding geographic reach. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. We are committed to continuing to implement and improve internal controls and our risk management processes, and this remains a key priority for us. If, however, we are unable to manage operational risk in India and in the other jurisdictions in which we operate, or if we are perceived as being unable to manage such risk, we may be subject to enhanced regulatory oversight and scrutiny. For a discussion of how operational risk is managed, see also “Business—Risk Management—Market Risk—Operational Risk”.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
We may seek opportunities for growth through acquisitions, divest our existing businesses, or be required to undertake mergers by the Reserve Bank of India and could face integration and other acquisitions risks.
We may seek opportunities for growth through acquisitions or be required to undertake mergers mandated by the Reserve Bank of India under its statutory powers. In the past, we have undertaken mergers and acquisitions. In the past, the Reserve Bank of India has ordered mergers of weak banks with other banks primarily in the interest of depositors of the weak banks. The Government of India announced the amalgamation of 10 public sector banks into four larger banks from April 1, 2020 as part of a consolidation measure to create fewer banks that would be individually larger in scale. We may in the future examine and seek opportunities for acquisitions in countries where we currently operate. Our subsidiaries in India may also undertake mergers, acquisitions and takeovers in India or internationally. Our general insurance affiliate, ICICI Lombard General Insurance, concluded the allotment of equity shares to the eligible shareholders of Bharti AXA General Insurance Company Limited as per their proportionate shareholding, following the approval from the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India and the National Company Law Tribunal for a merger. Following the completion of the transaction, the Bank’s shareholding in ICICI Lombard General Insurance decreased to 48.1%, and ICICI Lombard General Insurance ceased to be a subsidiary of the Bank. Mergers and acquisitions by our subsidiaries could lead to reduction in our shareholding in such subsidiaries (including to below majority ownership in certain subsidiaries), and under applicable law that may require us to reduce our shareholding to 30.0% or less, unless we receive regulatory and governmental approval to maintain a higher level of shareholding, which may be subject to various conditions including divestment to the required level of 30.0% within a specified timeframe. The Bank has been granted time until September 2023 to reduce its shareholding in ICICI Lombard General Insurance to 30.0%, to comply with the requirements under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Any future acquisitions or mergers or takeovers, whether by us or our subsidiaries, both Indian or international, may involve a number of risks, including the possibility of a deterioration of asset quality, quality of business and business operations, financial impact of employee related liabilities, diversion of our management’s attention required to integrate the acquired business and the failure to retain key acquired personnel and clients, leverage synergies or rationalize operations, or develop the skills required for new businesses and markets, or unknown and known liabilities including any ongoing litigation, claims or disputes concerning such acquisition, merger, its shareholders, share capital or its legal and regulatory compliance obligations or practices, some or all of which could have an adverse effect on our business or that of our subsidiaries. We may also sell all or part of one or more of our businesses, including our subsidiaries and affiliates, for a variety of reasons including changes in strategic focus, redeployment of capital, contractual obligations and regulatory requirements.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
Changed
We continue to expand our branch network and any inability to use these branches productively may have an adverse impact on our growth and profitability.
The branch network of ICICI Bank in India increased from 5,266 branches at March 31, 2021 to 5,418 branches at March 31, 2022. We plan to leverage our extensive geographical reach to support growth in our business. Our new branches typically operate at lower productivity levels, as compared to our existing branches. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—We may seek opportunities for growth through acquisitions, divest our existing businesses, or be required to undertake mergers by the Reserve Bank of India and could face integration and other acquisitions risks”. We also have a substantial branch network in rural and semi-urban areas and have also established branches in villages that did not have any banking services. Any inability to achieve or substantial delays in achieving desired levels of deposits, advances and revenues from the new branches would have an adverse impact on our growth and profitability and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 12/63 (19%)Above Sector Average
Regulation8 | 12.7%
Regulation - Risk 1
Changes in Indian regulations on foreign ownership, a change in investor preferences or an increase in the number of ADSs outstanding could adversely affect the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
ADSs issued by companies in certain emerging markets, including India, may trade at a discount or a premium to the underlying equity shares, in part because of the restrictions on foreign ownership of the underlying equity shares. See also “Restriction on Foreign Ownership of Indian Securities”. Historically, our ADSs have generally traded at a small premium to the trading price of our underlying equity shares on the Indian stock exchanges. We believe that this price premium resulted from the limited portion of our market capitalization represented by ADSs, restrictions imposed by Indian law on the conversion of equity shares into ADSs and an apparent preference among some investors to trade dollar-denominated securities. In fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2008, we conducted offerings of ADSs which increased the number of outstanding ADSs and we may conduct similar offerings in the future. Also, over time, some of the restrictions on the issuance of ADSs imposed by Indian law have been relaxed. As a result, any premium enjoyed by ADSs as compared to the equity shares may be reduced or eliminated as a result of offerings made or sponsored by us, changes in Indian law permitting further conversion of equity shares into ADSs or a change in investor preferences.
Regulation - Risk 2
Changed
Our asset management, private equity, insurance and securities broking subsidiaries and affiliates have retail and corporate customers and are subject to extensive regulation and supervision which can lead to increased costs or additional restrictions on their activities that adversely impact the Bank.
Our asset management subsidiary, ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited, is subject to supervision and regulation by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. For instance, in fiscal 2019, our asset management subsidiary, based on communication from the regulator, paid compensation with interest to certain schemes of ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund in connection with shares allotted to these schemes in the initial public offering of ICICI Securities Limited in March 2018, and also compensated the investors in these schemes who had redeemed their units since the March 2018 allotment. In the same matter, an adjudication proceeding was initiated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which was disposed of pursuant to an application for settlement of proceedings and payment of settlement charges by our asset management subsidiary. Further, certain investors of a real estate investment fund, registered in Mauritius, which is an investor in a real estate fund in India managed by ICICI Venture Funds Management Company Limited, our private equity subsidiary, had initiated legal proceedings in Mauritius alleging, among others, mis-selling and mismanagement. ICICI Bank and ICICI Venture as respondents had denied the allegations and raised objections on jurisdictional maintainability. The court has stayed the proceedings against ICICI Bank and ICICI Venture. The plaintiffs appraised the court of their intention to not pursue vacation of the stay. In view of the stay, application for removal of averments/prayers against ICICI Bank and ICICI Venture was made, which was allowed by the court. However, subsequently the plaintiffs have now filed an appeal against the order permitting removal of averments/prayers against ICICI Bank and ICICI Venture. In the same matter, ICICI Venture Funds Management Company after receiving a notice from the Securities and Exchange Board of India, settled the matter with the Securities and Exchange Board of India. However, one of the investors in the real estate investment fund, registered in Mauritius has filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against, among others, the Securities and Exchange Board of India and ICICI Venture in respect of the settlement order. In the said writ petition, no reliefs have been sought as against ICICI Venture. At present, the writ petition has not been admitted and no notice to ICICI Venture has been issued by the Bombay High Court. See also, “—Risks Relating to Our Business—A determination against us in respect of disputed tax assessments may adversely impact our financial performance.” and “Business – Legal and Regulatory Proceedings”. Our insurance businesses are also subject to extensive regulation and supervision by India’s insurance regulator. They also have a large number of retail and corporate clients, from whom claims may arise which could be determined in courts or also by regulators and result in determination against our insurance businesses or us or our insurance businesses’ management and employees. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India has the authority to specify, modify and interpret regulations regarding the insurance industry, including regulations governing products, selling commissions, solvency margins and reserving, which can lead to additional costs or restrictions on our insurance subsidiaries’ activities. Further, our insurance and securities broking subsidiaries and insurance affiliate are now publicly listed companies on the Indian stock exchanges, which has resulted in enhanced compliance requirements and regulatory oversight. There can be no assurance that increased regulatory scrutiny of our insurance and securities broking subsidiaries and affiliate along with stringent requirements, including additional disclosures, will not have a material adverse impact on the Bank. There could be instances where the regulator or governmental agency may find that we are not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations pertaining to listed companies or their relationship with the parent or other group companies, or with their interpretations of laws and regulations, and may take formal or informal actions against us and our subsidiaries or affiliates.
Regulation - Risk 3
Changed
The enhanced supervisory and compliance environment in the financial sector increases the risk of regulatory action against us, whether formal or informal.
We are subject to a wide variety of banking, insurance and financial services laws, regulations and regulatory policies and a large number of regulatory and enforcement authorities in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Regulators in India and in the other jurisdictions in which we operate subject financial sector institutions, including us, to intense review, supervision and scrutiny. This heightened level of review and scrutiny or any changes in the existing regulatory supervision framework, increases the possibility that we will face adverse legal or regulatory actions. In the face of difficulties in the Indian banking sector, the Reserve Bank of India has been increasing the intensity of its scrutiny of Indian banks and has been imposing fines and penalties that are larger than the historic norms on Indian banks. The Reserve Bank of India and other regulators regularly review our operations, and there can be no guarantee that all regulators will agree with our internal assessments of asset quality, provisions, risk management, capital adequacy and management functioning, other measures of the safety and soundness of our operations or compliance with applicable laws, regulations, accounting and taxation norms, listing norms or regulatory policies. Regulators, including among others the Reserve Bank of India and the Securities and Exchange Board of India, may find that we are not in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, accounting and taxation norms, listing norms or regulatory policies, or with the regulators’ revised interpretations of such laws, regulations or regulatory policies, and may take formal or informal actions against us. Such formal or informal actions might force us to make additional provisions for our non-performing assets or otherwise, divest our assets, adopt new compliance programs or policies, remove personnel including senior executives, reduce dividend or executive compensation, provide remediation or refunds to customers or undertake other changes to our business operations. In fiscal 2021, pursuant to judicial orders, the Reserve Bank of India has provided copies of its supervisory inspection reports for certain banks, including us, for earlier years to an external party. The consequences of these reports, or any future reports, being available in the public domain are uncertain and may result in negative publicity about us. See also “Supervision and Regulation”. If we fail to manage our legal and regulatory risk in the many jurisdictions in which we operate, our business could suffer, our reputation could be harmed and we would be subject to additional legal and regulatory risks. This could, in turn, increase the size and number of claims and damages asserted against us and/or subject us to regulatory investigations, enforcement actions or other proceedings, or lead to increased supervisory concerns. We may also be required to spend additional time and resources on remedial measures and conducting enquiries, beyond those already initiated and ongoing, which could have an adverse effect on our business. New regulations and compliance and disclosure requirements relating to environment, social and governance matters, especially climate change, have been recommended or are under consideration by regulators in the jurisdictions where we have our operations. These may require us to review and make changes to the conduct of our business and incur additional costs. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in penalties or regulatory action against us. Despite our best efforts to comply with all applicable regulations, there are a number of risks that cannot be completely controlled. Our international presence has led to increased legal and regulatory risks. Regulators in every jurisdiction in which we operate or have listed our securities have the power to restrict our operations, stipulate higher capital and liquidity requirements or bring administrative or judicial proceedings against us (or our employees, representatives, agents and third-party service providers), which could result, among other things, in suspension or revocation of one or more of our licenses, cease and desist orders, fines, civil penalties, criminal penalties or other disciplinary action which could materially harm our reputation, results of operations and financial condition.
