According to a recent LinkedIn post from Veremark, the company is emphasizing gaps it perceives in typical employee background screening programmes. The post highlights that many employers focus on criminal and employment history while potentially overlooking other risk indicators.
Claim 55% Off TipRanks
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Discover top-performing stock ideas and upgrade to a portfolio of market leaders with Smart Investor Picks
The post cites discrepancy or flag rates across several checks, including a 7.4% discrepancy rate in adverse financial history, higher detection from academic authentication versus standard degree checks, and undisclosed directorships in roughly 1 in 67 candidates. It also notes that social media checks reportedly flag issues in 93% of cases and claims that most companies do not rescreen employees after hiring.
For investors, the post suggests Veremark is positioning its platform toward broader, more continuous risk screening in HR and talent management. This positioning could support demand from regulated industries and larger enterprises that face higher compliance and reputational risk, potentially expanding Veremark’s addressable market within the background screening and HR technology sector.

