According to a recent LinkedIn post from Axiad, the company is drawing attention to Gartner’s formalization of Identity Verification and Intelligence Platform (IVIP) as a distinct category in July 2025. The post highlights IVIP as a unifying layer that provides a consolidated view of identity data, activity, relationships, and security posture across existing identity stacks, rather than another standalone tool to manage.
Claim 30% Off TipRanks
- Unlock hedge fund-level data and powerful investing tools for smarter, sharper decisions
- Discover top-performing stock ideas and upgrade to a portfolio of market leaders with Smart Investor Picks
The LinkedIn content suggests that current Identity and Access Management (IAM), Identity Governance and Administration (IGA), and Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions often operate in silos, limiting visibility into overall identity risk. It characterizes a growing challenge in tracking non‑human identities such as service accounts, API keys, machine credentials, and AI agents, which are said to now outnumber human identities in many enterprises.
The post references Gartner projections that 70% of CISOs could be using an IVIP to reduce their IAM attack surface by 2028, compared with what is described as sub‑5% adoption today. This framing points to a potentially large addressable market for vendors positioned in the IVIP space and implies a multi‑year growth runway as organizations look to consolidate identity risk insights.
Within this context, the post positions Axiad Mesh as being designed specifically to address the problem IVIP targets, suggesting strategic alignment between the company’s product roadmap and Gartner’s emerging category. For investors, this could indicate that Axiad is aiming to capitalize on an early‑stage but potentially fast‑growing segment of the identity security market, with upside if IVIP adoption tracks Gartner’s forecast.
If Axiad can demonstrate that its Mesh platform materially improves visibility into identity risk across both human and machine identities, it may strengthen its competitive standing against traditional IAM, IGA, and PAM vendors. Successful execution could support higher customer stickiness and cross‑sell potential, though the opportunity will depend on market acceptance of IVIP as a must‑have layer and on Axiad’s ability to differentiate in what is likely to become a more crowded category.

