Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.
Aercap Holdings disclosed 45 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Aercap Holdings reported the most risks in the “Legal & Regulatory” category.
Risk Overview Q4, 2025
Risk Distribution
24% Legal & Regulatory
22% Finance & Corporate
20% Macro & Political
18% Production
11% Ability to Sell
4% Tech & Innovation
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.
Risk Change Over Time
2022
Q4
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
Aercap Holdings Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
Risk Highlights Q4, 2025
Main Risk Category
Legal & Regulatory
With 11 Risks
Legal & Regulatory
With 11 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
45
+2
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
45
+2
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
3Risks added
1Risks removed
3Risks changed
Since Dec 2025
3Risks added
1Risks removed
3Risks changed
Since Dec 2025
Number of Risk Changed
3
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
3
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of Aercap Holdings in the last period.
Risk Word Cloud
The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 45
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 11/45 (24%)Above Sector Average
Regulation3 | 6.7%
Regulation - Risk 1
Added
We may lose our foreign private issuer status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act's domestic reporting regime, increasing our regulatory and administrative burden.
We currently meet the definition of a foreign private issuer ("FPI") as defined by the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, which allows us to benefit from certain accommodations from the registration and disclosure requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. These accommodations include, among others, exemption from U.S. proxy rules, less frequent and less detailed periodic reporting, an exemption from certain U.S. insider trading reporting requirements and rules, and a later filing deadline for annual reports than for U.S. domestic issuers.
Under the current definition, we would lose our status as an FPI if more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are held of record either directly or indirectly by U.S. residents and any of the following is true: (1) the majority of our executive officers or directors are U.S. citizens or residents; (2) more than 50% of our assets are located in the United States; or (3) our business is administered principally in the United States.
On June 4, 2025, the SEC published a Concept Release on FPI Eligibility (the "Concept Release") inviting public comment on potential amendments to the FPI definition. The Concept Release highlights possible approaches to amending the FPI definition, including updating the existing eligibility requirements, adding a foreign trading volume requirement, adding a major foreign exchange listing requirement, requiring that each FPI be incorporated in a jurisdiction that the SEC determines to have a robust regulatory and oversight framework, developing robust mutual recognition systems and adding an international cooperation arrangement requirement. If the SEC formally proposes and adopts any of the amendments discussed in the Concept Release, we may no longer qualify as an FPI, even if we still meet the current definition described above. Loss of FPI status would subject us to the full reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which could increase our compliance and administrative costs.
Regulation - Risk 2
We are subject to regulatory and compliance risks and requirements associated with transacting business in many countries.
The international nature of our business and our lessees' businesses exposes us to a wide range of regulatory and legal regimes, including trade and economic sanctions, export controls and other restrictions imposed by the United States, the European Union, China, the United Kingdom, and other governments or organizations. Changes in international regulations, laws, taxes, export controls, tariffs, embargoes, sanctions, outbound investment rules or other restrictions on trade or travel, including changes in response to geopolitical events, could adversely affect the profitability of our lessees' businesses, the operations of aircraft manufacturers or the results of our operations. There is also a risk that we may become subject to contradictory legal obligations.
A violation of any of these laws or regulations, and those imposed by other relevant jurisdictions (including the European Union), could materially and adversely impact our business, operating results, and financial condition. For instance, the U.S. Departments of Justice, Commerce, State and Treasury and other U.S. federal agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of economic sanctions laws, export control laws, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other U.S. federal statutes and regulations, including those established by the Office of Foreign Asset Control. Under these laws and regulations, the U.S. government may require export licenses, may seek to impose modifications to business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs, and may subject us to fines, penalties and other sanctions.
We have implemented and maintain in effect policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us, our subsidiaries and our directors, officers, employees, consultants and agents with respect to various export control, anti-corruption, anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. However, such personnel could engage in unauthorized conduct for which we may be held responsible. Violations of such laws and regulations may result in severe criminal or civil penalties, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
The General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"), which became law in the EU in 2018, regulates the ways in which businesses process personal data in Europe. There are extensive documentation obligations and transparency requirements, which may impose significant costs on us. Failure to comply with the GDPR may subject us to significant litigation or enforcement actions, fines, claims for compensation by customers and other affected individuals, damage to our reputation, orders to remedy breaches or criminal prosecutions, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition. For example, under the GDPR, we could incur significant fines of up to 4% of our annual global revenue. The development of additional, or enhancement of existing, data protection regulations in other jurisdictions, such as the United States, may impose additional costs on us.
Regulation - Risk 3
In certain countries, an engine affixed to an aircraft may become an accession to the aircraft and we may not be able to exercise our ownership rights over the engine.
Under some legal principles, an engine affixed to an aircraft may become an accession to the aircraft, whereby the ownership rights of the owner of the airframe supersede those of the owner of the engine. In such cases, where an aircraft is security for the owner's obligations to a third-party, the security interest in the aircraft may supersede our rights as owner of the engine. As a substantial part of the value of an aircraft derives from its engines, we would suffer a substantial loss if our ability to repossess a leased engine were limited in the event of a lease default, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities1 | 2.2%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Existing and future litigation could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
We are, and from time to time in the future may be, a party to lawsuits relating to our business. We cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any litigation due to its inherent uncertainties. These uncertainties may be increased by our exposure to different liability standards and legal systems internationally, including some that may be less developed and less predictable than those in advanced economies. An unfavorable outcome could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position, liquidity or results of operations. For instance, in June 2025, we prevailed in the London Commercial Court in a dispute against certain insurers under our contingent and possessed aviation insurance policy ("C&P Policy") and, as a result of this judgment, we received recoveries of approximately $1.2 billion in 2025 (refer to Note 25-Net (recoveries) charges related to Ukraine Conflict to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for further details). Certain insurers are seeking to appeal the London Commercial Court judgment and, if the appeal is ultimately successful, we could be required to pay back to these insurers up to approximately $1.2 billion plus interest. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation, we may be required to devote substantial resources and executive time to the defense of such actions. For a description of certain pending litigation involving our business, including the dispute with insurers described above, refer to Note 31-Commitments and contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report.
Taxation & Government Incentives6 | 13.3%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
We may become a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC") for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
We do not believe we will be classified as a PFIC for 2025. Although there can be no assurance, we do not expect to be classified as a PFIC for 2026 or subsequent years. This expectation is based on our current operations and current law. The determination as to whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC is a complex determination based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances and depends on the classification of various assets and income under the PFIC rules. Further, this determination must be tested annually at the end of the taxable year and, while we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner that will reduce the likelihood of our becoming a PFIC, our circumstances may change in any given year. We do not intend to make decisions regarding the purchase and sale of aircraft with the specific purpose of reducing the likelihood of our becoming a PFIC. Accordingly, our business plan may result in our engaging in activities that could cause us to become a PFIC. There can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year or any future taxable year. If we are or become a PFIC, U.S. shareholders may be subject to increased U.S. federal income taxes on a sale or other disposition of our ordinary shares and on the receipt of certain distributions and will be subject to increased U.S. federal income tax reporting requirements. Refer to "Item 10. Additional Information-Taxation-U.S. tax considerations" for a more detailed discussion of the consequences to you if we are treated as a PFIC and a discussion of certain elections that may be available to mitigate the effects of that treatment. We urge you to consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to your particular circumstances.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2
We may become subject to income or other taxes in jurisdictions which would adversely affect our financial results.
We and our subsidiaries are subject to the income tax laws of Ireland, the United States and other jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries are incorporated or based. Our effective tax rate in any period is impacted by the source and the amount of earnings among our different tax jurisdictions. Our ability to defer the payment of some level of income taxes to future periods is dependent upon the continued benefit of accelerated tax depreciation on our flight equipment in some jurisdictions, the continued deductibility of the group's financing arrangements and the application of tax losses prior to their expiration in certain tax jurisdictions, among other factors. A change in the division of our earnings among our tax jurisdictions could have a material impact on our effective tax rate and our financial results. In addition, we or our subsidiaries may be subject to additional income or other taxes in these and other jurisdictions by reason of the management and control of our subsidiaries, our activities and operations, where our aircraft operate, where the lessees of our aircraft (or others in possession of our aircraft) are located or changes in tax laws or practices, regulations or accounting principles. We rely on certain double tax treaties to mitigate withholding tax and/or income tax on our lease rental income. Following various international tax changes (such as the OECD's Multilateral Instrument project), tax authorities are more focused on entitlement to the benefits of a tax treaty. Although we have adopted guidelines and operating procedures to ensure our subsidiaries are appropriately managed and controlled, we may be subject to such taxes in the future and such taxes may be substantial. The imposition of such taxes could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 3
We may become subject to additional taxes in Ireland based on the extent of our operations carried on in Ireland.
