tiprankstipranks
Advertisement
Advertisement

VOO or QQQ: Investor Says One ETF Looks Far More Attractive for 2026

VOO or QQQ: Investor Says One ETF Looks Far More Attractive for 2026

Few ETFs are as widely followed as the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ). Both funds have built large investor bases thanks to their scale, track records, and exposure to some of the most influential companies in the market.

Claim 55% Off TipRanks

Trade QQQ with leverage

ETFs provide diversification by bundling a range of assets into a single investment. For many investors, that structure offers a straightforward way to gain broad market exposure without having to pick individual stocks.

VOO tracks the S&P 500, giving investors a stake in the performance of the U.S. large-cap market. The fund manages more than $860 billion in assets, and its beta of 0.99 indicates that it tends to move almost in lockstep with the broader market.

VOO also has a fairly passive management structure, and its expense ratio of 0.03% is among the cheapest available. Over the past few years, VOO has soared alongside the S&P, and the ETF’s largest holdings are heavily weighted toward the technology giants that have helped drive the market higher – including Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), and Amazon (AMZN), which together account for more than 20% of the portfolio.

Although VOO has risen almost 70% during the past three years, momentum has cooled recently. Worries about an AI-driven bubble and the sustainability of massive capital spending have pressured technology stocks, dragging VOO into the red so far this year.

QQQ – which is designed to track the Nasdaq-100 – follows a similar trajectory, albeit to the extreme. Though QQQ and VOO share many of the same names, the Nasdaq-heavy ETF has even greater exposure to the tech sector.

The numbers bear this out; QQQ’s 3-year gains of some 93% surpass VOO’s returns, though its fall this year has also slipped beyond that of VOO. QQQ’s beta of 1.25 speaks to this potential to outperform the market, though these prospective gains also come with additional risk.

With roughly $386 billion in assets under management, QQQ is considerably smaller than VOO. It is also more expensive to own, carrying an expense ratio of 0.18%.

Amid all the commotion in markets these days – a war in the Gulf, fears of an AI bubble, and uncertainty surrounding future interest rate cuts – investors can be forgiven for searching for safer bets.

But one investor, known by the pseudonym Vega North, is choosing QQQ over VOO, arguing that “it’s actually cheaper.”

Specifically, Vega North compares the price-to-earnings to growth ratios of both ETFs and argues that QQQ’s growth-adjusted valuation of ~1.3x is cheaper than the S&P 500’s 1.47x. In other words, investors going with QQQ are paying less for future growth than those electing to purchase VOO.

On that score, the investor firmly believes there will be plenty of growth on the horizon. Vega North points out that QQQ offers exposure to the entire AI ecosystem, spanning semiconductors to cloud computing to monetization platforms.

“I am aware of no other investment vehicle that can provide such an extensive array of exposures within a single holding,” adds Vega North.

Vega North does not ignore QQQ’s recent weakness. In fact, the investor notes that the ETF has just gone through the largest inflow-to-outflow reversal in its history, with $8.5 billion pouring in during December 2025 before sentiment swung the other way and produced a $7 billion outflow by February 2026.

However, rather than run from this exodus of capital, Vega North believes the time is right to go against the grain.

“I believe the $7 billion outflow from QQQ in February provides a perfect contrarian buying opportunity,” concludes Vega North, who rates QQQ a Buy.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured investor. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

1