According to a recent LinkedIn post from Cerby, the company is drawing attention to what it describes as a persistent “identity coverage gap” in enterprise security architectures. The post argues that many identity programs implicitly assume this gap will close over time as more vendors adopt SCIM, legacy systems are retired, and identity standards mature.
Claim 30% Off TipRanks
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Discover top-performing stock ideas and upgrade to a portfolio of market leaders with Smart Investor Picks
The post suggests that this assumption may be unrealistic, noting that application vendor incentives, ongoing reliance on on‑premise systems, and fragile custom integrations leave a significant share of enterprise apps outside traditional IAM and IGA tools. Cerby positions the second part of its “Modernizing Identity Lifecycle Management” series as an examination of why this gap endures and why relying solely on standards evolution may be insufficient.
For investors, the messaging points to Cerby focusing on a structural problem in identity security that may not be fully addressed by incumbent IAM and IGA platforms. If Cerby can offer solutions that secure unmanaged or hard‑to‑integrate applications at scale, this positioning could support differentiated demand among large enterprises facing complex hybrid environments.
The emphasis on persistent coverage gaps and limitations of existing standards indicates a potential market for specialized tools that complement rather than replace established identity stacks. This could translate into opportunities for integration‑driven revenue, particularly in regulated or security‑sensitive sectors where unmanaged access represents a material risk and where budgets for cyber and identity controls remain a priority.