According to a recent LinkedIn post from Tipalti, the company is spotlighting commentary from Bryan Simpson on the evolving role of procurement in technology spending. The post suggests that while most organizations can track technology costs, far fewer rigorously assess whether those investments deliver tangible business value.
Claim 55% Off TipRanks
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Discover top-performing stock ideas and upgrade to a portfolio of market leaders with Smart Investor Picks
The LinkedIn content emphasizes a shift in procurement from a narrow cost-control function toward a discipline focused on value attribution and business outcomes. Simpson is portrayed as arguing that procurement teams are well positioned to link technology expenditures with what they actually produce for the business.
The post highlights that as technology investments become larger and more complex, organizations that merely monitor budgets may be at a competitive disadvantage. Instead, the companies described as “getting this right” are depicted as building a systematic connection between technology costs and measurable results.
For investors, this focus suggests Tipalti is aligning its messaging with a broader trend toward outcome-based spend management and strategic procurement. If Tipalti’s products or services support this type of value attribution, such positioning could enhance its appeal to finance and procurement leaders seeking higher ROI on technology and more disciplined capital allocation.
In the wider fintech and spend-management landscape, the theme may indicate rising demand for tools that provide granular visibility into the performance of technology investments. This could support sustained growth opportunities for vendors that can credibly demonstrate linkages between spend data, business outcomes, and decision-making speed, potentially strengthening competitive positioning over time.

