Public companies are required to disclose risks that can affect the business and impact the stock. These disclosures are known as “Risk Factors”. Companies disclose these risks in their yearly (Form 10-K), quarterly earnings (Form 10-Q), or “foreign private issuer” reports (Form 20-F). Risk factors show the challenges a company faces. Investors can consider the worst-case scenarios before making an investment. TipRanks’ Risk Analysis categorizes risks based on proprietary classification algorithms and machine learning.
The9 disclosed 123 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. The9 reported the most risks in the “Finance & Corporate” category.
Risk Overview Q4, 2023
Risk Distribution
29% Finance & Corporate
28% Legal & Regulatory
17% Tech & Innovation
12% Production
10% Macro & Political
3% Ability to Sell
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
This chart displays the stock's most recent risk distribution according to category. TipRanks has identified 6 major categories: Finance & corporate, legal & regulatory, macro & political, production, tech & innovation, and ability to sell.
Risk Change Over Time
2020
Q4
S&P500 Average
Sector Average
Risks removed
Risks added
Risks changed
The9 Risk Factors
New Risk (0)
Risk Changed (0)
Risk Removed (0)
No changes from previous report
The chart shows the number of risks a company has disclosed. You can compare this to the sector average or S&P 500 average.
The quarters shown in the chart are according to the calendar year (January to December). Businesses set their own financial calendar, known as a fiscal year. For example, Walmart ends their financial year at the end of January to accommodate the holiday season.
Risk Highlights Q4, 2023
Main Risk Category
Finance & Corporate
With 36 Risks
Finance & Corporate
With 36 Risks
Number of Disclosed Risks
123
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
123
-1
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 31
Recent Changes
9Risks added
10Risks removed
30Risks changed
Since Dec 2023
9Risks added
10Risks removed
30Risks changed
Since Dec 2023
Number of Risk Changed
30
+3
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
30
+3
From last report
S&P 500 Average: 3
See the risk highlights of The9 in the last period.
Risk Word Cloud
The most common phrases about risk factors from the most recent report. Larger texts indicate more widely used phrases.
Risk Factors Full Breakdown - Total Risks 123
Finance & Corporate
Total Risks: 36/123 (29%)Below Sector Average
Share Price & Shareholder Rights23 | 18.7%
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 1
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our ADSs depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts or the content that they publish about us. If our financial performance fails to meet analyst estimates or one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our ADSs or change their opinion of our ADSs, our ADS price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our ADS price or trading volume to decline.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 2
You may not be able to exercise your right to vote.
As a holder of ADSs, you will not have any direct right to attend general meetings of our shareholders or to cast any votes at such meetings. You may give voting instructions to the depositary of our ADSs to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs. Otherwise, you will not be able to exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs unless you withdraw the shares and become the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting. However, you may not receive sufficient advance notice of a shareholders' meeting to enable you to withdraw the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs and become the registered holder of such shares to allow you to attend the general meeting and to vote directly with respect to any specific matter or resolution to be considered and voted upon at the general meeting. Pursuant to our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, we may convene a shareholders' meeting on seven business days' notice. If we ask for your instructions, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out your voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out your voting instructions, if any such action or non-action is in good faith. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs are voted and you may have no legal remedy if the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs are not voted as you requested.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 3
Your ability to bring an action against us or against our directors and officers, or to enforce a judgment against us or them, will be limited because we are incorporated in the Cayman Islands, because we conduct a substantial portion of our operations in China and because the majority of our directors and officers reside outside of the United States.
We are an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, substantially all of our assets are located in the U.S. For assets located in China, we conduct a substantial portion of our operations through our wholly-owned subsidiaries and variable interest entity in China. Most of our directors and officers reside outside of the United States and most of the assets of those persons are located outside of the United States. As of the date of this annual report, all of our directors and officers are located in China. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 4
Our currently effective memorandum and articles of association provide that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (or, if the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a particular dispute, the state courts in New York County, New York) is the exclusive judicial forum within the U.S. for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising out of or relating in any way to the federal securities laws of the United States, which could limit the ability of holders of our Class A ordinary shares, the ADSs or other securities to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us, our directors and officers, the depositary, and potentially others.
Our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (or, if the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a particular dispute, the state courts in New York County, New York) is the exclusive forum within the United States for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising out of or relating in any way to the federal securities laws of the United States, regardless of whether such legal suit, action, or proceeding also involves parties other than our company. The enforceability of similar federal court choice of forum provisions in other companies' organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings in the United States, and it is possible that a court could find this type of provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable. If a court were to find the federal choice of forum provision contained in our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions. If upheld, the forum selection clause in our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association may limit a security-holder's ability to bring a claim against us, our directors and officers, the depositary, and potentially others in his or her preferred judicial forum, and this limitation may discourage such lawsuits. Holders of our shares or the ADSs will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the regulations promulgated thereunder pursuant to the exclusive forum provision in our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 5
You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and our ability to protect our rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association and by the Companies Act and common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and provides significantly less protection to investors. Therefore, our public shareholders may have more difficulties protecting their interests in the face of actions by our management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States. In addition, with respect to Cayman Islands companies, plaintiffs may face special obstacles, including but not limited to those relating to jurisdiction and standing, in attempting to assert derivative claims in state or federal courts of the United States. As a result, our shareholders may not be able to protect their interests if they are harmed in a manner that would otherwise enable them to sue in a United States federal court.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 6
Our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association contain anti-takeover provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs.
Our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction. Our dual-class voting structure gives disproportionate voting power to the holders of our Class B ordinary shares. In addition, our board of directors will have the authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our Class A ordinary shares, including Class A ordinary shares represented by ADS. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of our ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 7
The rights of our shareholders may differ from the rights typically offered to shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
We are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. The rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares and, therefore, certain of the rights of holders of our ADSs, are governed by Cayman Islands law, including the provisions of the Companies Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands, or the Companies Act, and by our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. These rights differ in certain respects from the rights of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. See "Item 10. Additional Information-B. Memorandum and Articles of Association-Differences in Corporate Law" for a description of certain key differences between the provisions of the Companies Act applicable to us and, for example, the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to shareholders' rights and protections.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 8
Our shareholders may not have the same protections generally available to stockholders of other Nasdaq-listed companies because we are currently a "controlled company" within the meaning of the Nasdaq Listing Rules.
Because Mr. Jun Zhu holds a majority of the total outstanding voting power in our company for the election of our board of directors, we are a "controlled company" within the meaning of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5615(c). As a controlled company, we qualify for, and our board of directors, the composition of which is controlled by Mr. Jun Zhu, may rely upon, exemptions from several of Nasdaq's corporate governance requirements, including requirements that:
- a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors;- compensation of officers be determined or recommended to the board of directors by a majority of its independent directors or by a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors; and - director nominees be selected or recommended to the board of directors by a majority of its independent directors or by a nominating committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.
Accordingly, to the extent that we may choose to rely on one or more of these exemptions, our shareholders would not be afforded the same protections generally as shareholders of other Nasdaq-listed companies for so long as Mr. Zhu is able to control the composition of our board and our board determines to rely upon one or more of such exemptions.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 9
Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.
We have a dual-class share structure such that our ordinary shares consist of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. Holders of our Class A ordinary shares and our Class B ordinary shares shall at all times vote together as one class on all resolutions submitted to a vote by our shareholders. Each Class A ordinary share shall entitle the holder thereof to one vote on all matters subject to vote at our general meetings, and each Class B ordinary share shall entitle the holder thereof to a hundred votes on all matters subject to vote at our general meetings. Each Class B ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by the holder thereof, while Class A ordinary shares are not convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances. Upon any sale, transfer, assignment or disposition of any Class B ordinary share by the holder of such Class B ordinary share to any person who is not an affiliate of such shareholder, such Class B ordinary share shall be automatically and immediately converted into one Class A ordinary share.
Mr. Jun Zhu, our chairman and chief executive officer, beneficially owns all of our outstanding Class B ordinary shares. As of March 31, 2024, Mr. Jun Zhu beneficially owned approximately 53.3% of the aggregate voting power of our company. As a result of the dual-class share structure and the concentration of ownership, holders of our Class B ordinary shares have considerable influence over matters such as decisions regarding mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. They may take actions that are not in the best interest of us or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of our ADSs. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial. In addition, we may incur incremental compensation expenses to the holders of Class B ordinary shares as a result of their becoming entitled to high votes on each Class B ordinary share.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 10
Purchasers of our warrants will not have any rights of common shareholders until such warrants are exercised.
The warrants we offered do not confer any rights of common share ownership on their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the right to acquire common shares at a fixed price.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 11
The warrants are speculative in nature.
The Warrants we offered do not confer any rights of ordinary share ownership on their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the right to acquire our Class A ordinary shares at a fixed price.
In October 2020, we completed an offering by issuing 70,500,000 Class A ordinary shares and 27,025,000 warrants to purchase 2,702,500 ADSs, each ADS representing thirty Class A ordinary shares then and each warrant exercisable for the purchase of 0.1 ADS, including 3,525,000 warrants to purchase an additional 352,500 ADSs, each ADS representing thirty Class A ordinary shares then, pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriter to purchase additional warrants to cover over-allotments. In connection with this offering, we issued representative warrants to purchase 117,500 ADSs, each representing thirty Class A ordinary shares, to the underwriter of the offering. We received net proceeds of US$8.1 million from this offering. Most of the warrants and representative warrants were exercised by cash and other means in 2021. In 2021, we received an additional amount of US$9.98 million. The approximate total amount of proceeds from the offering is US$18.6 million. As of the date of this annual report, the remaining warrants had expired.
On January 25, 2021, we entered into a purchase agreement with the holding entities of several investors in the cryptocurrencies mining industry, including Jianping Kong, the former Director and Co-Chairman of Canaan Inc. (Nasdaq: CAN), a Bitcoin mining machine manufacturer listed on Nasdaq, Qifeng Sun, Li Zhang and Enguang Li. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, we issued 8,108,100 Class A ordinary shares in aggregate at US$0.1233 per Class A ordinary share and 207,891,840 warrants in aggregate, each warrant representing the right to purchase one Class A ordinary share, to the investors in February 2021. The warrants were divided into four equal tranches. The exercise price of each of the warrants in the first three tranches was US$0.1233 per Class A ordinary share while the exercise price of each of the warrants in the fourth tranche was US$0.2667 per Class A ordinary share. The warrants were only exercisable upon the satisfaction of certain conditions in connection with our market capitalization. In addition, the third tranche would be automatically forfeited with nil consideration if the second tranche fails to become exercisable within certain specified timeframe and the fourth tranche would be automatically forfeited with nil consideration if the second and third tranches fail to become exercisable within certain specified timeframe. We had the option to request the investors to make payment of the purchase price and the exercise price for the warrants in cash, cryptocurrencies or a combination of both. The investors were entitled to collectively appoint one director to our board of directors. The appointment right would automatically terminate on the later of (i) the third anniversary of the closing date, i.e., January 25, 2024, and (ii) the date on which the investors collectively hold less than 5% of our total number of ordinary shares on a fully diluted basis. The transaction was closed in February 2021 and we issued 8,108,100 Class A ordinary shares for total purchase price of US$1.0 million fully in cash. As of the date of this annual report, none of the warrants was exercised. On July 15, 2022, we entered into a cancellation agreement with JPKONG LTD. and Qifeng Sun Ltd., entities controlled by Mr. Jianping Kong and Mr. Qifeng Sun, respectively, to cancel the fourth tranche, which represented warrants issued to JPKONG LTD. to purchase 23,099,093 Class A ordinary shares at the exercise price of US$0.2667 per Class A ordinary share and warrants issued to Qifeng Sun Ltd. to purchase 11,549,547 Class A ordinary shares at the exercise price of US$0.2667 per Class A ordinary share. The cancellation would not affect the terms or conditions of the other three tranches. As of the date of this annual report, the remaining warrants had expired.
On March 31, 2021, we entered into an underwriting agreement with Maxim Group LLC, as the representative of several underwriters. In April 2021, we completed an offering of 3,765,100 ADSs, each representing thirty Class A ordinary shares, and warrants to purchase 2,823,825 ADSs, at a public offering price of US$33.20 per ADS and accompanying 0.75 of an warrant. The warrants offered in this offering has a term of three years and are exercisable by the holder at US$36.00 per ADS at any time after the date of issuance. The underwriter exercised its over-allotment option that we granted to it and we further issued and sold 564,760 ADSs, each representing thirty Class A ordinary shares, and warrants to purchase 423,574 ADSs to cover over-allotments. The aggregate net proceeds from this offering was approximately US$135.1 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. As of the date of this annual report, the remaining warrants had expired.
In November 2023, we closed a private placement securities purchase transaction with Bripheno Pte. Ltd., a Singapore limited liability company, pursuant to which we sold and issued (i) 150,000,000 Class A ordinary shares (equivalent to 500,000 ADSs) at a price of US$12 per ADS, (ii) two-year 3% per annum convertible promissory note at the purchase price of US$6 million with the conversion price of US$15 per ADS, and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 120,000,000 Class A ordinary shares (equivalent to 400,000 ADSs) at an exercise price of US$60 per ADS. The warrants would expire two years from the date of issuance. These securities were subject to a six-month lock up period. We raised a total of US$12 million as the aggregate consideration for the securities.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 12
The market price for our ADSs may be volatile.
We have been experiencing extreme price volatility. During the year 2023, the closing trade price of our ADSs ranged from US$3.55 to US$16.1 per ADS. Such extreme price volatility was probably attributable to our cryptocurrency mining business and the macro environment for the overall cryptocurrency industry. Due to such extreme price volatility, the risks exposure to and the possibilities of short squeeze also increased.
The market price for our ADSs is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors including the following:
- actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;- the market price of cryptocurrency;- the development of our cryptocurrency mining business;- changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;- price fluctuations of publicly traded securities of other PRC-based companies engaging in internet-related services or other similar businesses;- changes in the economic performance or market valuations of other internet companies;- announcements from us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;- fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the RMB;- addition or departure of key personnel; and - pending and potential litigation.
In addition, the securities market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our ADSs.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 13
Substantial future sales or the perception of sales of our ADSs or ordinary shares could adversely affect the price of our ADSs.
If our shareholders sell or are perceived by the market to sell substantial amounts of our ADSs, including those issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, in the public market, the market price of our ADSs could fall. Such sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate. If any existing shareholder or shareholders sell or are perceived by the market to sell a substantial amount of Class A ordinary shares, the prevailing market price for our ADSs could be adversely affected.
We may issue additional ordinary shares or ADSs for future acquisitions. If we pay for our future acquisitions in whole or in part with additionally issued ordinary shares or ADSs, your ownership interest in our company would be diluted and this, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our ADSs.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 14
There can be no assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company, which could subject United States holders of the ADSs or ordinary shares to significant adverse United States federal income tax consequences.
A non - U.S. corporation will be a "passive foreign investment company," or PFIC, for any taxable year if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for such year consists of certain types of passive income, or (2) at least 50% of the value of its assets (generally determined on the basis of a quarterly average) during such year is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. We must make a separate determination after the close of each taxable year as to whether we were a PFIC for that year.
Based on the market price of our ADSs and the nature and composition of our assets, although not free from doubt, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our taxable year ended December 31, 2023. Because the value of our assets for purposes of the PFIC test will generally be determined by reference to the market price of our ADSs or ordinary shares, our PFIC status will depend in part on the market price of the ADSs or ordinary shares, which may fluctuate significantly, and the composition of our assets and liabilities. In light of recent declines in the market price of our ADSs, our risk of becoming a PFIC has increased. The market price of our ADSs may continue to fluctuate considerably and, consequently, we cannot assure you of our PFIC status for any taxable year. Further, as previously disclosed, although not free from doubt, we believe that we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for prior years, including our taxable year ended December 31, 2021. In addition, it is possible that one or more of our subsidiaries were also PFICs for such years for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined in "Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-U.S. Federal Income Taxation") holds our ADSs or ordinary shares, such U.S. Holders will generally be subject to reporting requirements and may incur significantly increased U.S. income tax on gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the ADSs or ordinary shares and on the receipt of distributions on the ADSs or ordinary shares to the extent such gain or distribution is treated as an "excess distribution" under the U.S. federal income tax rules. Further, a U.S. Holder will generally be treated as holding an equity interest in a PFIC in the first taxable year of the U.S. Holder's holding period in which we become classified as a PFIC and in subsequent taxable years even if we cease to be a PFIC in subsequent taxable years. See "Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-U.S. Federal Income Taxation-Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules."
You are strongly urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the impact of our being a PFIC in any taxable year on your investment in our ADSs and ordinary shares as well as the application of the PFIC rules.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 15
ADS holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.
The deposit agreement governing the ADSs provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, ADS holders waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to our shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws.
If we or the depositary opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before investing in the ADSs.
If you or any other ADS holders bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, you may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and / or the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against us and/or the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiffs in any such action.
Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial.
No provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs serves as a waiver of any ADS holder or us or the depositary of compliance with any substantive provision of the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 16
You may not receive distributions on ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to you.
The depositary of our ADSs has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on ordinary shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. We have no obligation to register ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or other securities under U.S. securities laws. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of ADSs. This means that you may not receive the distribution we make on our ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you. These restrictions may have a material adverse effect on the value of your ADSs.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 17
The PCAOB may be unable to inspect or investigate completely our auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements. If the PCAOB is unable to conduct such inspection, our investors would be deprived of the benefits of such inspection.
Our auditor, the independent registered public accounting firm that issue the audit report included elsewhere in this annual report, as auditor of companies with securities that are traded publicly in the United States and firms registered with the PCAOB, are subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess their compliance with the applicable professional standards. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong in the past has made it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of these auditors' audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong that are subject to the PCAOB inspections. Our independent registered public accounting firm, RBSM LLP, or RBSM, is headquartered in New York, New York, and has been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis. The PCAOB currently has access to inspect the working papers of our auditor. Our auditor is not headquartered in the Chinese mainland or Hong Kong and was not identified as a firm subject to the PCAOB determinations announced on December 16, 2021 and as of the filing date of this annual report. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB issued a report that vacated its December 16, 2021 determination and removed the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. However, if the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong, and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we and investors in the ADSs would be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections again, which could cause investors and potential investors in the ADSs to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 18
The principal shareholders of the variable interest entity have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may adversely affect our business.
Qi Wang and Wei Ji, two of our employees, are the principal shareholders of Shanghai IT, the variable interest entity. Thus, there may be conflicts of interest between their respective duties to our company as employees and their respective shareholder interests in the variable interest entity. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise, these persons will act in our best interests or that conflicts of interests will be resolved in our favor. These persons could violate their legal duties, including duties under their non-competition or employment agreements with us, by engaging in activities that are not in the best interest in our company, such as diverting business opportunities from us. In any such event, we would have to rely on the PRC legal system to enforce these agreements. Any legal proceeding could result in the disruption of our business, diversion of our resources and the incurrence of substantial costs. See "-Risks Related to Doing Business in China-Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us."
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 19
It is uncertain whether certain cryptocurrencies fall within the definition of a "security" under the U.S. federal, state or foreign securities laws. If one of the cryptocurrencies that we possess are deemed to be a security under any U.S. federal or state or foreign jurisdiction, or in a proceeding in a court of law or otherwise, it may have adverse consequences for such cryptocurrency, and we could be subject to legal or regulatory action.
The SEC and its staff, as well as U.S. state securities regulators, have taken the position that certain cryptocurrencies fall within the definition of a "security" under the U.S. federal and state securities laws. U.S. Supreme Court case law and the SEC staff have indicated that the determination as to whether a cryptocurrency is a security or not depends on the characteristics and use of that particular asset. A non-exhaustive list of cryptocurrencies declared as securities by the SEC includes FTX Token, Algorand, Filecoin, BNB and Binance USD. A number of enforcement actions and regulatory proceedings have since been initiated against crypto assets and crypto asset products and their developers and proponents, as well as against trading platforms that support crypto assets. It is possible that a change in the governing administration or the appointment of new SEC commissioners could substantially impact the views of the SEC and its staff. Similarly, though the SEC's Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology published a framework for analyzing whether any given cryptocurrency is a security in April 2019, this framework is also not a rule, regulation or statement of the SEC and is not binding on the SEC. In addition, several foreign governments have also issued similar warnings cautioning that crypto assets may be deemed to be securities under the laws of their jurisdictions.
With respect to Ethereum, proof-of-stake mechanism might have brought Ethereum closer to a "security" because its interest payouts require little work and rhyme with the Howey test's "expectation of profit." In a lawsuit filed against Seychelles-based crypto-exchange KuCoin in March 2023, it was argued that by shifting to proof-of-stake, Ethereum no longer relies upon competition between computers, but instead now relies on a pooling method that incentivizes users to own and stake Ethereum; and that the shift to proof-of-stake significantly impacted the core functionality and incentives for owning Ethereum, because Ethereum holders now can profit merely by participating in staking.
Our risk-based assessments about whether certain cryptocurrencies are securities are not legal determinations. The classification of a cryptocurrency as a security under applicable law has wide-ranging implications for the regulatory obligations that flow from the offer, sale, trading, and clearing of such assets. For example, a cryptocurrency that is a security in the United States may generally only be offered or sold in the United States pursuant to a registration statement filed with the SEC or in an offering that qualifies for an exemption from registration. Persons that effect transactions in cryptocurrencies that are securities in the United States may be subject to registration with the SEC as a "broker" or "dealer." Platforms that bring together purchasers and sellers to trade cryptocurrencies that are securities in the United States are generally subject to registration as national securities exchanges, or must qualify for an exemption, such as by being operated by a registered broker-dealer as an alternative trading system. Persons facilitating clearing and settlement of securities may be subject to registration with the SEC as a clearing agency.
To the extent that the SEC or a court determines that any cryptocurrency supported by a trading platform is a security, that determination could prevent the platform from continuing to facilitate the trading of that cryptocurrency. It could also result in regulatory enforcement penalties and financial losses to the platform if it was determined to have liability to its customers and thus had to compensate them for any losses or damages. Such a platform could also be subject to judicial or administrative sanctions for failing to offer or sell the cryptocurrency in compliance with securities registration requirements, or for acting as a securities broker or dealer without appropriate registration. Such an action could result in injunctions and cease and desist orders, as well as civil monetary penalties, fines, and disgorgement, criminal liability, and reputational harm. Customers that traded those cryptocurrencies and suffered trading losses might also seek to rescind the transactions facilitated by the platform on the basis that such trades were conducted in violation of applicable law, which could subject the trading platform operator to significant liability and losses.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 20
If we acquire digital securities, even unintentionally, we may violate the Investment Company Act of 1940 and incur potential third-party liabilities.
We intend to comply with the 1940 Act in all respects. To that end, if holdings of cryptocurrencies are determined to constitute investment securities of a kind that subject us to registration and reporting under the 1940 Act, the volatility in digital asset markets may make it difficult to maintain a portfolio consisting of no more than 40% of digital assets that are securities or could result in sales of digital assets to avoid exceeding this threshold, including at times that may not be opportune. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act defines "investment company" to mean any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer's total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Section 3(a)(2) of the 1940 Act defines "investment securities" to include all securities except (A) Government securities, (B) securities issued by employees' securities companies, and (C) securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries which (i) are not investment companies and (ii) are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company in section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. As noted above, the SEC has not stated whether Bitcoin and cryptocurrency is an investment security, as defined in the 1940 Act.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 21
Changed
We may continue to face the legal risks arising from our non-fungible tokens or NFTs.