Our Irish tax resident group companies are currently subject to Irish corporate income tax on trading income at a rate of 12.5%, on capital gains at 33% (calculated in euros) and on other income at 25%. Where the 12.5% rate applies to our income, we incur additional top-up tax charges as a result of the Pillar Two minimum tax rate rules that Ireland has enacted, which seek to ensure that companies are taxed at a minimum effective tax rate of 15% on their Pillar Two adjusted income. As of December 31, 2025, we had significant Irish tax losses available to carry forward against our trading income. The ability to carry forward Irish tax losses to offset future taxable trading income and to avail of the 12.5% rate depends in part on the extent and nature of activities carried on in Ireland, both in the past and in the future. Certain aspects of the Irish leasing regime have been codified into law in Finance Act (No.2) 2023, with effect from January 1, 2024, and new guidance was released in 2024 regarding the tax treatment of leasing companies. Going forward, the combination of the revised law and final guidance imposes a higher threshold on the Irish lessors and financing companies within our group to demonstrate that they have sufficient activity to avail of the 12.5% rate on their leasing and financing activity.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 4
The EU Anti-tax Avoidance proposals may impact our effective rate of tax in future periods.
In 2021, the European Commission issued a proposal for a council directive to establish rules to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes within the EU ("EU ATAD 3") and has since issued a number of draft amendments to this directive. EU ATAD 3 was initially expected to be adopted and published into EU member states' national laws by June 30, 2023, and to become effective as of January 1, 2024. However, it has not yet become effective and in June 2025 the Council of the European Union published a report noting that work on EU ATAD 3 will no longer continue in its current form. It may be the case that EU ATAD 3 will be reflected in a future amendment to EU mandatory disclosure rules. This could impact our effective rate of tax and result in additional reporting and disclosure obligations.
It is possible that the European Commission will propose other new tax-related directives in the future which could impact our business.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 5
The U.S. Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax ("CAMT") may impact our effective tax rate in future periods.
In 2022, the United States enacted the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax on adjusted financial statement income ("AFSI"). For a U.S. corporation that is a member of a foreign-parented multi-national group, the CAMT applies where (i) the three-year average annual AFSI from all members of the foreign-parented multi-national group exceeds $1 billion, and (ii) the three-year average annual AFSI from the group's U.S. corporation(s) is $100 million or more.
CAMT only applies to "applicable corporations" (generally determined from the thresholds noted above). We did not meet the criteria to be an applicable corporation for 2023 or 2024 and, consequently, we were not subject to CAMT for those years. Based on the most recent guidance from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), we do not expect to be an applicable corporation for 2025. However, in the absence of final regulations from the IRS, CAMT's impact on our effective tax rate for 2025 and future years remains uncertain.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 6
We may fail to qualify for benefits under one or more tax treaties.
We do not expect that our subsidiaries located outside of the United States will have any material U.S. federal income tax liability by reason of activities we carry out in the United States and the leasing of assets to lessees that operate in the United States. This conclusion will depend, in part, on continued qualification for the benefits of income tax treaties between the United States and other countries in which we are subject to tax (particularly Ireland), and further that our Irish subsidiaries take steps to ensure they do not have a permanent establishment in the United States. That qualification may depend on, among other factors, the nature and level of activities carried on by us and our subsidiaries in each jurisdiction, the identity of the owners of equity interests in subsidiaries that are not wholly owned and the identities of the direct and indirect owners of our indebtedness and the continued listing and trading of our shares on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE").
The nature of our activities may be such that our subsidiaries may not continue to qualify for the benefits under income tax treaties with the United States and may not otherwise qualify for treaty benefits. Failure to so qualify could result in the imposition of U.S. federal and state taxes, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Environmental / Social1 | 2.2%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
Our assets are subject to various environmental regulations and concerns, including those relating to climate change.
Our operations and assets are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations, and non-U.S. laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment. We could incur substantial costs, including capital and other expenditures, to comply with such requirements, as well as fines, penalties, or civil or criminal sanctions and third-party claims, if we were to violate or become liable under such laws or regulations. For example, jurisdictions around the world have adopted regulations regarding aircraft and engine noise and emissions levels that apply based on where the relevant aircraft is registered and where the aircraft is operated and that have become more stringent over time. These or other future regulations applicable to our aircraft could limit the usability or the economic life of certain of our aircraft and engines, reduce their value, limit our ability to lease or sell the non-compliant aircraft and engines or, if engine modifications are permitted, require us to make significant additional investments in the aircraft and engines to make them compliant.
Due to concerns over the risks of climate change, certain jurisdictions in which we operate have moved towards imposing more stringent limits on greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft. Although current emissions control laws generally apply to newer engines, new laws could be passed in the future that also impose limits on older engines, thereby subjecting our older engines to existing or new emissions limitations or indirect taxation. These limits may also impact growth levels in air travel. In particular, the aviation sector is subject to a number of Emissions Trading Systems ("ETS"), the most significant of which is the European Union's EU-ETS. These are cap-and-trade systems for greenhouse gas emissions, under which airlines currently are granted free emissions allowances based on historical performance and a carbon dioxide efficiency benchmark. However, in a 2023 directive, the European Parliament and European Council adopted components of the European Commission's "Fit for 55" proposal, which modified the EU-ETS by phasing out free emissions allowances for the aviation sector by 2026. Additionally, in connection with its efforts to achieve emissions reduction targets for 2030 and 2050, the EU adopted the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation in 2023. Under this regulation, fuel suppliers were required to increase the share of sustainable aviation fuel blended into conventional aviation fuel supplied at designated EU airports beginning in 2025, with further increases over the next 25 years. In addition, the International Civil Aviation Organization ("ICAO") has adopted the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation ("CORSIA"), a global market-based scheme aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions from international aviation that will become mandatory in 2027. As of December 31, 2025, 129 countries, including the United States, were participating in the voluntary phase of CORSIA. Although participation is voluntary for countries, CORSIA compliance is mandatory for all airlines operating international flights between any participating countries. Assigning a cost to air emissions, such as via ETS and CORSIA, could favor the use of younger, more fuel-efficient aircraft, since they generally produce lower levels of emissions per passenger, which could adversely affect our ability to re-lease or otherwise dispose of less efficient older aircraft on a timely basis, on favorable terms or at all. This is an area of law that continues to evolve and varies by jurisdiction. While it is uncertain whether new emissions restrictions will be passed, or if passed, what impact these laws might have on our business, any future emissions limitations or other future requirements to address climate change concerns could adversely affect us.
The airline industry has also come under scrutiny by the press, the public and investors regarding the impact of air travel on the environment, including emissions to the air, discharges to surface and subsurface waters, safe drinking water, aircraft noise, the management of hazardous substances, oils and waste materials and other environmental impacts related to aircraft operations. If such scrutiny results in reduced air travel or increased costs to air travel, it may affect demand for our aircraft and lessees' ability to make rental and other lease payments and reduce the value we receive for our aircraft upon any disposition, which would negatively affect our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. In addition, growing demand to transition to lower-carbon technologies, such as sustainable aviation fuels that may be developed over time, may increase airline costs or reduce demand for our aircraft or engines or airline travel more generally.
Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 10/45 (22%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights2 | 4.4%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
We are a public limited liability company incorporated in the Netherlands ("naamloze vennootschap" or "N.V.") and it may be difficult to obtain or enforce judgments against us or our executive officers, some of our directors and some of our named experts in the United States.
We were incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands and, as such, the rights of holders of our ordinary shares and the civil liability of our directors are governed by the laws of the Netherlands and our articles of association. The rights of shareholders under the laws of the Netherlands may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in other jurisdictions. Many of our directors and executive officers and most of our assets and the assets of many of our directors are located outside the United States. In addition, our articles of association do not provide for U.S. courts as a venue for, or for the application of U.S. law to, lawsuits against us, our directors and executive officers. As a result, you may not be able to serve process on us or on such persons in the United States or obtain or enforce judgments from U.S. courts against us or them based on the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States. There is doubt as to whether the Dutch courts would enforce certain civil liabilities under U.S. securities laws in original actions and enforce claims for punitive damages.
Under our articles of association, we indemnify and hold our directors, officers and employees harmless against all claims and suits brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. Under our articles of association, to the extent allowed by law, the rights and obligations among or between us, any of our current or former directors, officers and employees and any current or former shareholder shall be governed exclusively by the laws of the Netherlands and subject to the jurisdiction of the Dutch courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of their capacities listed above. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce such provision in an action brought in the United States under U.S. securities laws, such provision could make judgments obtained outside of the Netherlands more difficult to enforce against our assets in the Netherlands or jurisdictions that would apply Dutch law.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
Changed
Corporate responsibility, specifically related to ESG matters, has imposed, and may continue to impose, additional costs.
