Cousins Properties (CUZ) Risk Analysis

One of our objectives is to develop and maintain a strong management group at all levels. At any given time, we could lose the services of key executives, members of the Board of Directors, and other employees, including the managing directors and other leaders of our respective markets. None of our Board members, key executives, or other employees are subject to employment contracts. Further, we do not carry key person insurance on any of our executive officers or other key employees. While we believe that we could find replacements for these key personnel, the loss of services of any of these key persons could diminish relationships with investors, lendors, prospective customers, joint venture partners, and others in the industry, and therefore such a loss could have an adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition, and our ability to execute our business strategy.

General economic and market risks. In a general economic decline or recessionary climate, our commercial real estate assets may not generate sufficient cash to pay expenses, service debt, or cover operational, improvement, or maintenance costs, and, as a result, our results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected. Factors that may adversely affect the economic performance and value of our properties include, among other things: - changes or volatility within the national, regional, and local economic climate, including dislocations and volatility in the capital markets;- Risks associated with real estate assets, including - competition from other available properties and other local real estate conditions such as an oversupply of rentable space caused by increased development of new properties, a reduction in demand for rentable space caused by a change in the preferences and requirements of our tenants (including space usage), such as work-from-home practices and utilization of open workspaces or "co-working" space, or local economic conditions decreasing the desirability of our locations,- the financial condition of our tenants, including potential adverse effects from the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more major tenants,- the attractiveness of our properties to tenants or buyers,- changes in market rental rates and related concessions granted to tenants including, but not limited to, free rent and tenant improvement allowances,- the need to periodically repair, renovate, and re-lease properties,- potential delays in completion of development and re-development projects due to supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and increased construction costs;- the impact of common stock, debt, or operating partnership issuances;- uninsured losses (including those resulting from high deductibles) or losses in excess of our insurance coverage as a result of casualty events or other claims or events;- insolvency of our insurance carriers or increased cost or unavailability of insurance;- the financial condition and liquidity of, or disputes with, joint venture partners;- sociopolitical unrest such as political instability, civil unrest, armed hostilities, or political activism resulting in a disruption of day-to-day building operations;- the immediate and long-term impact of a public health crisis and the governmental and third party response to such a crisis;- changes in federal, state, and local income laws and regulations (including tax laws and environmental or other regulatory requirements) as they affect real estate companies and real estate investors;- changes in interest rates and availability and cost of corporate and property financing sources, and the inability to comply with debt covenants under credit agreements;- risks associated with security breaches through cyber attacks, cyber intrusions, or otherwise;- changes in senior management, the Board of Directors, or key personnel; and - risks associated with climate change and severe weather events, as well as compliance with regulatory efforts intended to address those risks. Uncertain economic conditions may adversely impact current tenants in our various markets and, accordingly, could affect their ability to pay rent owed to us pursuant to their leases. In periods of economic uncertainty, tenants are more likely to downsize and/or to declare bankruptcy; and, pursuant to various bankruptcy laws, leases may be rejected and thereby terminated. Furthermore, our ability to sell or lease our properties at favorable rates, or at all, may be negatively impacted by general or local economic conditions. Our ability to collect rent from tenants may affect our ability to pay for adequate maintenance, insurance, and other operating costs. Also, the expense of owning and operating a property is not necessarily proportionally reduced when circumstances such as reduced occupancy or other market factors cause a reduction in revenue from the property. If a property is mortgaged and we are unable to meet the mortgage payments, the lender could foreclose on the mortgage and take title to the property. Impairment risks. We regularly review our real estate assets for impairment in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"); and based on these reviews, we may record impairments that have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Negative or uncertain market and economic conditions, as well as market volatility, increase the likelihood of incurring impairment. If we decide to sell a real estate asset rather than holding it for long-term investment or if we reduce our estimates of future cash flows on a real estate asset, the risk of impairment increases. In some cases, our joint venture partners may elect to require a sale of a real estate asset that we intended to hold for a longer period, which could increase the risk of impairment. The magnitude and frequency with which these charges occur could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Leasing risk. Our operating office properties were 91.6% leased at December 31, 2024. Our 20 largest tenants account for a meaningful portion of our revenues. Our operating revenues are dependent upon entering into leases with, and collecting rents from, our tenants. Tenants whose leases are expiring may want to decrease the space they lease and/or may be unwilling to continue their lease. When leases expire or are terminated, replacement tenants may not be available upon acceptable terms and market rental rates may be lower than the previous contractual rental rates. Also, our tenants may approach us for additional concessions in order to remain open and operating. The granting of these concessions may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows to the extent that they result in reduced rental rates, additional capital improvements, or allowances paid to, or on behalf of, the tenants. Tenant and market concentration risk. As of December 31, 2024, our top 20 tenants represented 39.5% of total annualized rent with our largest single tenant accounting for 8.1% of annualized rent. The inability or refusal of any of our significant tenants to pay rent or a decision by a significant tenant to vacate their premises prior to, or at the conclusion of, their lease term (including as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding) could have a significant negative impact on our results of operations or financial condition if a suitable replacement tenant is not secured in a timely manner. For the three months ended December 31, 2024, 35.7% of our net operating income for properties owned was derived from the Atlanta area, 32.4% was derived from the Austin area, 9.0% was derived from the Charlotte area, 8.6% was derived from the Tampa area, 8.1% was derived from the Phoenix area, and 2.4% was derived from the Dallas area. Any adverse economic conditions impacting Atlanta, Austin, Tampa, Charlotte, Phoenix, or Dallas could adversely affect our overall results of operations and financial condition. Because our portfolio consists primarily of lifestyle office buildings (as opposed to a more diversified real estate portfolio), a decrease in demand for this type of workplace could adversely affect our overall results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, some of our markets (and the submarkets within which we operate) have an outsized concentration of a limited number of industries. For example, as of December 31, 2024, in Austin, technology companies represent 52.0% of our annualized rent, in Charlotte, banking and other financial sector companies represent 32.9% of our annualized rent, and in Tampa, biotechnology and health science companies represent 26.6% of our our annualized rent. A significant downturn in one or more of the foregoing sectors and/or sustained changes in space utilization due to remote or hybrid work models could result in decreased leasing demand and have an adverse effect on our overall results of operations and financial condition. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. For example, major tenants such as Silicon Valley Bank Financial and WeWork have previously filed for bankruptcy protection. Other major tenants could file for bankruptcy protection or become insolvent in the future and we cannot evict a tenant on this basis alone. On the other hand, a bankrupt tenant may reject and terminate its lease with us. In such a case, our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid and future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and, even so, our claim for unpaid rent would likely not be paid in full. This shortfall could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Uninsured losses and condemnation costs. Accidents, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, ice storms, wind storms, terrorism incidents, and other physical losses at our properties could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Casualties may occur that significantly damage an operating property or property under development, insurance deductibles or co-insurance limits may be significant (including with respect to damage from named wind storms, where available co-insurance limits are significantly in excess of deductibles for most other casualty losses), and insurance proceeds may be less than the total loss incurred by us. Although we, or our joint venture partners where applicable, maintain casualty insurance under policies we believe to be adequate and appropriate, including commercial general liability, fire, flood, and rent loss insurance on operating properties, as well as cyber coverage, some types of losses, such as those related to the termination of longer-term leases and other contracts, generally are not insured. Property ownership also involves potential liability to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring on the property. There may be certain losses that are not generally insured against or that are not generally fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so, including losses due to floods, wind, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism, riots, or pandemics. A number of our properties are located in areas that are known to be subject to hurricane or flood risk. We carry hurricane and flood hazard insurance on all of our properties located in areas historically subject to such activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles, if we believe it is commercially reasonable. In Tampa and Houston, our wind storm insurance is subject to deductibles from 2% to 5% of the value of the affected building. We evaluate our insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties. We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market in general, but we cannot anticipate what insurance coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years. Such losses may not be fully insured. In addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations could adversely affect the viability of such projects. Environmental issues. Federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products or other chemicals which are discovered at or migrating from a property, simply because of our past ownership or operation of the real estate. If determined to be liable, the owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination, or perform such investigation and clean up itself. Although certain legal protections may be available to prospective purchasers of property, these laws typically impose remediation responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the regulated substances. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the release of regulated substances at the property, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the remediation costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from regulated substances emanating from that site. We manage this risk through Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and, as necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, which may include environmental sampling on properties we acquire or develop. Most of our properties are located in urban or previously developed areas, and the historic use of some sites may have resulted in contamination. Inquiries about indoor air quality and water quality may necessitate special investigation and, depending on the results, remediation beyond our regular testing and maintenance programs. Indoor air quality and water quality issues can stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contaminants from indoor or outdoor sources, and biological contaminants such as molds, pollen, viruses, and bacteria. When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Indoor exposure to mold or other chemical or biological contaminants above certain levels can be alleged to be connected to allergic reactions or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. If these conditions were to occur at one of our properties, we may be subject to third-party claims for personal injury or may need to undertake a targeted remediation program, including without limitation, steps to increase indoor ventilation rates and eliminate sources of contaminants. Such remediation programs could be costly, necessitate the temporary relocation of some or all of the property's tenants, or require rehabilitation of the affected property. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability from our tenants, employees of our tenants, or others if property damage or personal injury occurs. We are not currently aware of any environmental liabilities at locations that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, financial condition, or results of operations. Unidentified environmental liabilities could arise, however, including as a result of our new or more stringent environmental laws and regulations, and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Sustainability strategies. Our sustainability strategy is to develop and maintain resilient buildings that are operated in an environmentally and socially responsible manner, encouraging office users to select us for their corporate operations while enhancing the communities in which our buildings are located. Failure to develop and maintain sustainable and resilient buildings relative to our peers could adversely impact our ability to lease space at competitive rates and negatively impact our results of operations and portfolio attractiveness. Climate change and severe weather event risks. The physical effects of climate change could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations, and business. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns or severity, our markets could experience increases in storm intensity (including floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts, wind storms, ice storms, and earthquakes), rising sea-levels, and changes in precipitation, temperature, air quality, and quality and availability of water. Over time, these conditions could result in physical damage to, or declining demand for, our properties or our inability to operate the buildings efficiently or at all. Climate change may also indirectly affect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of required resources, including energy, other fuel sources, water, and waste removal services, and increasing the risk and severity of floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts, wind storms, ice storms, and earthquakes at our properties. Should the impact of climate change be severe or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws may require material expenditure by us. For example, various federal, state, and local laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Among other things, "green" building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management. Such codes could require us to make improvements to our existing properties, increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties, or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties. We have historically voluntarily disclosed relevant information regarding our sustainability practices; however, federal, state, and local laws and regulations are evolving and future regulation may require more stringent data reporting. We face transition risks in the event of the implementation of any such federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and codes. Expenditures required for compliance with such codes may affect our cash flow and results of operations. Additionally, although we pursue a robust sustainability strategy, new approaches and trends regarding building resiliency emerge from time to time in this rapidly evolving focus area. Our approaches and priorities may differ from those of our peers, and the perception of the public or investors of these differences may adversely impact our portfolio attractiveness of our ability to lease space at competitive rates. Joint venture structure risks. We hold ownership interests in a number of joint ventures with varying structures and may in the future invest in additional real estate through such structures. We currently have joint ventures that are and are not consolidated within our financial statements. Our venture partners may have rights to take actions over which we have no control, or the right to withhold approval of actions that we propose (including with respect to the decision to commence development of or to sell a project), either of which could adversely affect our interests in the related joint ventures, and in some cases, our overall financial condition and results of operations. A venture partner may have economic and/or other business interests or goals that are incompatible with our business interests or goals and that venture partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our interests, including declining to sell at a time or price that we find attractive or determining to sell at a time or price that we do not find attractive. In addition, such venture partners may default on their obligations, including loans secured by property owned by the joint venture that could have an adverse impact on the financial condition and operations of the joint venture. Such defaults may result in our fulfilling the defaulting partners' obligations that may, in some cases, require us to contribute additional capital to the ventures. Furthermore, the success of a project may be dependent upon the expertise, business judgment, diligence, and effectiveness of our venture partners in matters that are outside our control. Thus, the involvement of venture partners could adversely impact the development, operation, ownership, financing, or disposition of the underlying properties. Title insurance risk. We did not acquire new title insurance policies in connection with the mergers with Parkway Properties, Inc. ("Parkway") in 2016 or TIER REIT, Inc. ("TIER") in 2019, instead relying on existing policies benefiting those entities' subsidiaries. Nevertheless, because we acquired these properties indirectly through the acquisition of these subsidiaries, the title insurance policies benefiting those entities may continue to benefit us. We generally do acquire title insurance policies for all developed and acquired properties; however, these policies may be for amounts less than the current or future values of the covered properties. If there were a title defect related to any of these properties, or to any of the properties acquired in connection with the mergers with Parkway or TIER where title insurance policies are ruled unenforceable, we could lose both our capital invested in and our anticipated profits from such property. Liquidity risk. Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and can be difficult to sell and convert to cash quickly. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties may be limited. In the event we want to sell a property, we may not be able to do so in the desired time period, the sales price of the property may not meet our expectations or requirements, and/or we may be required to record an impairment on the property. Ground lease risks. As of December 31, 2024, we had interests in eight land parcels in various markets that we lease individually on a long-term basis. As of December 31, 2024, we had 2.4 million aggregate square feet of rental space located on these leased parcels, from which we generated 14% of our total Net Operating Income ("NOI") in the fourth quarter of 2024. In the future, we may invest in additional properties on some of these parcels or additional parcels subject to ground leases. Many of these ground leases and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject property and restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the property. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the property, may impair the property's value, or may negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the property. In addition, if we default under the terms of any particular lease, we may lose the ownership rights to the property subject to the lease. Upon expiration of a lease, we may not be able to renegotiate a new lease on favorable terms, if at all. The loss of the ownership rights to these properties or an increase of rental expense could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial, and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of federal and state income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our shares. In particular, the comprehensive tax reform legislation enacted in December 2017 and commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") made many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws that have profoundly impacted the taxation of individuals and corporations (including both regular C corporations and corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs). A number of changes that affect noncorporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. Among other changes, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, signed into law in March 2020, makes certain changes to the TCJA. These changes have impacted us and our stockholders in various ways, some of which are adverse or potentially adverse compared to prior law. Additional changes to tax laws were enacted with the Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA") of 2022, signed into law in August 2022. Many of the material provisions of the IRA exempt REITs. To date, the IRS has issued only limited guidance with respect to certain of the new provisions, and there are numerous interpretive issues that will require further guidance. It is highly likely that technical corrections of legislation will be needed to clarify certain aspects of the new law and give proper effect to Congressional intent. There can be no assurance, however, that technical clarifications or changes needed to prevent unintended or unforeseen tax consequences will be enacted by Congress in the near future. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure investors that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of our stockholders. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our properties. Investors are urged to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on ownership of shares and the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals, and their potential effect on ownership of shares.