In late 2021, we formally stepped into the NFT business. In 2023, we sold NFTSTAR Singapore pte. Ltd. and its subsidiaries to an unrelated third party. We no longer operate an NFT business. However, we may still be subject to risks arising from our previous NFT operations. For example, we entered into license agreements with international sports stars, pursuant to which they had granted us licenses to use their likeness for production of NFTs. The terms of the license agreements are generally two to three years. Even though we sold the NFT business to an unrelated third party, we could not foresee whether these licensors would still attempt to claim any unpaid amount from us by relying on the dispute resolution clauses provided by the license agreements.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 22
Changed
Further questions may hinge on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the creation, promotion and sale of NFTs as to whether they might be classified as securities.
Under the Howey test, an asset constitutes an investment contract, and thus qualify as a security, when it represents a transaction involving (1) an investment of money, (2) in a common enterprise, (3) where profits are reasonably expected to be derived from the managerial or entrepreneurial efforts of others. An asset may fall outside the investment contract definition when it is acquired primarily for personal use rather than passive investment. Where the profits sought by purchasers are based on their own efforts or market forces of supply and demand, the Howey test may not be satisfied.
There are strong grounds to conclude the NFTs are not considered investment contracts under Howey, as each NFT is a unique, one-of-a-kind digital asset, there is arguably no common enterprise involved in the NFT's purchase or sale. Further, many purchasers of NFTs buy them because of their consumptive value, that is, the buyers enjoy owning them in their own right, not because of any potential profit that ownership might bring. Even though some buyers of NFTs may seek to profit based on the possibility that they appreciate in value in the future, such value appreciation is likely to be more closely tied to its rarity and market forces than any ongoing managerial or entrepreneurial efforts of the sellers.
Nevertheless, courts have held that the manner in which the underlying asset is promoted to purchasers may give rise to an investment contract under Howey if they create a reasonable expectation of profits based on the managerial efforts of others. The concern here is that such marketing could transform a non-security into a security, such as that in Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., in which a secondary market for the instruments was touted. Central to determining whether a security is being sold is how it is being sold and the reasonable expectations of purchasers. For example, when someone buys a housing unit to live in, it is probably not a security, but under certain circumstances, the same asset can be offered and sold in a way that causes investors to have a reasonable expectation of profits based on the efforts of others. If the housing unit is offered with a management contract or other services, it can be a security. Similarly, when a certificate of deposit, exempt from being treated as a security under Section 3 of the Securities Act, is sold as a part of a program organized by a broker who offers retail investors promises of liquidity and the potential to profit from changes in interest rates, Gary Plastic holds that the instrument can be part of an investment contract that is a security.
We do not think NFTs produced by NFTSTAR are securities as they constitute art or collectibles with the consumptive value and they are finished products whose value is determined at a sale that is made directly to a buyer. We targeted consumers who are fans of sport stars and enjoy owning piece of their likeness. Historically, our NFTs were not marketed to reward holders with appreciation, profit, or dividends. Our NFTs, here, were more resembling sports cards than investment product. NFTSTAR was not an agent for the sports stars and did not extend any managerial efforts that would enhance popularity of any star and hence the value of their NFTs. Moreover, our sales proceeds were not funds which are raised with the expectation that we would build system and that investors can earn a return on the instrument.
There are, however, substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current or future laws and regulations in the field of cryptocurrency. If we are deemed to engage in, or facilitate, transactions in unregistered securities, it could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of our ADSs, significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors, or cause the value of such securities to significantly decline.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights - Risk 23
Changed
There is no public market for the warrants we offered and we do not expect one to develop.
There is presently no established public trading market for the warrants we offered and we do not expect a market to develop. In addition, we do not intend to apply to list the warrants or on any securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system, including the Nasdaq. Without an active market, the liquidity of the warrants will be limited.
Accounting & Financial Operations5 | 4.1%
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 1
Changed
Material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting has been identified, and if we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and the trading price of our ADSs.
We are subject to reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management in its annual report that contains management's assessment of the effectiveness of a company's disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting.
In preparing our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, we and our independent registered public accounting firms identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with the standards established by the PCAOB. As defined in the standards established by the PCAOB, a "material weakness" is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the material weaknesses identified were that (a) we failed to maintain and implement controls over our period-end closing and financial reporting process in a timely manner, and (b) we lacked accounting personnel with knowledge of U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting requirements, which resulted in a number of adjustments detected and or proposed by our auditor. We also noted the following deficiencies that we believe to be significant deficiencies. As defined in standards established by the PCAOB, a "significant deficiency" is deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the significant deficiency identified were that (a) certain of the intercompany balances in each respective entities are not reconciled and some intercompany adjustments are made as topside entries and most are carried over from prior years without identifying which entities were pertaining to and from, and the explanations for these adjustments were not documented clearly, and (b) certain supporting documents for the mining pool are not obtained timely. To remedy our identified material weakness and significant deficiency, we will prepare the period-end closing and financial reporting process earlier to ensure we have sufficient time on these. We will also strengthen our accounting personnel's knowledge by training or additional hiring. We will improve on the reconciliation of intercompany balances by minimizing unnecessary intercompany transactions. In additional, we will improve our communication with our mining pool partner to ensure supporting documents can be obtained earlier.
In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, we and our independent registered public accounting firms identified significant deficiency as of December 31, 2022, in accordance with the standards established by the PCAOB. As defined in standards established by the PCAOB, a "significant deficiency" is deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the significant deficiency identified related to the untimely period-end closing of our subsidiaries abroad. In response, we strengthened the management and financial personnel of our subsidiaries. We also improved our reporting process from subsidiary level to group consolidation level.
In preparing our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, we and our independent registered public accounting firms identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with the standards established by the PCAOB. As defined in the standards established by the PCAOB, a "material weakness" is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the material weaknesses identified were that (a) we failed to maintain and implement controls over our period-end closing and financial reporting process in a timely manner, and (b) we lacked accounting personnel with knowledge of U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting requirements, which resulted in a number of adjustments detected and or proposed by our auditor. We took improvement measures and we believe our internal control over financial reporting was improved.
In documenting our internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, we may identify other weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, our management and, if applicable, our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a decline in the trading price of our ADSs. Ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the Nasdaq, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods. Furthermore, we have incurred and anticipate that we will continue to incur considerable costs and use significant management time and other resources in an effort to comply with Section 404 and other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 2
To the extent that the profit margins of digital asset mining operations are not high, operators of digital asset mining operations are more likely to immediately sell their digital assets earned by mining in the digital asset exchange market, resulting in a reduction in the price of digital assets that could adversely impact an investment in us.
Over the past six years, digital asset mining operations have evolved from individual users mining with computer processors, graphics processing units and first-generation servers. Currently, new processing power brought onto the digital asset networks is predominantly added by incorporated and unincorporated "professionalized" mining operations. Professionalized mining operations may use proprietary hardware or sophisticated machines. They require the investment of significant capital for the acquisition of this hardware, the leasing of operating space (often in data centers or warehousing facilities), incurring of electricity costs and the employment of technicians to operate the mining farms. As a result, professionalized mining operations are of a greater scale than prior miners and have more defined, regular expenses and liabilities. These regular expenses and liabilities require professionalized mining operations to more immediately sell digital assets earned from mining operations on the digital asset exchange market, whereas it is believed that individual miners in past years were more likely to hold newly mined digital assets for more extended periods. The immediate selling of newly mined digital assets greatly increases the supply of digital assets on the digital asset exchange market, creating downward pressure on the price of each digital asset.
The extent to which the value of digital assets mined by a professionalized mining operation exceeds the allocable capital and operating costs determines the profit margin of such operation. A professionalized mining operation may be more likely to sell a higher percentage of its newly mined digital assets rapidly if it is operating at a low profit margin-and it may partially or completely cease operations if its profit margin is negative. In a low profit margin environment, a higher percentage could be sold into the digital asset exchange market more rapidly, thereby potentially reducing digital asset prices. Lower digital asset prices could result in further tightening of profit margins, particularly for professionalized mining operations with higher costs and more limited capital reserves, creating a network effect that may further reduce the price of digital assets until mining operations with higher operating costs become unprofitable and remove mining power from the respective digital asset network. The network effect of reduced profit margins resulting in greater sales of newly mined digital assets could result in a reduction in the price of digital assets that could adversely impact an investment in us.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 3
Changed
We may incur losses, negative cash flows from operating activities and negative working capital position in the future.
We recorded net loss of RMB416.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and net loss of RMB979.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. We recorded net income of RMB12.6 million (US$1.8 million) for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to a one-time non-cash gain on debt relief from the refund plan arising out of non-renewal of the license on World of Warcraft, or WoW, and a rebound in Bitcoin prices. Our product development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses may increase in the future as we continue to explore various opportunities of new product and services development and business expansion in order to grow our revenues. Our ability to achieve profitability depends on our ability to improve operational efficiency, control costs and provide new products and services to meet market demand and attract new customers. Due to the numerous risks and uncertainties arising from our business, we may not be able to achieve profitability in the short-term or long-term.
We generated negative operating cash flows of RMB704.3 million, RMB154.0 million and RMB46.3 million (US$6.5 million) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of RMB58.1 million and RMB45.2 million (US$6.4 million), respectively. As of December 31, 2022, we had a negative working capital of RMB166.5 million. However, as of December 31, 2023, we had a positive working capital of RMB60.0 million (US$8.4 million). Our negative working capital position as of December 31, 2022 was primarily due to continuous cash outflow in connection with our product development and sales and marketing activities. Our positive working capital position as of December 31, 2023 was primarily due to operating activities of cryptocurrency mining. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-A. Operating Results-Results of Operations." We cannot assure you that our liquidity position will continue to improve in the future. We may incur losses, negative cash flows from operating activities and negative working capital position in the future, which may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
We had an accumulated deficit of approximately RMB4,356.8 million (US$613.6 million) as of December 31, 2023. We generated negative cash flow from operating activities. If we are unable to achieve profitability or raise sufficient capital to cover our capital needs, we may not continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that we can obtain additional financing. Our ability to obtain additional financing is subject to a number of factors, which may be beyond our control. See "-We may not be able to obtain additional financing to support our business and operations, and our equity or debt financings may have an adverse effect on our business operations and share price."
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 4
Our operating results may fluctuate due to various factors, and therefore may not be indicative of our future results.
Our operating results have experienced fluctuations from time to time and will likely continue to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations in operating results depend on a variety of factors, including cryptocurrency price fluctuations, mining difficulty, market sentiment in the cryptocurrency space, the expiration or termination of our remaining game licenses, and acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries.
To a significant degree, our operating expenses are based on planned expenditures and our expectations regarding prospective customer usage. Failure to meet our expectations could disproportionately and adversely affect our operating results in any given period. As a result, our historical operating results may not necessarily be indicative of our future results.
Accounting & Financial Operations - Risk 5
Because we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you must rely on a price appreciation of our ADSs for return on your investment.
We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in our ADSs as a source for any future dividend income.
Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain requirements of Cayman Islands law. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our directors. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either profit or share premium account, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in us being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, we receive from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in our ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of our ADSs. There is no guarantee that our ADSs will appreciate in value in the future or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in our ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in our ADSs.
Debt & Financing4 | 3.3%
Debt & Financing - Risk 1
Digital Asset transactions are irrevocable and stolen or incorrectly transferred digital assets may be irretrievable. As a result, any incorrectly executed digital asset transactions could adversely affect an investment in us.
Digital asset transactions are not, from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active participation of the recipient of the transaction or, in theory, control or consent of a majority of the processing power on the respective digital asset network. Once a transaction has been verified and recorded in a block that is added to the blockchain, an incorrect transfer of digital assets or a theft of digital assets generally will not be reversible, and we may not be capable of seeking compensation for any such transfer or theft. Although our transfers of digital assets will regularly be made to or from vendors, consultants, services providers, among others, it is possible that, through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, our digital assets could be transferred from us in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized third parties. To the extent that we are unable to seek a corrective transaction with such third party or are incapable of identifying the third party which has received our digital assets through error or theft, we will be unable to revert or otherwise recover incorrectly transferred Company digital assets. To the extent that we are unable to seek redress for such error or theft, such loss could adversely affect an investment in us.
Debt & Financing - Risk 2
Added
The SEC's determination that Filecoin or any other cryptocurrency is a "security" may adversely affect the value of such cryptocurrency and could therefore adversely affect our business, prospects or operations.
Depending on its characteristics, a cryptocurrency may be considered a "security" under the federal securities laws. The test for determining whether a particular cryptocurrency is a "security" is complex and difficult to apply, and the outcome is difficult to predict. Whether a cryptocurrency is a security under the federal securities laws depends on whether it is included in the lists of instruments making up the definition of "security" in the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, and the Investment Company Act. Cryptocurrencies as such do not appear in any of these lists, although each list includes the terms "investment contract" and "note," and the SEC has typically analyzed whether a particular cryptocurrency is a security by reference to whether it meets the tests developed by the federal courts interpreting these terms, known as the Howey and Reves tests, respectively. For many cryptocurrencies, whether or not the Howey or Reves tests are met is difficult to resolve definitively, and substantial legal arguments can often be made both in favor of and against a particular digital asset qualifying as a security under one or both of the Howey and Reves tests. Adding to the complexity, the SEC staff has indicated that the security status of a particular digital asset can change over time as the facts evolve.
Current and future legislation and SEC-rulemaking and other regulatory developments, including interpretations released by a regulatory authority, may impact the manner in which cryptocurrencies are viewed or treated for classification and clearing purposes. In particular, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies may not be excluded from the definition of "security" by SEC rulemaking or interpretation requiring registration of all transactions unless another exemption is available, including transacting in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies among owners and requiring registration of trading platforms as "exchanges." Accordingly, a given cryptocurrency may currently be a security based on the facts as they exist today, or may in the future be found by the SEC or a federal court to be a security under the federal securities laws.
The SEC is of the view that Filecoin meets the definition of a security under the U.S. federal securities laws. We generate Filecoin mining revenues through provision of computing storage space to the main networks. Unlike our Bitcoin mining business, we rely on a Filecoin mining company to manage Filecoin mining instead of managing it by ourselves. We cannot control the timing and quantity of Filecoin to be received and earned. Accordingly, we only record Filecoin mining revenues when we actually receive the Filecoin in our cryptocurrency wallet. As of December 31, 2022 and 2023, we had recognized RMB0.8 million and RMB1.5 million (US$0.2 million). To date, we have generated minimal revenues from our mining of Filecoin. Still, the SEC's determination that Filecoin is security could result in interruptions to our business. For example, if we were deemed an ‘investment company' under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, we would be required to meet burdensome compliance requirements and register as an investment company. Investment company registration is time consuming and would require a restructuring of our business. Moreover, the operation of an investment company is very costly and restrictive, as investment companies are subject to substantial regulation concerning management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons and portfolio composition, and the Investment Company Act filing requirements. The cost of such compliance would result in us incurring substantial additional expenses, and the failure to register if required would have a materially adverse impact on its operations.
Debt & Financing - Risk 3
We may not be able to obtain additional financing to support our business and operations, and our equity or debt financings may have an adverse effect on our business operations and share price.
We may continue to experience a material decrease in our cash and cash equivalents balance. We will require additional cash resources to fund our working capital and expenditure needs, such as acquisition costs of cryptocurrency mining machines, electricity expenses, product developments expenses, payment of license fees and royalties, sales and marketing activities, and investment or acquisition transactions.
Furthermore, we expect to continue to increase our global hash rate of Bitcoin, we expect to further invest into Bitcoin mining machines in order to achieve our business goal. If our internal financial resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek additional financing through the issuance of equity securities or through debt financing, such as borrowings from commercial banks or other financial institutions or lenders. However, we cannot assure you that such efforts may succeed. For example, in July 2019, we entered into a convertible note purchase agreement with Jupiter Excel Limited, or Jupiter Excel, pursuant to which we agreed to sell and Jupiter Excel agreed to purchase 12% convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of US$30 million. The closing of the transaction was subject to certain closing conditions. Due to unfavorable market conditions and failure to satisfy the closing conditions, the proposed convertible notes transaction was not closed and the convertible note purchase agreement was terminated in March 2020.
To meet our anticipated working capital needs, we are considering multiple alternatives. See "Item 5. Operating And Financial Review And Prospects-B. Liquidity and Capital Resources-Cash Flows and Working Capital." There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete any such transaction on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain the necessary capital, we may need to seek to be acquired by another entity or cease operations. Meanwhile, any equity or debt financing may result in dilution to our existing shareholders' interests or an increase in our debt service obligations. We have entered into several equity and debt financing transactions that have such dilutive effect in the past few years and may continue to enter into such transactions from time to time. For details of our material equity and debt financing transactions, see "Item 4. Information on the Company-A. History and Development of the Company" and "Item 5. Operating And Financial Review And Prospects-B. Liquidity and Capital Resources-Cash Flows and Working Capital."
Our ability to make scheduled principal or interest payments or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations. Incurrence of additional indebtedness could also result in operating and financing covenants restricting our business operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that any such future financing will be available to us in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we fail to obtain sufficient financing to fund our capital needs, our business, financial condition and results or operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Debt & Financing - Risk 4
Changed
We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our Chinese mainland subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Although currently substantially all of our revenue is generated from our subsidiaries outside of the Chinese mainland, any limitation on the ability of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.
We are a holding company, and we may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our Chinese mainland subsidiaries for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders and service any debt we may incur. After the middle of 2021, substantially all of our revenue is generated from our subsidiaries outside of the Chinese mainland. However, any limitation on the ability of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries to make payments to us may still have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business. If our Chinese mainland subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require our Chinese mainland subsidiaries to adjust their taxable income under the contractual arrangements they currently have in place with the consolidated variable interest entity in a manner that would materially and adversely affect their ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us. See "-Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure-Our contractual arrangements with the variable interest entity may result in adverse tax consequences to us."
Under laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, as wholly foreign-owned enterprises in the Chinese mainland, may pay dividends only out of their respective accumulated after-tax profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such funds reaches 50% of its registered capital. At its discretion, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise may allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. These reserve funds and staff welfare and bonus funds are not distributable as cash dividends.
Any limitation on the ability of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.
Corporate Activity and Growth4 | 3.3%
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 1
Changed
We may not be able to pursue growth through strategic acquisitions in the Chinese mainland due to complicated procedures under PRC laws and regulations for foreign investors to acquire companies in the Chinese mainland.
In recent years, certain laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland have established procedures and requirements that are expected to make merger and acquisition activities in the Chinese mainland by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex. These laws and regulations include, without limitation, the Rules on the Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, and the Anti-Monopoly Law and the MOFCOM Security Review Rules. In some instances, the Ministry of Commerce needs to be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a domestic enterprise in the Chinese mainland. The approval by the Ministry of Commerce may also need to be obtained in circumstances where overseas companies established or controlled by enterprises or residents in the Chinese mainland acquire affiliated domestic companies. Laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland also require certain merger and acquisition transactions to be subject to merger control review or security review. The MOFCOM Security Review Rules, effective from September 1, 2011, provide that, when deciding whether a specific merger or acquisition of a domestic enterprise by foreign investors shall be subject to the security review by the Ministry of Commerce, the principle of substance over form shall be applied. In particular, foreign investors are prohibited from bypassing the security review requirement by structuring transactions through proxies, trusts, indirect investments, leases, loans, control through contractual arrangements or offshore transactions.
If the business of any target company that we expect to acquire becomes subject to the security review, we may not be able to successfully complete the acquisition of such company, either by equity or asset acquisition, capital contribution or through any contractual arrangement. Complying with the requirements of the laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland to complete acquisition transactions could become more time-consuming and complex. Any required approval, such as approval by the Ministry of Commerce, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to grow our business or increase our market share. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether the M&A Rules, security review rules or the other regulations of the Chinese mainland regarding the acquisitions of companies in the Chinese mainland by foreign investors will be amended when the Foreign Investment Law becomes effective in the future.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 2
We have been transitioning our business focus and our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Historically, we primarily operated and developed proprietary and licensed online games. We previously made significant investment in developing our own proprietary games as well as offering games licensed from game licensors. As most of our game licenses have already expired or terminated and we may not continue allocating major resources in game development or negotiate to regain any licenses, we do not believe that our past investment into and devotion to game development will contribute to our financial performance in the future.
In 2019, we attempted to transition our business focus to electric vehicles and we expected to develop our electric vehicles business through a proposed joint venture with Faraday&Future Inc., or F&F. The electric vehicles business did not develop as we anticipated.
In early 2021, we decided to launch a cryptocurrency mining business and started to devote resources and establish collaborative relationships with industry participants to develop our cryptocurrency mining business. We began cryptocurrency mining activities in February 2021 and the operation of an NFT platform, NFTSTAR, in late 2021. In January 2023, we ceased operations of the NFT business and its related blockchain-based online game, MetaGoal. The decision to cease operations of the NFT business was primarily a result of unfavorable financial performance. We sold NFTSTAR Singapore pte. Ltd. and its subsidiaries to an unrelated third party in 2023 and we no longer operate an NFT business.
Our efforts in developing our cryptocurrency mining business may not succeed and we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to cover our investment and become profitable. During this process, our results of operations and financial condition may not improve in a timely manner, or at all. Given the substantial uncertainties regarding the prospects of the cryptocurrency mining business, there can be no assurance that we will not change our business focus again in the future. We may continue to explore other business opportunities. However, we cannot assure you that we will successfully transition our business focus and it is possible that we remain in such status for a certain period of time. During such period, our revenue may be very limited and we may continue to experience material and adverse effect to our results of operations, financial condition and business prospects.
Since the beginning of 2024, we have been gradually stepping into the AI industry. We entered into a few strategic alliances with multiple business partners.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 3
Changed
There can be no assurance that the market for digital assets will be developed and sustained, which may materially adversely affect our business operations.
The market for digital assets is still nascent. Accordingly, the market for digital assets may not develop, of if a market does develop, such value be maintained. If no market develops for digital assets in the future, it may be difficult or impossible for us to develop and maintain a platform where our users can trade, purchase and sell digital assets. If we could not receive transaction fees from secondary market due to these users being unable to trade, purchase and sell digital assets, our business operations and financial performance may be negatively affected.
Corporate Activity and Growth - Risk 4
Our equity investments or establishment of joint ventures and any material disputes with our investment or joint venture partners may have an adverse effect on our financial results, business prospects and our ability to manage our business.
From time to time, subject to the availability of the necessary financial resources, we make equity investments into selected targets, such as mining data center developers, online game developers, operators or application platforms, or establish joint venture with business partners, to seek business growth opportunities. For example, in March 2019, we entered into a joint venture agreement with F&F. The immediate objective of this joint venture was to exclusively manufacture and distribute certain electric car model designed and developed by F&F in China. The electric vehicles business did not develop as we anticipated. In addition, in May 2019, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Shenzhen EN-plus Technologies Co., Ltd., or EN+, to establish a joint venture to engage in sales of electric vehicle charging equipment, investment, construction and operation of charging stations, and provision of operational services relating to charging equipment and platforms for electric vehicles. Currently, we do not expect to pursue such joint venture opportunity with EN+.
We may have limited power to direct or otherwise participate in the management of operations and strategies of the companies in which we invest or the joint ventures we establish. The diversion of our management's attention away from our business and any difficulties encountered in managing our interests in the respective investees or joint ventures could have an adverse effect on our ability to manage our business. Any material disputes with our investment or joint venture partners and existing shareholders may also require us to allocate significant corporate and other resources.
Our investments may also be subject to market conditions and therefore are uncertain whether our resources and expenses devoted are able to be converted into revenue. In addition, we may not recover our equity investments if the companies in which we invest do not perform well and equity investments could result in the incurrence of operating or impairment losses, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Legal & Regulatory
Total Risks: 35/123 (28%)Above Sector Average
Regulation24 | 19.5%
Regulation - Risk 1
It may be illegal now, or in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell or use digital assets in one or more countries, and ownership of, holding or trading in our securities may also be considered illegal and subject to sanction.