Certain jurisdictions in which we operate have proposed or enacted ESG-specific reporting requirements, such as the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. Certain organizations that provide corporate governance and other corporate risk information to investors and shareholders have developed, and others may in the future develop, scores and ratings to evaluate companies and investment funds based upon ESG or "sustainability" metrics. The level of a company's greenhouse gas emissions is one such metric that has received heightened attention by lenders, investors, shareholders and lawmakers in recent years. Investors, particularly institutional investors, have in the past used, and may continue to use, these scores to benchmark companies against their peers. Investors' and other stakeholders' perspectives on ESG and sustainability reporting vary. Some investment funds continue to focus on positive ESG business practices and sustainability scores when making investments and may consider a company's ESG or sustainability scores as a reputational or other factor in making an investment decision. In other jurisdictions, the importance of ESG metrics has waned or has been the subject of backlash. As a result, companies' ESG actions and disclosures have in recent years triggered both positive and negative engagement by investors and may continue to affect investors' voting decisions or other actions in respect of such companies' governance. We have had to, and may continue to have to, address inconsistent regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations across the jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, current EU regulations require financial firms to disclose how sustainability risks are incorporated into their lending decisions, and further regulations in the EU, and similar regulations in other jurisdictions, may come into force in the future. Such regulations may encourage or require lenders to consider the sustainability impact of their loans, and if we, or the aviation sector generally, become disfavored, the availability or terms of financing and our cost of funds could be materially and adversely impacted. We may also face reputational damage in the event our corporate responsibility initiatives or objectives (including with respect to greenhouse gas emissions), or the ESG or sustainability ratings assigned by third-party rating services, do not meet (or are perceived not to meet) the expectations of our lenders, investors, shareholders, lawmakers or other constituencies. Our ESG or sustainability rating or score by a third-party rating service could also result in the exclusion of our common stock or debt from consideration by certain investors who may elect to invest with competitors that are more closely aligned with their ESG or sustainability priorities. Our monitoring of, and efforts to comply with, evolving standards regarding ESG-related corporate responsibility matters by lenders, investors, lawmakers and other parties as described above have in the past imposed, and may continue to impose, additional costs, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Accounting & Financial Operations1 | 2.2%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
We may not be able to continue, or may elect to discontinue, paying dividends, which may adversely affect our share price.
In May 2024, we adopted a dividend policy pursuant to which we intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our ordinary shares. Our ability to continue to pay dividends to our shareholders is subject to our Board of Directors' approval and depends on our availability of capital; principal repayments and other capital requirements; our ability to comply with covenants imposed by our financing agreements; our ability to finance our purchase commitments on our flight equipment; our ability to refinance our long-term debt before it matures; our ability to negotiate favorable lease rates and other contractual terms; demand for our aircraft; the economic condition of the commercial aviation industry generally; the financial strength of our lessees; unexpected or increased expenses; the value of our fleet; our results of operations and general business conditions; legal restrictions on the payment of dividends and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant. In the future, we may elect not to pay dividends, be unable to pay dividends or maintain or increase our current level of dividends, which may negatively affect our share price.
Debt & Financing7 | 15.6%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
We require significant capital to fund our business.
As of December 31, 2025, we had 283 new aircraft, 35 new engines, and 12 new helicopters on order, which will require substantial purchase contract payments. In order to meet these commitments and to maintain an adequate level of unrestricted cash, we will need to raise additional funds by accessing committed debt facilities, securing additional financing from banks or through capital markets transactions, or possibly by selling flight equipment.
If we are unable to meet our purchase commitments as they come due, we will be subject to several risks, including:
- forfeiting deposits and progress payments to manufacturers and having to pay certain significant costs related to these commitments such as actual damages and legal, accounting and financial advisory expenses;- defaulting on our lease commitments, which could result in monetary damages and strained relationships with lessees;- failing to realize the benefits of purchasing and leasing such flight equipment; and - risking harm to our business reputation, which would make it more difficult to purchase and lease flight equipment in the future on agreeable terms, if at all.
Any of these events could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
To service our debt and meet our other cash needs, we will require a significant amount of cash, which may not be available.
Our ability to make payments on, and to repay or refinance, our debt depends largely upon our operating performance, which is in part subject to factors beyond our control. In addition, our ability to borrow funds to make payments on our debt depends on our maintaining specified financial ratios and satisfying financial condition tests and other covenants in certain of the agreements governing our debt. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available in amounts sufficient to pay our debt and to satisfy our other liquidity needs.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to seek alternatives, such as to reduce or delay investments and flight equipment purchases, sell assets, restructure or refinance our indebtedness, or seek additional capital, including through new types of debt, equity or hybrid securities. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates, which would increase our debt service requirements accordingly. Moreover, any such refinancing might require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations or to meet our flight equipment purchase commitments as they come due. Failure to make payments on our debt would result in a default under those agreements and could result in a default under other agreements containing cross default provisions. Moreover, the issuance of additional equity may be dilutive to existing shareholders or otherwise may be on terms not favorable to us or existing shareholders. Under these circumstances, we may have insufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all our obligations.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
Our level of indebtedness, which requires significant debt service payments, could adversely impact our operating flexibility and financial results.
The principal amount of our outstanding indebtedness, which excludes debt issuance costs, debt discounts and debt premium of $241 million, was $43.8 billion as of December 31, 2025 (61% of our total assets as of December 31, 2025), and our interest payments, net of amounts capitalized, were $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025. Due to the capital-intensive nature of our business, we expect that we will incur additional indebtedness in the future and continue to maintain significant levels of indebtedness.
Our level of indebtedness:
- requires a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to be dedicated to interest and principal payments and therefore not available to fund our operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions or general corporate or other purposes;- may impair our ability to obtain additional financing on favorable terms or at all in the future;- may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry; and - may make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business, our industry or the economy in general.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
The agreements governing our debt contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us that may affect our ability to operate our business.
Certain of our indentures, term loan facilities, ECA-guaranteed financings, revolving credit facilities, securitizations, other commercial bank financings, and other agreements governing our debt impose operating and financial restrictions on our activities that limit our operational flexibility. Among other negative covenants customary for such financings, certain of these restrictions limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens on, sell or access certain assets, declare or pay certain dividends and distributions or enter into certain transactions, investments, acquisitions, loans, guarantees or advances. Additionally, a substantial portion of our owned aircraft are held through Special Purpose Entities ("SPEs") or finance structures that finance or refinance the aircraft through funding agreements that place restrictions on distributions of funds to us.
Agreements governing certain of our indebtedness also contain financial covenants, including requirements that we comply with certain loan-to-value, interest coverage and leverage ratios. These restrictions could impede our ability to operate our business by, among other things, limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, merger and acquisition and other corporate opportunities. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control including war or other hostilities or the imposition of sanctions. Please refer to the discussion in "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks related to the geopolitical, regulatory, corporate responsibility and legal exposure of our business-The international operations of our business and those of our lessees expose us to geopolitical risks that may have a negative impact on our and our lessees' businesses, including the risk of legal and regulatory responses." Failure to comply with any of the covenants in our financing agreements would result in a default under those agreements and could result in a default under other agreements containing cross-default provisions. Under these circumstances, we may have insufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all our obligations.
Debt & Financing - Risk 5
Changes in interest rates may adversely affect our net income, particularly by increasing our cost of borrowing.
Like many leasing companies, we are subject to interest rate risk. We use a mix of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt to finance our business. The principal amount of our outstanding floating-rate debt was $10.9 billion, or 25% of the total principal amount of our outstanding indebtedness, as of December 31, 2025. Our cost of borrowing is affected by the interest rates that we obtain on our debt financings, which can fluctuate based on, among other things, general market conditions, the market's assessment of our credit risk, prevailing interest rates in the market, fluctuations in U.S. Treasury rates and other benchmark rates, changes in credit spreads or swap spreads, and the duration of the debt we issue. While we routinely enter into hedging transactions to mitigate this risk, those hedging transactions may not sufficiently insulate us from the impact of changes in interest rates and may cause us to forgo any benefit that might result from favorable fluctuations in such rates. In addition, we are exposed to the credit risk that the counterparties to our derivative contracts will default on their obligations. Please refer to "Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk-Interest rate risk" for further details on our interest rate risk. One of our primary sources of income is leases with multi-year fixed rates. A mismatch in the rates that we are obligated to pay to finance our business and the rents that accrue to us under leases of our flight equipment can negatively impact our net income.