Regulation - Risk 4
Changes in the regulation and structure of the financial markets in India may adversely impact our business.
The Indian financial markets have in recent years experienced, and continue to experience, changes and developments aimed at reducing the cost and improving the quality of service delivery to users of financial services. We may experience an adverse impact on the cash float and fees from our cash management business resulting from the development and increased usage of payment systems, as well as other similar structural changes. The Reserve Bank of India, from time to time, imposes limits on transaction charges levied by banks on customers, including those on cash and card transactions. The Reserve Bank of India has announced the introduction of an electronic trading platform for buying and selling foreign currencies by retail customers of banks, aimed at enhancing transparency and competition and lowering costs for retail customers. In August 2020, the Reserve Bank of India issued rules for opening current account of customers having credit facilities from the banking system. Such developments may adversely impact the profitability of banks, including us, by reducing float balances and fee incomes, and increasing costs. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—The enhanced supervisory and compliance environment in the financial sector increases the risk of regulatory action against us, whether formal or informal”. Our subsidiaries and affiliates are also subject to similar risks. For instance, the Indian government has permitted a dual tax regime for personal income tax, with the option for individuals to have a lower tax rate if no additional tax exemptions are taken. This could impact insurance companies, including our insurance subsidiary and affiliate, where a part of their retail premium is driven by tax exemptions for individuals. See also “—Risks relating to our insurance subsidiary and affiliate—While our insurance businesses are an important part of our business, there can be no assurance of their future rates of growth or levels of profitability”. The Reserve Bank of India has been permitting the entry of new players in the financial sector, including through issuance of licenses for universal banks and small finance banks in the private sector under the continuous licensing policy and allowing fintechs and technology companies to offer payment and other financial services. The entry of new players has intensified competition which could impact our ability to capture business opportunities if we are not able to adapt our business strategy to new developments. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our industry is very competitive and our strategy depends on our ability to compete effectively.” The Reserve Bank of India has announced a review of the guidelines pertaining to ownership, governance and corporate structure of private sector banks in India and set up an internal working group to consider, among other things, holding of financial subsidiaries through a non-operative financial holding company. The Reserve Bank of India released the report of the internal working group in November 2020, and sought feedback on the recommendations by January 15, 2021. In November 2021, the Reserve Bank of India accepted few recommendations made by the internal working group including a non-operative financial holding company structure for all new licenses issued for universal banks. The outcome of this report may result in changes to our group structure, the nature and impact of which cannot be predicted currently. In addition, changes in laws, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in the interpretation or application of such laws, regulations and regulatory policies, may adversely affect the products and services we offer, the value of our assets or the collateral or contractual comforts available for our loans or our business in general. For example, in August 2020, the Reserve Bank of India issued rules linking opening and maintaining current accounts with banks by companies having credit facilities from the banking system. As per the guidelines, banks are allowed to open current account of customers who have not availed any credit from the banking system. Current account cannot be opened for customers who have availed only cash credit or overdraft facility, through which all their transactions must be routed; only a lending bank meeting specified credit exposure thresholds is eligible for opening a current account of the borrower. Banks will be required to monitor all current accounts on a periodic basis to comply with the rules. This may impact the low-cost current account deposits held by companies with banks that do not have the requisite level of exposure to such companies which may in turn impact the growth of our current account deposits. Changes currently under review by the Reserve Bank of India and other regulators, such as those relating to ownership, governance and corporate structure of private sector banks; management compensation, board governance, consumer protection, sustainable finance and risk management, are expected to have an impact on our business and our future strategy. These changes could require us to reduce or increase our business in specific segments, increase competition, impact our overall growth and return on capital. We cannot predict future legal or regulatory changes. Any such regulatory or structural changes may result in increased expenses, including enhanced compliance costs, operational restrictions, increased competition or revisions to our business operations, which may reduce our profitability or force us to forego potentially profitable business opportunities.
Regulation - Risk 5
The opportunities for growth in our international operations and our ability to repatriate capital from these operations may be limited by the local regulatory environments.
Our banking subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Canada have in the past focused primarily on leveraging their deposit franchises in these markets to extend financing to Indian companies for their operations in India and globally, including the financing of overseas acquisitions by Indian companies through structured transactions. In view of regulatory limitations on cross-border financing of this nature, these subsidiaries have experienced a reduction in their business, impacting their profitability and resulting in a sharp reduction in the return on the capital invested in these businesses. While both these subsidiaries are focused on growing their business within the current regulatory framework, the opportunities to do so may be limited. Further, while both these subsidiaries are focused on optimizing their capital base and have repatriated capital and made dividend payments to ICICI Bank in the past, such actions are subject to regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance regarding the timing or grant of such approvals in the future. We are repositioning our international business strategy to sharpen our focus on the non-resident Indian community and on India-linked trade. There can be no assurance of the successful execution of this strategy and the future growth and profitability of our international operations. Our international branches are also subject to respective local regulatory requirements, including any requirements related to liquidity, capital and asset classification and provisioning.
Regulation - Risk 6
The board of directors of the Bank has, pursuant to an independent enquiry, taken action against the former Managing Director and CEO. In the event the Bank is found by any of the enquiries in the matter by government and regulatory agencies to have violated applicable laws or regulations, the Bank could become subject to legal and regulatory sanctions that may materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition and reputation.
In fiscal 2019, the Audit Committee under direction given by the Board of Directors of the Bank had instituted an independent enquiry to consider various allegations relating to the former Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Chanda Kochhar. The enquiry was supported by an external counsel and a forensic firm. The allegations levelled against Ms. Kochhar included nepotism, quid pro quo and claims that Ms. Kochhar, by not disclosing conflicts of interest caused by certain transactions between certain borrowers of the Bank and entities controlled by Ms. Kochhar’s spouse, committed infractions under applicable regulations and the Bank’s Code of Conduct. While the enquiry was underway, the Board accepted Ms. Kochhar’s request for early retirement, while noting that the enquiry would remain unaffected by this and certain benefits would be subject to the outcome of the enquiry. Subsequently, on consideration of the enquiry report and its conclusions, the Board of Directors decided to treat the separation of Ms. Chanda Kochhar from the Bank as a ‘Termination for Cause’ under the Bank’s internal policies, schemes and the Code of Conduct, with all attendant consequences. In January 2020, the Bank instituted a recovery suit against Ms. Kochhar for inter alia the clawback of bonus paid from April 2009 to March 2018. Ms. Kochhar also filed a suit before Bombay High Court in January 2022 contending that the termination of her employment is invalid and she is entitled to all the Employee Stock Options, which were originally allocated to her. An alternative claim has been made for damages of Rs. 17.3 billion against the Bank. Both these suits are being heard by the Bombay High Court. Enquiries by government authorities and regulatory agencies in the matter are continuing and the Bank has a cooperative posture for such enquiries and requests emanating from such authorities and agencies. The Securities and Exchange Board of India issued a show-cause notice to Ms. Kochhar and to the Bank in May 2018 in relation to the allegations. In November 2020, Securities and Exchange Board of India, issued a modified show cause notice to the Bank and responses were submitted by the Bank to both the show cause notices. The Central Bureau of Investigation had also initiated a preliminary enquiry and in January 2019, the Central Bureau of Investigation filed a first information report against Ms. Kochhar, her spouse and certain borrowers of the Bank and their promoters, accusing them of cheating the Bank. The first information report states that certain individuals, who were on the board of directors of the Bank and were part of committees (that sanctioned credit facilities to the concerned borrower group when the alleged transactions occurred), may also be investigated. These include the present Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and the present Managing Director of the Bank’s life insurance subsidiary. Authorities such as the Enforcement Directorate and Income-tax authorities are also probing the matter. In the event that the Bank is found by Securities and Exchange Board of India or the Central Bureau of Investigation or by any other authority or agency to have violated applicable laws or regulations, the Bank could become subject to legal and regulatory sanctions that may materially and adversely affect our reputation and may impact results of operations or financial condition.
Regulation - Risk 7
We may be subject to fines, restrictions or other sanctions for past instances of regulatory failures, which may adversely affect our financial position or our ability to expand our activities.
