A LinkedIn post from Research Grid highlights persistent challenges in clinical trial recruitment, citing figures that 80–85% of trials miss enrollment projections and nearly 30% of sites enroll no participants. The post suggests that traditional recruitment strategies focused on broad digital reach and large patient databases may generate visibility but fall short on trust and relevance.
Claim 55% Off TipRanks
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Discover top-performing stock ideas and upgrade to a portfolio of market leaders with Smart Investor Picks
According to the post, this model can lead to wide reach with low context, prioritizing volume over relevance and putting awareness before trust, which may contribute to participation gaps and under-representation in clinical data. The commentary emphasizes that potential participants are more likely to engage when research is introduced through familiar, community-based networks that reflect their daily realities.
The company’s LinkedIn post points to community partners and trusted networks as a way to build credibility earlier in the recruitment process rather than at the point of enrollment. It references internal observations, including input from team member Sam Meyer, that both researchers and community partners perceive a lack of trust early in the engagement pipeline.
As described in the post, community-first approaches are linked to a reported 145% increase in patient engagement, alongside stronger participation, better retention, and more representative data. For investors, this focus on trust-driven, community-based recruitment may indicate a strategic positioning of Research Grid within the clinical trial enablement and patient recruitment market, potentially enhancing the value proposition of its services to sponsors seeking to reduce trial failure risk and improve data quality.