Despite rate decreases during the year ended December 31, 2025, interest rates remain elevated relative to the past 15 years in the United States, the European Union and other countries, and may remain high during 2026. In a higher interest rate environment, we are obligated to make higher interest payments to the lenders of our floating-rate debt, which negatively impacts our net income to the extent that those payments are not hedged. Higher rates are also likely to increase the cost of any new financing we may raise during this period, which could, if not hedged, impact our net income. Typically, we are not able to immediately offset this negative impact by increasing the rates on our leases. During the year ended December 31, 2025, 99% of our basic lease rents from flight equipment under operating leases was attributable to leases with fixed lease rates or power-by-the-hour ("PBH") agreements and 1% was derived from leases with lease rates tied to floating interest rates. As our leases are primarily for multiple years with fixed lease rates for the duration of the lease, we generally cannot increase the lease rates with respect to a particular aircraft until the expiration of the lease, even if the market is able to bear the increased lease rates. As a result, there will be a lag in our ability to adjust and pass on the costs of increasing interest rates. Rising interest rates may also have a negative impact on the financial condition of our lessees, who may find it more difficult to service their debt and obtain new financing on favorable terms. While most of our leases have fixed lease rates, some lessees do have floating-rate leases, and rising interest rates may increase the risk of a lessee with floating-rate lease rates defaulting as payments due to us increase.
We are also exposed to certain risks from interest rate decreases. Decreases in interest rates may adversely affect our interest revenue on cash deposits and our lease revenue, in part because a decrease in interest rates would cause a decrease in our lease revenue from leases with lease rates tied to floating interest rates. We could also experience reduced lease revenue from our fixed-rate leases if interest rates decrease because these are based, in part, on prevailing interest rates at the time we enter into the lease. As a result, new fixed-rate leases we enter into at a time of lower interest rates may be at lower lease rates than had no such interest rate decrease occurred, adversely affecting our lease revenue. This may be particularly harmful to our business if we incur debt at higher interest rates and enter into leases at a time of lower interest rates.
Debt & Financing - Risk 6
Negative changes in our credit ratings may limit our ability to obtain financing or increase our borrowing costs.
Our cost of borrowing and access to the capital markets are affected by our credit ratings.
We are currently subject to periodic review by independent credit rating agencies S&P Global Ratings, Moody's Investor Services and Fitch Ratings, each of which currently maintains an investment grade rating with respect to us.
We cannot assure you that these credit ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered, suspended or withdrawn. Any actual or anticipated changes in our credit ratings could negatively impact our ability to obtain secured or unsecured financing, increase our borrowing costs or limit our access to the capital markets, which could adversely impact our financial results.
Debt & Financing - Risk 7
Changed
Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may incur significantly more debt.
Despite our current indebtedness levels, we may increase our levels of debt in the future to finance our operations, including to purchase aircraft, engines or helicopters or to meet our contractual obligations, or for any other purpose. The agreements relating to our debt, including our indentures, term loan facilities, Export Credit Agency ("ECA")-guaranteed financings, revolving credit facilities, securitizations, other commercial bank financings, and other financings do not prohibit us from incurring additional debt. As of December 31, 2025, we had $11.0 billion of undrawn lines of credit available under our revolving credit and term loan facilities, subject to certain conditions, including compliance with certain financial covenants. If we increase our total indebtedness, our debt service obligations will increase, and we will become more exposed to the risks arising from our substantial level of indebtedness.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 9/45 (20%)Above Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment3 | 6.7%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
Inflationary pressure may have a negative impact on our financial results, including by diminishing the value of our leases.
After a sustained period of relatively low inflation rates, rates of inflation increased significantly during 2022 and 2023, reaching recent historical highs across major economies, including the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and other countries, before stabilizing during 2024 and 2025. The increases in tariffs by the United States in the last year, the prospect of potential additional tariffs and retaliatory tariffs and the trade agreements between the United States and certain trading partners in recent months may lead to higher inflation in the future. High rates of inflation may have a number of adverse effects on our business. Inflation may increase the costs of goods, services and labor used in our operations, thereby increasing our expenses. To the extent that we derive our income from leases with fixed rates of payment, high rates of inflation will cause a greater decrease in the value of those payments than had the rates of inflation remained lower. Because our leases are generally multi-year, there may be a lag in our ability to adjust the lease rates for flight equipment accordingly. High rates of inflation may also lead policymakers to attempt to decrease demand or to adopt higher interest rates to combat inflationary pressures, resulting in the risks detailed in "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks relating to our funding, liquidity and financial structure-Changes in interest rates may adversely affect our net income, particularly by increasing our cost of borrowing." Our suppliers and lessees may also be subject to material adverse effects as a result of high rates of inflation, including as a result of the impact on their financial condition, changes in demand patterns, price volatility, and supply chain disruption.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's ("OECD") Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ("BEPS") initiative.
In 2021, the European Commission published an EU Directive (the "EU Minimum Tax Directive") to incorporate the Pillar Two minimum tax rate rules into EU law, which Ireland has enacted into domestic legislation. In Ireland, the EU Minimum Tax Directive has been implemented by means of a top-up tax to achieve an effective rate of 15% that became effective on January 1, 2024. Further guidance from the OECD and the Irish tax authorities in relation to these rules is expected to be published in the future. It is possible that the Irish tax authorities will seek to further refine or change the Irish tax rules regarding Pillar Two given that it is a new development in Irish tax law. It is also possible that the OECD will release further guidance in the future on Pillar Two. As an example, on January 5, 2026, new guidance was released by the OECD as to how these rules could apply to U.S.-headquartered groups. It is difficult to determine the degree to which any future guidance or changes in law could alter the operation of this tax, and any such developments may have an adverse impact on our effective tax rate and cash tax liabilities in future periods.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3
Added
Trade tensions, including actual or threatened U.S. tariffs and retaliatory measures by some countries, and the resulting geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainty could adversely impact our business.
Changes in U.S. trade policy, including new or increased tariffs, and responses by other countries to these changes, have created, and may continue to create, uncertainty in global commerce. During the past year, the United States has introduced or threatened to introduce significantly higher tariffs on most countries around the world and continues to use tariffs or the threat thereof as a means of pursuing foreign policy, economic or other objectives. In response, other countries have introduced or threatened to introduce retaliatory tariffs against the United States. While some of the tariffs announced by the United States and other countries have been suspended as a result of completed or pending negotiations, in general the United States has introduced tariffs on all non-U.S.-origin goods, with certain exceptions. Trade agreements that were announced in 2025 between the United States and the United Kingdom and the European Union would generally exempt aviation from tariffs. However, these agreements have not been formally implemented and there is no assurance that they will be enacted or that aviation will remain exempt from tariffs between these countries.
These changes in trade policy and ongoing negotiations of trade agreements are creating significant uncertainty, and future tariffs or other measures may create additional uncertainty, which could materially affect our business. In addition, tariffs and other measures could result in material additional costs to our lessees in impacted jurisdictions, which could affect the ability of those lessees to meet their lease obligations to us and could negatively impact the demand for leases or purchases of certain types of flight equipment in impacted jurisdictions. In addition, tariffs levied on countries where our suppliers source their parts and materials could disrupt their operations, which could result in delays in the delivery of our flight equipment on order or increased costs. These tariffs and other measures could be inflationary or cause interest rates to rise, which could negatively impact us, our suppliers and our lessees. Please refer to the discussion in "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks relating to our funding, liquidity and financial structure-Changes in interest rates may adversely affect our net income, particularly by increasing our cost of borrowing" and "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks relating to our funding, liquidity and financial structure-Inflationary pressure may have a negative impact on our financial results, including by diminishing the value of our leases."
Changes in tariffs and other measures may be announced with little or no advance notice. The adoption and expansion of tariffs and other measures, or other changes in governmental policies related to taxes, tariffs, trade agreements, are difficult to predict, which makes attendant risks difficult to anticipate and mitigate. Changes in tariffs and other measures announced to date, or the threats of such tariffs or other measures, have led to increased geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets.
Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows, liquidity and results of operations.
International Operations3 | 6.7%
International Operations - Risk 1
Changed
Where we have a concentration of lessees or assets in certain geographical regions, the geopolitical, political and economic risks associated with those regions, particularly the United States and China, can be exacerbated.
