On October 15, 2018, we closed the Purchase and Sale Agreement with EZ-CLONE Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation (the "Agreement"). On November 5, 2019, the Company amended the Agreement with one 24.5% shareholder of EZ-CLONE Enterprises, Inc. ("EZ-CLONE"), to extend the date to purchase the remaining 49% of stock of EZ-CLONE in exchange for a 20% extension fee (a total of $171,000 for the 49% or $85,500 for each 24.5% shareholder) of the $855,000 cash payable at the earlier of the closing of $2,000,000 in funding or nine months (July 2020). We did not close the purchase of the remaining 49% of stock of EZ-CLONE by the extended deadline.
On September 15, 2020, we received notice that William Blackburn and Brad Mickelsen ("Plaintiffs"), minority shareholders of EZ-CLONE Enterprises, Inc., a majority owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a complaint against the Company and its officers Marco Hegyi and Mark Scott ("Officers"), in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento ("Complaint") for claims related to breach under the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated October 15, 2018 between the Company and Plaintiffs. The Complaint also alleges that the Company and its Officers made certain false representations and other claims to consummate the Transaction and as a result has failed to complete the second closing as required under Purchase and Sale Agreement. The Plaintiffs are seeking rescission of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, unspecified damages in excess of ten thousand dollars, and other equitable relief.
On September 15, 2020, the Company filed a notice of removal with the California Superior Court, County of Sacramento and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The case was removed to Federal District Court for the Eastern District of California and Plaintiffs filed an Ex Parte Application for TRO and an Order for Preliminary Injunction with the Federal Court. The TRO was granted on September 16, 2020 and a preliminary injunction hearing was scheduled for September 29, 2020. After reviewing all pleadings and oral arguments at the hearing, the Court issued a ruling granting Plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction.
Presently the parties are providing legal briefs to the Federal court to determine if rescission should be granted. If we are unsuccessful and the court grants Plaintiffs' request for rescission the resulting actions are speculative at this time but could include the return of the consideration exchanged as part of the acquisition subject to certain adjustments as the result of several variables which the court will consider. If the court denies Plaintiffs request for rescission the litigation will continue regarding the breach of contract claims and contractual remedies for breach and the Court may or may not dissolve the preliminary injunction as a result.
A decision to grant rescission could materially harm our business as EZ-Clone represents a significant portion of our operations.
As of September 30, 2020, we recorded a liability of $2,131,000 for acquisition payable of which a $1,105,000 is payable in stock and $1,026,000 is payable in cash.
Our acquisition of EZ-CLONE thus far has been positive for our overall results of operations. Additionally, we have spent a significant amount of time and effort modifying our business plans and focuses toward the clone industry. If we fail to close on the remaining 49% of EZ-CLONE or settle the above legal action, we may experience direct consequences including, but not limited to, claims for breach of contract for failure to close on a contractual obligation, possible rescission of the EZ-CLONE acquisition, damages, and other equitable relief.