Although currently digital assets are not regulated or are lightly regulated in most countries, including the United States. In September 2021, PRC authorities issued the new regulations which made it clear that virtual currencies do not have the same legal status as legal currency, and virtual currency-related activities are illegal financial activities, strictly prohibiting new virtual currency mining projects, and accelerating the orderly withdrawal of the stock of projects. Provision of services by overseas virtual currency exchanges to mainland China residents via the internet is also considered to be an illegal financial activity. Subject to the new regulations, it is forbidden to invest in incremental projects and to develop virtual currency mining projects in any name. The virtual currency mining activities have been treated as the eliminated industry, and listed as the eliminated industries into Catalogue for Guiding Industry Restructuring (2019 version). One or more countries may take regulatory actions in the future that severely restricts the right to acquire, own, hold, sell or use digital assets or to exchange digital assets for fiat currency. Such an action may also result in the restriction of ownership, holding or trading in our securities. Such restrictions may adversely affect an investment in us.
Regulation - Risk 2
Our Chinese mainland subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on paying dividends or making other payments.
We may rely on dividends paid by our Chinese mainland subsidiaries to fund our operations, such as paying dividends to our shareholders or meeting obligations under any indebtedness we or our overseas subsidiaries incurred. Current regulations of the Chinese mainland restrict our Chinese mainland subsidiaries from paying dividends in the following two principal aspects: (i) our Chinese mainland subsidiaries are only permitted to pay dividends out of their respective after-tax profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations, and (ii) these entities are required to allocate at least 10% of their respective after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund statutory reserve funds until the cumulative total of the allocated reserves reaches 50% of registered capital, and a portion of their respective after-tax profits to their staff welfare and bonus reserve funds as determined by their respective boards of directors or shareholders. These reserves are not distributable as dividends. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Government Regulations." Further, if these entities incur debt on their behalf in the future, the instruments governing such debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments. Our inability to receive dividends or other payments from our Chinese mainland subsidiaries may adversely affect our ability to continue to grow our business and make cash or other distributions to the holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs. In addition, failure to comply with SAFE regulations may restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to make dividend payments to us. See "-Risks Related to Doing Business in China-Regulations of the Chinese mainland relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by residents of the Chinese mainland may subject our resident shareholders of the Chinese mainland or us to penalties and fines, and limit our ability to inject capital into our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, limit our subsidiaries' ability to increase their registered capital, distribute profits to us, or otherwise adversely affect us."
Regulation - Risk 3
It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigation or collect evidence within China.
According to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, or Article 177, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the Chinese mainland. While detailed interpretation of or implementation rules under Article 177 have yet to be promulgated, the inability for an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within China may further increase difficulties faced by you in protecting your interests. See also "-General Risks Related to Our Shares, ADSs and Warrants-You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law" for risks arising from investing in us as a Cayman Islands company.
Regulation - Risk 4
Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us.
We conduct our business primarily through our subsidiaries, and we have gradually and significantly reduced our business operation through the variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland. Our Chinese mainland subsidiaries are generally subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in the Chinese mainland and, in particular, laws applicable to wholly-foreign-owned enterprises. We entered into a series of contractual arrangements with the variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland to conduct business operations. Almost all of the agreements under those contractual arrangements are governed by laws of the Chinese mainland and disputes arising out of these agreements are expected to be decided by arbitration in the Chinese mainland. The legal system of the Chinese mainland is based on written statutes. Prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. Legislation and regulations of the Chinese mainland have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in the Chinese mainland for the past decades. Despite the lack of legal majority ownership, we are able to direct the activities of and derive economic benefits from the consolidated variable interest entity and therefore our Cayman Island holding company is considered the primary beneficiary of the consolidated variable interest entity for accounting purposes and consolidates the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries as required by Accounting Standards Codification topic 810, Consolidation. Accordingly, we treat the consolidated variable interest entity as a consolidated entity under U.S. GAAP and we consolidate the financial results of the consolidated variable interest entity in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Neither The9 Limited nor its investors have an equity ownership in, direct foreign investment in, or control through such ownership or investment of, the consolidated variable interest entity, and the contractual arrangements are not equivalent to an equity ownership in the business of the consolidated variable interest entity.
From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. Any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce the contracts we have entered into and could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based, in part, on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published in a timely manner, or at all, but which may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not always be aware of any potential violation of these policies and rules. Such unpredictability towards our contractual, property and procedural rights could adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.
PRC government has significant oversight over the conduct of our business and it has indicated an intent to exert more oversight over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers in recent years. Any such action could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.
Regulation - Risk 5
Our current corporate structure and business operations may be affected by the Foreign Investment Law.
On March 15, 2019, the National People's Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which took effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the existing laws regulating foreign investment in the Chinese mainland, namely, the Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Law, the Sino-Foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Law and the Wholly Foreign-owned Enterprise Law, or Existing FIE Laws, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected regulatory trend in the Chinese mainland to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Government Regulations-Regulations on Foreign Investment."
Uncertainties still exist in relation to interpretation and implementation of the Foreign Investment Law, especially with respect to, including, among other things, the nature of variable interest entity contractual arrangements and specific rules regulating the organization form of foreign-invested enterprises within the five-year transition period. While the Foreign Investment Law does not define contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment explicitly, we cannot assure you that future laws and regulations will not provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. Therefore, there can be no assurance that our business operations conducted through contractual arrangements with the consolidated variable interest entity will not be deemed as foreign investment in the future. Despite the lack of legal majority ownership, we are able to direct the activities of and derive economic benefits from the consolidated variable interest entity and therefore our Cayman Island holding company is considered the primary beneficiary of the consolidated variable interest entity for accounting purposes and consolidates the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries as required by Accounting Standards Codification topic 810, Consolidation. Accordingly, we treat the consolidated variable interest entity as a consolidated entity under U.S. GAAP and we consolidate the financial results of the consolidated variable interest entity in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Neither The9 Limited nor its investors have an equity ownership in, direct foreign investment in, or control through such ownership or investment of, the consolidated variable interest entity, and the contractual arrangements are not equivalent to an equity ownership in the business of the consolidated variable interest entity. The Special Administrative Measures on Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (Edition 2020), or the 2020 Negative List, was jointly issued by the Ministry of Commerce, and the National Development and Reform Commission, on June 23, 2020, which took effect on July 23, 2020, and the Special Administrative Measures on Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (Edition 2021), or the 2021 Negative List, was jointly issued by the Ministry of Commerce, and the National Development and Reform Commission, on December 27, 2021, which took effect on January 1, 2022. The 2020 Negative List and the 2021 Negative List stipulate the special administrative measures on access of foreign investment. Industries not listed in the 2020 Negative List and the 2021 Negative List are generally deemed as falling into categories of "encouraged" or "permitted" unless specifically restricted by other laws of the Chinese mainland. Our current business operations in the Chinese mainland falls in the "prohibited" industry for foreign investment. However, even though the Foreign Investment Law does not define contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment explicitly, there can be no assurance that our contractual arrangements will be valid and legal at all times. In the event that any possible implementing regulations of the Foreign Investment Law, any other future laws, administrative regulations or provisions deem contractual arrangements as a way of foreign investment, our contractual arrangements may be deemed as invalid and illegal, we may be required to unwind the variable interest entity contractual arrangements and/or dispose of any affected business. Also, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions mandate further actions to be taken with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Furthermore, under the Foreign Investment Law, foreign investors or the foreign investment enterprise should be imposed legal liabilities for failing to report investment information in accordance with the requirements. In addition, the Foreign Investment Law provides that foreign invested enterprises established according to the existing laws regulating foreign investment may maintain their structure and corporate governance within a five-year transition period, which means that we may be required to adjust the structure and corporate governance of certain of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries in such transition period. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.
Regulation - Risk 6
The PRC government's significant oversight and discretion over our business operation could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of our ADSs.
We conduct our business globally through our subsidiaries in the U.S., Kazakhstan, Hong Kong and Singapore, and we have significantly reduced our business operation through the variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland. Our operations in the Chinese mainland are governed by laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland. The PRC government has significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business, and it may influence our operations, which could result in a material adverse change in our operation and/or the value of our ADSs. Also, the PRC government has indicated an intent to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers in recent years. For example, on July 6, 2021, the PRC government authorities made public the Opinions on Strictly Scrutinizing Illegal Securities Activities in Accordance with the Law. These opinions emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over illegal securities activities and the supervision on overseas listings by PRC-based companies and proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by PRC-based overseas-listed companies. On November 14, 2021, the CAC released the Regulations on the Network Data Security, or the Draft Regulations, for public comments, which stipulates, among other things, that a prior cybersecurity review is required for listing abroad of data processors which process over one million user' personal information, and the listing of data processors in Hong Kong which affects or may affect national security. On December 28, 2021, the thirteen ministries and commissions including the National Internet Information Office, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of National Security, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Commerce, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the State Administration of Radio and Television, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Secret Service, the State Cryptography Administration issued the Measures for Cybersecurity Review(2021), emphasized that operators of "critical information infrastructure" or data processors holding over one million users' personal information shall apply with the Cybersecurity Review Office for a cybersecurity review before any public offering at a foreign stock exchange. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued a Trial Measures for the Administration of Overseas Securities Issuance and Listing of Domestic Enterprises, or the Trial Measures, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. According to the Trial Measures, the overseas offering and listing by a domestic company, whether directly or indirectly, shall be filed with the CSRC. According to the Trial Measures, the issuer or its affiliated domestic company, as the case may be, shall file with the CSRC: (i) with respect to its initial public offering and listing overseas, it shall file with the CSRC within three business days after submitting the application documents for offering and listing overseas. (ii) with respect to its follow-on offering in the same overseas market, it shall file with the CSRC within three business days after completion of the follow-on offering. (iii) If an issuer, after completion of the offering and listing overseas, make offering and listing in other overseas markets, it shall put on record in accordance with the provisions of the Article(i).
Trial Measures remain uncertain when dose the overseas listed company need to obtain such approvals from the CSRC, and Measures for Cybersecurity Review(2021) remain uncertain whether we are required to obtain any specific regulatory approvals from the CAC or any other PRC governmental authorities for our offshore offerings. If the CSRC, the CAC or other regulatory agencies later promulgate new rules or explanations requiring that we obtain their approvals for our future offshore offerings, we may be unable to obtain such approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. In addition, implementation of industry-wide regulations directly targeting our operations could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline. Therefore, investors of our company and our business face potential uncertainty from actions taken by the PRC government affecting our business.
Regulation - Risk 7
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from a number of rules under the U.S. securities laws and are permitted to file less information with the SEC than U.S. public companies.
We are a "foreign private issuer" as defined in the SEC rules and regulations and, consequently, we are not subject to all of the disclosure requirements applicable to companies organized within the United States. For example, we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that regulate disclosure obligations and procedural requirements related to the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations applicable to a security registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers and directors are exempt from the reporting and "short-swing" profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our securities. Further, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. public companies. Accordingly, there may be less publicly available information concerning our company than there is for U.S. public companies.
As a foreign private issuer, we file annual reports on Form 20-F within four months of the close of each fiscal year ended December 31 and reports on Form 6-K relating to certain material events promptly after we publicly announce these events. However, because of the above exemptions for foreign private issuers, our shareholders are not afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies organized in the United States.
While we are a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to certain Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. listed companies. We are entitled to rely on a provision in the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards that allows us to elect to follow Cayman Islands "home county" corporate law with regard to certain aspects of corporate governance. This allows us to follow certain corporate governance practices that differ in significant respects from the corporate governance requirements applicable to U.S. companies listed on the Nasdaq. For example, in each of November 2015 and August 2016, our board of directors approved an increase in the total number of ordinary shares reserved for issuance under our then effective stock option plan, for which we have followed "home country practice" in lieu of obtaining a shareholder approval pursuant to Nasdaq Market Rule 5635(c). In June 2020, we also followed "home country practice" in lieu of obtaining a shareholder approval pursuant to Nasdaq Market Rule 5635(a) with respect to issuance of securities in excess of 20% of our total issued and outstanding shares prior to such issuance. We also followed "home country practice" in lieu of the requirement under Nasdaq rule 5635(d) to seek shareholder approval in connection with certain transactions involving the sale, our issuance or potential issuance of common stock (or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock) at a price less than certain references price equals 20% or more of common stock or 20% or more of the voting power outstanding before the issuance. We may also rely on other exemptions available to foreign private issuers in the future, and to the extent that we choose to do so in the future, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.
Regulation - Risk 8
Changed
Regulatory changes or actions may restrict the use of Bitcoin or the operation of the Bitcoin network in a manner that adversely affects an investment in us.
As Bitcoin has grown in popularity and in market size, the Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Congress and certain U.S. agencies (e.g., the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the SEC, the FinCEN and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) have begun to examine the operations of the Bitcoin network, Bitcoin users and the Bitcoin exchange market.
Digital assets currently face an uncertain regulatory landscape in not only the United States but also in many foreign jurisdictions such as the European Union, China and Russia. While certain governments such as China, where PRC authorities has declared that virtual currencies do not have the same legal status as legal currency, most regulatory bodies have expressed intention to regulate crypto assets, although any determinations on regulation of Bitcoin, the Bitcoin network and Bitcoin users are not definite as of the date of this report.
The effect of any future regulatory change on us, Bitcoin, or other digital assets is impossible to predict, but such change could be substantial and adverse to us and could adversely affect an investment in us.
Regulation - Risk 9
Digital Assets such as Bitcoin are likely to be regulated as securities or investment securities.
Bitcoin is the oldest and most well-known form of digital asset. Bitcoin and other forms of digital assets/cryptocurrencies have been the source of much regulatory consternation, resulting in differing definitional outcomes without a single unifying statement. When the interests of investor protection are paramount, for example in the offer or sale of initial coin offering tokens, the SEC has no difficulty determining that the token offerings are securities under the Howey test as stated by the United States Supreme Court. As such, initial coin offerings would require registration under the Securities Act or an available exemption therefrom for offers or sales in the United States to be lawful. Section 5(a) of the Securities Act provides that, unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, it is unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to engage in the offer or sale of securities in interstate commerce. Section 5(c) of the Securities Act provides a similar prohibition against offers to sell, or offers to buy, unless a registration statement has been filed. Although we do not believe our mining activities require registration for us to conduct such activities and accumulate digital assets the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Nasdaq or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency or organization may conclude that our activities involve the offer or sale of "securities", or ownership of "investment securities", and we may face regulation under the Securities Act or the 1940 Act. Such regulation or the inability to meet the requirements to continue operations, would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
Regulation - Risk 10
Added
If regulatory changes or interpretations require the regulation of Bitcoin under the Securities Act and Investment Company Act by the SEC, we may be required to register and comply with such regulations. To the extent that we decide to continue operations, the required registrations and regulatory compliance steps may result in extraordinary, non-recurring expenses to us. We may also decide to cease certain operations. Any disruption of our operations in response to the changed regulatory circumstances may be at a time that is disadvantageous to investors. This would likely have a material adverse effect on us and investors may lose their investment.
Current and future legislation and the SEC rulemaking and other regulatory developments, including interpretations released by a regulatory authority, may impact the manner in which Bitcoin and Filecoin are treated for classification and clearing purposes. The SEC's July 25, 2017 Report expressed its view that crypto assets may be securities depending on the facts and circumstances. As of the date of this annual report, we are not aware of any rules that have been proposed to regulate Bitcoin and Filecoin as securities. We cannot be certain as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of Bitcoin and Filecoin under the law. Such additional registrations may result in extraordinary, non-recurring expenses, thereby materially and adversely impacting an investment in us. If we determine not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, we may seek to cease certain of our operations. Any such action may adversely affect an investment in us.
To the extent that crypto assets we held, including Bitcoin and Filecoin, are deemed by the SEC to fall within the definition of a security, we may be required to register as an investment company and comply with additional regulation under the 1940 Act, including additional periodic reporting and disclosure standards and requirements and significant limitations on dealings among affiliates. Additionally, one or more states may conclude Bitcoin, Filecoin and other crypto assets we may own are a security under state securities laws which would require registration under state laws including merit review laws which would adversely impact us since we would likely not comply. Such additional registrations may result in extraordinary, non-recurring expenses of our Company, thereby materially and adversely impacting an investment in our Company. If we determine not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, we may seek to cease all or certain parts of our operations. Any such action would likely adversely affect an investment in us and investors may suffer a complete loss of their investment.
Regulation - Risk 11
Added
Any failure to obtain or maintain necessary governmental licenses and authorizations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We maintain necessary governmental licenses and authorizations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, where we understand they are required. Specifically, we have obtained the requisite licenses in certain jurisdictions to the extent that the laws and regulations of such jurisdictions clearly indicate that a license is required or where the regulators of such jurisdictions have advised us that we need a license to operate. We also operate in jurisdictions where we do not believe we are required, or where we have been informed by these jurisdictions that we are not required, to obtain certain licenses. To the extent that the laws and regulations of certain jurisdictions clearly indicate that a license is required or where the regulators of such jurisdictions have advised us that we need a license to operate, and we have not obtained such licenses or registrations, then we do not operate the jurisdictions.
As noted above, our customers include persons who are located or resident in jurisdictions where we do not believe we are required, or where we have been informed by these jurisdictions that we are not required, to obtain certain licenses. It is possible that the authorities in those jurisdictions may take the position that we are required to obtain licenses or otherwise comply with local laws and regulations in order to conduct our business with persons located or resident in those jurisdictions. Complying with such laws and regulations may require substantial expense, and any non-compliance may expose us to liabilities. In the event of non-compliance, we may have to incur significant expenses and divert substantial management time to rectify the incidents. In the future, if we fail to obtain all the necessary approvals, licenses, permits and certifications, we may be subject to fines or the suspension of operations that do not have all the requisite approvals, licenses, permits and certifications, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. We may also experience adverse publicity arising from non-compliance with government regulations, which would negatively impact our reputation.
In any jurisdiction, if we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements, we may risk being disqualified for our existing businesses or being rejected for renewal of our qualifications and/or licenses upon expiry by the regulatory authorities as well as other penalties, fines, or sanctions. In respect of any new business that we may contemplate, we may not be able to obtain the approvals for developing such new business if we fail to comply with the regulations and regulatory requirements. As a result, we may fail to develop new business as planned, or we may fall behind our competitors in such businesses.
In any jurisdiction in which we operate, to the extent that we are required to obtain government licenses or approvals, there is no assurance that we will be able to fulfill all the conditions necessary to obtain the required government approvals, or that government officials will always, if ever, exercise their discretion in our favor, or that we will be able to adapt to any new laws, regulations and policies. There may also be delays on the part of government authorities in reviewing our applications and granting approvals, whether due to the lack of human resources or the imposition of new rules, regulations, government policies or their implementation, interpretation and enforcement. If we are unable to obtain, or experiences material delays in obtaining, necessary government approvals, our operations may be substantially disrupted or discontinued, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Regulation - Risk 12
Added
Our platform may be subject to enhanced regulation by financial regulators.
Cryptocurrencies, generally, and our platform may be subject to certain U.S. regulatory regimes. The application of any of these regimes could result in a materially adverse impact on our financial condition and operations.
For example, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has stated that cryptocurrencies fall within the definition of "commodities." If cryptocurrencies were deemed to be commodities, transactions over cryptocurrencies could be subject to prohibitions on deceptive and manipulative trading or restrictions on manner of trading (e.g., on a registered derivatives exchange), depending on how the transaction is conducted.
In addition, if regulatory changes or interpretations of our activities require registration as a money services business under the regulations promulgated by the FinCEN under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act or as a money transmitter or a digital currency business under state regimes (e.g., New York) for the licensing of such businesses, we could suffer reputational harm and also extraordinary, recurring and/or nonrecurring expenses, which would adversely impact an investment in us.
Certain of our operations are subject to U.S. economic sanctions programs, including those administered by the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC. As a result of doing business in foreign countries and with foreign partners, we may be exposed to a heightened risk of violating OFAC sanctions laws and regulations.
Regulation - Risk 13
Changed
Restrictions on currency exchange in the Chinese mainland limit our ability to utilize our revenues effectively, make dividend payments and meet our foreign currency denominated obligations.
Currently, we no longer derive a significant portion of our revenues from the Chinese mainland and most of our revenues are not denominated in RMB. For the limited portion of revenues that are denominated in RMB, restrictions on currency exchange in the Chinese mainland limit our ability to utilize revenues generated in RMB to fund our business activities outside of the Chinese mainland, make dividend payments in U.S. dollars, or obtain and remit sufficient foreign currency to satisfy our foreign currency-denominated obligations, such as paying license fees and royalty payments. The principal regulation governing foreign currency exchange in the Chinese mainland is the Foreign Exchange Administration Rules (1996), as amended. Under such rules, the RMB is generally freely convertible for trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, but not for direct investment, loans or investment in securities outside of the Chinese mainland unless the prior approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, or designated banks is obtained. Although the government regulations of the Chinese mainland now allow greater convertibility of RMB for current account transactions, significant restrictions still remain. For example, foreign exchange transactions under capital account of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, including principal payments in respect of foreign currency-denominated obligations, remain subject to significant foreign exchange controls and the approval and filing procedures of SAFE or authorized banks, as applicable. These limitations could affect our ability to obtain foreign exchange for capital expenditures. We cannot be certain that the PRC regulatory authorities will not impose more stringent restrictions on the convertibility of the RMB, especially with respect to foreign exchange transactions. As a result, there is no assurance the PRC government will not intervene in or impose restrictions on the ability of us, our subsidiaries, and the consolidated variable interest entity to transfer cash. To the extent cash in the business is in the Chinese mainland or an entity in the Chinese mainland, the funds may not be available to fund operations or for other use outside of the Chinese mainland due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations on the ability of us, our subsidiaries, or the variable interest entity by the PRC government to transfer cash.
Regulation - Risk 14
Changed
Regulation in the Chinese mainland of loans to and direct investment in entities in the Chinese mainland by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay or prevent us from making loans or additional capital contributions to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and the variable interest entity, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.
We are an offshore holding company conducting our operations in the Chinese mainland through our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and the variable interest entity. We may make loans to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and the variable interest entity subject to the approval from or registration with governmental authorities and limitation on amount, we may make additional capital contributions to our wholly foreign-owned Chinese mainland subsidiaries, we may establish new Chinese mainland subsidiaries and make capital contributions to these new Chinese mainland subsidiaries, or we may acquire offshore entities with business operations in the Chinese mainland in an offshore transaction.
Most of the aforementioned ways of making loans or investments in entities in the Chinese mainland are subject to regulations and approvals of the Chinese mainland. For example, any loans to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and the variable interest entity are subject to applicable foreign loan registrations with the local counterpart of SAFE and limitation on amount under laws of the Chinese mainland. If we decide to finance our wholly-owned subsidiary in the Chinese mainland by means of capital contributions, these capital contributions are subject to filing and registration with certain PRC government authorities, including the Ministry of Commerce or its local counterparts and the SAMR through its Enterprise Registration System, the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System and the local counterpart of SAFE. In addition, an FIE shall use its capital pursuant to the principle of authenticity and self-use within its business scope.
SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Mode of Management of Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign Invested Enterprises, or the SAFE Circular 19, effective June 2015 and amended on December 2019, in replacement of a former regulation. According to the SAFE Circular 19, the flow and use of the RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company is regulated such that RMB capital may not be used for the issuance of RMB entrusted loans (unless otherwise permitted in the business license), the repayment of inter-enterprise loans or the repayment of bank loans that have been transferred to a third party. Although the SAFE Circular 19 allows RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise to be used for equity investments within the Chinese mainland, it also reiterates the principle that RMB converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital of a foreign-invested company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope. Thus, it is unclear whether SAFE will permit such capital to be used for equity investments in the Chinese mainland in actual practice. SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Foreign Exchange Settlement Management Policy of Capital Account, or the SAFE Circular 16, effective on June 9, 2016, which reiterates some of the rules set forth in the SAFE Circular 19, but changes the prohibition against using RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company to issue RMB entrusted loans to a prohibition against using such capital to issue loans to non-associated enterprises. Specifically, the SAFE Circular 16 provides that the capital of an FIE shall not be used for the following purposes: (i) directly or indirectly used for payment beyond the business scope of such FIE or the payment prohibited by laws and regulations; (ii) directly or indirectly used for investment in securities or investments in financial management other than banks' principal-secured products unless otherwise provided by laws and regulations; (iii) the granting of loans to non-affiliated enterprises, except where it is expressly permitted in the business license; and (iv) paying the expenses related to the purchase of real estate that is not for self-use (except for the foreign-invested real estate enterprises). Violations of the SAFE Circular 19 and the SAFE Circular 16 could result in administrative penalties. The SAFE Circular 19 and the SAFE Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to transfer any foreign currency we hold to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, which may adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business in the Chinese mainland. On October 23, 2019, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Promoting the Convenience of Cross-border Trade and Investment, or the SAFE Circular 28, which, among other things, allows all foreign-invested companies to use Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital for equity investments in the Chinese mainland, as long as the equity investment is genuine, does not violate applicable laws, and complies with the negative list on foreign investment. On April 10, 2020, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Optimizing Administration of Foreign Exchange to Support the Development of Foreign-related Business, or the SAFE Circular 8, under which eligible enterprises are allowed to make domestic payments by using their capital funds, foreign loans and the income under capital accounts of overseas listing without providing the evidentiary materials concerning authenticity of each expenditure in advance, provided that their capital use shall be authentic and conforms to the prevailing administrative regulations on the use of income under capital accounts. However, since the SAFE Circular 28 and the SAFE Circular 8 are relatively new, it is unclear how SAFE and competent banks will carry them out in practice.
Because we conduct business operations through contractual arrangement with the consolidated variable interest entity through contractual arrangements, we are not able to make capital contribution to the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries; however, we may provide financial support to them by loans. Under the laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, loans to the variable interest entity directly from the Cayman entity shall not exceed 200% of the net assets of the variable interest entity, whereas loans from our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, subject to the laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland concerning foreign currency, are not subject to amount limitations. Even though Renminbi capital, foreign debt and repatriated funds raised through overseas listing may be used at the discretion of the foreign-invested enterprise pursuant to the SAFE Circular 19 and the SAFE Circular 16, it is still not clear whether our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, as foreign invested enterprises, are allowed to extend intercompany loans to the variable interest entity. Despite the lack of legal majority ownership, we are able to direct the activities of and derive economic benefits from the consolidated variable interest entity and therefore our Cayman Island holding company is considered the primary beneficiary of the consolidated variable interest entity for accounting purposes and consolidates the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries as required by Accounting Standards Codification topic 810, Consolidation. Accordingly, we treat the consolidated variable interest entity as a consolidated entity under U.S. GAAP and we consolidate the financial results of the consolidated variable interest entity in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Neither The9 Limited nor its investors have an equity ownership in, direct foreign investment in, or control through such ownership or investment of, the consolidated variable interest entity, and the contractual arrangements are not equivalent to an equity ownership in the business of the consolidated variable interest entity.
In light of the various requirements imposed by regulations of the Chinese mainland on loans to and direct investment in entities in the Chinese mainland by offshore holding companies, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary government registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, or at all, with respect to our future loans to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries or the variable interest entity or its subsidiaries or with respect to our future capital contributions to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries. If we fail to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals, our ability to capitalize or otherwise fund our operations in the Chinese mainland may be negatively affected, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.
Regulation - Risk 15
Changed
Regulations of the Chinese mainland relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by residents of the Chinese mainland may subject our resident shareholders in the Chinese mainland or us to penalties and fines, and limit our ability to inject capital into our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, limit our subsidiaries' ability to increase their registered capital, distribute profits to us, or otherwise adversely affect us.
On July 4, 2014, SAFE issued the Circular on Several Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration of Domestic Residents Engaging in Overseas Investment, Financing and Round-Trip Investment via Special Purpose Vehicles, or the SAFE Circular 37. The SAFE Circular 37 and its detailed guidelines require residents of the Chinese mainland to register with the local branch of SAFE before contributing their legally owned onshore or offshore assets or equity interest into any special purpose vehicle, or SPV, directly established, or indirectly controlled, by them for the purpose of investment or financing. The SAFE Circular 37 further requires that when there is (a) any change to the basic information of the SPV, such as any change relating to its individual resident shareholders of the Chinese mainland, name or operation period or (b) any material change, such as increase or decrease in the share capital held by its individual resident shareholders of the Chinese mainland, a share transfer or exchange of the shares in the SPV, or a merger or split of the SPV, the resident of the Chinese mainland must register such changes with the local branch of SAFE on a timely basis.
We have requested all of our shareholders who, based on our knowledge, are residents of the Chinese mainland or whose ultimate beneficial owners are residents of the Chinese mainland to comply with all applicable SAFE registration requirements. However, we have no control over our shareholders. We cannot assure you that the beneficial owners in the Chinese mainland of our company and our subsidiaries have completed the required SAFE registrations or complied with other related requirements. Nor can we assure you that they will be in full compliance with the SAFE registration in the future. Any non-compliance by the beneficial owners in the Chinese mainland of our company and our subsidiaries may subject us or such resident shareholders of the Chinese mainland to fines and other penalties. It may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and our subsidiaries' ability to distribute profits or make other payments to us.
Regulation - Risk 16
Changed
Regulation in the Chinese mainland of direct investment and loans by offshore holding companies to entities in the Chinese mainland may delay or limit us from using offshore assets, including the proceeds of our initial public offering and other offering, to make additional capital contributions or loans to our subsidiary in the Chinese mainland.
We are an offshore holding company conducting our operations in the Chinese mainland through our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries. We may make loans to our subsidiary in the Chinese mainland, the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries, subject to the approval from governmental authorities and limitation of amount, or we may make additional capital contributions to our subsidiary in the Chinese mainland.
Any loans to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries, which are treated as foreign-invested enterprises under laws of the Chinese mainland, are subject to foreign exchange loan registrations. In addition, a foreign-invested enterprise shall use its capital pursuant to the principle of authenticity and self-use within its business scope. The capital of a foreign invested enterprise shall not be used for the following purposes: (i) direct or indirect payment beyond the business scope of the enterprises or the payment prohibited by the laws and regulations; (ii) direct or indirect investment in securities or investments other than banks' principal-secured products unless otherwise provided by laws and regulations; (iii) the granting of loans to non-affiliated enterprises, except where it is expressly permitted in the business license; and (iv) paying the expenses related to the purchase of real estate that is not for self-use (except for the foreign-invested real estate enterprises).In light of the various requirements imposed by regulations of the Chinese mainland on loans to and direct investment in entities in the Chinese mainland by offshore holding companies, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary registration or obtain the necessary approval on a timely basis, or at all. If we fail to complete the necessary registration or obtain the necessary approval, our ability to make loans or equity contributions to our subsidiary in the Chinese mainland may be negatively affected, which could adversely affect the liquidity of our subsidiary in the Chinese mainland and its ability to fund its working capital and expansion projects and meet its obligations and commitments.
Regulation - Risk 17
Changed
Failure to comply with regulations of the Chinese mainland regarding the registration requirements for employee stock ownership plans or share option plans may subject the plan participants in the Chinese mainland or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.
In February 2012, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Relevant Issues Concerning the Administration of Foreign Exchange for Domestic Individuals' Participation in Equity Incentive Programs of Overseas Listed Companies, or Circular 7. Under Circular 7, residents of the Chinese mainland who participate in stock incentive plan in an overseas publicly-listed company are required to register with SAFE or its local branches and complete certain other procedures. Participants of a stock incentive plan who are residents of the Chinese mainland must retain a qualified agent in the Chinese mainland, which could be a subsidiary in the Chinese mainland of such overseas publicly listed company or another qualified institution selected by such subsidiary in the Chinese mainland, to conduct the SAFE registration and other procedures with respect to the stock incentive plan on behalf of its participants. Such participants must also retain an overseas entrusted institution to handle matters in connection with their exercise of stock options, the purchase and sale of corresponding stocks or interests and fund transfers. In addition, the agent in the Chinese mainland is required to amend the SAFE registration with respect to the stock incentive plan if there is any material change to the stock incentive plan, the agent in the Chinese mainland or the overseas entrusted institution or other material changes. We and our employees in the Chinese mainland who have been granted stock incentive awards are be subject to these regulations. However, neither our plan participants in the Chinese mainland nor we have completed such requisite registration and other procedures. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the registration for new employees who participate in such stock incentive plan in the future in a timely manner or at all. Failure of our plan participants in the Chinese mainland to complete their SAFE registrations may subject these residents in the Chinese mainland or us to fines and legal sanctions and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into our subsidiary in the Chinese mainland, limit the ability of our subsidiary in the Chinese mainland to distribute dividends to us, or otherwise materially and adversely affect our business. We also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional incentive plans for our directors and employees under laws of the Chinese mainland.
Regulation - Risk 18
Changed
If the PRC government determines that the contractual arrangements constituting part of the variable interest entity structure do not comply with laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, or if these laws and regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.
Foreign ownership of certain of our businesses including value-added telecommunication services is subject to restrictions under current laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland. For example, foreign investors are not allowed to own more than 50% of the equity interests in a value-added telecommunication service provider (excluding e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, data collection and transmission services and call centers) and the main foreign investor in the foreign-invested telecommunication enterprise must have experience in providing value-added telecommunications services overseas and maintain a good track record.
We are a Cayman Islands company and our Chinese mainland subsidiaries are considered foreign-invested enterprises. To comply with laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, we conduct our operations in the Chinese mainland through a series of contractual arrangements entered into the variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland and its Chinese mainland subsidiaries, including Shanghai IT.
In the opinion of our PRC legal counsel, (i) the ownership structures of the variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland and the Chinese mainland subsidiaries that have entered into contractual arrangements with the variable interest entity, including Shanghai IT, comply with all existing laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland; and (ii) the contractual arrangements between the Chinese mainland subsidiaries, including Shanghai IT, the variable interest entity and its respective shareholders governed by laws of the Chinese mainland are valid, binding and enforceable, and will not result in any violation of laws or regulations of the Chinese mainland currently in effect.
However, we are a Cayman Islands holding company with no equity ownership in the consolidated variable interest entity and we conduct our operations in the Chinese mainland primarily through the consolidated variable interest entity with which we have maintained contractual arrangements. Investors in our Class A ordinary shares or the ADSs thus are not purchasing equity interest in the consolidated variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland but instead are purchasing equity interest in a Cayman Islands holding company. If the PRC government determines that the contractual arrangements constituting part of the variable interest entity structure do not comply with laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, or if these laws and regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations. We may not be able to repay the notes and other indebtedness, and the securities we are registering may significantly decline in value or become worthless, if the determinations, changes, or interpretations result in our inability to conduct business operations of the consolidated variable interest entity. Our holding company in the Cayman Islands, the consolidated variable interest entity, and investors of our company face uncertainty about potential future actions by the PRC government that could affect the enforceability of the contractual arrangements with the consolidated variable interest entity and, consequently, significantly affect the financial performance of the consolidated variable interest entity and our company as a group.
Our PRC legal counsel has also advised us that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future laws, regulations and rules in the Chinese mainland; accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may take a view that is contrary to the opinion of our PRC legal counsel. It is uncertain whether any other new laws or regulations of the Chinese mainland relating to variable interest entity structures will be adopted or if adopted, what they would provide. If we or any of the variable interest entity are found to be in violation of any existing or future laws or regulations of the Chinese mainland, or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the PRC regulatory authorities would have broad discretion to take action in dealing with such violations or failures, including:
- revoking the business licenses of such entities;- discontinuing or restricting the conduct of any transactions between certain of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and the variable interest entity;- imposing fines, confiscating the income from the variable interest entity, or imposing other requirements with which we or the variable interest entity may not be able to comply;- requiring us to restructure our ownership structure or operations, including terminating the contractual arrangements with the variable interest entity and deregistering the equity pledges of the variable interest entity, which in turn would affect our ability to consolidate, derive economic interests from, or conduct business operations through contractual arrangements with the consolidated variable interest entity; or - restricting or prohibiting our use of the proceeds of any of our financing outside of the Chinese mainland to finance our business and operations in the Chinese mainland.
The imposition of any of these penalties would result in a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business. In addition, it is unclear what impact the PRC government actions would have on us and on our ability to consolidate the financial results of the variable interest entity in our consolidated financial statements, if the PRC government authorities were to find our legal structure and contractual arrangements to be in violation of laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland. If the imposition of any of these government actions causes us to lose our right to direct the activities of the variable interest entity or our right to receive substantially all the economic benefits and residual returns from the variable interest entity and we are not able to restructure our ownership structure and operations in a satisfactory manner, we would no longer be able to consolidate the financial results of the variable interest entity in our consolidated financial statements. Either of these results, or any other significant penalties that might be imposed on us in this event, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Although we believe we, our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and the variable interest entity comply with current laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, we cannot assure you that the PRC government would agree that our contractual arrangements comply with licensing, registration or other regulatory requirements in the Chinese mainland, with existing policies or with requirements or policies that may be adopted in the future. The PRC government has broad discretion in determining rectifiable or punitive measures for non-compliance with or violations of laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland. If the PRC government determines that we or the variable interest entity do not comply with applicable law, it could revoke the variable interest entity's business and operating licenses, require the variable interest entity to discontinue or restrict the variable interest entity's operations, restrict the variable interest entity's right to collect revenues, block the variable interest entity's websites, require the variable interest entity to restructure our operations, impose additional conditions or requirements with which the variable interest entity may not be able to comply, impose restrictions on the variable interest entity's business operations or on their customers, or take other regulatory or enforcement actions against the variable interest entity that could be harmful to their business. Any of these or similar occurrences could significantly disrupt our or the variable interest entity's business operations or restrict the variable interest entity from conducting a substantial portion of their business operations, which could materially and adversely affect the variable interest entity's business, financial condition and results of operations. If any of these occurrences results in our inability to direct the activities of any of the variable interest entity that most significantly impact its economic performance, and/or our failure to receive the economic benefits from any of the variable interest entity, we may not be able to consolidate these entities in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Regulation - Risk 19
Changed
Laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland restrict foreign ownership of internet content provision, internet culture operation and internet publishing licenses, and substantial uncertainties exist with respect to the application and implementation of laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and, as such, we are classified as a foreign enterprise under laws of the Chinese mainland. Various regulations of the Chinese mainland currently restrict foreign or foreign-owned entities from holding certain licenses required in the Chinese mainland to provide online game operation services over the internet, including ICP, internet culture operation and internet publishing licenses. In light of such restrictions, we primarily rely on Shanghai IT, the variable interest entity, to hold and maintain the licenses necessary for the operation of our online games in the Chinese mainland.
In July 2006, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, or the MIIT, issued a notice entitled "Notice on Strengthening Management of Foreign Investment in Operating Value-Added Telecommunication Services," or the MII Notice, which prohibits ICP license holders from leasing, transferring or selling a telecommunications business operating license to foreign investors in any form, or providing resources, sites or facilities to any foreign investors for their illegal operation of a telecommunications business in the Chinese mainland. The notice also requires that ICP license holders and their shareholders directly own the domain names and trademarks used by such ICP license holders in their daily operations. The notice further requires each ICP license holder to have the necessary facilities for its approved business operations and to maintain such facilities in the regions covered by its license. In addition, all value-added telecommunication service providers are required to maintain network and information security in accordance with the standards set forth under regulations of the Chinese mainland. The local authorities in charge of telecommunications services are required to ensure that existing ICP license holders conduct a self-assessment of their compliance with the MII Notice and submit status reports to the MIIT before November 1, 2006. Since the MII Notice was issued, we have transferred to Shanghai IT all of the domain names used in our daily operations and certain trademarks used in our daily operations, as required under the MII Notice. All necessary transfers have been completed and approvals have been obtained.
In September 2009, the General Administration of Press and Publication, Radio, Film and Television, or the GAPPRFT (formerly known as the General Administration of Press and Publication, or the GAPP), promulgated the Circular Regarding the Implementation of the Department Reorganization Regulation by State Council and Relevant Interpretation by State Commission Office for Public Sector Reform to Further Strengthen the Administration of Pre-approval on Online Games and Approval on Import Online Games, or the GAPP Circular, which provides that foreign investors shall not control or participate in online game operation businesses in the Chinese mainland indirectly or in a disguised manner by establishing joint venture companies or entering into agreements with, or by providing technical supports to, such online game operation companies in the Chinese mainland, or by inputting the users' registration, account management or game card consumption directly into the interconnected gaming platform or fighting platform controlled or owned by the foreign investor. In addition, on February 4, 2016, the GAPPRFT and the MIIT jointly issued the Administrative Measures on Network Publication, which took effect in March 2016. Pursuant to the Administrative Measures on Network Publication, wholly foreign-owned enterprises, Sino-foreign equity joint ventures and Sino-foreign cooperative enterprises shall not engage in the provision of web publishing services, including online game services. Project cooperation involving internet publishing services between an internet publishing service provider and a wholly foreign-owned enterprise, Sino-foreign equity joint venture, or Sino-foreign cooperative enterprise within the Chinese mainland or an overseas organization or individual shall be subject to prior examination and approval by the GAPPRFT. It is unclear whether the authorities will deem the variable interest entity structure as a kind of such "manners of cooperation" by foreign investors to gain control over or participate in domestic online game operators, and it is not clear whether the GAPPRFT and the MIIT have regulatory authority over the ownership structures of online game companies based in the Chinese mainland and online game operation in the Chinese mainland.
Subject to the interpretation and implementation of the GAPP Circular and the Administrative Measures on Network Publication, the ownership structure and the business operation models of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and variable interest entity comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations of the Chinese mainland, and no consent, approval or license is required under any of the existing laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland for their ownership structure and business operation models except for those which we have already obtained or which would not have a material adverse effect on our business or operations as a whole. There are, however, substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current or future laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that PRC government authorities will ultimately take a view that is consistent with the opinion of our PRC legal counsel.
For example, the Ministry of Commerce, promulgated the Rules of Ministry of Commerce on Implementation of Security Review System of Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors in August 2011, or the MOFCOM Security Review Rules, to implement the Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Establishing the Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors promulgated on February 3, 2011, or Circular No. 6. According to these circulars and rules, a security review is required for mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors having "national defense and security" concerns and mergers and acquisitions by which foreign investors may acquire the "de facto control" of domestic enterprises having "national security" concerns. In addition, when deciding whether a specific merger or acquisition of a domestic enterprise by foreign investors is subject to the security review, the Ministry of Commerce will look into the substance and actual impact of the transaction. The MOFCOM Security Review Rules further prohibit foreign investors from bypassing the security review requirement by structuring transactions through proxies, trusts, indirect investments, leases, loans, control through contractual arrangements or offshore transactions. There is no explicit provision or official interpretation stating that our online game operation services falls into the scope subject to the security review, and there is no requirement for foreign investors in those merger and acquisition transactions already completed prior to the promulgation of Circular No. 6 to submit such transactions to the Ministry of Commerce for security review. As we have already obtained the "de facto control" over the variable interest entity prior to the effectiveness of these circulars and rules, we do not believe we are required to submit our existing contractual arrangement to the Ministry of Commerce for security review. However, we are advised by our PRC legal counsel that, as there is a lack of clear statutory interpretation on the implementation of these circulars and rules, there is no assurance that the Ministry of Commerce will have the same view as we do when applying these national security review-related circulars and rules.
We have been further advised by our PRC counsel, Grandall Law Firm, that if we, any of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries or variable interest entity are found to be in violation of any existing or future laws or regulations of the Chinese mainland, including the MII Notice, the GAPP Circular and the Administrative Measures on Network Publication, or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the PRC regulatory authorities, would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations, including:
- revoking the business and operating licenses of Shanghai IT;- confiscating our income or the income of Shanghai IT;- discontinuing or restricting the operations of any related party transactions among us and Shanghai IT;- limiting our business expansion in China by way of entering into contractual arrangements;- imposing fines or other requirements with which we may not be able to comply;- requiring Shanghai IT or us to restructure our corporate structure or operations; or - requiring Shanghai IT or us to discontinue any portion or all of our operations related to online games.
The imposition of any of these penalties could result in a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business and on our results of operations. If any of these penalties results in our inability to direct the activities of Shanghai IT that most significantly impact its economic performance, and/or our failure to receive the economic benefits from Shanghai IT, we may not be able to consolidate Shanghai IT in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Regulation - Risk 20
Changed
Our ability to enforce the Equity Pledge Agreements between us and the shareholders of Shanghai IT may be subject to limitations based on laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland.
Pursuant to the Equity Pledge Agreements with the shareholders of Shanghai IT, such shareholders agreed to pledge their equity interests in Shanghai IT to secure their performance under the contractual arrangements. The equity pledges of Shanghai IT under these Equity Pledge Agreements have been registered with the local administration for market regulation pursuant to the PRC Property Rights Law. According to the PRC Property Rights Law and PRC Guarantee Law, the pledgee and the pledgor are prohibited from making an agreement prior to the expiration of the debt performance period to transfer the ownership of the pledged equity to the pledgee when the obligor fails to pay the debt due. However, under the PRC Property Rights Law, when an obligor fails to pay its debt when due, the pledgee may choose to either conclude an agreement with the pledgor to obtain the pledged equity or seek payments from the proceeds of the auction or sell-off of the pledged equity. If Shanghai IT or its shareholders fail to perform their obligations secured by the pledges under the Equity Pledge Agreements, one remedy in the event of default under the agreements is to require the pledgors to sell the equity interests of Shanghai IT in an auction or private sale and remit the proceeds to our wholly-owned Chinese mainland subsidiaries, net of related taxes and expenses. Such an auction or private sale may not result in our receipt of the full value of the equity interests in Shanghai IT. We consider it very unlikely that the public auction process would be undertaken since, in an event of default, our preferred approach is to ask Hui Ling Computer Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Hui Ling, our wholly-owned subsidiary in the Chinese mainland and a party to the Call Option Agreement, to replace or designate another person or entity in the Chinese mainland to replace the existing shareholders of Shanghai IT pursuant to the direct transfer option we have under the option agreement.
In addition, in the registration forms of the local branch of State Administration for Market Regulation (formerly known as the State Administration for Industry and Commerce) for the pledges over the equity interests under the Equity Pledge Agreements, the amount of registered equity interests in Shanghai IT pledged to us was stated as RMB23.0 million, which represent 100% of the registered capital of Shanghai IT. The Equity Pledge Agreements with the shareholders of Shanghai IT provide that the pledged equity interest shall constitute continuing security for any and all of the indebtedness, obligations and liabilities under all of the contractual arrangements and the scope of pledge shall not be limited by the amount of the registered capital of Shanghai IT. However, it is possible that a court of the Chinese mainland may take the position that the amount listed on the equity pledge registration forms represents the full amount of the collateral that has been registered and perfected. If this is the case, the obligations that are supposed to be secured under the Equity Pledge Agreements in excess of the amount listed on the equity pledge registration forms could be determined by the court of the Chinese mainland as unsecured debt, which takes last priority among creditors and often does not have to be paid back at all. We do not have agreements that pledge the assets of Shanghai IT for the benefit of us.