Through our lessees and the countries in which they operate, we are exposed to the specific economic, geopolitical and political conditions and associated risks of those jurisdictions. These risks can include economic recessions, regional impacts of epidemic diseases, burdensome local regulations, armed conflicts or, in extreme cases, increased risks of requisition or other loss of our flight equipment and risks of wide-ranging sanctions prohibiting us from leasing flight equipment in certain jurisdictions. These risks can be exacerbated in jurisdictions where we have a concentration of customers or assets. For instance, 13.9% of our long-lived assets were on lease to U.S. airlines and 11.7% of our long-lived assets were on lease to Chinese airlines as of December 31, 2025. Therefore we have significant exposure to the economic and political conditions in those countries. Please refer to Note 21-Geographic information to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for further details. An adverse geopolitical, political or economic event in any region or country in which our lessees or our flight equipment are concentrated, such as the United States or China, could affect the ability of our lessees to meet their obligations to us, expose us to legal or political risks associated with the affected jurisdictions, or impact our ability to recover our assets (as happened as a result of the Ukraine Conflict), all of which could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows, liquidity and results of operations and our ability to comply with financial covenants. Please refer to the discussion in "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks related to our funding, liquidity and financial structure-The agreements governing our debt contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us that may affect our ability to operate our business."
International Operations - Risk 2
The international operations of our business and those of our lessees expose us to geopolitical risks that may have a negative impact on our and our lessees' businesses, including the risk of legal and regulatory responses.
Our business, and the aviation industry generally, are subject to certain geopolitical risks. Geopolitical turmoil and uncertainty can have a significant disruptive effect on global markets, lead to regulatory and legal uncertainty and the imposition of requirements that may adversely affect our business, and impact trade markets, currency exchange rates, supply chains, and demand for and regulation concerning international and domestic travel, among other areas. This could have a negative impact on our ability to lease aircraft, engines and helicopters to, collect payments from, and support and recover aviation assets from customers in certain regions based on trade restrictions, embargoes, and export control laws, and could disrupt airline travel through, among other avenues, the closures of air space. Sanctions, including prohibitions regarding the supply of aircraft and aircraft components to specific persons, or for use in specific territories, may have a material adverse impact on our business, including reduced revenues and operating cash flows and the impairment or write-off of assets. For example, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and continued conflict in that area (the "Ukraine Conflict"), the resulting sanctions imposed against Russia and actions of our former Russian lessees and the Russian government had an adverse impact on our business and resulted in our loss of flight equipment, and associated revenue, in Russia.
Future geopolitical events and their associated responses, particularly in or between countries and regions where we have substantial exposure, could have similar or worse effects on our operations and financial results. For example, tensions and potential conflict between mainland China and Taiwan, tensions between China and the United States, territorial disputes between Japan and China or tensions in the South China Sea could lead to further instability in these regions and materially and adversely impact our lessees' businesses and our business and results of operations, including our ability to comply with financial covenants. Please refer to the discussion in "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks related to our funding, liquidity and financial structure-The agreements governing our debt contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us that may affect our ability to operate our business." Our business, and that of our lessees, may also be negatively impacted by escalation or the continuation of the Ukraine Conflict or other hostilities in that region or between Russia and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, intensification or expansion of the conflicts involving Israel or other tensions or conflicts in the Middle East, the situations in Venezuela and Sudan, continued tension over the nuclear programs of North Korea and Iran, or political instability, hostilities or conflicts in other regions.
Additionally, the international distribution of our assets exposes us to risks associated with limitations on the repossession and repatriation of our assets or the expropriation of our assets, which could lead to impairments or other write-offs. For example, at the time of Russia's launch of the Ukraine Conflict, we had significant assets on lease to Russian airlines. While we sought to repossess the affected assets, we were only able to recover a small minority of the assets and in 2022 wrote-off the rest of our flight equipment which remained in Russia. Please refer to Note 25-Net (recoveries) charges related to Ukraine Conflict to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for further details.
International Operations - Risk 3
We conduct substantial business in emerging markets, and are subject to the economic, legal and political risks associated with this strategy.
We derive substantial lease revenue (45% in 2025, 46% in 2024 and 48% in 2023) from airlines in countries that are classified as emerging markets under the Morgan Stanley Capital International ("MSCI") Emerging Markets Index methodology. Emerging market countries have less developed economies, are more vulnerable to economic and political problems and may experience significant fluctuations in gross domestic product, interest rates and currency exchange rates, as well as civil disturbances, government instability, nationalization and expropriation of private assets and the imposition of taxes or other charges by government authorities. The occurrence of any of these events could result in economic instability, which may affect the ability of our lessees that serve these markets to meet their lease obligations. This may lead to higher default rates and could adversely affect the value of our ownership interest in flight equipment subject to lease in such countries. In addition, legal systems in emerging market countries may be less developed, which could make it more difficult for us to enforce our legal rights in such countries. For these and other reasons, our financial results may be materially and adversely affected by economic and political developments in emerging market countries.
Natural and Human Disruptions2 | 4.4%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
Global or regional public health developments, extreme weather or natural disasters or other force majeure events may adversely affect the demand for air travel, the financial condition of our lessees and the aviation industry more broadly, and ultimately our financial condition, results and cash flows.
Our international operations expose us to risks associated with unforeseen global and regional events. Epidemic diseases such as Covid-19, Ebola, measles, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), H1N1 (swine flu) and Zika virus could materially and adversely affect the overall amount of air travel. For example, the Covid-19 pandemic caused significant economic disruption and a dramatic reduction in commercial airline traffic, resulting in a broad adverse impact to the aviation industry and our business. These diseases, or the fear of these diseases, could result in government-imposed travel restrictions and reduced passenger demand for travel. The occurrence of severe weather events or natural disasters, including floods, earthquakes, wildfires, hurricanes and volcanic eruptions, may make airlines unable to operate to or from certain regions or impact demand for air travel, and the frequency or severity of these types of events may worsen as a result of climate change. The occurrence or outbreak of any of the above events or other force majeure events could adversely affect commercial airline traffic, reduce demand for flight equipment leases or impair the financial condition of the aviation industry, including our lessees. As a result, our lessees may not be able to satisfy their payment obligations to us. These events may also cause damage to our flight equipment, the extent of losses from which may not be fully covered by insurance. For these and other reasons, our financial results may be materially and adversely affected by the occurrence of such events.
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 2
The effects of, or the threat of, terrorist attacks, war or armed hostilities may adversely affect the financial condition of the airline industry and our lessees' ability to meet their lease payment obligations to us.
Terrorist attacks and the threat of terrorist attacks, war or armed hostilities, or the fear of such events, have historically had a negative impact on the aviation industry and could result in:
- higher costs to airlines due to the increased security measures;- decreased passenger and air cargo demand and revenue;- the imposition of "no-fly zone" or other restrictions on commercial airline traffic in certain regions;- uncertainty of the price and availability of jet fuel and the cost and practicability of obtaining fuel hedges;- higher financing costs and difficulty in raising the desired amount of proceeds on favorable terms, if at all;- significantly higher premiums or reduced coverage amounts for aviation insurance coverage for future claims caused by acts of war, terrorism, sabotage, hijacking and other similar perils, which may be insufficient to comply with the current requirements of aircraft lenders and lessors or applicable government regulations, or the unavailability or cancellation of certain types of insurance, as generally evidenced by the change in the war insurance market, and by the imposition by insurers of new geographical limits and restrictions on airlines' policies;- reliance by aircraft lenders or lessors on government programs for specified types of aviation insurance, which may not be available at the relevant time or under which governments may not pay in a timely fashion;- inability of airlines to reduce their operating costs and conserve financial resources, taking into account the increased costs incurred as a consequence of such events;- special charges recognized by some operators, such as those related to the impairment of aircraft and engines and other long-lived assets stemming from the grounding of aircraft as a result of terrorist attacks, economic conditions and airline reorganizations; and - an airline becoming insolvent and/or ceasing operations.
Such events are likely to cause our lessees to incur higher costs and to generate lower revenues, which could result in a material adverse effect on their financial condition and liquidity, including their ability to make rental and other lease payments to us or to obtain the types and amounts of insurance we require. Such events could also impact the operations of our lessees and could lead to aircraft or fleet groundings (for instance due to cancellation of war insurance cover) or additional lease restructurings and repossessions, increase our cost of re-leasing or selling flight equipment, impair our ability to re-lease or otherwise dispose of flight equipment on favorable terms or at all, or reduce the proceeds we receive for our flight equipment in a disposition.
Capital Markets1 | 2.2%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Instability in the banking system or financial markets could impair our lessees' ability to finance their operations, which could affect their ability to comply with payment obligations to us.
Adverse changes in the global banking system or the global financial markets may have a material adverse effect on our business. Many of our lessees have expanded their airline operations through borrowings and some are highly leveraged. These lessees depend on banks and the capital markets to provide working capital and to refinance existing indebtedness. Global financial markets can be highly volatile and the availability of credit from financial markets and financial institutions can vary substantially. Events that adversely impact capital markets could lead to the imposition of stricter capital requirements on borrowers, reduce the general availability of credit or otherwise result in higher borrowing costs, limiting our lessees' abilities to finance their operations, which could affect their ability to meet payment obligations to us.