Failure to comply with applicable regulations in various jurisdictions, including unauthorized actions by employees, representatives, agents and third parties, suspected or perceived failures and media reports, and ensuing inquiries or investigations or proceedings by regulatory and enforcement authorities, has resulted, and may result in the future, in regulatory actions, including financial penalties and restrictions on or suspension of the related business operations. Whenever we consider it appropriate and the regulatory guidelines so permit, we may seek to settle or compound regulatory inquiries or investigations or proceedings through consensual process with the concerned regulator, which may entail monetary payment by us or agreeing to non-monetary terms. The non-monetary terms may include suspension or cessation of business activities for a specified period; change in key management personnel or restrictions being placed on key management personnel; disgorgement; implementation of enhanced policies and procedures to prevent future violations; appointing or engaging an independent consultant to review internal policies, processes and procedures; providing enhanced training and education; and/or submitting to enhanced internal audit, concurrent audit or reporting requirements. For example, in December 2021, the Reserve Bank of India imposed a penalty of Rs. 3.0 million on the Bank for non-compliance with directions issued by it on charges levied for non-maintenance of minimum balance in savings accounts.
Regulation - Risk 8
We are at increased risk for inquiries or investigations by regulatory and enforcement authorities, which may adversely affect our reputation, lead to increased regulatory scrutiny, cause us to incur additional costs or adversely affect our ability to conduct business.
A failure to comply with the applicable regulations in various jurisdictions by our employees, representatives, agents and third-party service providers either in or outside the course of their services, or suspected or perceived failures by them, may result in further inquiries or investigations by regulatory and enforcement authorities and in additional regulatory or enforcement action against either us, or such employees, representatives, agents and third-party service providers. Such additional actions may further impact our reputation, result in adverse media reports, lead to increased or enhanced regulatory or supervisory concerns, cause us to incur additional costs, penalties, claims and expenses or impact adversely our ability to conduct business. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—The board of directors of the Bank has, pursuant to an independent enquiry, taken action against the former Managing Director and CEO. In the event the Bank is found by any of the enquiries in the matter by government and regulatory agencies to have violated applicable laws or regulations, the Bank could become subject to legal and regulatory sanctions that may materially and adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition and reputation.” We have also experienced international expansion into banking in multiple jurisdictions which exposes us to a variety of regulatory and business challenges and risks, including cross-cultural risk, and further increases the risk of inquiries or investigations by regulatory and enforcement authorities. Expansion into additional jurisdictions also increases the complexity of our risks in a number of areas including currency risks, interest rate risks, compliance risk, regulatory risk, reputational risk and operational risk. We, or our employees, may from time to time, and as is common in the financial services industry, be the subject of inquiries, examinations or investigations that could lead to proceedings against us or our employees. We cannot predict the timing or form of any current or future regulatory or law enforcement initiatives, which are increasingly common for international banks and financial institutions.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities2 | 3.2%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Actuarial experience and other factors could differ from assumptions made in the calculation of life actuarial reserves and other actuarial information.
The assumptions our life insurance subsidiary makes in assessing its life insurance reserves and computing other actuarial information may differ from what it experiences in the future. These assumptions include the assessment of the long-term development of interest rates, investment returns, the allocation of investments between equity, fixed income and other categories, persistency, mortality and morbidity rates, policyholder lapses, policy discontinuation and future expense levels. In addition, there is a risk that the model used to estimate life and health insurance reserves based on such assumptions could be incorrect. Our life insurance subsidiary monitors its actual experience of these assumptions and to the extent that it considers any deviation from assumption to continue in the longer term, it refines its long-term assumptions. Changes in any such assumptions may lead to changes in the estimates of life and health insurance reserves and other actuarial information. Such changes may also impact the valuation of our life insurance subsidiary by existing or potential investors, and the valuation at which any future monetization of our shareholding in the life insurance subsidiary may take place, if at all. While our life insurance subsidiary monitors its experience and assumptions, events such as the Covid-19 pandemic are not anticipated in setting life insurance reserves. Higher claims due to the pandemic would have an adverse impact on the earnings and net worth of the subsidiary.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 2
We are involved in various litigations. Any final judgment awarding material damages against us could have a material adverse impact on our future financial performance and our stockholders’ equity.
We and our group companies, or our or their directors or officers, are often involved in litigations (civil and criminal) in India and in the other jurisdictions in which we operate for a variety of reasons, which generally arise because we seek to recover our dues from borrowers or because customers seek claims against us. In certain instances, present and former employees have instituted legal and other proceedings against us. The majority of these cases arise in the normal course of business and we believe, based on the facts of the cases and consultation with counsel, that these cases generally do not involve the risk of a material adverse impact on our financial performance or stockholders’ equity. We estimate the probability of losses that may be incurred in connection with legal and regulatory proceedings as of the date on which our unconsolidated and consolidated financial statements are prepared. We recognize a provision when we have a present obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made. We determine the amount of provision based on our estimate of the amount required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date, supplemented by our experience in similar situations. We review provisions at each balance sheet date and adjust them to reflect current estimates. In cases where the available information indicates that a loss is reasonably possible but the amount of such loss cannot be reasonably estimated, we make a disclosure to this effect in the unconsolidated and consolidated financial statements. Whenever we consider it appropriate and the legal or regulatory guidelines so permit, we may seek to settle or compound legal or regulatory proceedings through consensual process with the concerned claimant or regulator, which may entail monetary payment or receipt or agreeing to non-monetary terms. The non-monetary terms may include suspension or cessation of business activities for a specified period; change in key management personnel or restrictions being placed on key management personnel; disgorgement; implementation of enhanced policies and procedures to prevent future violations; appointing or engaging an independent consultant to review internal policies, processes and procedures; providing enhanced training and education; and/or submitting to enhanced internal audit, concurrent audit or reporting requirements. When there is only a remote risk of loss, we do not recognize a provision nor do we include a disclosure in the unconsolidated and consolidated financial statements. See also “Business—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings”. We cannot guarantee that the judgments in, or the outcomes of any of the litigation or other proceedings or of any settlement or compounding of legal or regulatory proceedings in which we are involved would be favorable to us and if our assessment of the risk changes, our view on provisions will also change.
Taxation & Government Incentives2 | 3.2%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
A determination against us in respect of disputed tax assessments may adversely impact our financial performance.
We are regularly assessed by the Government of India’s tax authorities, and on account of outstanding tax demands we have included in contingent liabilities Rs. 84.8 billion in additional taxes in excess of our provisions at March 31, 2022. These additional tax demands mainly relate to income tax, service tax, sales tax and value added tax demands by the Government of India’s tax authorities for past years. We have appealed against each of these tax demands. The tax related inquiries are not included in contingent liabilities as we believe that such proceedings are likely to be dropped by the tax authorities or will not be upheld by judicial authorities. The amount of Rs. 84.8 billion included in our contingent liabilities does not include further disputed tax assessments amounting to Rs. 36.2 billion, of which Rs. 30.8 billion mainly relates to bad debts written off, broken period interest and penalties levied, where the possibility of liability arising has been considered remote based on favorable Supreme Court of India decisions in other similar cases, and Rs. 4.5 billion relating to error requiring rectification by tax authorities. See also “Business—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings”. During fiscal 2019, the tax authorities had issued notices to banks, including us, regarding levy of service tax on free services provided by banks to customers maintaining specified minimum balances in their deposit accounts. The banking industry has contested this notice and filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court on July 2, 2019. We have appealed all of these demands. While we expect that no additional liability will arise out of these disputed demands based on our consultations with tax counsel and favorable decisions in our own and other cases, there can be no assurance that these matters will be settled in our favor or that no further liability will arise out of these demands. Any additional tax liability may adversely impact our financial performance and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. There could be a difference in the assessment of our indirect tax liability which may lead to additional demand being raised subsequently by tax authorities. For instance, the service tax authorities, in earlier years, had raised a demand on trusts for certain funds managed by ICICI Venture, including in relation to the amounts retained by the trusts for incurring various expenses, distribution of certain class of unit holders and provisions for certain expenses/losses. On July 1, 2021, the Appellate Tribunal passed a judgement upholding the liability towards service tax on certain items. We are considering legal remedies in this matter and the funds have preferred an appeal with the High Court, against the order of the Appellate Tribunal.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2
You may be subject to Indian taxes arising out of capital gains.
In certain circumstances, capital gains arising on the sale of the underlying equity shares are subject to Indian capital gains tax. Investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors and to carefully consider the potential tax consequences of owning ADSs or underlying equity shares. See also “Taxation—Indian Tax”.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 12/63 (19%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment3 | 4.8%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
A significant change in the Indian government’s policies, including economic policies, fiscal policies and structural reforms, could adversely affect our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Our business and customers are predominantly located in India or are related to and influenced by the Indian economy. The Indian government has traditionally exercised, and continues to exercise, a dominant influence over many aspects of the economy. The Indian government’s policies could adversely affect business and economic conditions in India, our ability to implement our strategy, the operations of our subsidiaries and affiliates and our future financial performance. Successive Indian governments have pursued policies of economic liberalization, including significantly relaxing restrictions on the private sector and encouraging the development of the Indian financial sector. While a single party achieved majority in the general elections in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2020, India has been governed by coalition governments in previous years. The leadership of India and the composition of the government are subject to change, and election results are not predictable. It is difficult to predict the economic policies that will be pursued by governments in the future. In addition, investments by the corporate sector in India may be impacted by government policies and decisions including judicial decisions, including with respect to awards of licenses and resources, access to land and natural resources and policies with respect to protection of the environment. Such policies and decisions may result in delays in execution of projects, including those financed by us, and also limit new project investments, and thereby impact economic growth. The pace of economic liberalization could change, and specific laws and policies affecting banking and finance companies, foreign investment, currency exchange and other matters affecting investment in our securities could change as well. Decisions by the Government of India could impact our business and financial performance. For instance, the Indian government’s decision in fiscal 2017 to withdraw legal tender status of high denomination currency notes led to an increase in costs due to measures such as the reduction or waiver of transaction charges for ATM and card transactions for the specified period. The surge in low cost deposits resulted in a significant increase in liquidity in the banking system and a reduction in cost of funds. The Indian government announced the introduction of central bank digital currency by the Reserve Bank of India in the Union Budget for fiscal 2023, and the impact of the introduction of digital currency on the banking system, including us, is uncertain. Any such changes in regulations or significant change in India’s economic policies or any market volatility as a result of uncertainty surrounding India’s macroeconomic policies or the future elections of its government could adversely affect business and economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
A prolonged slowdown in economic growth in India could cause our business to suffer.