Regulation - Risk 21
Changed
The laws and regulations governing the online game industry in the Chinese mainland are developing and subject to future changes. If we fail to obtain or maintain all applicable permits and approvals, our business and operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The online game industry in the Chinese mainland is highly regulated by the PRC government. Various regulatory authorities of the PRC central government, such as the State Council, the MIIT, the GAPPRFT, the Ministry of Culture and the Tourism (formerly known as the Ministry of Culture), the Ministry of Public Security, are empowered to issue and implement regulations governing various aspects of the online games industry.
We are required to obtain applicable permits or approvals from different regulatory authorities in order to provide online games to our customers. For example, an internet content provider must obtain a value-added telecommunications business operating license for ICP, or ICP License, in order to engage in any commercial ICP operations within the Chinese mainland. In addition, an online games operator must also obtain a license from the Ministry of Culture and the Tourism and a license from the GAPPRFT in order to distribute games through the internet. Furthermore, an online game operator is required to obtain approval from the Ministry of Culture and the Tourism in order to distribute virtual currencies for online games such as prepaid value cards, prepaid money or game points. If we fail to obtain or maintain any of the required filings, permits or approvals in the future, we may be subject to various penalties, including fines and the discontinuation or restriction of our operations. Any such disruption in our business operations would materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As the online game industry is at an early stage of development in the Chinese mainland, new laws and regulations may be adopted from time to time to require additional licenses and permits other than those we currently have, and may address new issues that arise from time to time. As a result, substantial uncertainties exist regarding the interpretation and implementation of current and any future laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland applicable to the online gaming industry. We cannot assure you that we will be able to timely obtain any new license required in the future, or at all. While we believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland currently in effect, we cannot assure you that we will not be found in violation of any current or future laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland.
Regulation - Risk 22
Changed
The approval of and filing with the CSRC or other PRC government authorities may be required in connection with our offshore offerings under laws of the Chinese mainland, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing.
The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, requires an overseas special purpose vehicle formed for listing purposes through acquisitions of domestic companies in the Chinese mainland and controlled by persons or entities in the Chinese mainland to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such special purpose vehicle's securities on an overseas stock exchange.
On July 6, 2021, the PRC government authorities issued Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down Illegal Securities Activities in Accordance with the Law. These opinions emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over illegal securities activities and the supervision on overseas listings by PRC-based companies and proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by PRC-based overseas-listed companies.
On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the Trial Measures, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. According to the Trial Measures, the overseas offering and listing by a domestic company, whether directly or indirectly, shall be filed with the CSRC. Specifically, the determination of an indirect offering and listing will be conducted on a "substance over form" basis, and an offering and listing shall be considered as an indirect overseas offering and listing by a domestic company if the issuer meets the following conditions: (i) the operating income, gross profit, total assets, or net assets of the domestic enterprise in the most recent fiscal year was more than 50% of the relevant line item in the issuer's audited consolidated financial statement for that year; and (ii) the main part of the business activities is carried out in the territory of the Chinese mainland or the main place of business is in the Chinese mainland, and the senior management personnel responsible for business operations and management are mostly citizens of the Chinese mainland or are ordinarily resident in the Chinese mainland.
According to the Trial Measures, the issuer or its affiliated domestic company, as the case may be, shall file with the CSRC: (i) with respect to its initial public offering and listing overseas, it shall file with the CSRC within three business days after submitting the application documents for offering and listing overseas. (ii) with respect to its follow-on offering in the same overseas market, it shall file with the CSRC within three business days after completion of the follow-on offering. (iii) If an issuer, after completion of the offering and listing overseas, make offering and listing in other overseas markets, it shall put on record in accordance with the provisions of the Article(i). According to the Trial Measures, domestic enterprises which have already listed overseas is not required to make such filing immediately. However, we can not assure you that any new rules or regulations promulgated by CSRC in the future will not require us to obtain any approval or filing.
Non-compliance with the Trial Measures or an overseas listing completed in breach of the Trial Measures may result in a warning on the domestic companies or a fine of RMB1 million to RMB10 million on them. The controlling shareholder or actual controller of the domestic enterprise organizes or instructs the illegal acts, then a fine between RMB1 million to RMB10 million shall be imposed on them, and for other directly responsible personnel in charge shall be punished by a fine of RMB500,000 to RMB5,000,000. Furthermore, If the circumstances are serious, the CSRC may impose a securities market ban on the responsible personnel from entering the securities market, and if they constitute a crime, criminal liability shall be investigated in accordance with the law.
According to the Trial Measures, an overseas offering and listing is prohibited under any of the following circumstances: (i) if the intended securities offering and listing is specifically prohibited by national laws and regulations and provisions; (ii) if the intended securities offering and listing may constitute a threat to or endangers national security as reviewed and determined by competent authorities under the State Council in accordance with law; (iii) if, in the past three years, the domestic enterprise or its controlling shareholders or actual controllers have committed corruption, bribery, embezzlement, misappropriation of property, or other criminal offenses disruptive to the order of the socialist market economy; (v) if, the domestic enterprises are currently under investigation for suspicion of criminal offenses, or are under investigation for suspicion of major violations of laws and regulations, although no clear conclusions have been reached; (vi) if there are material ownership disputes over the equities held by the controlling shareholder or the shareholder under the control of the controlling shareholder or the de facto controller.
Relatedly, on December 27, 2021, the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Finance, jointly issued the 2021 Negative List, which came into effect on January 1, 2022. Pursuant to such Special Administrative Measures, if a domestic company engaging in the prohibited business stipulated in the 2021 Negative List seeks an overseas offering and listing, it shall obtain the approval from the competent governmental authorities. Besides, our foreign investors shall not be involved in our operation and management, and their shareholding percentage shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the regulations on the domestic securities investments by foreign investors. As the 2021 Negative List is relatively new, there remain substantial uncertainties as to the interpretation and implementation of these new requirements, and it is unclear as to whether and to what extent listed companies like us will be subject to these new requirements. If we are required to comply with these requirements and fail to do so on a timely basis, if at all, our business operation, financial conditions and business prospect may be adversely and materially affected.
In addition, we cannot assure you that any new rules or regulations promulgated in the future will not impose additional requirements on us. If it is determined in the future that approval and filing from the CSRC or other regulatory authorities or other procedures, including the cybersecurity review under the enacted version of the revised Measures for Cybersecurity Review and the draft of Regulations on the Network Data Security, are required for our offshore offerings, it is uncertain whether we can or how long it will take us to obtain such approval or complete such filing procedures and any such approval or filing could be rescinded or rejected. Any failure to obtain or delay in obtaining such approval or completing such filing procedures for our offshore offerings, or a rescission of any such approval or filing if we obtain, would subject us to sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory authorities for failure to seek CSRC approval or filing or other government authorization for our offshore offerings. These regulatory authorities may impose fines and penalties on our operations in the Chinese mainland, limit our ability to pay dividends outside of the Chinese mainland, limit our operating privileges in the Chinese mainland, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from our offshore offerings into the Chinese mainland or take other actions that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects, as well as the trading price of our listed securities. The CSRC or other PRC regulatory authorities also may take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for us, to halt our offshore offerings before settlement and delivery of the shares offered. Consequently, if investors engage in market trading or other activities in anticipation of and prior to settlement and delivery, they do so at the risk that settlement and delivery may not occur. In addition, if the CSRC or other regulatory authorities later promulgate new rules or explanations requiring that we obtain their approvals or accomplish the required filing or other regulatory procedures for our prior offshore offerings, we may be unable to obtain a waiver of such approval requirements, if and when procedures are established to obtain such a waiver. Any uncertainties or negative publicity regarding such approval requirement could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, reputation, and the trading price of our listed securities.
Regulation - Risk 23
Changed
Our ADSs may be prohibited from trading in the United States under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely auditors located in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The delisting of the ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.
Pursuant to the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by an independent registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspections by the PCAOB for two consecutive years, the SEC shall prohibit our shares or ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States.
On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC of its determination that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong. Our auditor is not headquartered in the Chinese mainland or Hong Kong and was not identified as a firm subject to the PCAOB determinations announced on December 16, 2021 and as of the filing date of this annual report. Our auditor has been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis. The PCAOB currently has access to inspect the working papers of our auditor. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB removed the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. For this reason, we do not expect to be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer under the HFCAA after we file this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year. In accordance with the HFCAA, our securities would be prohibited from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States if we are identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years in the future. If our shares and ADSs are prohibited from trading in the United States, there is no certainty that we will be able to list on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our shares will develop outside of the United States. A prohibition of being able to trade in the United States would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase our ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty arising from delisting would have a negative impact on the price of our ADSs. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.
Regulation - Risk 24
Changed
We may be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and changes in regulation in the Chinese mainland of blockchain, and internet-related businesses and companies, and any lack of requisite approvals, licenses or permits applicable to our business may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The PRC government extensively regulates the internet industry, including foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements pertaining to, companies in the internet industry. These internet-related laws and regulations are evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainties. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations.
We only have contractual control over our websites. We do not directly own the websites due to the restriction of foreign investment in businesses providing value-added telecommunication services in the Chinese mainland, including internet information provision services. This may significantly disrupt our business, subject us to sanctions, compromise enforceability of related contractual arrangements, or have other harmful effects on us.
The evolving PRC regulatory system for the internet industry may lead to the establishment of new regulatory agencies. For example, in May 2011, the State Council announced the establishment of a new department, the State Internet Information Office (with the involvement of the State Council Information Office, the MIIT, and the Ministry of Public Security). The primary role of this new agency is to facilitate the policy-making and legislative development in this field, to direct and coordinate with the departments in connection with online content administration and to deal with cross-ministry regulatory matters in relation to the internet industry.
Shanghai IT, the variable interest entity operating our online gaming business, may be deemed to be providing commercial internet information services and transaction processing services, which would require Shanghai IT to obtain an ICP License.
An ICP License is a value-added telecommunications business operating license required for provision of commercial internet information services. As of the date of this annual report, Shanghai IT has applied and obtained an ICP License. Furthermore, as we are providing mobile applications to mobile device users, it is uncertain if Shanghai IT will be required to obtain a separate value-added telecommunications business operating license with respect to the services provided through mobile devices in addition to the ICP License. Although we believe that not obtaining such separate license is in line with the current market practice, there can be no assurance that we will not be required to apply for an operating license for our mobile applications in the future.
The Circular on Strengthening the Administration of Foreign Investment in and Operation of Value-added Telecommunications Business, issued by the MIIT in July 2006, prohibits domestic telecommunication service providers from leasing, transferring or selling telecommunications business operating licenses to any foreign investor in any form, or providing any resources, sites or facilities to any foreign investor for its illegal operation of a telecommunications business in the Chinese mainland. According to this circular, either the holder of a value-added telecommunication services operation permit or its shareholders must directly own the domain names and trademarks used by such license holders in their provision of value-added telecommunication services. The circular also requires each license holder to have the necessary facilities, including servers, for its approved business operations and to maintain such facilities in the regions covered by its license. Shanghai IT currently owns the domain names and trademarks in connection with our value-added telecommunications business and has the necessary personnel to operate our websites. If an ICP License holder fails to comply with the requirements and also fails to remedy such non-compliance within a specified period of time, the MIIT or its local counterparts have the discretion to take administrative measures against such license holder, including revoking its ICP License.
The interpretation and application of existing laws, regulations and policies in the Chinese mainland and possible new laws, regulations or policies in the Chinese mainland relating to the internet industry have created substantial uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, internet businesses in the Chinese mainland, including our business. We cannot assure you that we have obtained all the permits or licenses required for conducting our business in the Chinese mainland or will be able to maintain our existing licenses or obtain new ones. If the PRC government considers that we were operating without the proper approvals, licenses or permits or promulgates new laws and regulations that require additional approvals or licenses or imposes additional restrictions on the operation of any part of our business, it has the power, among other things, to levy fines, confiscate our income, revoke our business licenses, and require us to discontinue our business or impose restrictions on the affected portion of our business. Any of these actions by the PRC government may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities3 | 2.4%
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 1
Changed
Some of our subsidiaries, the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries, and joint ventures in the Chinese mainland engaged in certain business activities beyond the authorized scope of their respective licenses, and if they are subject to administrative penalties or fines, our operating results may be adversely affected.
Some of our subsidiaries, the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries, and joint ventures in the Chinese mainland engaged in business activities that were not within the authorized scope of their respective licenses in the past. The PRC authorities may impose administrative fines or other penalties for the non-compliance with the authorized scope of the business licenses, which may in turn adversely affect our operating results.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 2
Added
Digital assets we held are not subject to protections from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
We do not hold our digital assets with a banking institution or a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation and, therefore, our digital assets are not subject to the protections enjoyed by depositors with the member institutions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
Litigation & Legal Liabilities - Risk 3
You may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in China against us or our management named in this annual report based on foreign laws.
We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. We no longer conduct substantially all of our operations in China and substantially all of our assets are no longer located in China. However, all our senior executive officers reside within China for a significant portion of the time. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process upon us or our management residing in China. In addition, China does not have treaties providing for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts with the Cayman Islands and many other countries and regions. Therefore, recognition and enforcement in China of judgments of a court in any of these non-Chinese mainland jurisdictions in relation to any matter not subject to a binding arbitration provision may be difficult or impossible.
Taxation & Government Incentives6 | 4.9%
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 1
Strengthened scrutiny over acquisition transactions by the PRC tax authorities may have a negative impact on our acquisition strategy.
In connection with the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, the SAT issued, on February 3, 2015, the Notice on Several Issues regarding Enterprise Income Tax for Indirect Property Transfer by Non-resident Enterprises, or SAT Circular 7, which further specifies the criteria for judging reasonable commercial purpose, and the legal requirements for the voluntary reporting procedures and filing materials in the case of indirect property transfer. SAT Circular 7 has listed several factors to be taken into consideration by tax authorities in determining whether an indirect transfer has a reasonable commercial purpose. However, despite these factors, an indirect transfer satisfying all the following criteria shall be deemed to lack reasonable commercial purpose and be taxable under the laws of the Chinese mainland: (i) 75% or more of the equity value of the intermediary enterprise being transferred is derived directly or indirectly from the taxable properties in the Chinese mainland; (ii) at any time during the one year period before the indirect transfer, 90% or more of the asset value of the intermediary enterprise (excluding cash) is comprised directly or indirectly of investments in the Chinese mainland, or 90% or more of its income is derived directly or indirectly from the Chinese mainland; (iii) the functions performed and risks assumed by the intermediary enterprise and any of its subsidiaries that directly or indirectly hold the taxable properties in the Chinese mainland are limited and are insufficient to prove their economic substance; and (iv) the foreign tax payable on the gains derived from the indirect transfer of the taxable properties in the Chinese mainland is lower than the potential Chinese mainland tax on the direct transfer of such assets. Nevertheless, the indirect transfer falling into the scope of the safe harbor under SAT Circular 7 may not be subject to the Chinese mainland tax and such safe harbor includes qualified group restructuring, public market trading and tax treaty exemptions. According to SAT Circular 7, where the payer fails to withhold tax in a sufficient amount, the transferor can declare and pay such tax to the tax authority by itself within the statutory time period. Late payment of applicable tax will subject the transferor to default interest.
On October 17, 2017, the SAT released the Public Notice Regarding Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or SAT Public Notice 37, which further elaborates the implementation rules regarding the calculation, reporting and payment obligations of the withholding tax by the non-resident enterprises.
Under SAT Circular 7 and SAT Public Notice 37, the entities or individuals obligated to pay the transfer price to the transferor shall be the withholding agent and shall withhold the Chinese mainland tax from the transfer price. If the withholding agent fails to do so, the transferor shall report to and pay the Chinese mainland tax to the PRC tax authorities. In case neither the withholding agent nor the transferor complies with the obligations under SAT Circular 7 and SAT Public Notice 37, other than imposing penalties such as late payment interest on the transferors, the tax authority may also hold the withholding agent liable and impose a penalty of 50% to 300% of the unpaid tax on the withholding agent, provided that such penalty imposed on the withholding agent may be reduced or waived if the withholding agent has submitted the materials in connection with the indirect transfer to the PRC tax authorities in accordance with SAT Circular 7 and SAT Public Notice 37.
Since we may pursue acquisition as one of our growth strategies, and have conducted and may conduct acquisitions involving complex corporate structures, the PRC tax authorities may, at their discretion, adjust the capital gains and impose tax return filing obligations on us or request us to submit additional documentation for their review in connection with any of our acquisitions, thus causing us to incur additional acquisition costs.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 2
Contractual arrangements in relation to the variable interest entity may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or the variable interest entity owes additional taxes, which could negatively affect our financial condition and the value of your investment.
Under applicable laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements in relation to the variable interest entity were not entered into on an arm's length basis in such a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable laws, rules and regulations of the Chinese mainland, and adjust the taxable income of the variable interest entity in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by the variable interest entity for PRC tax purposes, which could in turn increase its tax liabilities without reducing tax expenses of our Chinese mainland subsidiaries. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on the variable interest entity for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the applicable regulations. Our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the variable interest entity's tax liabilities increase or if it is required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 3
Our international business may face uncertainty in the tax implications.
We may be subject to various tax obligations associated with mining in countries where we have hosting agreements for our machines in the future, including the so-called tax on mining in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, effectively a surcharge on the electricity price per kW/h. Although crypto assets obtained through crypto mining operations are not currently taxed in some jurisdictions, we cannot guarantee the case will always be true in the future. If the governments promulgate new tax regimes that will subject our operation to additional tax liabilities, our business operations might be materially affected.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 4
Our contractual arrangements with the variable interest entity may result in adverse tax consequences to us.
We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that our contractual arrangements with Shanghai IT were not made on reasonable or arm's length commercial terms or otherwise. If this were to occur, they may adjust our income and expenses for PRC tax purposes in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could result in a reduction, for PRC tax purposes, of costs and expenses recorded by the variable interest entity, which could adversely affect us by: (i) increasing the tax liability of the variable interest entity without reducing the tax liability of our other Chinese mainland subsidiaries, which could further result in late payment fees and other penalties to the variable interest entity for underpaid taxes; or (ii) limiting the abilities of the variable interest entity to maintain preferential tax treatments and other financial incentives.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 5
Changed
The income tax laws of the Chinese mainland may increase our tax burden or the tax burden on the holders of our shares or ADSs, and tax benefits available to us may be reduced or repealed, causing the value of your investment in us to decrease.
Our subsidiaries and the variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland are subject to enterprise income tax, on the taxable income as reported in their respective statutory financial statements adjusted in accordance with the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, which was approved by the National People's Congress on March 16, 2007. The PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law went into effect as of January 1, 2008 and was amended on February 24, 2017 and December 29, 2018, which unified the tax rate generally applicable to both domestic and foreign-invested enterprises in the Chinese mainland. Our subsidiaries and the variable interest entity in the Chinese mainland are generally subject to enterprise income tax at a statutory rate of 25%. Shanghai IT, the variable interest entity which holds a High and New Technology Enterprise, or HNTE, qualification is entitled to enjoy a 15% preferential enterprise income tax rate till November 23, 2020. As the HNTE qualification has expired in 2020, Shanghai IT was no longer entitled to enjoy a preferential enterprise income tax rate.
Moreover, unlike the tax regulations effective before 2008, which specifically exempted withholding taxes on dividends payable to non-Chinese mainland investors from foreign-invested enterprises in the Chinese mainland, the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules provide that a withholding income tax rate of 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies to non-Chinese mainland-resident enterprises unless otherwise exempted or reduced according to treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and the governments of other countries or regions. While the Tax Agreement between the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong provides dividends paid by a foreign-invested enterprise in the Chinese mainland to its corporate shareholder, which is considered a Hong Kong tax resident, will be subject to withholding tax at the rate of 5% of total dividends, this is limited to instances where the corporate shareholder directly holds at least 25% of our shares that is to pay dividends for at least twelve consecutive months immediately prior to receiving the dividends and meets certain other criteria prescribed by the regulations. Under the Administrative Measures for Non-Resident Taxpayer to Enjoy Treatments under Tax Treaties, which became effective in January 2020, non-resident taxpayers shall determine whether they are eligible for treaty benefits and file a report and materials with the tax authorities. Meanwhile, the reduced withholding tax rate also applies if the conditions stipulated by other tax rules and regulations are met.
In February 2018, the State Administration of Taxation, or SAT issued the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Relating to "Beneficial Owner" in Tax Treaties on issues relating to "beneficial owner" in tax treaties, or Circular No. 9, which took effect on April 1, 2018. Circular No. 9 provides detailed guidance to determine whether the applicant engages in substantive business activities to constitute a "beneficial owner". When determining the applicant's status of the "beneficial owner" regarding tax treatments in connection with dividends, interests or royalties in the tax treaties, several factors, including without limitation, whether the applicant is obligated to pay more than 50% of his or her income in the past twelve months to residents in third country or region, whether the business operated by the applicant constitutes the actual business activities, and whether the other country or region to the tax treaties does not levy any tax or grant tax exemption on relevant incomes at all or levy tax at an extremely low rate, will be taken into account, and it will be analyzed according to the actual circumstances of the specific cases. If the non-resident taxpayer does not apply to the withholding agent for the tax treaty benefits, or such taxpayer does not satisfy the criteria to be entitled to tax treaty benefits, the withholding agent should withhold tax pursuant to the provisions of tax laws of the Chinese mainland. We cannot assure you that any dividends to be distributed from our subsidiaries to us or from us to our non-Chinese mainland shareholders and ADS holders, whose jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with the Chinese mainland providing a different withholding arrangement, will be entitled to the benefits under the withholding arrangement.
In addition, the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law deems an enterprise established offshore but having its management organ in the Chinese mainland as a "resident enterprise" that will be subject to the Chinese mainland tax at the rate of 25% of its global income. Under the Implementation Rules of the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, the term "management organ" is defined as "an organ which has substantial and overall management and control over the manufacturing and business operation, personnel, accounting, properties and other factors." On April 22, 2009, the SAT further issued a notice regarding recognizing an offshore-established enterprise controlled by shareholders in the Chinese mainland as a resident enterprise according to its management organ, or Circular 82. According to Circular 82, a foreign enterprise controlled by a Chinese mainland company or a Chinese mainland company group shall be deemed a resident enterprise of the Chinese mainland, if (i) the senior management and the core management departments in charge of its daily operations are mainly located and function in the Chinese mainland; (ii) its financial decisions and human resource decisions are subject to the determination or approval of persons or institutions located in the Chinese mainland; (iii) its major assets, accounting books, company seals, minutes and files of board meetings and shareholders' meetings are located or kept in the Chinese mainland; and (iv) more than half of the directors or senior management with voting rights reside in the Chinese mainland. On July 27, 2011, SAT issued the Administrative Measures of Enterprise Income Tax of Chinese-Controlled Offshore Incorporated Resident Enterprises (Trial), or SAT Bulletin 45, which was amended in April 2015, June 2016 and June 2018. SAT Bulletin 45 further clarified the detailed procedures for determining resident status under Circular 82, competent tax authorities in charge and post-determination administration of such resident enterprises. Although our offshore companies are not controlled by any Chinese mainland company or Chinese mainland company group, we cannot assure you that we will not be deemed to be a "resident enterprise" under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and thus be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on our global income.