Production
Total Risks: 8/45 (18%)Below Sector Average
Manufacturing1 | 2.2%
Manufacturing - Risk 1
We may be unable to generate sufficient returns on our flight equipment investments.
Our results depend on our ability to consistently acquire strategically attractive flight equipment, continually and profitably lease and re-lease them, and finally sell or otherwise dispose of them, in order to generate returns on the investments we have made, provide cash to finance our growth and operations, and service our existing debt. Upon acquiring flight equipment, we may not be able to enter into leases that generate sufficient cash flow to justify the cost of purchase. When our leases expire or our flight equipment is returned prior to the date contemplated in the lease, we bear the risk of re-leasing, selling or parting-out the asset. Because our leases are predominantly operating leases, only a portion of the relevant flight equipment's value is recovered by the revenues generated from the lease and we may not be able to realize such flight equipment's residual value after lease expiration. Our ability to profitably purchase, lease, re-lease, sell or otherwise dispose of our aircraft, engines and helicopters will depend in part on conditions in the airline industry and general market and competitive conditions at the time of purchase, lease and disposition, which are outside of our control.
Employment / Personnel1 | 2.2%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
If our lessees encounter financial difficulties and we restructure or terminate our leases, including as a result of customer reorganizations or bankruptcies, we are likely to obtain less favorable lease terms.
If a lessee delays, reduces, or fails to make rental payments when due, or has advised us that it will do so in the future, we may elect or be required to restructure or terminate the lease. In addition, in recent years, several airlines and other customers, including several of our lessees, have filed for protection under their local bankruptcy and insolvency laws, and certain airlines and other customers have gone into liquidation. A restructured lease will likely contain terms that are less favorable to us. If we are unable to agree on a restructuring and we terminate the lease, we may not receive all or any payments still outstanding, and we may be unable to re-lease the flight equipment promptly and at favorable rates, if at all. Moreover, airline bankruptcies historically have led to the grounding of significant numbers of aircraft, rejection of leases and negotiated reductions in aircraft lease rentals, with the effect of depressing aircraft market values. As such, further reorganizations would adversely affect our ability to re-lease or sell aircraft at favorable rates, if at all. We have conducted restructurings and terminations in the ordinary course of our business, and we expect more will occur in the future. If we are obligated to perform a significant number of restructurings and terminations, the associated reduction in lease revenue could materially and adversely affect our financial results and cash flows.
Supply Chain2 | 4.4%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
The financial instability of, or manufacturing delays suffered by, an aircraft or engine manufacturer or other industry partner could impact delivery of our flight equipment on order and negatively affect our cash flow and results of operations.
The supply of commercial aircraft is dominated by Airbus and Boeing and there are a limited number of engine manufacturers. There is a risk that disruptions, including supply chain issues, labor stoppages, manufacturing and quality control issues, and any financial instability, at any of these manufacturers could harm our business, as our ability to deliver new aircraft and engines to our lessees depends on these manufacturers timely fulfilling their contractual delivery obligations to us. Further, we may experience additional delivery delays and associated costs if aircraft manufacturers continue to encounter quality issues that delay the manufacture of new aircraft or those aircraft fail to meet the contractual requirements or the requirements of air travel regulators. For example, the grounding and suspension of deliveries of the Boeing 737 MAX in 2019 and 2020 and the suspension of deliveries of the Boeing 787 in 2020 and 2021, production halts and enhanced inspection procedures required in advance of certification and clearance for delivery of certain Boeing aircraft have led to delays in the delivery of our aircraft on order from Boeing. In addition, a Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") constraint on expansion of 737 MAX production has contributed to additional delays, although Boeing has recently received approval from the FAA to increase 737 MAX production rates. Delivery delays can materially affect our revenues, results of operations, net income and operating cash flows. For additional detail, please refer to "Item 3. Key Information-Risk Factors-Risks relating to market demand for, and lease rates and value of, flight equipment in our fleet-Manufacturer behavior may adversely affect the lease rates and value of aircraft in our fleet or our results of operations more broadly."
Our leases contain lessee cancellation clauses related to aircraft delivery delays, typically for new aircraft delivery delays greater than one year, and our purchase agreements contain similar provisions. If there are delivery delays for aircraft for which we have made future lease commitments, some or all of our affected lessees could elect to terminate their lease arrangements with respect to such delayed aircraft. Any such termination could negatively affect our cash flow and results of operations.
Supply Chain - Risk 2
Manufacturer behavior may adversely affect the lease rates and value of aircraft in our fleet or our results of operations more broadly.
The manufacture and supply of commercial aircraft is concentrated among a limited number of manufacturers. Aircraft also have long delivery cycles. We rely, as a result, on these manufacturers responding early and appropriately to changes in the market environment, delivering aircraft that meet our lessees' expectations and fulfilling contractual obligations they have to us. Failure on the part of manufacturers in relation to any of these requirements may cause us to experience:
- missed or late delivery of aircraft and engines ordered by us and an inability to meet our contractual obligations to our customers, resulting in lost or delayed revenues, lower growth rates and strained customer relationships;- an inability to acquire aircraft and engines and related components on terms that will allow us to lease those aircraft and engines to customers at a profit, resulting in lower growth rates or a contraction in our aircraft portfolio;- a market environment with too many aircraft and engines available, creating downward pressure on demand for the aircraft and engines in our fleet and reduced market lease rates and sale prices;- reduced demand for a manufacturer's aircraft due to poor customer support or reputational damage to such manufacturer, thereby reducing the demand for those aircraft or engines in our fleet and reduced market lease rates and residual aircraft values for those aircraft and engines;- a reduction in our competitiveness due to deep discounting by the aircraft or engine manufacturers, which may lead to reduced market lease rates and aircraft values and may affect our ability to remarket for lease, or sell at a profit, some of the aircraft in our fleet; and - technical or other difficulties with aircraft or engines after delivery that subject aircraft to operating restrictions or groundings, reducing value and lease rates of such aircraft and our ability to lease or dispose of such aircraft on favorable terms. Operating restrictions or groundings may also adversely impact our lessees' business. For example, production quality issues requiring the removal of Pratt & Whitney geared turbofan engines for accelerated inspection has led to an increase in groundings of impacted A320neo Family aircraft, which may negatively impact the financial condition of our lessees and demand for Pratt & Whitney-powered A320neo Family aircraft.
Uncertainty regarding air travel demand may also lead to a reduction in the availability of debt financing for aircraft purchases, which could increase the gap between aircraft production and demand. Any such decrease in aircraft values and lease rates, or increase in the cost or availability of funding, could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
Costs4 | 8.9%
Costs - Risk 1
Our insurance policies, including our use of a captive insurance company, may not provide adequate protection against risks, events outside of our control may cause insurers to raise premiums and/or reduce or cancel available coverage, and we may not be able to recover losses under our policies.
We seek protection from a number of our key operational risk exposures by purchasing insurance to cover insurable risks, by requiring our lessees to maintain insurance, and through a captive insurance program. We require our lessees to provide insurance coverage with respect to leased flight equipment, with AerCap (or our relevant affiliate) named as an insured under those policies in the event of a total loss of an aircraft or engine. We also purchase contingent and possessed insurance, which provides us with coverage when our flight equipment is not subject to a lease or where a lessee's policy fails to indemnify us. We have also adopted a captive insurance program to complement our overall insurance program.
Although we believe that our insurance coverage is consistent with industry practice and available cover from the insurance market, our insurance may not adequately cover certain risks. Our and our lessees' insurance policies are subject to periodic review by insurers and may not be renewed at all or may be renewed on less favorable terms. Events outside of our control may cause insurers to increase premiums and/or decrease coverage under insurance policies, or even withdraw from the market entirely. For example, the Ukraine Conflict led insurers to reassess their exposure to certain risks and geographical locations and, since the start of the Ukraine Conflict, we have experienced a significant increase in the cost of our insurance and a significant reduction in our insurance cover. We expect to continue to experience difficulty in obtaining appropriate policy limits and coverage at a reasonable cost and on reasonable terms. An inability to obtain insurance, significant increases in the cost of insurance we obtain, higher deductibles or lower limits under our policies or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In 2022, we established a Bermuda-domiciled wholly-owned captive insurance company, Aistrigh Limited ("Aistrigh"), to help mitigate significant increases to our insurance costs. As of December 31, 2025, Aistrigh provided approximately 3.1% of our hull war insurance and approximately 2.5% of our hull all risks insurance. Aistrigh's participation in our aviation insurance may increase or decrease in future years. Aistrigh may not provide the intended benefits, and our funding of Aistrigh may be insufficient to adequately cover the costs of any insured events. In addition, there is no guarantee that reinsurance will continue to be available to Aistrigh, which would negatively impact our captive insurance coverage.