We are heavily dependent upon the state of the Indian economy, and a slowdown in growth in the Indian economy could adversely affect our business, our borrowers, our counterparties and other constituents, especially if such a slowdown was to be prolonged. India’s gross domestic product grew by 3.7% in fiscal 2020. In fiscal 2021, India’s gross domestic product declined by 6.6% as the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic and consequent lockdowns and other containment measures negatively impacted economic activity during the year. In fiscal 2022, India’s gross domestic product grew by 8.7%. The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a nation-wide lockdown in India in April-May 2020, which substantially impacted economic activity. The easing of lockdown measures subsequently led to gradual improvement in economic activity and progress towards normalcy from the second half of fiscal 2021. The second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in April-May 2021 and the third wave of Covid-19 pandemic in December 2021-January 2022 led to the re-imposition of localised/regional lockdown measures in various parts of the country. Following the outbreak of the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Reserve Bank of India announced several measures during fiscal 2021, including a moratorium on loan repayments for certain borrowers and an asset classification standstill benefit for overdue accounts where a moratorium had been granted, restructuring of loans to small borrowers including individuals, small businesses and micro, small and medium enterprises, and funding under the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme for micro, small and medium enterprises and other stressed sectors. The impact of such measures on our borrowers, our business and the Indian credit market remains uncertain, and may lead to an increase in the level of our non-performing assets, and there could be an adverse impact on our business, our future financial performance, our stockholders’ equity and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. While there has been a significant improvement in economic conditions during fiscal 2022, and significant progress in the vaccination programme in India, with 1.84 billion vaccine doses administered till March 31, 2022, including 23 million precaution doses, the emergence of another wave of the Covid-19 pandemic or its variant or any other economic challenges could require renewed or additional measures, impacting the pace of recovery of the Indian economy and consequently have an adverse affect on our results of operations and financial condition. See also “Risks Relating to Our Business—The future trajectory of the Covid-19 pandemic is uncertain and could adversely affect our business, the quality of our loan portfolio and our financial performance”. An economic slowdown and a general decline in business activity in India could impose stress on our borrowers’ financial soundness and profitability and thus expose us to increased credit risk. Economic growth in India is also influenced by inflation, interest rates, external trade and capital flows. The level of inflation or depreciation of the Indian rupee may limit monetary easing or cause monetary tightening by the Reserve Bank of India. Any increase in inflation, due to increases in domestic food prices or global prices of commodities, including crude oil, the impact of currency depreciation on the prices of imported commodities and additional pass through of higher fuel prices to consumers, or otherwise, may result in a tightening of monetary policy. During the three months ended June 30, 2022, uncertainties in the global environment increased following geo-political tensions, uncertainties around global growth recovery, increase in commodity prices and an increase in inflation in developed and emerging economies. In India, the Reserve Bank of India increased the repo rate by 90 basis points in May-June 2022 in response to the rise in inflation. A return to high rates of inflation with a resulting rise in interest rates, and any corresponding tightening of monetary policy, may have an adverse effect on economic growth in India. Adverse changes to global liquidity conditions, comparative interest rates and risk appetite could lead to significant capital outflows from India, which could adversely affect our business. For instance, the increased uncertainties and risk aversion caused by the Covid-19 pandemic led to significant outflows of net investments by foreign portfolio investors from Indian equity and debt markets in an aggregate amount of approximately US$ 14.7 billion during the three months ended March 31, 2020. There has been an outflow of net investments by foreign portfolio investors during the six months ended March 31, 2022 of US$ 19.0 billion, and further during the three months ended June 30, 2022 of approximately US$ 14.0 billion. A slowdown in global growth may impact India’s exports. While currently commodities have experienced a significant increase in prices, sharp and sustained price reductions of globally traded commodities such as metals and minerals in the event of a global slowdown may negatively impact our borrowers in these sectors. Global trade disputes and protectionist measures and counter-measures could impact trade and capital flows and negatively affect the Indian economy, which could adversely affect our business. Adverse economic conditions in India due to the Covid-19 pandemic or otherwise and movements in global capital, commodity and other markets could result in reduction of demand for credit and other financial products and services, increased competition, and higher defaults among corporate, retail and rural borrowers, which could adversely impact our business, our financial performance, our stockholders’ equity, our ability to implement our strategy and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3
Financial instability in other countries, particularly countries where we have established operations, could adversely affect our business.
There is a history of financial crises and boom-bust cycles in multiple markets in both the emerging and developed economies, which increase risks for all financial institutions, including for our business and results of operations. Global economic changes, such as developments in the Eurozone, including the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union following the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union (“Brexit”); concerns related to the impact of tightening monetary policy in the U.S.; the war between Russia and Ukraine and the sanctions imposed on the former; elevated inflation levels; supply and demand imbalances relating to the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict; high global energy prices; potential trade wars between large economies; and the economic consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic may lead to increased risk aversion and volatility in global capital markets and foreign exchange rate movements, which could impact global liquidity and adversely affect our business. Uncertainty around these and related issues could lead to adverse effects on the economy of the United Kingdom and the other economies in which we operate. Our subsidiary in the United Kingdom has made changes to its operations in the European Union due to Brexit, which could adversely affect our business in the United Kingdom and Europe if the changes are not implemented effectively. In addition, China is one of India’s major trading partners and the border dispute between India and China could have an adverse impact on economic relations between the two countries. Further, India has trade ties with both Russia and Ukraine. These factors may also result in a slowdown in India’s trade growth. The effect of any legislative and regulatory efforts to address these risks is uncertain, and they may not have the intended positive effects. Such volatility and negative economic developments could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A loss of investor confidence in the financial systems of India or other markets and countries or any financial instability in India or any other market may cause increased volatility in the Indian financial markets and, directly or indirectly, adversely affect the Indian economy and financial sector, our business and our future financial performance. We remain subject to the risks posed by the indirect impact of adverse developments in the global economy and the global banking environment, some of which cannot be anticipated and the vast majority of which are not under our control. We also remain subject to counterparty risk to financial institutions that fail or are otherwise unable to meet their obligations to us.
International Operations1 | 1.6%
International Operations - Risk 1
The exposures of our international branches and banking subsidiaries could generally affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The loan portfolio of our international branches and banking subsidiaries includes foreign currency loans to Indian companies for their Indian operations (where permitted by regulation) as well as for their overseas ventures, including cross-border acquisitions. This exposes us to specific additional risks including the failure of the acquired entities to perform as expected, and our inexperience in various aspects of the economic and legal framework in overseas markets. We are, through our international branches and banking subsidiaries, also exposed to a variety of local market credit risks, where our expertise and experience may be limited. Our international profile has also increased the complexity of our risks in a number of areas including price risks, currency risks, interest rate risks, compliance risk, regulatory and reputational risk and operational risk. We also face risks arising from our ability to manage inconsistent legal and regulatory requirements in the multiple jurisdictions in which we operate. Our businesses are subject to changes in legal and regulatory requirements and it may not be possible to predict the timing or nature of such changes. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—The opportunities for growth in our international operations and our ability to repatriate capital from these operations may be limited by the local regulatory environments.” Business opportunities in these jurisdictions will also determine the growth in our operations. Global developments including geopolitical tensions could impact economic growth in Canada and the United Kingdom, which in turn could impact the business of our banking subsidiaries in these countries. Our international branches and banking subsidiaries undertake select local banking businesses, including lending to multinational and local corporations, small businesses, property backed lending and insured and other mortgages, and in the event of these corporations being impacted by global and local economic conditions it could have an adverse impact on our business. For instance, during the three months ended March 31, 2020, two non-India linked loan accounts at our international branches had to be classified as non-performing as the borrowers misrepresented their financial position to lenders. Our international branches and banking subsidiaries have also made investments in bonds, certificates of deposit, mortgage backed securities, treasury bills and asset-backed commercial paper. We are repositioning our international business strategy to sharpen our focus on the non-resident Indian community and on India-linked trade. We aim to progressively exit exposures that are not linked to India in a planned manner at our international branches. Our overseas banking subsidiaries will continue to serve local markets selectively with a focus on risk mitigation and granularity of business. There can be no assurance of our successful execution of this strategy. The global financial and economic crisis resulted in mark-to-market and realized losses on our overseas and other subsidiaries’ investment and derivative portfolios, increased the regulatory scrutiny of our international operations, constrained our international debt capital market borrowings and increased our cost of funding. The Covid-19 pandemic also increased challenges for our international branches and banking subsidiaries. If we are unable to manage these risks, our business would be adversely affected.The classification of the loan portfolio of our international branches and banking subsidiaries is also subject to the regulations of respective local regulators. Such loans that are identified as impaired as per host country regulations for reasons other than record of recovery, but which are standard as per the current Reserve Bank of India guidelines, are classified as non-performing to the extent of the amount of outstanding loan in the host country. Overseas regulators may also require higher provisions against loans held in their jurisdictions.
Natural and Human Disruptions4 | 6.3%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
Natural calamities, climate change and health epidemics could adversely affect the Indian economy, or the economy of other countries where we operate, our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
India has experienced natural calamities such as earthquakes, floods and droughts in the past few years. The extent and severity of these natural disasters determine their impact on the Indian economy. In particular, climatic and weather conditions, such as the level and timing of monsoon rainfall, impact the agricultural sector, which constituted approximately 15% of India’s gross value added in fiscal 2022. Prolonged spells of below or above normal rainfall or other natural calamities, or global or regional climate change, could adversely affect the Indian economy and our business, especially our rural portfolio. Similarly, global or regional climate change in India and other countries where we operate could result in change in weather patterns and frequency of natural calamities like droughts, floods and cyclones, which could affect the economy of India, the countries where we operate and our operations in those countries. Health epidemics could also disrupt our business, our borrowers, our counterparties and other constituents. The emergence of disease pandemics like Covid-19 since the first quarter of calendar year 2020, the more recent outbreak of monkeypox or other earlier outbreaks like the nipah virus in 2018 in certain regions of southeast Asia, including India, have caused, and could in the future cause, economic and financial disruptions. Such disruptions in India and other areas of the world in which we operate could lead to operational difficulties, including travel restrictions, that could impact our business and our ability to manage or conduct our business. The Covid-19 pandemic and any future outbreak of health epidemics may impact the quality of our portfolio and result in an increase in our non-performing loans, and restrict the level of business activity in affected areas, which may in turn adversely affect our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—The future trajectory of the Covid-19 pandemic is uncertain and could adversely affect our business, the quality of our loan portfolio and our financial performance”.