According to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules, dividends are exempted from income tax if such dividends are received by a resident enterprise on equity interests it directly owns in another resident enterprise. However, foreign corporate holders of our shares or ADSs may be subject to taxation at a rate of 10% on any dividends received from us or any gains realized from the transfer of our shares or ADSs if we are deemed to be a resident enterprise or if such income is otherwise regarded as income from "sources within the Chinese mainland." The PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law empowers the PRC State Council to enact appropriate implementing rules and measures and there is no guarantee that we or our subsidiaries will be entitled to any of the preferential tax treatments. Nor can we assure you that the tax authorities will not, in the future, discontinue any of our preferential tax treatments, potentially with retroactive effect. Any significant increase in the enterprise income tax rate under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law applicable to our Chinese mainland subsidiaries and the variable interest entity, or the imposition of withholding taxes on dividends payable by our subsidiaries to us, or an enterprise income tax levy on us or any of our subsidiaries or variable interest entity registered outside of the Chinese mainland, or dividends or capital gains received by our shareholders due to shares or ADSs held in us will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial conditions and the value of investments in us.
Taxation & Government Incentives - Risk 6
Changed
We are required to pay value added tax as a result of tax reforms in various regions in the Chinese mainland and we may be subject to similar tax treatments elsewhere in the Chinese mainland.
On March 23, 2016, the Ministry of Finance and the SAT jointly issued the Circular on the Pilot Program for Overall Implementation of the Collection of Value Added Tax Instead of Business Tax, or Circular 36, which took effect on May 1, 2016. Pursuant to Circular 36, all companies operating in construction, real estate, finance, modern service or other sectors which were required to pay business tax are required to pay value added tax, or VAT, in lieu of business tax. As a result of Circular 36, the services provided by general VAT payers will be subject to VAT at the rate of 6%, and the services provided by small-scale VAT payers will be subject to VAT at the rate of 3%. While as general VAT payers may reduce their VAT payable amount by the VAT which they paid in connection with their purchasing activities, or the Input VAT, those companies as small-scale VAT payers may not reduce their VAT payable amount by their Input VAT. As a result, some of our subsidiaries and the variable interest entity may be subject to more unfavorable tax treatment as a result of the tax reform, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Environmental / Social2 | 1.6%
Environmental / Social - Risk 1
Changed
Regulation and censorship of information disseminated over the internet in the Chinese mainland may adversely affect our business, and we may be liable for information displayed on, retrieved from, or linked to our internet websites.
The PRC government has adopted certain regulations governing internet access and the distribution of news and other information over the internet. Under these regulations, internet content providers and internet publishers are prohibited from posting or displaying over the internet content that, among other things, violates laws and regulations of the Chinese mainland, impairs the national dignity of China, or is obscene, superstitious, fraudulent or defamatory. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the revocation of ICP and other required licenses and the closure of the concerned websites. The website operator may also be held liable for such prohibited information displayed on, retrieved from or linked to such website.
The Ministry of Culture and the Tourism has promulgated laws and regulations that reiterate the government's policies to prohibit the distribution of games with violence, cruelty or other elements that are believed to have the potential effect of instigating crimes, and to prevent the influx of harmful cultural products from overseas.
The Ministry of Culture and the Tourism has promulgated laws and regulations that require, among other things, (i) the review and prior approval of all new online games licensed from foreign game developers and related license agreements, (ii) the review of patches and updates with substantial changes of games which have already been approved, and (iii) the filing of domestically developed online games. Furthermore, online games, regardless of whether imported or domestic, will be subject to content review and approval by the GAPPRFT prior to the commencement of games operations in the Chinese mainland. Failure to obtain or renew approvals or to complete filings for online games, including mobile games, may materially delay or otherwise affect game operator's plans to launch new games, and the operator may be subject to fines, restriction or suspension of operations of the related games or revocation of licenses in the event that the governmental authority believes that the violation is severe. We obtained the necessary approvals from and completed necessary filings with the Ministry of Culture and the GAPP for operations of our games as applicable. Consistent with the general practice of the mobile and TV game industry in the Chinese mainland, we have not yet completed filings with the Ministry of Culture and the GAPPRFT for our mobile and TV games before we commenced our operations. If any such negative event occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, the MIIT has published regulations that subject website operators to potential liability for content included on their websites and the actions of users and others using their websites, including liability for violations of laws of the Chinese mainland prohibiting the dissemination of content deemed to be socially destabilizing. The Ministry of Public Security has the authority to order any local internet service provider to block any internet website maintained outside of the Chinese mainland at its sole discretion. Periodically, the Ministry of Public Security has stopped the dissemination over the internet of information which it believes to be socially destabilizing. The State Secrecy Bureau, which is directly responsible for the protection of State secrets of the PRC government, is authorized to block any website it deems to be leaking state secrets or failing to meet the regulations relating to the protection of state secrets in the dissemination of online information.
As these regulations are subject to interpretation by the authorities, it may not be possible for us to determine in all cases the type of content that could result in liability for us as a website operator. In addition, we may not be able to control or restrict the content of other internet content providers linked to or accessible through our websites, or content generated or placed on our websites by our users, despite our attempt to monitor such content. To the extent that regulatory authorities find any portion of our content objectionable, they may require us to limit or eliminate the dissemination of such information or otherwise curtail the nature of such content on our websites, which may reduce our user traffic and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may be subject to significant penalties for violations of those regulations arising from information displayed on, retrieved from or linked to our websites, including a suspension or shutdown of our operations.
Environmental / Social - Risk 2
Our business is subject to complex and evolving Chinese and international laws and regulations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity. Failure to protect confidential information of our customers and network against security breaches could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and results of operations.
As the regulations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity are quickly evolving in China and globally, we may become subject to new laws and regulations applying to the solicitation, collection, processing or use of personal or consumer information that could affect how we store, process and share data with our customers, suppliers and third-party merchants.
On August 20, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of China promulgated the Personal Information Protection Law, which integrates the scattered rules with respect to personal information rights and privacy protection and took effect on November 1, 2021. We do not collect user personal information. We do not collect any sensitive personal information or other excessive personal information that is not related to the corresponding services. We update our privacy policies from time to time to meet the latest regulatory requirements of the CAC and other authorities and adopt technical measures to protect data and ensure cybersecurity in a systematic way. Nonetheless, the Personal Information Protection Law raises the protection requirements for processing personal information, and many specific requirements of the Personal Information Protection Law remain to be clarified by the CAC, other regulatory authorities, and courts in practice. We may be required to make further adjustments to our business practices to comply with the personal information protection laws and regulations. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Regulations."
On December 28, 2021, thirteen ministries and commissions, including the National Internet Information Office, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of National Security, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Commerce, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the State Administration of Radio and Television, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Secret Service, and the State Cryptography Administration, issued the Measures for Cybersecurity Review (2021), which emphasized that operators of "critical information infrastructure" or data processors holding over one million users' personal information shall apply with the Cybersecurity Review Office for a cybersecurity review before any public offering at a foreign stock exchange. The Measures for Cybersecurity Review that took effect on February 15, 2022 provide that the purchase of network products and services by critical information infrastructure operator and the data processing activities carries out online platform operators, which affects or may affect national security, shall be subject to cybersecurity review in accordance with the present Measures. In connection with offering and listing in an overseas market, an online platform operator who possesses the personal information of more than one million users shall declare to the Office of Cybersecurity Review for cybersecurity review.
On November 14, 2021, the CAC released the Regulations on the Network Data Security (Draft for Comments), or the Draft Regulations. The Draft Regulations provide that data processors refer to individuals or organizations that autonomously determine the purpose and the manner of processing data. In accordance with the Draft Regulations, data processors shall apply for a cybersecurity review for the following activities: (i) merger, reorganization or division of internet platform operators that have acquired a large number of data resources related to national security, economic development or public interests to the extent that affects or may affect national security; (ii) listing abroad of data processors which process over one million users' personal information; (iii) the listing of data processors in Hong Kong which affects or may affect national security; or (iv) other data processing activities that affect or may affect national security. However, there have been no clarifications from the authorities as of the date of this annual report as to the standards for determining such activities that "affects or may affect national security." See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Regulations." As of the date of this annual report, the Draft Regulations were released for public comment only, and their respective provisions and the anticipated adoption or effective date may be subject to change with substantial uncertainty. As of the date of this annual report, we have not been involved in any formal investigations on cybersecurity review made by the CAC on such basis. However, if we are not able to comply with the cybersecurity and network data security requirements in a timely manner, or at all, we may be subject to government enforcement actions and investigations, fines, penalties, suspension of our non-compliant operations, or removal of our app from the application stores, among other sanctions, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition to the cybersecurity review, the Draft Regulations requires that data processors processing "important data" or listed overseas shall conduct an annual data security assessment by itself or commission a data security service provider to do so, and submit the assessment report of the preceding year to the municipal cybersecurity department by the end of January each year.
As of the date of this annual report, (i) we are not a critical information infrastructure operator, (ii) we collect less than one million users' information through our internet platform in China-the amount of registered users are approximately 100,000 as of the filing date of this annual report, and (iii) our business does not affect national security. Thus, our PRC legal counsel does not expect that, as of the date of this annual report, we are required to file an application for the cybersecurity review by CAC.
On February 22, 2023, the CAC issued the Measures on the Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information, or the Measures, which took effect on June 1, 2023, and the Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information. The Measures consist of 13 articles, clarifying the scope of application, applicable conditions, requirements for supporting personal information protection impact assessments, record-keeping requirements, and other related matters for the Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information. If a personal information processor provides personal information to overseas parties by entering into standard contracts, it shall meet the following conditions at the same time: (1) it shall not be a operator of critical information infrastructure; (2) the number of individuals whose personal information is processed shall be less than 1 million; (3) the cumulative number of individuals whose personal information has been provided to overseas parties shall be less than 100,000 since January 1 of the previous year; and (4) the cumulative number of individuals whose sensitive personal information has been provided to overseas parties shall be less than 10,000 since January 1 of the previous year. As of the date of this annual report, we had not provided personal information to overseas organizations, and there is no situation of providing personal information to overseas data processors. However, the Measures do not clarify whether the regulations still apply to companies providing personal information of their own directors and senior executives (such as their names, ages, and addresses that need to be disclosed in prospectuses) to overseas intermediaries and regulatory authorities. Based on the foregoing, our PRC legal counsel does not expect that, as of the date of this annual report, the current applicable laws of the Chinese mainland on personal information export would have a material adverse impact on our business.
In addition, we may need to comply with increasingly complex and rigorous regulatory standards enacted to protect business and personal data in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere. For example, the European Union adopted the General Data Protection Regulation, which became effective on May 25, 2018. The General Data Protection Regulation imposes additional obligations on companies regarding the handling of personal data and provides certain individual privacy rights to persons whose data is stored. Compliance with existing, proposed and recently enacted laws (including implementation of the privacy and process enhancements called for under the General Data Protection Regulation) and regulations can be costly; any failure to comply with these regulatory standards could subject us to legal and reputational risks.
We generally comply with industry standards and are subject to the terms of our own privacy policies. Compliance with any additional laws could be expensive, and may place restrictions on the conduct of our business and the manner in which we interact with our customers. Any failure to comply with applicable regulations could also result in regulatory enforcement actions against us, and misuse of or failure to secure personal information could also result in violation of data privacy laws and regulations, proceedings against us by governmental authorities or other authorities, damage to our reputation and credibility and could have a negative impact on revenues and profits.
Significant capital and other resources may be required to protect against information security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such breaches or to comply with our privacy policies or privacy-related legal obligations. The resources required may increase over time as the methods used by hackers and others engaged in online criminal activities are increasingly sophisticated and constantly evolving. Any failure or failure we perceived in preventing information security breaches or to comply with privacy policies or privacy-related legal obligations, or any compromise of security that results in the unauthorized release or transfer of personally identifiable information or other customer data, could cause our customers to lose trust in us and could expose us to legal claims. Any perception by the public that online transactions or the privacy of user information are becoming increasingly unsafe or vulnerable to attacks could inhibit the growth of our business.
Tech & Innovation
Total Risks: 21/123 (17%)Above Sector Average
Innovation / R&D2 | 1.6%
Innovation / R&D - Risk 1
The further development and acceptance of digital asset networks and other digital assets, which represent a new and rapidly changing industry, are subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate. The slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of digital asset systems may adversely affect an investment in us.
Digital assets such as Bitcoin, that may be used, among other things, to buy and sell goods and services are a new and rapidly evolving industry of which the digital asset networks are prominent, but not unique, parts. The growth of the digital asset industry in general, and the digital asset networks of Bitcoin in particular, are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The factors affecting the further development of the digital asset industry, as well as the digital asset networks, include:
- continued worldwide growth in the adoption and use of Bitcoin and other digital assets;- government and quasi-government regulation of Bitcoin and other digital assets and their use, or restrictions on or regulation of access to and operation of the digital asset network or similar digital assets systems - the maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of the Bitcoin network;- changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences;- the availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services, including new means of using fiat currencies;- general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to digital assets;- the impact of regulators focusing on digital assets and digital securities and the costs associated with such regulatory oversight; and - a decline in the popularity or acceptance of the digital asset networks of Bitcoin, or similar digital asset systems, could adversely affect an investment in us.
Additionally, various governmental and regulatory bodies, including legislative and executive bodies, in the United States and in other countries may adopt new laws and regulations, the direction and timing of which may be influenced by changes in the governing administrations and major events in the cryptoeconomy. For example, following the failure of several prominent crypto trading venues and lending platforms, such as FTX, Celsius Networks, Voyager and Three Arrows Capital in 2022, the U.S. Congress expressed the need for both greater federal oversight of the cryptoeconomy and comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation. In the near future, various governmental and regulatory bodies, including in the United States, may introduce new policies, laws, and regulations relating to crypto assets and the cryptoeconomy generally, and crypto asset platforms in particular. The failures of risk management and other control functions at other companies that played a role in the above-mentioned events happened in 2022 could accelerate an existing regulatory trend toward stricter oversight of crypto asset platforms and the cryptoeconomy. Furthermore, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations may be issued by such bodies or the judiciary, which may adversely impact the development of the cryptoeconomy as a whole and our legal and regulatory status in particular by changing how we operate our business, how our products and services are regulated, and what products or services we and our competitors can offer, requiring changes to our compliance and risk mitigation measures, imposing new licensing requirements, or imposing a total ban on certain crypto asset transactions, as has occurred in certain jurisdictions in the past. For example, under recommendations from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or the FinCEN, and the Financial Action Task Force, the United States and several foreign jurisdictions have or are likely to impose the Funds Travel Rule and the Funds Transfer Rule (commonly referred to collectively as the Travel Rule) on financial service providers in the cryptoeconomy. We may face substantial costs to operationalize and comply with the Travel Rule and may be further subject to administrative sanctions for technical violations or customer attrition if the user experience suffers as a result. In December 2020, the FinCEN released a proposed rule that would require us to collect personal information from the owners of self-custodied wallets that transfer cryptocurrencies to or receive cryptocurrencies from us, and report certain transactions to the federal government. There are substantial uncertainties on how these requirements would apply in practice, and we may face substantial costs to operationalize and comply with these rules.
Innovation / R&D - Risk 2
New lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risks.
From time to time, we may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within our existing lines of business. For example, in March 2019, we entered into a joint venture agreement with F&F relating to the design and development of electric vehicles. However, the electric vehicles business did not develop as we anticipated. We also operated an NFT business between 2021 and 2023 which we subsequently sold off. Currently, we are developing our cryptocurrency mining business, having begun cryptocurrency mining activities in February 2021. Since the beginning of 2024, we have been gradually stepping into the AI industry, by entering into a few strategic alliances. We may enter into new lines of business in the future.
As a new entrant into new lines of business, we face significant challenges, uncertainties and risks, including, among other things, with respect to our ability to:
- build a well-recognized and respected brand;- establish and expand our customer base;- improve and maintain our operational efficiency for new lines of business;- maintain a reliable, secure, high-performance and scalable technology infrastructure for our new lines of business;- anticipate and adapt to changing market conditions, including technological developments and changes in competitive landscape;- navigate an evolving and complex regulatory environment, such as licensing and compliance requirements; and - manage the resources and attention of management between our current core business and new lines of business.
Moreover, there can be no assurance that the introduction and development of new lines of business or new products and services would not encounter significant difficulties or delay or would achieve the profitability as we expect. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and prospects. For example, with respect to our plan to develop our cryptocurrency mining business, we may not be able to acquire cryptocurrency mining machines at a reasonable cost, or at all. Due to our limited experience with cryptocurrency and its mining activities, we also face challenges and uncertainties relating to the possibility of success of our new business. We cannot assure you that our efforts in entry into new business sectors, such as our development of cryptocurrency mining business, will succeed. There can be no assurance that such operations will succeed or revert satisfactory results and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
As we enter into new business sectors, we are also subject to competition from such industry. For example, the cryptocurrency industry is highly competitive despite its relatively short history. There can be no assurance that we are able to compete effectively with respect to our new businesses. If we fail to establish our strengths or maintain our competitiveness in those industries, our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.
Trade Secrets4 | 3.3%
Trade Secrets - Risk 1
We may not be able to prevent others from infringing upon our intellectual property rights, which may harm our business and expose us to litigation.
We regard our proprietary software, domain names, trade names, trademarks and similar intellectual properties as critical to our business. Intellectual property rights and confidentiality protection in China may not be as effective as in the United States or other countries. Monitoring and preventing the unauthorized use of proprietary technology is difficult and expensive. The steps we have taken may be inadequate to prevent the misappropriation of our proprietary technology. Any misappropriation could have a negative effect on our business and operating results. We may need to resort to court proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights in the future. Litigation relating to our intellectual property might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention away from our business. See "-Risks Related to Doing Business in China-Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us."
Trade Secrets - Risk 2
Variability in intellectual property laws may adversely affect our intellectual property position.
Intellectual property laws, and patent laws and regulations in particular, have been subject to significant variability either through administrative or legislative changes to such laws or regulations or changes or differences in judicial interpretation, and it is expected that such variability will continue to occur. Additionally, intellectual property laws and regulations differ among states, and countries. Variations in the patent laws and regulations or in interpretations of patent laws and regulations in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property and may change the impact of third-party intellectual property on us. Accordingly, we cannot predict the scope of patents that may be granted to us, the extent to which we will be able to enforce our patents against third parties, or the extent to which third parties may be able to enforce their patents against us.
Trade Secrets - Risk 3
We have been and may be subject to future intellectual property rights claims or other claims, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our financial and management resources away from our business.
There is no assurance that all aspects of our business operation do not or will not infringe upon patents, valid copyrights or other intellectual property rights held by third parties. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time relating to the intellectual property of others.
Some of our employees were previously employed at other companies, including our current and potential competitors. To the extent these employees have been involved in research at our company similar to research in which they had been involved at their former employers, we may become subject to claims that such employees have used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. In addition, our competitors may file lawsuits against us in order to gain an unfair competitive advantage over us.
If any such claim arises in the future, litigation or other dispute resolution proceedings may be necessary to retain our ability to offer our current and future games, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our financial and management resources. Furthermore, if we are found to have violated the intellectual property rights of others, we may be enjoined from using such intellectual property, incur additional costs to license or develop alternative games and be forced to pay fines and damages, each of which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Trade Secrets - Risk 4
Your right to participate in any future rights offerings may be limited, which may cause dilution to your holdings.
We may from time to time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make rights available to you in the United States unless we register the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. Also, under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not make rights available to you unless the distribution to ADS holders of both the rights and any related securities are either registered under the Securities Act, or exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or securities or to endeavor to cause such a registration statement to be declared effective. Moreover, we may not be able to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act. The depositary may, but is not required to, sell such undistributed rights to third parties in this situation. Accordingly, you may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution in your holdings.
Cyber Security7 | 5.7%
Cyber Security - Risk 1
We could be liable for breaches of security of third-party online payment channels, which may have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business.
Currently, a portion of our online game operation revenues are generated from sales through third-party online payment platforms. In such transactions, secured transmission of confidential information, such as customers' credit card numbers and expiration dates, personal information and billing addresses, over public networks, in some cases including our website, is essential to maintain consumer confidence. While we have not experienced any material breach of our security measures to date, we cannot assure you that our current security measures are adequate. We do not have control over the security measures of our third-party online payment vendors and we cannot assure you that these vendors' security measures are adequate or will be adequate with the expected increased usage of online payment systems. Security breaches of the online payment systems that we use could expose us to litigation and possible liability for failing to secure confidential customer information and could harm our reputation, ability to attract customers and ability to encourage customers to purchase in-game items.
Cyber Security - Risk 2
A loss of confidence in our security system, or a breach of our security system, may adversely affect us and the value of an investment in us.
We will take measures to protect us and our digital assets from unauthorized access, damage or theft; however, it is possible that the security system may not prevent the improper access to, or damage or theft of our digital assets. A security breach could harm our reputation or result in the loss of some or all of our digital assets. A resulting perception that our measures do not adequately protect our digital assets could result in a loss of current or potential shareholders, reducing demand for our Class A ordinary shares or the ADSs and causing our shares to decrease in value.
Cyber Security - Risk 3
Security threats to us could result in, a loss of our digital assets, or damage to the reputation and our brand, each of which could adversely affect an investment in us.
Security breaches, computer malware and computer hacking attacks have been a prevalent concern in the digital asset exchange markets, for example since the launch of the Bitcoin network. Any security breach caused by hacking, which involves efforts to gain unauthorized access to information or systems, or to cause intentional malfunctions or loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment, and the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses, could harm our business operations or result in loss of our digital assets. Any breach of our infrastructure could result in damage to our reputation which could adversely affect an investment in us. Furthermore, we believe that, as our assets grow, it may become a more appealing target for security threats such as hackers and malware.
We primarily rely on cold self-storage to safeguard our digital assets from theft, loss, destruction or other issues relating to hackers and technological attack. Nevertheless, our designated self-custody security system may not be impenetrable and may not be free from defect or immune to acts of God, and we will bear any loss due to a security breach, software defect or act of God.
The security system and operational infrastructure may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, error or malfeasance of an employee of ours, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our, private keys, data or Bitcoin. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees of ours to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our infrastructure. As the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently, or may be designed to remain dormant until a predetermined event and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security system occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security system could be harmed, which could adversely affect an investment in us.
In the event of a security breach, we may be forced to cease operations, or suffer a reduction in assets, the occurrence of each of which could adversely affect an investment in us.
Cyber Security - Risk 4
If we or our third-party service providers experience a security breach or cyberattack and unauthorized parties obtain access to our Bitcoin, we may lose some or all of our Bitcoin and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
Security breaches and cyberattacks are of particular concern with respect to our Bitcoin. Bitcoin and other blockchain-based cryptocurrencies have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. A successful security breach or cyberattack could result in a partial or total loss of our Bitcoin in a manner that may not be covered by insurance or indemnity provisions of the custody agreement with a custodian who holds our Bitcoin. Such a loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Cyber Security - Risk 5
The loss or destruction of a private key required to access a digital asset may be irreversible. Our loss of access to our private keys or our experience of a data loss relating to our Company's digital assets could adversely affect an investment in our Company.
Digital assets are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the digital assets are held. We are required by the operation of digital asset networks to publish the public key relating to a digital wallet we use when it first verifies a spending transaction from that digital wallet and disseminates such information into the respective network. We safeguard and keep private the private keys relating to our digital assets; to the extent a private key is lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key is accessible, we will be unable to access the digital assets held by it and the private key will not be capable of being restored by the respective digital asset network. Any loss of private keys relating to digital wallets used to store our digital assets could adversely affect an investment in us.
Cyber Security - Risk 6
If a malicious actor or botnet obtains control in excess of 50% of the processing power active on any digital asset network, including the Bitcoin network, it is possible that such actor or botnet could manipulate the blockchain in a manner that adversely affects an investment in us.
