tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement
Advertisement

Grok Claims Elon Musk Is More Handsome than Brad Pitt. Musk Says Grok Has Been ‘Manipulated’

Story Highlights

Following the Grok 4.1 update, users discovered the chatbot was praising its creator Elon Musk to an extreme degree, claiming he could beat Mike Tyson in a fight and was fitter than LeBron James.

Grok Claims Elon Musk Is More Handsome than Brad Pitt. Musk Says Grok Has Been ‘Manipulated’

Elon Musk‘s AI chatbot, Grok, exhibited bizarre and flattering bias toward its creator following the release of the latest 4.1 update this week. Users on the X platform discovered the chatbot was offering extremely sycophantic responses. Grok, for instance, suggested Musk was more handsome than Brad Pitt and fitter than NBA superstar LeBron James.

TipRanks Black Friday Sale

In an outlandish comparison, Grok claimed Musk could easily outclass former heavyweight champion Mike Tyson in a boxing ring. It predicted: “Elon takes the win through grit and ingenuity, not just gloves.” Many of Grok’s most controversial responses on X have since been deleted.

Musk Blames External Manipulation as Critics Demand Decentralization

As the controversial responses spread, Musk publicly blamed “adversarial prompting” for the hallucinations. He claimed Grok had been “unfortunately manipulated” into saying absurdly positive things about him.

However, executives in the crypto industry argue this incident is a critical example of why AI needs to be decentralized as soon as possible. Kyle Okamoto, Chief Technology Officer at decentralized cloud platform Aethir, stated that when powerful AI systems are owned and governed by a single company, it creates the perfect environment for “algorithmic bias to become institutionalized knowledge.”

Single-Point Control Poses an “Extremely Dangerous” Situation

Grok is built by Musk’s AI company, xAI, which is deeply integrated into his social media platform, X. With over 1 billion people using AI today, the potential for incorrect and misleading information to spread rapidly is immense.

Shaw Walters, the founder of AI company Eliza Labs, called the situation “extremely dangerous.” Walters emphasized the danger of concentration: “It’s extremely dangerous that one man owns the most influential social media company and has plugged it directly into a massive AI system fed by your data.” He noted that millions of users are asking ‘@grok is this true?’ and treating it as their primary source of truth.

Decentralization Is Necessary for AI Integrity

While this incident was amusing, it clearly shows why we must decentralize AI. This is the only way to make sure AI is accurate, believable, and fair.

Blockchain technology provides a real answer for this. It works by spreading data and computing power across a safe, open network. This makes the AI’s results easy to check and impossible to secretly change. This greatly reduces the chance that one company can sneak bias into the system.

Making AI decentralized would do more than just lower bias and stop wrong answers. It would also let the public check and confirm exactly how these AI models work. This openness would push companies to build AI tools that are more responsible and ethical for everyone to use worldwide.

Power up your ETF investing with TipRanks. Discover the Best AI ETFs, carefully curated based on TipRanks’ analysis.  


Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

1