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 2
If regional hostilities, terrorist attacks, or social unrest in India or elsewhere increase, our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs could be adversely affected.
India has from time to time experienced social and civil unrest and hostilities both internally and with neighboring countries. In the past, there have been military confrontations between India and Pakistan, and border disputes with neighboring countries, including China. In June 2020, Indian and Chinese troops engaged in physical conflict in the Galwan River valley. Both Indian and Chinese governments have undertaken protective measures, such as, in relation to the presence of Chinese businesses in India. We cannot predict how such geopolitical events will develop in the future and how it may impact our business, operations, reputation and financial condition. India has also experienced terrorist attacks in some parts of the country, including in Mumbai, where our headquarters are located. India could also be impacted by intensifying border disputes with its neighbors, trade wars between large economies like the U.S. increasing trade tariffs on goods imported from China, or possible import restrictions on Indian goods by trading partners that could have an adverse impact on India’s trade and capital flows, exchange rate and macroeconomic stability. In addition, geopolitical events in the Middle East, Asia and Europe or terrorist or military action in other parts of the world, including the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, may impact prices of key commodities, financial markets and trade and capital flows, including by leading to restrictions on countries which are among India’s significant trading partners. These factors and any political or economic instability in India could adversely affect our business, our future financial performance and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 3
Changed
The financial results of our insurance companies could be materially adversely affected by the occurrence of a catastrophe.
Portions of our general insurance business may cover losses from unpredictable events such as hurricanes, windstorms, epidemics, monsoons, earthquakes, fires, industrial explosions, floods, riots and other man-made or natural disasters, including acts of terrorism, and epidemics or pandemics such as the Covid-19 pandemic. The incidence and severity of these catastrophes in any given period are inherently unpredictable. Although reserves are established after an assessment of potential losses relating to catastrophes covered, there is no assurance that such reserves would be sufficient to pay for all related claims. In addition, our life insurance subsidiary’s operations are also exposed to claims arising out of catastrophes and epidemics or pandemics, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, due to increased mortality and morbidity claims of affected customers. In the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, the number of new cases and resultant mortality has been higher compared to initial wave of the pandemic in 2020, and has resulted in a significant increase in claims on insurance companies, including our life insurance subsidiary. In addition, catastrophes could result in losses in the investment portfolios of our life insurance subsidiary due to, among other reasons, the failure of its counterparties to perform their obligations or significant volatility or disruption in the financial markets. Our general insurance company’s operations are exposed to claims relating to catastrophes and epidemics or pandemics. Continuing higher claims related to Covid-19 may adversely impact the profitability of our general insurance company. Although our insurance subsidiary and affiliate monitor their overall exposure to catastrophes and epidemics and other unpredictable events in each geographic region and determine their underwriting limits related to insurance coverage for losses from such events, the insurance subsidiary and affiliate generally seek to reduce their exposure through the purchase of reinsurance, selective underwriting practices and by monitoring risk accumulation. Claims relating to catastrophes and epidemics or pandemics may result in unusually high levels of losses and may require additional capital to maintain solvency margins and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 4
Changed
The future trajectory of the Covid-19 pandemic is uncertain and could adversely affect our business, the quality of our portfolio and our financial performance.
The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted, and is likely to continue to impact most countries, including India, and has resulted in substantial volatility in global financial markets, increased unemployment and operational challenges, such as the temporary closures of businesses, sheltering-in-place directives and increased remote work protocols, which have significantly slowed down economic activity. The Government of India initiated a nation-wide lockdown from March 25, 2020 until May 31, 2020, which substantially impacted economic activities. The easing of lockdown measures subsequently led to gradual improvement in economic activity and progress towards normalcy. For the banking sector, these developments resulted in lower demand for loans and fee-based services and regulatory measures like moratorium on payment of dues and standstill in asset classification to mitigate the economic consequences on borrowers. The second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in April-May 2021 and the third wave of Covid-19 pandemic in December 2021-January 2022 led to the re-imposition of localized/regional lockdown measures in various parts of the country. During fiscal 2022, there was significant progress in the vaccination programme in India, and significant improvement in economic conditions. However, the emergence of new waves of the Covid-19 pandemic or its variants may require renewed or additional mitigation measures and impact the pace of recovery of the Indian economy. Operationally, although we have established a work-from-home protocol and restricted business travel of our workforce, if significant portions of our workforce, including key personnel, are unable to work effectively because of illness, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic, the impact of the pandemic on our businesses could be adverse. The economic disruption caused by the pandemic, and related lockdowns could impact our business in a number of ways, including by increasing our number of non-performing loans due to the reduction in cash flows of businesses, income levels and the value of savings of households, as well as increased levels of unemployment. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the Reserve Bank of India has permitted lenders to implement a resolution plan, along with asset classification benefits, for eligible corporate and individual borrower segments. Restructuring of loans was also allowed for micro, small and medium enterprises subject to specific requirements. The impact of these measures on borrowers, our business and the Indian credit market is uncertain. The Bank had made Covid-19 related provisions of Rs. 27.3 billion during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and a further net provision of Rs. 47.5 billion during fiscal 2021, towards standard assets, which was higher than the requirement stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India. The Bank held a total contingency provision of Rs. 74.5 billion, including the Covid-19 related contingency provision of Rs. 64.3 billion, at March 31, 2022. Our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and Canada have also made Covid-19 related provisions. There can be no assurance of the adequacy of these provisions, or the level of additional provisions that will be required. The framework for resolution of stressed assets is still evolving which may create challenges for banks in suitably invoking a resolution plan. Additional provisions are required in the absence of a resolution plan or initiation of insolvency proceedings. Further, the Reserve Bank of India guidelines require banks to identify borrowers in financial difficulty, indications of which may include defaults, and projections of cash-flows, among other things. Further, as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Reserve Bank of India has allowed restructuring for specific borrower segments and invoking a resolution plan within specified timelines in order to provide temporary relief to eligible borrowers impacted by the pandemic. Considering the uncertainties with regard to economic growth and the trajectory of the Covid-19 pandemic, there is no assurance that such resolution plans will be successful.
Capital Markets4 | 6.3%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Any adverse impact on India’s external position due to an increase in the price of crude oil or the current account deficit or outflow of foreign capital or exchange rate volatility could adversely affect the Indian economy, which could adversely affect our business.
India is vulnerable to developments in the trade account. India imports a majority of its requirements of petroleum oil and petroleum products. The decline in the oil import bill in fiscal 2021 was largely due to a decline in global crude oil prices and weak demand conditions in the Indian economy caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. However, global crude oil prices have been rising since November 2020 and recently experienced a sharp increase following the hostilities between Russia and Ukraine. Elevated oil price levels or volatility in oil prices, as well as the impact of currency depreciation, which makes imports more expensive in local currency, and the pass-through of such increases to Indian consumers or an increase in subsidies (which would increase the fiscal deficit) could have a material adverse impact on the Indian economy and the Indian banking and financial system, including through a rise in inflation and market interest rates, higher trade and fiscal deficits and currency depreciation. India’s trade relationships with other countries and its trade deficit, may adversely affect Indian economic conditions and the exchange rate for the rupee. The current account deficit as a proportion of India’s gross domestic product was 0.9% of India’s gross domestic product in fiscal 2020 and there was a surplus in the current account of 0.9% in fiscal 2021. In fiscal 2022, the current account deficit was 1.2% of India’s gross domestic product. If current account and trade deficits increase, or are no longer manageable because of factors impacting the trade deficit like a significant rise in global crude oil prices or otherwise, the Indian economy, and therefore our business, our financial performance and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs could be adversely affected. Any reduction of or increase in the volatility of capital flows may impact the Indian economy and financial markets and increase the complexity and uncertainty in monetary policy decisions in India, leading to volatility in inflation and interest rates in India, which could also adversely impact our business, our financial performance, our stockholders’ equity, and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—We and our customers are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates”.