If a malicious actor or botnet (a volunteer or hacked collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the actions of the computers) obtains a majority of the processing power dedicated to mining on any digital asset network, including the Bitcoin network, it may be able to alter the blockchain by constructing alternate blocks if it is able to solve for such blocks faster than the remainder of the miners on the blockchain can add valid blocks. In such alternate blocks, the malicious actor or botnet could control, exclude or modify the ordering of transactions, though it could not generate new digital assets or transactions using such control. Using alternate blocks, the malicious actor could "double-spend" its own digital assets (i.e., spend the same digital assets in more than one transaction) and prevent the confirmation of other users' transactions for so long as it maintains control. To the extent that such malicious actor or botnet does not yield its majority control of the processing power or the digital asset community does not reject the fraudulent blocks as malicious, reversing any changes made to the blockchain may not be possible. Such changes could adversely affect an investment in us.
The approach towards and possible crossing of the 50% threshold indicate a greater risk that a single mining pool could exert authority over the validation of digital asset transactions. To the extent that the digital assets ecosystems do not act to ensure greater decentralization of digital asset mining processing power, the feasibility of a malicious actor obtaining in excess of 50% of the processing power on any digital asset network (e.g., through control of a large mining pool or through hacking such a mining pool) will increase, which may adversely impact an investment in us.
Cyber Security - Risk 7
Changed
Because we may, from time to time, hold our digital assets at digital asset exchanges, we face heightened risks from cybersecurity attacks and financial stability of digital asset exchanges.
We may transfer our digital asset from our wallet to digital asset exchanges prior to selling them. Digital assets not held in our wallet are subject to the risks encountered by digital asset exchanges including a dDoS Attack or other malicious hacking, a sale of the digital asset exchange, loss of the digital assets by the digital asset exchange and other risks similar to those described herein. While we may have a custodian agreement with various providers that hold our digital assets, these digital asset custodians provide only limited insurance over all crypto assets under their custody, and may lack the resources to protect against hacking and theft. If this were to occur, we may be materially and adversely affected.
We hold mined Bitcoin as current assets. We may occasionally sell portion of mined Bitcoin to cover our operational costs. We may sell Bitcoin through various exchanges, including Binance. We received 20 previously pledged Bitcoins from Binance on April 12, 2024. As of the date of this annual report, we had 18 Bitcoins pledged to Binance, and therefore, they are temporarily held on NBTC Limited's account on Binance exchange. As for the Filecoin, we keep them in the hot wallet and use our holdings to participate in direct staking. We do not have immediate plans to sell Filecoin. In addition, as of the date of this annual report, we hold approximately 22 Ethereum on Binance exchange account for future sales.
Technology8 | 6.5%
Technology - Risk 1
Changed
The continued growth of the Chinese mainland's internet market depends on the establishment of adequate telecommunications infrastructure.
Although private sector internet service providers currently exist in the Chinese mainland, almost all access to the internet is maintained through state-owned telecommunication operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the Chinese mainland's MIIT. In addition, the national networks in the Chinese mainland connect to the internet through government-controlled international gateways. These government-controlled international gateways are the only channel through which a domestic user in the Chinese mainland can connect to the international internet network. We rely on this infrastructure to provide data communications capacity primarily through local telecommunications lines. Although the government has announced plans to aggressively develop the national information infrastructure, we cannot assure you that this infrastructure will be developed as planned or at all. In addition, we will have no access to alternative networks and services, on a timely basis if at all, in the event of any infrastructure disruption or failure. The internet infrastructure in the Chinese mainland may not support the demands necessary for the continued growth in internet usage.
Technology - Risk 2
Significant contributors to all or any digital asset network could propose amendments to the respective network's protocols and software that, if accepted and authorized by such network, could adversely affect an investment in us.
For example, with respect to Bitcoin network, a small group of individuals contribute to the Bitcoin Core project on GitHub.com. This group of contributors is currently headed by Wladimir J. van der Laan, the current lead maintainer. These individuals can propose refinements or improvements to the Bitcoin network's source code through one or more software upgrades that alter the protocols and software that govern the Bitcoin network and the properties of Bitcoin, including the irreversibility of transactions and limitations on the mining of new Bitcoin. Proposals for upgrades and discussions relating thereto take place on online forums. For example, there is an ongoing debate regarding altering the blockchain by increasing the size of blocks to accommodate a larger volume of transactions. Although some proponents support an increase, other market participants oppose an increase to the block size as it may deter miners from confirming transactions and concentrate power into a smaller group of miners. To the extent that a significant majority of the users and miners on the Bitcoin network install such software upgrade(s), the Bitcoin network would be subject to new protocols and software that may adversely affect an investment in us. In the event a developer or group of developers proposes a modification to the Bitcoin network that is not accepted by a majority of miners and users, but that is nonetheless accepted by a substantial plurality of miners and users, two or more competing and incompatible blockchain implementations could result. This is known as a "hard fork." In such a case, the "hard fork" in the blockchain could materially and adversely affect the perceived value of digital assets as reflected on one or both incompatible blockchains, which may adversely affect an investment in us.
Technology - Risk 3
The open-source structure of the Bitcoin network protocol means that the contributors to the protocol are generally not directly compensated for their contributions in maintaining and developing the protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade the protocol could damage the Bitcoin network and an investment in us.
The Bitcoin network for example operates based on an open-source protocol maintained by contributors, largely on the Bitcoin Core project on GitHub. As an open source project, Bitcoin is not represented by an official organization or authority. As the Bitcoin network protocol is not sold and its use does not generate revenues for contributors, contributors are generally not compensated for maintaining and updating the Bitcoin network protocol. Although the MIT Media Lab's Digital Currency Initiative funds the current maintainer Wladimir J. van der Laan, among other things, this type of financial incentive is not typical. The lack of guaranteed financial incentive for contributors to maintain or develop the Bitcoin network and the lack of guaranteed resources to adequately address emerging issues with the Bitcoin network may reduce incentives to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner. Changes to a digital asset network which we are mining on may adversely affect an investment in us.
Technology - Risk 4
Changed
We are subject to risks arising from our need for significant electrical power.
Our Bitcoin mining operations have required significant amounts of electrical power, and, as we continue to expand our mining fleet, we anticipate our demand for electrical power will continue to grow. If we are unable to continue to obtain sufficient electrical power to operate our miners on a cost-effective basis, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of our significant capital investments in new miners.
Additionally, our mining operations could be materially and adversely affected by prolonged power outages. Although our miners may be powered by backup generators on a temporary basis, it would not be feasible or cost-effective to run miners on back-up power generators for extended periods of time. Therefore, we may have to reduce or cease our operations in the event of an extended power outage, or as a result of the unavailability or increased cost of electrical power. If this were to occur, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, and investors in our securities could be harmed.
Technology - Risk 5
Our ability to adopt technology in response to changing security needs or trends poses a challenge to the safekeeping of our digital assets.
The history of digital asset exchanges has shown that exchanges and large holders of digital assets must adapt to technological change in order to secure and safeguard their digital assets. We largely rely on cold storage solution to safeguard our digital assets from theft, loss, destruction or other issues relating to hackers and technological attack. Our digital assets will also be moved to various exchanges in order to exchange them for fiat currency during which time we will be relying on the security of such exchanges to safeguard our digital assets. We believe that it may become a more appealing target of security threats as the size of our Bitcoin holdings grow. To the extent that either our designated custodian of crypto assets or we are unable to identify and mitigate or stop new security threats, our digital assets may be subject to theft, loss, destruction or other attack, which could adversely affect an investment in us.
Technology - Risk 6
We may not have adequate sources of recovery if our digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed.
If our digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed under circumstances rendering a party liable to us, the responsible party may not have the financial resources sufficient to satisfy our claim. For example, as to a particular event of loss, the only source of recovery for us might be limited, to the extent identifiable, other responsible third parties (e.g., a thief or terrorist), any of which may not have the financial resources (including liability insurance coverage) to satisfy a valid claim of ours.
Technology - Risk 7
Our business may be harmed if our technology becomes obsolete or if our system infrastructure fails to operate effectively.
The industries we operate in are subject to rapid technological change. We need to anticipate the emergence of new technologies in cryptocurrency mining and online games, assess their acceptance and make appropriate investments. If we are unable to do so, new technologies in cryptocurrency mining and online game programming or operations could render our cryptocurrency mining inefficient or our games obsolete or unattractive. In addition, our business may be harmed if we are unable to upgrade our systems fast enough to accommodate increasing computing power and fluctuations in future traffic levels, avoid obsolescence or successfully integrate any newly developed or acquired technology with our existing systems. Capacity constraints could cause unanticipated system disruptions and slower response and processing time, affecting data transmission and efficiency. These factors could, among other things, cause our cryptocurrency mining activities to become inefficient or cause us to lose existing or potential customers and existing or potential game development partners.
Technology - Risk 8
Unexpected network interruptions caused by system failures or other internal or external factors may lead to user attrition, revenue reductions and may harm our reputation.
Any failure to maintain satisfactory performances, reliability, security and availability of our network infrastructure may cause significant harm to our reputation and our ability to attract and maintain users. The system hardware for our operations is located in several cities in China. We maintain our backup system hardware and operate our back-end infrastructure in Shanghai. Server interruptions, breakdowns or system failures in the cities where we maintain our servers and system hardware, including failures that may be attributable to sustained power shutdowns, or other events within or outside our control that could result in a sustained shutdown of all or a material portion of our services, could adversely impact our ability to service our users.
Our network systems are also vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, fire, flood, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer hacking and similar events. We maintain property insurance policies covering our servers, but do not have business interruption insurance.
Production
Total Risks: 15/123 (12%)Below Sector Average
Manufacturing1 | 0.8%
Manufacturing - Risk 1
Our mining operations, including the facilities in which our miners are operated, may experience damages, including damages that are not covered by insurance.
Our current mining operation in various countries is and any future mines we establish will be, subject to a variety of risks relating to physical condition and operation, including, but not limited to:
- the presence of construction or repair defects or other structural or building damage;- any noncompliance with or liabilities under applicable environmental, health or safety regulations or requirements or building permit requirements;- any damage resulting from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, floods and windstorms; and - claims by employees and others for injuries sustained at our properties.
For example, our or our partners' mining facilities could be rendered inoperable, temporarily or permanently, as a result of a fire or other natural disaster or by a terrorist or other attack on the mine. The security and other measures we take to protect against these risks may not be sufficient. Additionally, mining facilities could be materially and adversely affected by a power outage or loss of access to the electrical grid or loss by the grid of cost-effective sources of electrical power generating capacity. Given the power requirement, it would not be feasible to run miners on back-up power generators in the event of a power outage. Insurance which we may purchase from the market may not cover the replacement cost of any lost or damaged miners, or any interruption of our mining activities; therefore our insurance may not be adequate to cover the losses we suffer as a result of any of these events. In the event of an uninsured loss, including a loss in excess of insured limits, at any of the mining facilities in our network, such mining facilities may not be adequately repaired in a timely manner or at all and we may lose some or all of the future revenues anticipated to be derived from such mines. The potential impact on our business may be magnified as we further expand operations in various countries.
Employment / Personnel2 | 1.6%
Employment / Personnel - Risk 1
If we are unable to attract, train and retain key individuals and highly skilled employees, our business may be adversely affected.
Our business relies on our ability to hire and retain additional qualified employees, including skilled and experienced online game developers. Since our industry is characterized by high demand and intense competition for talent, we may need to offer higher compensation and other benefits in order to retain key personnel in the future. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract or retain the qualified game developers or other key personnel that we will need to achieve our business objectives.
Employment / Personnel - Risk 2
Our business depends substantially on the continuing efforts of our senior executives, and our business may be severely disrupted if we lose their services.
Our business and prospect depend heavily upon the continued services of our senior executives. We rely on their expertise in business operations, technology support and sales and marketing and on their relationships with our shareholders and distributors. We do not maintain key-man life insurance for any of our key executives. If one or more of our key executives are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to replace them easily or at all. As a result, our business may be severely disrupted, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected, and we may incur additional expense to recruit and train personnel.
Each of our executive officers has entered into an employment agreement with us, which contains confidentiality and non-competition provisions. If any disputes arise between our executive officers and us, we cannot assure you the extent to which any of these agreements could be enforced in China, where these executive officers reside and hold most of their assets, in light of uncertainties with the PRC legal system. See "Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Doing Business in China-Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could adversely affect us."
Supply Chain3 | 2.4%
Supply Chain - Risk 1
We rely on services and licenses from third parties to carry out our businesses, and if there is any negative development in these services or licenses, our end users may cease to use our products and services.
We rely on third parties for certain services and licenses for our business, including game platforms and distributors for the distribution of our games, and other services and licenses for our operations. For example, we rely on third-party licenses for some of the software underlying our technology platform, and on China Telecom's internet data centers for hosting our servers. See "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview-Pricing, Distribution and Marketing."
Any interruption or any other negative development in our ability to rely on these services and licenses, such as material deterioration of quality of the third-party services or the loss of intellectual property relating to licenses held by our licensors, could have a material and adverse impact on our business operations. In particular, our game licensors may be subject to intellectual property rights claims with respect to the games or software licensed to us. If such licensors cannot prevail on the legal proceedings brought against them, we could lose the right to use the licensed games or software. Furthermore, if our arrangements with any of these third parties are terminated or modified against our interest, we may not be able to find alternative solutions on a timely basis or on terms favorable to us. If any of these events occur, our end users may cease using our products and services, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Supply Chain - Risk 2
We depend on third-party companies to perform functions critical to our business, and any failure or increased cost on their part could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We depend on third-party companies to perform functions critical to our business. We depend on hosting service providers to conduct cryptocurrency mining. Difficulties with any of our significant partners or third parties involved in our business, regardless of the reason, could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, business and prospects.
Supply Chain - Risk 3
Changed
We rely on contractual arrangements for our operations and operating licenses in the Chinese mainland, which may not be as effective as direct ownership.
Because the PRC government restricts our ownership of ICP, internet culture operation and internet publishing businesses in the Chinese mainland, we primarily depend on Shanghai IT, in which we have no ownership interest, to operate our online game business and other ICP related businesses, and hold and maintain the requisite licenses. We have relied and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements to conduct business operations through contractual arrangements with Shanghai IT. Such contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership. From the legal perspective, if Shanghai IT fails to perform its obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and spend other resources to enforce such arrangements, and rely on legal remedies under laws of the Chinese mainland, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief and claiming damages. For example, if the shareholders of Shanghai IT were to refuse to transfer their equity interests in Shanghai IT to us or our designee when we exercise the call option pursuant to the Call Option Agreement, or if such shareholders otherwise act in bad faith toward us, we may have to take legal action to compel it to fulfill their contractual obligations, which could be time consuming and costly. Despite the lack of legal majority ownership, we are able to direct the activities of and derive economic benefits from the consolidated variable interest entity and therefore our Cayman Island holding company is considered the primary beneficiary of the consolidated variable interest entity for accounting purposes and consolidates the variable interest entity and its subsidiaries as required by Accounting Standards Codification topic 810, Consolidation. Accordingly, we treat the consolidated variable interest entity as a consolidated entity under U.S. GAAP and we consolidate the financial results of the consolidated variable interest entity in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Neither The9 Limited nor its investors have an equity ownership in, direct foreign investment in, or control through such ownership or investment of, the consolidated variable interest entity, and the contractual arrangements are not equivalent to an equity ownership in the business of the consolidated variable interest entity.
These contractual arrangements are governed by laws of the Chinese mainland and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration in the Chinese mainland. The legal environment in the Chinese mainland is not as developed as in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. We have historically derived significant revenues from Shanghai IT. For the year ended December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023, Shanghai IT contributed 0.9%, 0.6% and 0.1%, respectively, of our total revenues. In the event we are unable to enforce the contractual arrangements, we may not be able to have the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of Shanghai IT, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected, and we may not be able to consolidate the financial results of Shanghai IT into our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
We believe that our option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in Shanghai IT, when and to the extent permitted by laws of the Chinese mainland, or request any existing shareholder of Shanghai IT to transfer all or part of the equity interest in Shanghai IT to another person or entity of the Chinese mainland we designate at any time in our discretion, and the rights under the Shareholder Voting Proxy Agreement that the shareholders of Shanghai IT have granted to us, effectively enable us to have the ability to cause the related contractual arrangements to be renewed when needed. However, if we are not able to effectively enforce these agreements or otherwise renew the agreements when they expire, our ability to receive the economic benefits of Shanghai IT may be adversely affected.
Costs9 | 7.3%
Costs - Risk 1
Our mining operating costs could outpace our mining revenues, which could seriously harm our business or increase our losses.
Our mining operations are costly and our expenses may increase in the future. This expense increase may not be offset by a corresponding increase in revenue. Our expenses may be greater than we anticipate, and our investments to make our business more efficient may not succeed and may outpace monetization efforts. Increases in our costs without a corresponding increase in our revenue would increase our losses and could seriously harm our business and financial performance.
Costs - Risk 2
If the award of digital assets for solving blocks and transaction fees for recording transactions are not sufficiently high to incentivize miners, miners may cease expending hash rate to solve blocks and confirmations of transactions on the blockchain could be slowed temporarily. A reduction in the hash rate expended by miners on any digital asset network could increase the likelihood of a malicious actor obtaining control in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate hash rate active on such network or the blockchain, potentially permitting such actor to manipulate the blockchain in a manner that adversely affects an investment in us.
Bitcoin miners record transactions when they solve for and add blocks of information to the blockchain. When a miner solves for a block, it creates that block, which includes data relating to (i) the solution to the block, (ii) a reference to the prior block in the blockchain to which the new block is being added and (iii) all transactions that have occurred but have not yet been added to the blockchain. The miner becomes aware of outstanding, unrecorded transactions through the data packet transmission and propagation discussed above. Typically, Bitcoin transactions will be recorded in the next chronological block if the spending party has an internet connection and at least one minute has passed between the transaction's data packet transmission and the solution of the next block. If a transaction is not recorded in the next chronological block, it is usually recorded in the next block thereafter.
As the award of new digital assets for solving blocks declines, and if transaction fees are not sufficiently high, miners may not have an adequate incentive to continue mining and may cease their mining operations. For example, the primary cryptocurrencies for which we mine, Bitcoin, are subject to "halving," which is the process by which the cryptocurrency reward for solving a block is cut in half. The current fixed reward on the Bitcoin network for solving a new block is 6.25 Bitcoins per block, which is half of the previous reward of 12.5 Bitcoins. It is estimated that it will halve again in about two years. While Bitcoin prices have had a history of price fluctuations around the halving of their respective cryptocurrency rewards, there is no guarantee that the price change will be favorable or would compensate for the reduction in mining reward. This reduction may result in a reduction in the aggregate hash rate of the Bitcoin network as the incentive for miners will decrease. If a corresponding and proportionate increase in the trading price of these cryptocurrencies does not follow these anticipated halving events, the revenue we earn from our mining operations would see a corresponding decrease, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
Moreover, miners ceasing operations would reduce the aggregate hash rate on the Bitcoin network, which would adversely affect the confirmation process for transactions (i.e., temporarily decreasing the speed at which blocks are added to the blockchain until the next scheduled adjustment in difficulty for block solutions) and make the Bitcoin network more vulnerable to a malicious actor obtaining control in excess of 50% of the aggregate hash rate on the Bitcoin network. Periodically, the Bitcoin network has adjusted the difficulty for block solutions so that solution speeds remain in the vicinity of the expected ten minute confirmation time targeted by the Bitcoin network protocol.
We believe that from time to time there will be further considerations and adjustments to the Bitcoin network, and others regarding the difficulty for block solutions. More significant reductions in aggregate hash rate on digital asset networks could result in material, though temporary, delays in block solution confirmation time. Any reduction in confidence in the confirmation process or aggregate hash rate of any digital asset network may negatively impact the value of digital assets, which will adversely impact an investment in us.
Costs - Risk 3
The cost of obtaining new and replacement miners and parts has historically been capital intensive, and is likely to continue to be very capital intensive, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our mining operations can only be successful and ultimately profitable if the costs, including hardware and electricity costs, associated with mining cryptocurrencies are lower than the price of the cryptocurrencies we mine when we sell them. Our miners experience ordinary wear and tear from operation and may also face more significant malfunctions caused by factors which may be beyond our control. Additionally, as the technology evolves, we may acquire newer models of miners to remain competitive in the market. Over time, we replace those miners which are no longer functional with new miners purchased from third-party manufacturers, who are primarily based in Asia.
For example, in March 2021, our wholly-owned subsidiary NBTC Limited signed a Bitcoin mining machine purchase agreement with Bitmain Technologies Limited. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, we would purchase 24,000 Antminer S19j Bitcoin mining machines, which are scheduled to deliver starting from November 2021, for a total consideration of US$82.8 million payable in installments according to the agreed time schedule. As of the date of this annual report, all consideration has been paid. The miners will eventually become obsolete or will degrade due to ordinary wear and tear from usage, and may also be lost or damaged due to factors outside of our control. Once this happens, these new miners will need to be repaired or replaced along with other equipment from time to time for us to stay competitive. This upgrading process requires substantial capital investment, and we may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis based on availability of new miners and our access to adequate capital resources. If we are unable to obtain adequate numbers of new and replacement miners at scale, we may be unable to remain competitive in our highly competitive and evolving industry. If this happens, we may not be able to mine cryptocurrency as efficiently or in similar amounts as our competition and, as a result, our business and financial results could suffer. This could, in turn, materially and adversely affect the trading price of our securities and our investors could lose part or all of their investment.
Costs - Risk 4
The price of new miners may be linked to the market price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and, if the current relatively high market price of Bitcoin persists, our costs of obtaining new and replacement miners may increase, which may have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Reports have been released that the prices of new miners are adjusted according to the price of Bitcoin. As a result, the cost of new machines can be unpredictable, and could also be significantly higher than our historical cost for new miners. Similarly, as Bitcoin prices have risen, we have observed significant increase in the demand for miners. As a result, at times, we may obtain Bitmain miners and other hardware from Bitmain or from third parties at higher prices, to the extent they are available. For example, in the first quarter of 2021, we have observed a significant appreciation in the market price of Bitcoin, as well as an increase in the per-unit price of the new Bitmain Antminer model S19j miners we purchased during this same period. While we cannot know definitively if these two phenomena are linked, we have seen a measurable increase in the prices for new miners offered by Bitmain.
As disclosed in this annual report, our financial condition and results of operations are dependent on our ability to sell the Bitcoin we mine at a price greater than our costs to produce that Bitcoin. As the price for new miners we buy increases, our cost to produce a single Bitcoin also increases, therefore requiring a corresponding increase in the price of Bitcoin for us to maintain our results of operations. Market prices for Bitcoin have fluctuated greatly, to the extent that we are unable to reasonably predict future prices for the Bitcoin we mine.
We incur significant up-front capital costs each time we acquire new miners, and, if future prices of Bitcoin are not sufficiently high, we may not realize the benefit of these capital expenditures. If this occurs, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, which may have a negative impact on the trading price of our securities, which may have a materially adverse impact on investors' investment in our Company.
Costs - Risk 5
The sale of our digital assets to pay expenses at a time of low digital asset prices could adversely affect an investment in us.
We may sell our digital assets to pay expenses on an as-needed basis, irrespective of then-current prices. Consequently, our digital assets may be sold at a time when the prices on the respective digital asset exchange market are low, which could adversely affect an investment in us.
