tiprankstipranks
Advertisement
Advertisement

The Market Is Celebrating Disney’s (DIS) Q2. I’m Not

Story Highlights
  • Disney’s latest rally may be masking deeper issues, as streaming gains and higher guidance do not fully offset pressure in legacy businesses and a still-heavy debt load.
  • While the quarter offered some near-term positives, the stock may not be as attractive as it looks if growth continues to depend on price hikes rather than stronger underlying momentum.
The Market Is Celebrating Disney’s (DIS) Q2. I’m Not

Walt Disney’s (DIS) post-earnings rally looks more like a relief bounce than the start of a convincing turnaround, in my view. Fiscal Q2 gave investors a few reasons for celebration, particularly around streaming profitability and the company’s full-year outlook, but I do not think the broader concerns have disappeared.

Claim 55% Off TipRanks

Beneath the headline beats, the global media and entertainment conglomerate still appears heavily reliant on price increases while facing ongoing pressure across several legacy businesses, all against the backdrop of a leveraged balance sheet. So while the market may be treating this quarter as evidence that the turnaround is gaining traction, I remain unconvinced. That is why I’m bearish on DIS stock today.

The Illusion of a Turnaround

On the surface, I’ll admit the numbers Disney reported on May 6 looked like a win for Bob Iger’s second act. Revenue hit $25.17 billion, eking out a beat over the $24.87 billion Wall Street was looking for, and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) came in at $1.57, beating by $0.08 as well. However, the real headline-grabber, and the reason the stock popped, was the streaming business.

Seeing Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) operating income swing to a $582 million profit is a massive psychological milestone for investors who have spent years watching that segment bleed cash at a worrisome pace.

The market also cheered the upgraded guidance. Disney now sees full-year adjusted EPS growth of about 12%, and they’ve upped their share buyback target to at least $8 billion. Thus, on paper, this looks like a company that has finally found its footing, balancing the expensive transition to digital with the steady cash generation of its theme parks. Most analysts called the quarter a “clean beat,” citing 10% revenue growth in the entertainment segment as evidence that the content engine is finally back online.

Squeezing the Magic for Every Penny

However, here’s where the narrative starts to fray for me. If you actually dig into the “Experiences” segment, the sacred cow of the Disney portfolio, you see a company that is essentially subsidizing its existence by aggressively squeezing its most loyal customers. While revenue in the parks grew about 7%, that growth wasn’t driven by a massive influx of new fans but rather by higher “per capita spending.” In other words, Disney is raising prices on tickets, food, and “Lightning Lanes” to offset the fact that attendance growth is becoming harder to come by.

Look at the margins and the wider picture. While streaming is finally “profitable,” it’s doing so on the back of relentless price hikes that will surely hit a ceiling soon. Meanwhile, the Sports segment, including the once-mighty ESPN, saw its operating income actually drop by 5% to $652 million. Clearly, Disney is a massive, multi-headed beast, with one head always biting the other. That’s starting to become a major problem. In the meantime, expenses aren’t really moderating.

Overall, because they are relying on pricing power in the parks, I feel that this is an increasingly fragile strategy in a shaky macroeconomic environment. Also, their “growth” areas are barely keeping pace with the decline of their traditional linear television business. So while many investors want to see this as a thriving company, I still see it as a legacy conglomerate in a state of managed decline. They can keep posting “improving” numbers in certain areas, but how sustainable is that remains to be seen.

The Debt Trap and the Valuation Myth

Now, at first glance, Disney looks like a bargain. It’s trading at a forward P/E of roughly 16x this year’s consensus EPS estimate of $6.71. This multiple might initially seem like a steal for a global brand of this caliber, especially given the industry median for the entertainment sector at a forward P/E of around 18x. However, looking at Disney through a simple P/E ratio is like looking at a house and ignoring the fact that the foundation is sinking into a swamp.

The real concern here is the balance sheet. Disney is still hauling around a massive $41.7 billion net debt mountain, a hangover from the Fox (FOX) acquisition that refuses to go away. When you look at the enterprise value, the stock isn’t nearly as cheap as it seems. Even worse, look at the cash flow. While the company touted its quarterly performance, free cash flow for the first six months of the fiscal year plummeted 53%, to just $2.66 billion.

If the company actually tried to aggressively pay down its debt instead of recklessly spending $8 billion on share buybacks to keep the stock price afloat, it would take, quite literally, forever.

Meaningful capital returns, the kind that are not simply supported by more financial engineering, still feel a long way off. Once you account for weak organic growth and the drag from the interest burden, that 16x multiple does not look cheap. It starts to look like a value trap. I would even argue it is expensive, because what you are really buying is a low-growth utility with the risk profile of a media company still trying to find its footing.

Is DIS Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold?

After lagging for years, Disney stock has a Strong Buy consensus rating on Wall Street, based on 16 Buy and 2 Hold ratings. Notably, no analyst rates the stock a Sell. Furthermore, Disney’s average price target of $133.81 implies roughly 25% upside potential over the next 12 months.

Conclusion

Disney’s post-earnings rally could prove to be a great exit opportunity in hindsight. Disney is playing a game of expectations management, and I have to admit they are doing a good job of it. However, the fundamentals of a high-debt, margin-pressured legacy business haven’t changed. Therefore, until I see real, sustainable free cash flow growth that isn’t just a result of hiking ticket prices, I’m staying far away from the Mouse.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

1