Capital Markets - Risk 2
The banking and financial markets in India are still evolving and the Indian financial system could experience difficulties which could adversely affect our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
We continue to be categorized as a domestic systemically important bank in India by the Reserve Bank of India. We are not treated as a globally systemically important bank, either by the Financial Stability Board or the Reserve Bank of India. As a systemically important Indian bank, we are exposed to the risks of the Indian financial system which may be affected by the financial difficulties faced by certain Indian financial institutions because the commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely related as a result of credit, trading, clearing or other relationships. This risk, which is sometimes referred to as systemic risk, may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, banks, securities firms and exchanges with which we interact on a daily basis. Any such difficulties or instability of the Indian financial system in general could create an adverse market perception about Indian financial institutions and banks and adversely affect our business. For instance, in March 2020, the Reserve Bank of India imposed a moratorium restricting deposit withdrawals from a private sector bank, followed by implementation of a scheme of reconstruction involving change in management and equity capital infusion by several Indian banks, including us. The private sector bank also wrote down additional tier-1 bonds. The overall impact of such developments on credit markets is uncertain and there could be an adverse impact on the loan portfolios of banks, including us, if customers are no longer able to access financing or refinancing from these entities or replace such financing or refinancing from other sources, thereby impacting their ability to conduct operations or meet their financial obligations. Our transactions with these financial institutions expose us to credit risk in the event of default by the counterparty, which can be exacerbated during periods of market illiquidity. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—There is operational risk associated with the financial industry which, when realized, may have an adverse impact on our business”. As the Indian financial system operates in an emerging market, we face risks of a nature and extent not typically faced in more developed economies. Our credit risk may be higher than the credit risk of banks in some developed economies. Our access to information about the credit histories of our borrowers, especially individuals and small businesses, may be limited relative to what is typically available for similar borrowers in developed economies. In addition, the credit risk of our borrowers is often higher than borrowers in more developed economies due to the evolving Indian regulatory, political, economic and industrial environment. The directed lending norms of the Reserve Bank of India require us to lend a certain proportion of our loans to “priority sectors”, including agriculture and small enterprises, where we are less able to control the portfolio quality and where economic difficulties are likely to affect our borrowers more severely. We also purchase priority sector lending certificates to meet directed lending requirements, and the cost of purchasing such certificates may increase substantially depending on the demand and supply scenario of the certificates. Any shortfall in meeting the priority sector lending targets and sub-targets may be required to be allocated to investments yielding sub-market returns. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—We are subject to the directed lending requirements of the Reserve Bank of India, which may also involve buying related certificates at a premium to meet the annual targets, and any shortfall in meeting these requirements may be required to be invested in Government of India schemes that yield low returns, thereby impacting our profitability. We may also experience a higher level of non-performing assets in our directed lending portfolio, which could adversely impact the quality of our loan portfolio, our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs” and “Supervision and Regulation—Regulations Relating to Advancing Loans—Directed Lending”. In addition to credit risks, we face additional risks as compared with banks in developed economies. We may face the risk of deposit runs notwithstanding the existence of a national deposit insurance scheme. For instance, in 2008, following the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and the disclosure of our exposure to Lehman Brothers and other U.S. and European financial institutions, negative rumors circulated about our financial position which resulted in concerns being expressed by depositors and higher than normal transaction levels on a few days. We controlled the situation in this instance, but any failure to control such situations in the future could result in high volumes of deposit withdrawals, which would adversely impact our liquidity position, disrupt our business and, in times of market stress, undermine our financial strength. We pursue our banking, insurance and other activities in India in a developing economy with all of the risks that come with operating in a developing economy. Our activities in India are widespread and diverse and involve employees, contractors, counterparties and customers with widely varying levels of education, financial sophistication and wealth. Although we seek to implement policies and procedures to reduce and manage marketplace risks as well as risks within our own organization, some risks remain inherent in doing business in a large, developing country. We cannot eliminate these marketplace and operational risks, which may lead to or exacerbate legal, regulatory or judicial actions, negative publicity or other developments that could reduce our profitability. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—The enhanced supervisory and compliance environment in the financial sector increases the risk of regulatory action against us, whether formal or informal.”, “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—We are at increased risk for inquiries or investigations by regulatory and enforcement authorities, which may adversely affect our reputation, lead to increased regulatory scrutiny, cause us to incur additional costs or adversely affect our ability to conduct business” and “-Risks Relating to Our Business -Entry into new businesses or rapid growth in existing loan portfolios may expose us to increased risks that may adversely affect our business”.
Capital Markets - Risk 3
We and our customers are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
Several of our borrowers enter into derivative contracts to manage their foreign exchange risk exposures. Volatility in exchange rates may result in increased mark-to-market losses in derivative transactions for our clients. Upon the maturity or premature termination of the derivative contracts, these mark-to-market losses become receivables owed to us. Consequently, we become exposed to various kinds of risks including but not limited to credit risk, market risk and exchange risk. Exchange rates are impacted by a number of factors including volatility of international capital markets, interest rates and monetary policy stance in developed economies like the United States, level of inflation and interest rates in India, the balance of payment position and trends in economic activity. Rising volatility in capital flows due to changes in monetary policy in the United States or other economies or a reduction in risk appetite or increase in risk aversion among global investors and consequent reduction in global liquidity may impact the Indian economy and financial markets. Following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, there was a significant outflow of foreign investments from Indian equity and debt markets during the three months ended March 31, 2020, and the Indian rupee depreciated by 5.6% vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar during the quarter ended March 31, 2020. During fiscal 2021, the exchange rate appreciated by 3.0% from Rs. 75.39 per U.S. dollar at March 31, 2020 to Rs. 73.14 per U.S. dollar at March 31, 2021 as global oil prices declined due to weak demand conditions. During fiscal 2022, several factors impacted the exchange rate including the second and third wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, geo-political tensions due to the crisis in Ukraine and sanctions on Russia, and deterioration in economic conditions following a sharp rise in global crude oil prices and increase in inflation in developed economies. The Rupee depreciated to Rs. 75.87 per U.S. dollar at March 31, 2022. As discussed above, in the past, concerns over India’s current account deficit and changes in capital flows due to changes in U.S. monetary policy have caused the rupee to depreciate against the U.S. dollar. During the three months ended June 30, 2022, the rupee depreciated by 4.1% to Rs. 79.02 per U.S. dollar at June 30, 2022. This was following the tightening of monetary policy by the US Federal Reserve due to rising inflation concerns and consequent capital outflows from the Indian equity markets. Some of our borrowers with foreign exchange and derivative exposures may be adversely impacted by the depreciation of the rupee. These include borrowers impacted by higher rupee denominated interest or principal repayment on unhedged foreign currency borrowings; increases in the cost of raw material imports where there is limited ability to pass through such escalations to customers; and the escalation of project costs due to higher imported equipment costs; and borrowers that may have taken adverse positions in the foreign exchange markets. The failure of our borrowers to manage their exposures to foreign exchange and derivative risk, particularly adverse movements and volatility in foreign exchange rates, may adversely affect our borrowers and consequently the quality of our exposure to our borrowers and our business volumes and profitability. Further, any increased intervention in the foreign exchange market or other measures by the Reserve Bank of India to control the volatility of the exchange rate, may result in a decline in India’s foreign exchange reserves and reduced liquidity and higher interest rates in the Indian economy. Prolonged periods of volatility in exchange rates, reduced liquidity and high interest rates could adversely affect our business, our future financial performance and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. A sharp depreciation in the exchange rate may also impact some corporate borrowers having foreign currency obligations that are not fully hedged. An increase in non-performing or restructured assets on account of our borrowers’ inability to manage exchange rate risk and any increased capital or provisioning requirement against such exposures may have an adverse impact on our profitability, our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. We have adopted certain risk management policies to mitigate such risk. However, there is no assurance that such measures will be fully effective in mitigating such risks.
Capital Markets - Risk 4
Commission, exchange and brokerage income, profit on foreign exchange transactions and other sources of fee income are important elements of our profitability, and regulatory changes and market conditions could cause these income streams to decline and adversely impact our financial performance.
We earn commission, exchange and brokerage income from a variety of activities, including loan processing, syndication and advisory services for corporate clients with respect to their acquisition and project financing, distribution of retail investment and insurance products, transaction banking and retail credit products. Our commission, exchange and brokerage income is therefore impacted by the level of corporate activity including new financing proposals, the demand for retail financial products and the overall level of economic and trade activity. Our commission, exchange and brokerage income is also impacted by applicable regulations governing various products and segments of financial services and changes in these regulations may adversely impact our income streams and ability to grow our business. Our fee income from distribution of third party financial products is dependent on applicable regulations, the demand for these products and our distribution strategy for banking and third party products. Our ability to earn fees in the near term would likely be impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic. See also, “—Risks relating to our Business—The future trajectory of the Covid-19 pandemic is uncertain and could adversely affect our business, the quality of our loan portfolio and our financial performance.”
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 3/63 (5%)Below Sector Average
Cyber Security1 | 1.6%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
We face security risks, including denial of service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks targeting our colleagues and customers, malware intrusion or data corruption attempts, and identity theft that could result in the disclosure of confidential information, adversely affect our business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure.
