Leerink says the Court decision is an incremental positive in Guardant Health’s (GH) litigation against the University of Washington and TwinStrand. However, this decision does not strike down patent 10,760,127. Instead, it remands the case to PTAB so the appeal board can potentially consider patent validity under a different framework. And more importantly, it does not affect patent 10,287,631, which Guardant also infringed upon, Leerink adds. The ‘631 patent is going through its own ex parte reexamination. Therefore, the firm sees no immediate change but Guardant could potentially end up paying less damages vs the previously contemplated 6% royalty rate. Leerink has an Outperform rating on the shares.
Claim 50% Off TipRanks Premium
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Stay ahead of the market with the latest news and analysis and maximize your portfolio's potential
Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>>
Read More on GH:
- Guardant Health receives FDA approval for Guardant360 CDx in colorectal cancer
- Guardant Health announces multi-year strategic agreement with Merck
- Guardant Health Announces Strong 2025 Preliminary Revenue Growth
- Guardant Health price target raised to $120 from $100 at Stifel
- Guardant Health price target raised to $135 from $120 at Mizuho
