According to a recent LinkedIn post from Cerby, new Ponemon Institute research across more than 600 organizations suggests a significant gap between formal identity security programs and actual application coverage. The post highlights that while tools such as SSO, MFA, and lifecycle automation may appear mature, many applications reportedly operate outside these controls.
Claim 30% Off TipRanks
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Discover top-performing stock ideas and upgrade to a portfolio of market leaders with Smart Investor Picks
The post points to survey findings that 77% of respondents experienced incidents tied to “disconnected” applications, 63% allegedly failed audits due to such gaps, and teams spend an estimated 31 hours per week on manual workarounds. Cerby’s post also links this risk to accelerating “app sprawl,” particularly in the context of GenAI adoption.
For investors, the highlighted research implies a growing addressable market for solutions that secure unmanaged or nonstandard applications within identity and access management programs. If Cerby’s products are designed to address these gaps, the problem scale described could support demand for its offerings and justify continued investment in product development and go-to-market efforts.
The emphasis on audit failures, operational overhead, and incident frequency suggests that budget holders may prioritize spending on tools that bring disconnected apps under centralized control. This positioning could help Cerby compete in the broader identity security and IAM segments, where regulatory scrutiny and AI-driven application growth may drive sustained enterprise spending.