Our businesses rely on our secure processing, transmission, storage and retrieval of confidential, proprietary and other information in our computer and data management systems and networks and in the computer and data management systems and networks of third parties. To access our products and services, our customers may use personal smartphones, tablets, laptops, PCs, and other mobile devices that are beyond our control systems and subject to their own cybersecurity risks. Given our reliance and focus on technology and presence in diverse geographies, our technologies, systems, networks, and our customers’ devices are subject to security risks and are susceptible to cyber-attacks (such as, denial of service attacks, hacking, terrorist activities or identity theft) that could negatively impact the confidentiality, integrity or availability of data pertaining to us or our customers, which in turn may cause direct loss of money to our customers or to us, damage to our reputation and adversely impact our business and financial results. Third parties with which we do business or that facilitate our business activities could also be sources of operational and information security risk to us, including from breakdowns or failures of their own systems or capacity constraints. We, our customers, regulators and other third parties, including other financial services institutions and companies engaged in data processing, have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber-attacks. These cyber-attacks include computer viruses, malicious or destructive code, phishing attacks, denial of service or information, ransomware, improper access by employees or vendors, attacks on personal email of employees, ransom demands to not expose security vulnerabilities in our systems or the systems of third parties or other security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential, proprietary and other information of ours, our employees, our customers or of third parties, damage our systems or otherwise materially disrupt our or our customers’ or other third parties’ network access or business operations. Like many other large global financial institutions, we have also experienced a distributed denial of services attack which was intended to disrupt customer access to our main portal. While our monitoring and mitigating controls were able to detect and effectively respond to this incident, there can be no assurance that these security measures will be successful in the future. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. We have a governance framework in place for security and have implemented information security policies, procedures and technologies. However, considering that technology is currently in a phase of rapid evolution and that the methods used for cyber-attacks are also changing frequently or, in some cases, are not recognized until an actual attack, we may not be able to anticipate or to implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches. Further, circumstances such as the Covid-19 pandemic requiring a large number of our employees to work from home may increase our vulnerability to cyber attacks. Cyber threats are rapidly evolving and we may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks and could be held liable for any security breach or loss. Cybersecurity risks for banking organizations have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, and the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions. For example, cybersecurity risks may increase in the future as we continue to increase our mobile-payment and other internet-based product offerings and expand our internal usage of web-based products and applications. In addition, cybersecurity risks have significantly increased in recent years in part due to the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime affiliates, terrorist organizations, hostile foreign governments, disgruntled employees or vendors, activists and other external parties, including those involved in corporate espionage. Even the most advanced internal control environment may be vulnerable to compromise. Targeted social engineering attacks and “spear phishing” attacks are becoming more sophisticated and are extremely difficult to prevent. In such an attack, an attacker will attempt to fraudulently induce colleagues, customers or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to its data or that of its clients. Persistent attackers may succeed in penetrating defenses given enough resources, time, and motive. The techniques used by cyber criminals change frequently, may not be recognized until launched and may not be recognized until well after a breach has occurred. The risk of a security breach caused by a cyber-attack at a vendor or by unauthorized vendor access has also increased in recent years. Additionally, the existence of cyber-attacks or security breaches at third-party vendors with access to our data may not be disclosed to us in a timely manner. We could also face cybersecurity risks which result in direct loss of money, as has happened with certain other banks in the past where their high value payment systems were compromised resulting in direct monetary loss for the bank. We also face risks where our customers could lose money because of cyber attacks, and these could result in monetary as well as reputational risks for the Bank. We also face indirect technology, cybersecurity and operational risks relating to clients and other third parties with whom we do business or upon whom we rely to facilitate or enable our business activities, including, for example, financial counterparties, regulators and providers of critical infrastructure such as internet access and electrical power. As a result of increasing consolidation, interdependence and complexity of financial entities and technology systems, a technology failure, cyber-attack or other information or security breach that significantly degrades, deletes or compromises the systems or data of one or more financial entities could have a material impact on counterparties or other market participants, including us. This consolidation, interconnectivity and complexity increases the risk of operational failure, on both individual and industry-wide bases, as disparate systems need to be integrated, often on an accelerated basis. Any third-party technology failure, cyber-attack or other information or security breach, termination or constraint could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to effect transactions, service our clients, manage our exposure to risk or expand our business. Cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches, whether directed at us or third parties, may result in a material loss or have material consequences. Furthermore, the public perception that a cyber-attack on our systems has been successful, whether or not this perception is correct, may damage our reputation with customers and third parties with whom we do business. Hacking of personal information and identity theft risks, in particular, could cause serious reputational harm. A successful penetration or circumvention of system security could cause us serious negative consequences, including our loss of customers and business opportunities, costs associated with maintaining business relationships after an attack or breach; significant business disruption to our operations and business, misappropriation, exposure, or destruction of our confidential information, intellectual property, funds, and/or those of our customers; or damage to our computers or systems, and could result in a violation of applicable privacy laws and other laws, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, additional compliance costs, and could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. In view of the Covid-19 pandemic, work-from-home has been enabled for our employees, other than at the branches, which continue to function as banking is classified as an essential service. This may expose us to risks arising on account of remote work environment, data security issues, increased cyber-attacks and availability of critical functions and IT systems. Our customers could also be exposed to increased phishing and vishing attacks that could result in a financial loss to them, and in turn lead to claims for compensation from the Bank or reputation loss for the Bank.
Technology2 | 3.2%
Technology - Risk 1
System failures or system downtime could adversely impact our business.
Given the large share of retail products and services and transaction banking services in our total business, the importance of systems technology to our business has increased significantly. Our business, financial, accounting, data processing systems or other operating systems and facilities may stop operating properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, such as surges in customer transaction volume, utility disruptions or failures, natural disasters, diseases pandemics, events arising from political or social matters and terrorist attacks. While we have procedures to monitor for and prevent system downtime or failures, and to recover from system failures in the event they occur, there is no guarantee that these procedures will successfully prevent a system failure or allow us to recover quickly from a system failure. In the event that our data center is severely impacted, while we have a secondary disaster recovery data center, recovery of some of our systems and services may be delayed, thereby adversely impacting our operations and customer service levels. Any failure in our systems, particularly for retail products and services and transaction banking, could significantly affect our operations and the quality of our customer service and could result in enhanced regulatory scrutiny and business and financial losses that would adversely affect the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. Regulatory scrutiny in this area is increasing. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—The enhanced supervisory and compliance environment in the financial sector increases the risk of regulatory action against us, whether formal or informal.”
Technology - Risk 2
We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, we may rely on information furnished to us by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. We may also rely on certain representations as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of their independent auditors. For instance, in deciding whether to extend credit, we may assume that a customer’s audited financial statements conform to generally accepted accounting principles and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected by relying on financial statements that do not comply with generally accepted accounting principles or other information that is materially misleading. According to data published by the Reserve Bank of India, frauds reported in the Indian banking sector have shown an increasing trend in recent years, and the composition of the fraud amount reported is largely dominated by frauds related to loans and advances. In addition, our access to information about the credit histories of our borrowers, especially individuals and small businesses, may be limited, relative to what is typically available for similar borrowers in developed economies with more established nation-wide credit bureaus. This may affect the quality of information available to us about the credit history of our borrowers, especially individuals and small businesses. As a result, our ability to effectively manage our credit risk may be adversely affected.
Production
Total Risks: 3/63 (5%)Below Sector Average
Employment / Personnel1 | 1.6%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
We depend on the knowledge and skills of our senior management. Any inability to attract them and retain them and other talented professionals or any loss of senior management or other talented professionals may adversely impact our business.
Our continued success depends in part on the continued service of key members of our management team and our ability to continue to attract, train, motivate and retain highly qualified professionals. This is a key element of our strategy and we believe it to be a significant source of competitive advantage. The successful implementation of our strategy depends on the availability of skilled management, both at our head office and at each of our business units and international locations, continuity in the service of our directors, executives and senior managers, and our ability to attract and train young professionals. The appointment of individuals in certain positions is subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals. Any stringent requirements by our regulator for appointing key members in the management may require us to reorganize our management structure and may affect our ability to identify, hire and appoint suitable professionals for various roles. The loss of any member from our senior management, including directors and key personnel, can have a material impact on our business, our financial performance, our stockholders’ equity, our ability to implement our strategy and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. If we or one of our business units or other functions fail to staff operations appropriately, or lose one or more key senior executives or qualified young professionals and fail to replace them in a satisfactory and timely manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations, including our control and operational risks, may be adversely affected. Likewise, if we fail to attract and appropriately train, motivate and retain young professionals or other talent, our business may likewise be affected. We have recently made several changes to our human resource management practices, including key performance indicators, unit-level operating flexibility and accountability and a shift from grades to functional designations at senior levels, aimed at greater agility and synergy across the organization. There can be no assurance that these measures will be successful in meeting the desired objectives. A substantial portion of our compensation structure for middle and senior management is in the form of employee stock options, and dependent on the market price of our equity shares. Depending on market and business conditions, we may decide to reduce our employee strength in certain of our businesses. We recently introduced an employee stock option scheme for up to the middle-level management employees pursuant to which, options will be issued at a face value of Rs. 2.0 per unit, with the vesting of units based upon the continuation of the employee. However, increased competition, including the entry of new banks into an already competitive sector, may affect our ability to hire and retain qualified employees. See also “Business—Employees”. Several of our employees were impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic. Such health epidemics or natural disasters in the future could impact our employees, including the senior management. There can be no assurance that this would not impact our ability to manage or conduct our business or the price of our equity shares and ADSs.
Costs2 | 3.2%
Costs - Risk 1
While our insurance businesses are an important part of our business, there can be no assurance of their future rates of growth or levels of profitability.
Our life insurance and general insurance businesses are an important part of our business. See also “Business—Overview of Our Products and Services—Insurance”. These businesses have experienced volatility in growth rates in the past and there can be no assurance of their future rates of growth or profitability. The Indian life insurance sector has experienced significant regulatory changes in recent years. See also “Supervision and Regulation—Regulations Governing Insurance Companies”. The regulatory changes, apart from impacting the business strategy, have also resulted in reduced profit margins on life insurance products. Our life insurance subsidiary’s growth and profitability depends on various factors, including the proportion of protection and annuity products in its portfolio, the maintenance on its relationship with key distribution partners, regulatory changes, and market movements. The demand for unit-linked products may be influenced by any volatility or downturn in capital markets. ICICI Bank is a corporate agent of its insurance subsidiaries and accounts for a significant portion of the business volumes of its life insurance subsidiary. The growth of the life insurance subsidiary’s business is thus significantly dependent on the Bank’s distribution strategy with respect to banking products and third party products. While the subsidiary has been making profits since fiscal 2010, there can be no assurance of the continued growth of the subsidiary’s business and profitability, including the business generated by the Bank. We conduct our general insurance business through our general insurance affiliate, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company’s growth and profitability depends on various factors, including the proportion of certain profitable products in its portfolio, the maintenance on its relationship with key distribution partners and reinsurers, continuation of support by the Government of India of certain insurance schemes, regulatory changes, changes to tax positions and market movements. There can be no assurance of the future rates of growth in the insurance business. While this affiliate has been making profits since fiscal 2013, there can be no assurance of the future profitability or rates of growth in the insurance business. See also “—Risks relating to our insurance subsidiary and affiliate—Additional capital requirements of our insurance entities or our inability to monetize a part of our shareholding in these entities may adversely impact our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.” and “Supervision and Regulation—Regulations Governing Insurance Companies.” Further, the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India has from time to time proposed changes to the regulations governing distribution of insurance products by corporate agents, including banks. Any future regulatory changes or restrictions may require our insurance subsidiaries to change their distribution strategies, which may result in increased costs and lower business volumes, as well as impacting ICICI Bank’s distribution of their products and the associated fee income. A slowdown in growth in the Indian economy, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, further regulatory changes or customer dissatisfaction with our insurance products could adversely impact the future growth of these businesses. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—The enhanced supervisory and compliance environment in the financial sector increases the risk of regulatory action against us, whether formal or informal”. Any slowdown in these businesses could have an adverse impact on our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Costs - Risk 2
Changed
Loss reserves for our affilaite’s general insurance business are based on estimates as to future claims liabilities and adverse developments relating to claims could lead to further reserve additions and materially adversely affect the operation of our general insurance affiliate.