Even where we have insurance, we may face difficulties in pursuing claims under our policies. War risk insurance policies may be invalidated as a result of events outside of our control, including hostilities between the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Russia and China, or through the use of tactical nuclear devices in active conflicts. Where insurance claims can be made, they may take years to fully settle and we may be in dispute with our insurers about the extent of coverage, as we have experienced as a result of the Ukraine Conflict. Pursuing claims may require certain legal, regulatory and other enforcement costs for which we may not be reimbursed.
Costs - Risk 2
If our lessees fail to cooperate in returning our assets following lease terminations, we may encounter obstacles and are likely to incur significant costs and expenses conducting repossessions.
Our legal rights and the relative difficulty of repossession vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction in which our flight equipment is located and the applicable law. We may need to obtain a court order or consents for deregistration or re-export, a process that can differ substantially in different countries. Where a lessee or other operator flies only domestic routes in the jurisdiction in which the asset is registered or in which the lessee operator is based, repossessing and exporting the asset may be challenging, especially if the jurisdiction permits the lessee or the other operator to resist deregistration or export of the asset. For example, due to the Ukraine Conflict and sanctions imposed against Russia, we sought to repossess all of our aircraft and engines from Russian airlines and remove them from Russia, but we were unable to repossess the vast majority of those assets. Please refer to Note 25-Net (recoveries) charges related to Ukraine Conflict to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report for further details.
When a defaulting lessee is in bankruptcy, protective administration, insolvency or similar proceedings, additional limitations may apply. For example, certain jurisdictions entitle the lessee or another third-party to retain possession of the flight equipment without paying lease rent or performing all or some of the obligations under the relevant lease. Certain of our lessees are partially or wholly owned by government-related entities, which can complicate our efforts to repossess our aircraft in that government's jurisdiction. If we encounter any of these difficulties, we may be delayed in, or prevented from, enforcing certain of our rights under a lease and in re-leasing the affected flight equipment.
When conducting a repossession, we are likely to incur significant costs and expenses that are unlikely to be recouped, including, for example, legal and regulatory expenses, taxes, lost revenue, maintenance and refurbishment and repair costs necessary to put the flight equipment in suitable condition for re-lease or sale. We may also make payments to discharge liens placed on our flight equipment by third parties and, until these liens are discharged, be restricted in our ability to repossess, release or sell our flight equipment. Although the financial obligations relating to these liens are the contractual responsibility of our lessees, if they fail to fulfill these obligations, such liens may ultimately become our responsibility and impose additional repossession costs on us. If we incur significant costs in repossessing our flight equipment, our financial results may be materially and adversely affected.
Costs - Risk 3
We have limited control over the operation of our flight equipment while it is under lease and depend on our lessees to properly maintain and insure our flight equipment.
While our flight equipment is on lease, we do not directly control its operation. Under our leases, our lessees are primarily responsible for maintaining our assets, obtaining adequate levels of insurance and complying with all governmental requirements applicable to the lessee and the flight equipment, including operational, maintenance, government agency oversight, registration requirements and airworthiness directives. We also require many of our lessees to pay us supplemental maintenance rents. Nevertheless, because we still own and hold title to the flight equipment, we could be exposed to costs or losses resulting from a lessee's failure to properly maintain an asset under lease or be held liable for losses resulting from its operation while under lease. If a lessee fails to perform required maintenance on our asset during the term of the lease, the asset's market value may decline or we might be required to incur maintenance and modification costs, which would result in lower revenues from its subsequent lease or sale, or the asset might be grounded. Additionally, if our lessees are unable to procure, or fail to maintain, adequate insurance coverage, default in their indemnification or insurance obligations to us, or are exposed to losses for which they do not have coverage, our lessees' operations may be curtailed or halted, and we could face increased costs from pursuing corrective action or face reductions in, or the absence of, insurance proceeds that would otherwise be payable to us in the case of loss. If our lessees fail to meet their obligations to pay supplemental maintenance rents or end-of-lease ("EOL") compensation, fail to perform required scheduled maintenance, fail to obtain and maintain insurance coverage for losses to which they are exposed, or if we are required to incur unexpected costs associated with any of the above, our financial results may be materially and adversely affected.
Costs - Risk 4
Increases in fuel prices and fuel price volatility could affect our lessees' ability to meet their lease payment obligations to us.
The cost of fuel represents a major expense to airlines that is not within their control, and significant increases in fuel costs or hedges that inaccurately assess the direction of fuel costs can materially and adversely affect their operating results. Historically, fuel prices have fluctuated widely depending primarily on international market conditions, geopolitical and environmental events and currency exchange rates, including events, such as natural disasters and wars, that affect fuel supply.
Due to the competitive nature of the aviation industry, operators may be unable to increase airfares in a manner that fully offsets increases in fuel costs. In addition, they may not be able to enter appropriate hedging positions to manage their exposure to fuel price fluctuations. Airlines that hedge their fuel costs may suffer adverse impacts to their profitability and liquidity from swift movements in fuel prices, if their hedge agreements require them to post cash collateral. Therefore, if for any reason fuel prices return to historically high levels or show significant volatility, our lessees are likely to incur higher costs or generate lower revenues, which may affect their ability to meet their obligations to us.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 5/45 (11%)Below Sector Average
Competition1 | 2.2%
Competition - Risk 1
Competition and changes in market participants, including lessors, manufacturers and aircraft lessees, may adversely affect our business operations.
The aviation leasing industry is highly competitive. Our competitors are primarily other major aircraft leasing companies, but we may also encounter competition from emerging aircraft leasing companies that we do not currently consider our main competitors. We may also face competition from other market participants, such as airlines, aircraft manufacturers, aircraft brokers, financial institutions (including those seeking to dispose of repossessed aircraft at distressed prices) and other entities that invest in aircraft and engines. Some of these competitors may have greater operating and financial resources than we do and we may not always be able to compete successfully, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.
Over the past several years, market participants in the aviation industry have changed as a result of restructuring or bankruptcies, mergers and acquisitions, entities entering or exiting the industry or entities entering into new or different market segments. In some cases, competitors have increased in relative size to AerCap due to consolidation. We expect similar changes to take place in the future. Changes in market participants may affect our business by, for instance, reducing competition amongst manufacturers, changing the offering of aircraft types and models in the market, reducing demand for our aircraft from lessees or increasing the competition we face for new lessees or favorable terms on our transactions. New aircraft manufacturers, such as Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, Ltd. in China, could produce aircraft that compete with current and future offerings from Airbus, Boeing and Embraer. These changes may materially affect our business.
Demand3 | 6.7%
Demand - Risk 1
If a decline in demand for certain assets causes a decline in their projected lease rates and residual values, or if we expect to dispose of an asset for a price that is less than its depreciated book value on our balance sheet, then we will recognize impairments or make fair value adjustments.
We test long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the asset value (including the lease-related assets and liabilities of that asset, such as the maintenance rights assets, lease incentives, and maintenance liabilities), an impairment loss is recognized. The loss is measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its estimated fair value. Factors that may contribute to impairment charges include, but are not limited to, unfavorable airline industry trends affecting the residual values of certain flight equipment types, high fuel prices and development of more fuel-efficient aircraft shortening the useful lives of certain aircraft, management's expectations that certain flight equipment is more likely than not to be parted-out or otherwise disposed of sooner than their expected life, and new technological developments. Cash flows supporting carrying values of older flight equipment are more dependent upon current lease contracts.
If economic conditions deteriorate, we may be required to recognize impairment losses. In that event, our estimates and assumptions regarding forecasted cash flows from our long-lived assets would need to be reassessed, including the duration of the economic downturn and the timing and strength of the pending recovery, both of which are important variables for purposes of our long-lived asset impairment tests. Any of our assumptions may prove to be inaccurate, which could adversely impact forecasted cash flows of certain long-lived assets, especially for older aircraft. If so, it is possible that there may be an event-driven impairment for other long-lived assets in the future and that any such impairment amounts may be material.
As of December 31, 2025, 339 of our owned passenger aircraft under operating leases were 15 years of age or older. These aircraft represented 6% of our total flight equipment and lease-related assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2025. Please refer to "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Critical accounting estimates-Flight equipment held for operating leases, net" for a detailed description of our impairment policy.
Demand - Risk 2
Our business depends heavily on the level of demand for flight equipment in our fleet, which may decline as a result of changes in market conditions and the overall health of air travel.
