According to a recent LinkedIn post from IQM Quantum Computers, CEO Jan Goetz discussed the company’s role in the quantum computing landscape during an interview with Bloomberg’s Tom Mackenzie. The post indicates that IQM emphasizes global supply chains as critical to the “quantum computing race” and claims to have deployed more quantum computers than any other company worldwide.
Claim 30% Off TipRanks
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Discover top-performing stock ideas and upgrade to a portfolio of market leaders with Smart Investor Picks
The post also outlines Goetz’s view that Europe plays a strategic role in global technology supply chains, particularly for critical technologies like quantum computing. He reportedly warns about risks arising from technological dependency and links control over key technologies to both economic strength and political influence.
According to the content summarized in the post, Goetz highlights Europe’s growing quantum ecosystem and the need to scale and invest in domestic capabilities. This focus on homegrown infrastructure suggests IQM may be positioned to benefit from potential European public and private funding streams aimed at strengthening regional technological sovereignty.
For investors, the emphasis on ecosystem building and supply-chain control points to IQM’s strategic positioning as a systems and infrastructure provider rather than only a research player. If the deployment lead referenced in the post is accurate and sustainable, it could translate into recurring revenue opportunities, deeper customer relationships, and a stronger competitive moat in a capital-intensive, winner-takes-most market.
The geopolitical framing in the interview, as summarized by the post, also hints that quantum hardware and related infrastructure may be viewed as strategic assets by governments and large institutions. This could support long-term demand for IQM’s offerings but may also expose the company to policy, export-control, and standardization risks as jurisdictions seek greater control over critical technologies.