In accordance with the general insurance industry practice and accounting and regulatory requirements, our general insurance business establishes reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses related to its general insurance business. Reserves are based on estimates of future payments that will be made in respect of claims, including expenses relating to such claims. The estimation of the loss reserves relies on several key actuarial steps and assumptions, for example, selection of the actuarial methods by line of business, groupings of similar product lines and determination of underlying actuarial assumptions like expected loss ratios, loss development factors, and loss cost trend factors. Such estimates are made on both a case-by-case basis of claims that have been reported but not settled, based on the facts and circumstances available at the time the reserves are established, as well as in respect of losses that have been incurred but not reported. These reserves represent the estimated ultimate cost necessary to bring all pending claims to final settlement. Reserves are subject to change due to a number of variables which affect the ultimate cost of claims, such as changes in claims handling procedures, legal environment, social attitudes, results of litigation, costs of repairs, changing trends in medical costs, minimum wages and other factors such as inflation and exchange rates. Our general insurance company’s reserves for environmental and other latent claims are particularly subject to such variables. The results of operations of our general insurance company depend significantly upon the extent to which its actual claims experience is consistent with the assumptions it uses in setting the prices for products and establishing the liabilities for obligations for technical provisions and claims. To the extent that its actual claims experience is less favorable than the underlying assumptions used in establishing such liabilities, it may be required to increase its reserves, which may materially adversely affect its results of operations. Established loss reserves estimates are periodically adjusted in the ordinary course of settlement, using the most current information available to management, and any adjustments resulting from changes in reserve estimates are reflected in current results of operations. Our general insurance company also conducts reviews of various lines of business to consider the adequacy of reserve levels. Based on current information available and on the basis of internal procedures, the management of our general insurance company considers that these reserves are adequate. However, because the establishment of reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses is an inherently uncertain process, there can be no assurance that ultimate losses will not materially exceed the established reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses and have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of our general insurance company. Such adverse effect may also impact the valuation of our general insurance company by existing or potential investors, and the valuation at which any future monetization of our shareholding in the general insurance company may take place, if at all. See also “—Risks relating to our insurance subsidiary and affiliate—Additional capital requirements of our insurance entities or our inability to monetize a part of our shareholding in these entities may adversely impact our business and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs”.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 3/63 (5%)Below Sector Average
Competition2 | 3.2%
Competition - Risk 1
The growing use of technology in banking and financial services creates additional risks of competition, reliability and security.
Our business and our operations are heavily dependent upon our ability to offer digital products and services and process large volumes of transactions. This has increased our reliance on technology in recent years. Technology innovations in financial services require banks and financial services companies to continuously develop new and simplified models for offering banking products and services. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our industry is very competitive and our strategy depends on our ability to compete effectively.” The growing demand for digital banking services, accelerated in part due to the Covid-19 pandemic, has substantially increased the volume of transactions for the banking system, including us. This has required banks to enhance their focus on the availability and scalability of their systems in the context of growing customer dependence on digital transactions and increasing volumes of such transactions and may require additional investments. Any disruption in service delivery could impact our business, our financial position and our reputation, and also lead to regulatory action including imposing restrictions on business.
Competition - Risk 2
Our industry is very competitive and our strategy depends on our ability to compete effectively.
Within the Indian market, we face intense competition from other commercial banks, investment banks, insurance companies, non-bank finance companies, new private sector banks like payments banks and small finance banks and non-bank entities offering retail payments services. Some Indian public and private sector banks have experienced higher growth and increase in market shares relative to us. The expansion of existing competitors or the entry of new competitors could increase competition for products and services. There could be greater competition for business opportunities if there is a slowdown in growth in the Indian banking sector. The establishment of account aggregators, permitted by the Reserve Bank of India, will facilitate sharing of customer data with different financial service providers from whom customers may be seeking loans or other products and may increase competition by making it easier for new entrants to onboard customers at a lower cost than traditional models. Recently, a large private sector bank in India announced a proposal to merge its parent company, which is a large housing finance company, with itself, leading to a significant increase in size and scale for the bank. This may significantly impact competition in the industry, especially for deposits. Further, technology innovations in mobility and digitization of financial services require banks and financial services companies to continuously develop new and simplified models for offering banking products and services. The emergence of new platforms, or new operating models or new types of banks or other entities offering digital banking solutions, are trends that could increase competitive pressures on banks, including us. Innovations in the payments system and increasing use of mobile banking are leading to emergence of new platforms for cashless payments. This can also lead to new types of banks expanding their presence in other financial products like insurance and mutual funds. Non-financial companies, particularly international technology companies including large e-commerce players and internet-based service providers, are increasing their presence in the financial sector and are offering payment platforms and select services. We are currently partnering with some of these entities to jointly offer payment and credit products and services. Some or all of these entities, which have substantially more resources than us and other Indian banks, may eventually seek a larger share of the banking and financial services market in India and compete with us. Our subsidiaries also face similar risks, including enhanced competition from new, technology-led players with disruptive business models that may result in a loss of market share or reduced profitability or both, for existing players. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to respond promptly to new technological developments, and be in a position to participate in new market opportunities or dedicate resources to upgrade our systems and compete with new players entering the market. See also “—Risks relating to technology—The growing use of technology in banking and financial services creates additional risks of competition, reliability and security”. We face competition from non-banking finance companies that are lending in segments in which banks also have a presence, including home loans and vehicle loans. Their presence in the market may grow during periods when banks are unable to grow their advances due to challenges and stress in other businesses. There is no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete with these non-banking finance companies at all times. Further, changes in the banking sector structure due to consolidation as well as entry of new competitors may lead to volatility and new challenges and may increase pressure on banks to remain competitive. Any changes in the banking structure in India, including the entry of new banks, greater competition between existing players and improvement in the efficiency and competitiveness of existing banks, may have an adverse impact on our business. Due to competitive pressures, we may be unable to successfully execute our growth strategy or offer products and services at reasonable returns and this may adversely impact our business. See also “Business—Competition”. In our international operations we also face competition from the full range of competitors in the financial services industry, both banks and non-banks and both Indian and foreign banks. We remain a small to mid-size player in the international market and many of our competitors have resources much greater than our own.
Brand / Reputation1 | 1.6%
Brand / Reputation - Risk 1
Negative publicity could damage our reputation and adversely impact our business and financial results and the prices of our equity shares and ADSs.
Reputation risk, or the risk to our business, earnings and capital from negative publicity, is inherent in our business. The reputation of the financial services industry in general has been closely monitored as a result of the financial crisis and other matters affecting the financial services industry. Negative public opinion about the financial services industry generally or us specifically could adversely affect our ability to keep and attract customers, and expose us to litigation and regulatory action. Negative publicity can result from our actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices and specific credit exposures, the level of non-performing loans, corporate governance, regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions, and related disclosure, sharing or inadequate protection of customer information, and actions taken by government, regulators, investigative agencies, judiciary and community organizations in response to that conduct. The media coverage and public scrutiny of our business practices, our board of directors, key management personnel, policies and actions has increased significantly over the past few months. Although we take steps to minimize reputation risk in dealing with such events, we, as a large financial services organization are inherently exposed to this risk. We have experienced negative publicity with respect to the allegations levelled against Ms. Kochhar and her spouse and the whistleblower complaints regarding alleged incorrect asset classification and other allegations. See also “—Risks that arise as a result of our presence in a highly regulated sector—The board of directors of the Bank has, pursuant to an independent enquiry, taken action against the former Managing Director and CEO. In the event the Bank is found by any of the enquiries in the matter by government and regulatory agencies to have violated applicable laws or regulations, the Bank could become subject to legal and regulatory sanctions that may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and reputation.” We cannot be certain how the investigations by the government and regulatory and other agencies will conclude with regard to the issue of the former CEO and it is possible that the conclusions of these investigations could lead to more negative publicity. Any continued unfavorable publicity may adversely impact investor confidence and affect the prices of our equity shares and ADSs. Our subsidiaries’ businesses include mutual fund, portfolio and private equity fund management, which are exposed to various risks including diminution in value of investments and inadequate liquidity of the investments. We also distribute products of our insurance, asset management and private equity subsidiaries and affiliate. Investors in these funds and schemes may allege mismanagement or weak fund management as well as mis-selling and conflicts of interest, which may impact our overall reputation as a financial services group and may require us to support these businesses with liquidity and may result in a reduction in business volumes and revenues from these businesses. We are also exposed to the risk of litigation, claims or disputes by customers, counterparties or other constituents across our businesses.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.

FAQ

What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
      They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
        It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
          How do companies disclose their risk factors?
          Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
            Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
              Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
                According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
                  How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
                  Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
                    You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
                      Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
                        A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
                          What are all the risk factor categories?
                          TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
                          1. Financial & Corporate
                          • Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
                          • Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
                          • Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
                          • Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
                          2. Legal & Regulatory
                          • Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
                          • Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
                          • Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
                          • Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
                          3. Production
                          • Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
                          • Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
                          • Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
                          • Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
                          4. Technology & Innovation
                          • Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
                          • Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
                          • Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
                          • Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
                          5. Ability to Sell
                          • Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
                          • Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
                          • Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
                          • Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
                          6. Macro & Political
                          • Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
                          • Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
                          • International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
                          • Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.
                          What am I Missing?
                          Make informed decisions based on Top Analysts' activity
                          Know what industry insiders are buying
                          Get actionable alerts from top Wall Street Analysts
                          Find out before anyone else which stock is going to shoot up
                          Get powerful stock screeners & detailed portfolio analysis