Flight equipment are long-lived assets and demand can change over time as a result of changes in market conditions outside of our control. Customer demand for our assets is primarily driven by long-term trends in passenger air travel and air cargo demand, and is limited by airport and air traffic control infrastructure constraints. Demand is also influenced by changes in economic growth, regulation, customer profitability, fuel prices, the availability of asset financing, pricing and other competitive factors. The imposition of more stringent regulation on air travel may adversely impact the profitability of air travel and reduce demand for our aircraft and engines. Types of regulation that could impact flight equipment demand include environmental rules, noise or emissions limitations, aircraft age constraints, trade and import and export controls, tariffs and other trade barriers. If flight equipment demand declines, lease rates and residual values of assets could be negatively impacted and we may be unable to lease our assets on favorable terms, if at all. Flight equipment values and lease rates have occasionally experienced sharp decreases in response to market conditions or otherwise.
Demand for an aircraft can also be affected by factors unique to that aircraft, including the maintenance and operating history of the airframe and engines, the compatibility of aircraft configurations and specifications with other aircraft owned by operators of that type, the number of operators using the particular type of aircraft, the availability of documentary records for the aircraft and aircraft age. The desirability of an aircraft may also be impacted by factors pertinent to the model of an aircraft, such as the performance and reliability of the specific engine type installed on a particular aircraft model, technical limitations and technical problems associated with an aircraft model or the operating histories of an aircraft model.
In addition, new aircraft types that are introduced to the market could be more attractive for the target lessees of our aircraft, increasing the supply of older aircraft in the marketplace. This may cause the retirement and obsolescence of aircraft models, decrease comparative values of aircraft based on newly competitive aircraft and reduce the availability of spare parts for older aircraft. For instance, in the last 15 years, Airbus S.A.S. ("Airbus"), The Boeing Company ("Boeing") and Embraer S.A. ("Embraer"), have introduced several new technology aircraft types into service, including the Boeing 787 Family, the Boeing 737 MAX Family, the Airbus A320neo Family, the Airbus A330neo Family, the Airbus A350 Family, the Airbus A220 Family and the Embraer E-Jet E2 Family. These new technology aircraft types, and potential variants of these types, may reduce the desirability of, and have an adverse effect on residual value and future lease rates of, older aircraft types and variants. Additionally, new manufacturers may develop a narrowbody aircraft that competes with established aircraft types from Airbus, Boeing and Embraer, putting downward price pressure on, and decreasing the marketability of, aircraft from these manufacturers. The development of more fuel-efficient engines could make aircraft in our portfolio with engines that are not as fuel-efficient less attractive to potential lessees.
A decrease in demand for our flight equipment as a result of any of these factors could materially and adversely affect lease rates and residual values for our flight equipment, our ability to lease our flight equipment on favorable terms, if at all, and our financial results.
Demand - Risk 3
Added
The adoption of AI could have an adverse impact on our operations and reputation.
The Company is reviewing the use of AI technologies across various business functions. We are also seeing growing adoption of AI technologies across the operations of our business partners. While these technologies may offer future benefits, their use also presents a number of risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business. AI systems, including large language models and autonomous agents, are complex and may produce inaccurate, biased, or unpredictable outputs. These risks are heightened when AI is used to support decision-making processes, even in non-critical functions. Misuse, overreliance, or insufficient oversight of AI-generated content could lead to operational errors, reputational harm, or legal exposure, particularly in areas involving customer communications, financial reporting support, or regulatory compliance.
Additionally, the evolving regulatory landscape surrounding AI technologies may impose new compliance obligations or restrictions on the use of such tools. Failure to adhere to emerging standards or to implement appropriate governance frameworks could result in enforcement actions, fines, or limitations on the ability to deploy AI solutions, which could have an adverse impact on our reputation. There is also a risk that proprietary or sensitive data used to train or interact with AI systems could be inadvertently exposed or misused, especially when leveraging third-party platforms. While the Company does not currently use AI in critical operations, the prospective integration of these tools across our business, or by our business partners, may amplify cybersecurity, data privacy, and intellectual property risks. As the capabilities and adoption of AI continue to evolve, we may face challenges in ensuring that our workforce is adequately trained to use these tools responsibly and effectively. Any failure to manage the risks associated with AI could have a material adverse effect on our operations and reputation.
Sales & Marketing1 | 2.2%
Sales & Marketing - Risk 1
Our financial condition is dependent, in part, on the financial strength of our lessees.
We generate our revenue primarily from leases to airlines, and as a result we are exposed to many of the risks that airlines face. The ability of our lessees to perform their obligations depends primarily on their financial condition and cash flows, which are affected by factors outside our control. In addition to general economic and market conditions, airlines are affected by overall changes in passenger and air cargo demand, the price and availability of jet fuel, labor difficulties and costs, manufacturer production issues, disruptions to operations due to global conflicts, currency exchange rates, the availability of financial or other governmental support and governmental regulation and associated fees, including travel restrictions, restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions, environmental regulations and fly-over restrictions.
Generally, airlines with high financial leverage are more likely than airlines with stronger balance sheets to be affected, and are affected more quickly, by these factors. Such airlines are also more likely to seek operating leases.
A deterioration in the financial condition and cash flows of our lessees could increase the risk that they will delay, reduce or fail to make rental payments when due. At any point in time, our lessees may be significantly in arrears. Some lessees encountering financial difficulties may seek a reduction in their lease rates or other concessions, such as a deferral of their obligations to make rent or supplemental maintenance rent payments or a decrease in their contribution toward maintenance obligations. Moreover, we may not correctly assess the credit risk of each lessee or charge lease rates that incorrectly reflect related risks. Many of our lessees are not rated investment grade by the principal U.S. rating agencies and may be more likely to suffer liquidity problems than those that are so rated.
Our financial condition, financial results and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected by any events adversely affecting the financial strength of our lessees.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 2/45 (4%)Below Sector Average
Cyber Security1 | 2.2%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
A cybersecurity incident, including a ransomware attack, could lead to a material disruption of our information systems or the information systems of our third-party providers, the loss of business information or losses attributable to fraud, which may hinder our ability to conduct our business effectively or result in lost revenues or other costs.
Our business depends on the secure operation of our information systems and the information systems of our third-party providers to manage, process, store and transmit information associated with aviation leasing. Like other global companies, we have, from time to time, experienced cybersecurity threats to our data and information systems, including malware and computer virus attacks, internet network scans, systems failures and disruptions. For example, the Company experienced a cybersecurity incident related to ransomware in 2024, when a perpetrator exploited a vulnerability in third-party software to obtain access to data hosted on a small number of the Company's IT servers. The incident caused no material disruption to the Company's operations, the Company suffered no financial loss related to the incident, and the Company incurred no material expenses in connection with the investigation, review and disclosure of the attack.
A cybersecurity incident, including a ransomware attack such as the one that occurred in 2024, that bypasses our information security systems or the information security systems of our third-party providers, and causes an information security breach, could lead to a material disruption of our information systems or the information systems of our third-party providers, as applicable, and adversely impact our daily operations and cause the loss of sensitive information, including our own proprietary information and that of our customers, suppliers and employees. In addition, a cybersecurity incident at a third-party provider, lessee or other business counterparty could result in fraudulent activity that causes costs or other losses to us. Any such losses could harm our reputation or result in competitive disadvantages, litigation, regulatory enforcement actions, lost revenues, additional costs or liability. While we devote substantial resources to maintaining adequate levels of cybersecurity and other related controls, our resources and technical sophistication cannot prevent all cybersecurity incidents.
Technology1 | 2.2%
Technology - Risk 1
We could suffer material damage to, or interruptions in, our information systems or the information systems of our third-party providers as a result of external factors, staffing shortages or difficulties in updating our existing software or developing or implementing new software.
We depend largely upon our information systems and the information systems of our third-party providers in the conduct of all aspects of our operations. Such information systems are subject to damage or interruption from events such as power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, fire and natural disasters. AI tools and their use by bad actors and cybercriminals have enhanced the threats facing information systems. These developments could increase the risk of security breaches, which may lead to significant disruption to the business. Damage or interruption to our or our third-party providers' information systems may require a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may suffer interruptions in our operations in the interim. In addition, we are currently pursuing a number of information systems-related projects that will require ongoing information systems-related development, conversion of existing information systems and the rollout of new information systems. Costs and potential problems or interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded information systems and technology or with maintenance or support of existing information systems could also disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. Any material interruptions or failures in our information systems may have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.
FAQ
What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
1. Financial & Corporate
Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
2. Legal & Regulatory
Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
3. Production
Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
4. Technology & Innovation
Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
5. Ability to Sell
Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
6. Macro & Political
Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.