Costs - Risk 6
Because our miners are designed specifically to mine Bitcoin, our future success will depend in large part upon the value of Bitcoin, and any sustained decline in its value could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our operating results will depend in large part upon the value of Bitcoin because it is the primary cryptocurrency we currently mine. Specifically, our revenues from our Bitcoin mining operations are based upon two factors: (1) the number of Bitcoin rewards we successfully mine and (2) the value of Bitcoin. In addition, our operating results are directly impacted by changes in the value of Bitcoin, because under the value measurement model, we measure at fair value on the date earned. Fair value of the cryptocurrency award earned and received is determined using the quoted price of the related cryptocurrency at the time the amount of reward in cryptocurrency we earned, which is determined by our mining pool operator based on our computing power contributed to the mining pool on a daily basis. Under the guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, we may be required to change its policies, which could have an effect on our consolidated financial position and results from operations. This means that our operating results will be subject to daily increases or decreases in the value of Bitcoin. Furthermore, our business strategy focuses almost entirely on producing Bitcoin (as opposed to other cryptocurrencies), and our current application- specific integrated circuit miners principally utilize the "SHA-256 algorithm," which is designed primarily for mining Bitcoin. We therefore, cannot use these miners to mine other cryptocurrencies, such as ether, that are not mined utilizing this algorithm. If other cryptocurrencies overtake Bitcoin in terms of acceptance, the value of Bitcoin could decline. Further, if Bitcoin were to switch its proof of work algorithm from SHA-256 to another algorithm for which our miners would not be suited or if the value of Bitcoin were to decline for other reasons, particularly if such decline were significant or over an extended period of time, we would likely incur very significant costs in retooling or replacing our existing miners with miners better suited for this new protocols and our operating results could be adversely affected. This could result in a material adverse effect on our ability to pursue our business strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations, and thus harm investors.
Costs - Risk 7
The limited rights of legal recourse against us, and our lack of insurance protection expose us and our shareholders to the risk of loss of our digital assets for which no person is liable.
We have limited insurance coverage, including that covering our crypto assets which may be held in the custody accounts at custodians of the crypto assets, subject to the policy caps. A loss may be suffered with respect to our digital assets which is not covered by insurance and for which no person is liable in damages which could adversely affect our operations and, consequently, an investment in us.
Costs - Risk 8
To the extent that any miners cease to record transactions in solved blocks, transactions that do not include the payment of a transaction fee will not be recorded on the blockchain until a block is solved by a miner who does not require the payment of transaction fees. Any widespread delays in the recording of transactions could result in a loss of confidence in that digital asset network, which could adversely impact an investment in us.
To the extent that any miners cease to record transaction in solved blocks, such transactions will not be recorded on the blockchain. Currently, there are no known incentives for miners to elect to exclude the recording of transactions in solved blocks; however, to the extent that any such incentives arise (e.g., a collective movement among miners or one or more mining pools forcing Bitcoin users to pay transaction fees as a substitute for or in addition to the award of new Bitcoin upon the solving of a block), actions of miners solving a significant number of blocks could delay the recording and confirmation of transactions on the blockchain. Any systemic delays in the recording and confirmation of transactions on the blockchain could result in greater exposure to double-spending transactions and a loss of confidence in certain or all digital asset networks, which could adversely impact an investment in us.
Costs - Risk 9
We have limited business insurance coverage in China and other areas.
The insurance industry in China is still at an early stage of development. Insurance companies in China offer limited business insurance products. Additionally, we cease to possess significant operating assets located in China. As a result, we do not have any business liability or disruption insurance coverage for our operations in China. Any business disruption, litigation or natural disaster might result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of our resources.
Our mining machines are located in the U.S., Canada, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. We are in the process to obtain insurance on our mining machines. We currently rely on the data center operators to insure their data centers, including, among other things, our mining machines. Operators of data centers are holders of their own insurance policies. We cannot guarantee that the data center operators have fulfilled their obligations to comply with the insurance coverage requirements.
As of the date of this annual report, we do not have insurance coverage for our crypto assets or miners.
Macro & Political
Total Risks: 12/123 (10%)Below Sector Average
Economy & Political Environment5 | 4.1%
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 1
Adverse changes in economic and political policies of the PRC government could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China, which could adversely affect our business.
As the gaming industry is highly sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending, it tends to decline during general economic downturns. Accordingly, our results of operations, financial condition and prospects are subject to a significant degree to economic, political and legal developments in China. China's economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth in the past twenty years, growth has slowed down since 2012 and has been uneven across different regions and among various economic sectors of China. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic development and guide the allocation of resources. While some of these measures benefit the overall PRC economy, they may also have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable to us. As the PRC economy is increasingly intricately linked to the global economy, it is affected in various respects by downturns and recessions of major economies around the world. The various economic and policy measures the PRC government enacts to forestall economic downturns or shore up the PRC economy could affect our business.
Although the PRC government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in the Chinese mainland are still owned by the PRC government. In addition, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The PRC government also exercises significant control over China's economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. These actions, as well as future actions and policies of the PRC government, could materially affect our liquidity and access to capital and our ability to operate our business.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 2
Uncertainty and instability resulting from the conflict between Russia and Ukraine could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operations.
In the past we conducted certain of our mining operations in Russia by entering into hosting agreements pursuant to which our machines are co-located and operated in data centers in Russia. Our mining business in Russia contributed approximately 2% of our revenue in 2023. As of the date of this annual report, in connection with the termination arrangements, all of our Russia-related operations have been wound up.
The U.S. government and other governments in jurisdictions in which we operate may swiftly impose expansive economic sanctions that may have a material impact on our operations and require us to take, or refrain from taking, specific actions, including, but not limited to, ceasing agreements or mining operations involving Russia or transporting our mining machines out of Russia. Russia is considering a number of severe measures aimed at mitigating the effect of sanctions imposed against it by the U.S., EU, UK and other governments in connection with the Russia-Ukraine conflict, including nationalization and seizures of assets held by foreign businesses under certain circumstances. In addition, existing Russian legal frameworks may be unfairly or unevenly enforced, and courts may decline to enforce legal protections covering our investments and business partnerships in Russia altogether. In the future, the U.S. government or other governmental authorities may designate certain of our Russian partners as individuals or entities as subject to sanctions. The Russian government's ability to raise funds, including cryptocurrency, has been restricted. If the Russia-Ukraine conflict continues, the value of cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, may be materially affected.
On April 20, 2022, OFAC added to its list of Specially Designated Nationals, or the SDN List, certain companies operating in Russia's virtual currency mining industry, including BitRiver AG, or BitRiver. In the past, we partnered with BitRiver to carry out our mining business in Russia. Our mining business with BitRiver, our sole mining partner in Russia, contributed approximately 2% of our revenue in 2023. OFAC included BitRiver on the SDN List pursuant to Executive Order 14024, for operating or having operated in the technology sector of the Russian Federation's economy. BitRiver's Russia-based subsidiaries were put on the SDN List, also pursuant to Executive Order 14024, for being owned or controlled by, or for having acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, BitRiver. Any entity in which BitRiver, or any of its designated subsidiaries, has a 50% or greater, direct or indirect, ownership interest is also subject to U.S. sanctions. Such sanctions may materially affect our mining operations in Russia, and we have decided to terminate our partnership with BitRiver. In response to the sanctions, we have (i) disposed of our mining machines, (ii) transferred our mining machines outside of Russia, and (iii) for those mining machines not transferred or disposed of, signed hosting agreements with entities located outside of Russia. As of the date of this annual report, in connection with the termination arrangements, all of our Russia-related operations have been wound up. If we are not able to successfully mitigate some or all disruptions due to our termination of such relationship and the disposal or relocation of our mining machines, there could be a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 3
Added
The failure of financially troubled cryptocurrency-based companies impacts the broader crypto economy.
The failure of several crypto platforms has impacted and may continue to impact the broader crypto economy; the full extent of these impacts may not yet be known. Bitcoin is part of the cryptocurrency environment and is subject to price volatility resulting from financial instability, poor business practices, and fraudulent activities of players in the cryptocurrency market. When investors in cryptocurrency and cryptocurrency-based companies experience financial difficulty as a result of price volatility, poor business practices, and/or fraud, it has, and may cause loss of confidence in the cryptocurrency space, reputational harm to cryptocurrency assets, heightened scrutiny by regulatory authorities and law makers, and a steep decline in the value of Bitcoin, among other material impacts. Such adverse effects have, and may in the future, affect the profitability of our Bitcoin mining operations.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 4
Added
Deterioration in economic condition and escalation of geopolitical conflicts may create increased uncertainty and price changes, and we may face further restrictions on our liquidity due to unique risks related to recent crypto asset market developments.
We are subject to price volatility and uncertainty due to economic downturns and geopolitical conflicts. Such economic downturns and geopolitical conflicts may be a result of invasion, or possible invasion by one nation of another, leading to increased inflation and supply chain volatility. The Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Hamas-Israel conflict and the attacks on shipping in the Red Sea have heightened geopolitical tensions across the world. The impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on Ukraine food exports has contributed to increases in food prices and thus to inflation more generally. Such crises will likely continue to have an effect on our ability to do business in a cost-effective manner.
Inflation has caused the price of materials to increase leading to increased expenses to our business. Economic downturns and geopolitical conflicts may also have the effect of discouraging investment in Bitcoin as investors shift their investments to less volatile assets. Such shift could have a materially adverse effect on our business, operations and the value of the Bitcoin we mine.
The risks to our liquidity and market outlook would include the following:
- Deteriorating macroeconomic conditions as a result of the potential for recession in 2023 discussed in the media.
- U.S. government monetary policies and interest rate increases by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board may lead investors to rotate their investments out of the growth stocks, such as our stock, to the value stocks and fixed income instruments.
- Additional challenges arising from catastrophic events (such the FTX collapse and multiple bankruptcies of Bitcoin mining companies in 2022 and 2023) that would adversely affect the credibility of, and therefore investor confidence in, companies engaged in the digital assets space.
- Additional declines in Bitcoin prices and/or production, and increases in electricity costs which could adversely impact both the value of our Bitcoin holdings and our ongoing profitability.
Further instability in the banking system and collapse of more banking institutions which could put the liquidity and cash assets of third parties with which we do business such as miner hosting entities and suppliers and us, if we bank in the future with an institution which subsequently collapses.
Economy & Political Environment - Risk 5
Changed
Deterioration in economic condition and escalation of geopolitical conflicts may motivate large-scale sales of digital assets, which could result in a reduction in some or all digital assets' values and adversely affect an investment in us.
As an alternative to fiat currencies that are backed by central governments, digital assets such as Bitcoin, which are relatively new, are subject to supply and demand forces based upon the desirability of an alternative, decentralized means of buying and selling goods and services, and it is unclear how such supply and demand will be impacted by geopolitical conflicts. Nevertheless, political or economic crises may motivate large-scale acquisitions or sales of digital assets either globally or locally. Large-scale sales of digital assets would result in a reduction in their value and could adversely affect an investment in us.
Further, deterioration in economic condition and escalation of geopolitical conflicts may create increased uncertainty and price changes. Inflation has caused the price of materials to increase leading to increased expenses to our business. Global crises and economic downturns may also have the effect of discouraging investment in Bitcoin as investors shift their investments to less volatile assets. Such shift could have a materially adverse effect on our business, operations and the value of the Bitcoin we mine or the institutional data center clients we host.
International Operations2 | 1.6%
International Operations - Risk 1
Added
As we continue to expand and localize our international activities, our obligations to comply with the laws, rules, regulations and policies of a variety of jurisdictions will increase and we may be subject to investigations and enforcement actions by U.S. and non-U.S. regulators and governmental authorities.
As we expand and localize our international activities, we have become increasingly obligated to comply with the laws, rules, regulations, policies, and legal interpretations not only the jurisdictions in which we operate but also those into which we offer services on a cross-border basis. Laws regulating financial services, the internet, mobile technologies, crypto, and related technologies outside the United States often impose different, more specific, or even conflicting obligations on us, as well as broader liability.
Regulators throughout the world frequently study each other's approaches to the regulation of the crypto economy. Consequently, developments in any jurisdiction may influence other jurisdictions. New developments in one jurisdiction may be extended to additional services and other jurisdictions. As a result, the risks created by any new law or regulation in one jurisdiction are magnified by the potential that they may be replicated, affecting our business in another place or involving another service. Conversely, if regulations diverge throughout the world, we may face difficulty adjusting our products, services, and other aspects of our business with the same effect. These risks are heightened as we face increased competitive pressure from other similarly situated businesses that engage in regulatory arbitrage to avoid the compliance costs associated with regulatory changes.
The complexity of U.S. federal and state and international regulatory and enforcement regimes, coupled with the global scope of our operations and the evolving global regulatory environment, could result in a single event prompting a large number of overlapping investigations and legal and regulatory proceedings by multiple government authorities in different jurisdictions. Any of the foregoing could, individually or in the aggregate, harm our reputation, damage our brands and business, and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Due to the uncertain application of existing laws and regulations, certain of our products or services may become subject to financial regulation, licensing, or authorization obligations that we have not obtained or with which we have not complied. As a result, we are at a heightened risk of enforcement action, litigation, regulatory, and legal scrutiny which could lead to sanctions, cease, and desist orders, or other penalties and censures which could significantly and adversely affect our continued operations and financial condition.
International Operations - Risk 2
Our international business efforts could adversely affect us.
We operate and conduct business in different countries and regions. International transactions are subject to inherent risks and challenges that could adversely affect us, including:
- the need to develop new supplier and manufacturer relationships;- the need to comply with additional U.S. and foreign laws and regulations;- changes in international laws, regulatory requirements, taxes and tariffs;- our limited experience with different local cultures and standards;- geopolitical conflicts, such as war and terrorist attacks; and - the additional resources and management attention required for such expansion.
Our international business could expose us to penalties for non-compliance with laws applicable to international business and trade, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Compliance with such laws and regulations will result in additional costs and may necessitate changes to our business practices, which may adversely affect our business. To the extent that we make purchases or sales denominated in foreign currencies, we would have foreign currency risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, business and prospects.
Natural and Human Disruptions1 | 0.8%
Natural and Human Disruptions - Risk 1
We face risks related to natural disasters and health epidemics.
Our business could be materially and adversely affected by natural disasters, health epidemics or other public safety concerns affecting the PRC, and particularly Shanghai. Historically, the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected our business. Our employees in Shanghai were unable to go to our offices for an extended period, and COVID-19 caused delays in the development of the data centers where we planned to deploy our mining machines. Our foreign strategic partners faced similar delays in their respective countries. Natural disasters may give rise to server interruptions, breakdowns, system failures, technology platform failures or internet failures, which could cause the loss or corruption of data or malfunctions of software or hardware as well as adversely affect our ability to operate our platforms and provide services and solutions. Our business could also be adversely affected if our employees are affected by health epidemics. In addition, our results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent that any health epidemic harms the Chinese economy in general. Our headquarters are located in Shanghai, where most of our directors and management and the majority of our employees currently reside. Most of our system hardware and back-up systems are hosted in facilities located in Shanghai. Consequently, if any natural disasters, health epidemics or other public safety concerns were to affect Shanghai, our operation may experience material disruptions, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Capital Markets4 | 3.3%
Capital Markets - Risk 1
Future movements in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the RMB may adversely affect the value of our ADSs.
The conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, is based on rates set by the People's Bank of China. The Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. The value of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by changes in China's political and economic conditions and by foreign exchange policies in the Chinese mainland, among other things. We cannot assure you that Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces or the Chinese mainland or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.
Any significant appreciation or depreciation of Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our revenues, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our ADSs in U.S. dollars. Very limited hedging options are available in the Chinese mainland to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by exchange control regulations of the Chinese mainland that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates may have a material adverse effect on your investment.
Capital Markets - Risk 2
Our ADSs may be delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market as a result of our failure of meeting the Nasdaq Capital Market continued listing requirements.
Our ADSs are currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "NCTY." We must continue to meet the requirements set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550 to remain listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market provide that a company, in order to qualify for continued listing, must maintain a minimum ADS price of US$1.00 and satisfy standards relative to minimum shareholders' equity, minimum market value of publicly held shares, or MVPHS, minimum MVLS, and various additional requirements.
On January 11, 2024, we received a notification letter from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq, notifying us that we no longer complied with Rule 5550(b)(1) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules due to our failure to maintain a minimum of $2,500,000 in stockholders' equity. The Nasdaq notification letter also noted that we did not meet the alternatives of market value of listed securities or net income from continuing operations. Pursuant to Rule 5810(c)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules, we had 45 calendar days (no later than February 26, 2024) to submit a plan to regain compliance with the foregoing listing requirement. To the extent our compliance plan is accepted, we may be granted an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the Nasdaq notification letter to evidence compliance. In the event our compliance plan is not accepted, our securities may be subject to delisting and we may have the opportunity to appeal the staff's delisting determination to a hearings panel. We submitted a plan to regain compliance on February 26, 2024.
There can be no assurance that our ADSs would be eligible for trading on any other exchanges or markets in the United States. If Nasdaq determines to delist our ordinary shares, or if we fail to list our ADSs on other stock exchanges or find alternative trading venue for our ADSs, the market liquidity and the price of our ADSs and our ability to obtain financing for our operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Capital Markets - Risk 3
Fluctuations in the price of Bitcoin may significantly influence the market price of our Class A ordinary shares or the ADSs
To the extent investors view the value of our Class A ordinary shares or the ADSs as linked to the value or change in the value of our Bitcoin, fluctuations in the price of Bitcoin may significantly influence the market price of our Class A ordinary shares or the ADSs.
Capital Markets - Risk 4
There is a possibility of cryptocurrency mining algorithms transitioning to proof of stake validation and other mining related risks, which could make us less competitive and ultimately adversely affect our business and the value of our stock.
Proof of stake is an alternative method in validating cryptocurrency transactions. Should the algorithm shift from a proof of work validation method to a proof of stake method, mining would likely require less energy, which may render any company that maintains advantages in the current climate (for example, from lower priced electricity, processing, real estate, or hosting) less competitive. We, as a result of our efforts to optimize and improve the efficiency of our cryptocurrency mining operations, may be exposed to the risk in the future of losing the benefit of our capital investments and the competitive advantage we hope to gain from this as a result, and may be negatively impacted if a switch to proof of stake validation were to occur. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to pursue our new strategy at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.
Ability to Sell
Total Risks: 4/123 (3%)Below Sector Average
Demand1 | 0.8%
Demand - Risk 1
The acceptance of digital asset network software patches or upgrades by a significant, but not overwhelming, percentage of the users and miners in any digital asset network could result in a "fork" in the respective blockchain, resulting in the operation of two separate networks until such time as the forked blockchains are merged. The temporary or permanent existence of forked blockchains could adversely impact an investment in us.
Digital asset networks are open source projects and, although there is an influential group of leaders in, for example, the Bitcoin network community known as the "Core Developers," there is no official developer or group of developers that formally controls the Bitcoin network. Any individual can download the Bitcoin network software and make any desired modifications, which are proposed to users and miners on the Bitcoin network through software downloads and upgrades, typically posted to the Bitcoin development forum on GitHub.com. A substantial majority of miners and Bitcoin users must consent to those software modifications by downloading the altered software or upgrade that implements the changes; otherwise, the changes do not become a part of the Bitcoin network. Since the Bitcoin network's inception, changes to the Bitcoin network have been accepted by the vast majority of users and miners, ensuring that the Bitcoin network remains a coherent economic system; however, a developer or group of developers could potentially propose a modification to the Bitcoin network that is not accepted by a vast majority of miners and users, but that is nonetheless accepted by a substantial population of participants in the Bitcoin network. In such a case, and if the modification is material and/or not backwards compatible with the prior version of Bitcoin network software, the consequence would be what is known as a "fork" of the network, resulting in two separate Bitcoin networks, one running the pre-modification software program and the other running the modified version (i.e., a second "Bitcoin" network). The effect of such a fork would be the existence of two versions of the cryptocurrency running in parallel, yet lacking interchangeability and necessitating exchange-type transaction to convert currencies between the two forks. Additionally, it may be unclear following a fork which fork represents the original asset and which is the new asset.
Such a fork in the blockchain typically would be addressed by community-led efforts to merge the forked blockchains, and several prior forks have been so merged. Different metrics adopted by industry participants to determine which is the original asset include: referring to the wishes of the core developers of a cryptocurrency, blockchains with the greatest amount of hashing power contributed by miners or validators; or blockchains with the longest chain. This kind of split in the Bitcoin network could materially and adversely impact an investment in us and, in the worst-case scenario, harm the sustainability of the Bitcoin network's economy.
We may not be able to realize the economic benefit of a fork, either immediately or ever, which could adversely affect an investment in our securities. If we hold a cryptocurrency at the time of a hard fork into two cryptocurrencies, industry standards would dictate that we would be expected to hold an equivalent amount of the old and new assets following the fork. However, we may not be able, or it may not be practical, to secure or realize the economic benefit of the new asset for various reasons. For instance, we may determine that there is no safe or practical way to custody the new asset, that trying to do so may pose an unacceptable risk to our holdings in the old asset, or that the costs of taking possession and/or maintaining ownership of the new cryptocurrency exceed the benefits of owning the new cryptocurrency. Additionally, laws, regulation or other factors may prevent us from benefitting from the new asset even if there is a safe and practical way to custody and secure the new asset.
Sales & Marketing2 | 1.6%
Sales & Marketing - Risk 1
The digital asset exchanges on which digital assets trade are relatively new and, in most cases, largely unregulated and may therefore be more exposed to fraud and failure than established, regulated exchanges for other products. To the extent that the digital asset exchanges representing a substantial portion of the volume in digital asset trading are involved in fraud or experience security failures or other operational issues, such digital asset exchanges' failures may result in a reduction in the price of some or all digital assets and can adversely affect an investment in us.
The digital asset exchanges on which the digital assets trade are new and, in most cases, largely unregulated. Furthermore, many digital asset exchanges (including several of the most prominent U.S. dollar denominated digital asset exchanges) do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices or regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience problems relating to, digital asset exchanges, including prominent exchanges handling a significant portion of the volume of digital asset trading. In 2022, a number of digital asset exchanges filed for bankruptcy proceedings and/or became the subjects of investigation by various governmental agencies for, among other things, fraud, causing a loss of confidence and an increase in negative publicity for the digital asset ecosystem. As a result, many digital asset markets, including the market for Bitcoin, have experienced increased price volatility. The Bitcoin ecosystem may continue to be negatively impacted and experience long term volatility if public confidence decreases.
These events are continuing to develop and it is not possible to predict, at this time, every risk that they may pose to us, our service providers, or the digital asset industry as a whole.
A lack of stability in the digital asset exchange market and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital asset exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in the digital asset networks and result in greater volatility in digital asset values. These potential consequences of a digital asset exchange's failure could adversely affect an investment in us.
Sales & Marketing - Risk 2
Added
We currently have a limited U.S. presence and do not proactively offer services in the United States or to U.S. persons.
Our subsidiary, NBTC US Ltd, has entered into a hosting agreement with a third-party data center by which the third party agreed to host our mining machines in its data center located at Pecos County, Texas. Under a 12-month hosting agreement, the third party provides electricity, hosting service, and other services to Company mining operations. We may occasionally sell a portion of its Bitcoin mined in Texas, including through third-party exchanges for its own account.
Since January 2023, we no longer mints or offers NFTs, or provides any services related to previously minted NFTs. NFTs we previously issued may continue to be available on third-party trading sites that we do not operate or control. We may receive royalties from secondary sales of previously-issued NFTs and the amount is expected to be minimal. These secondary sales royalties only amounted to RMB26 thousand (US$3.7 thousand) in 2023.
We continues to evaluate its U.S. compliance obligations in light of its evolving business lines.
Brand / Reputation1 | 0.8%
Brand / Reputation - Risk 1
Our business may be adversely affected by public opinion and government policies in China.
Due to the population of mobile internet and higher degree of user loyalty to mobile games, easy access to personal computers and mobile devices, and lack of more appealing forms of entertainment in China, many teenagers frequently play online games. This may result in these teenagers spending less time on, or refraining from, other activities, including education and sports. In April 2007, various governmental authorities, including the GAPP, the MIIT, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Public Security, and other authorities jointly issued a circular concerning the mandatory implementation of an "anti-fatigue system" in online games, which aims to protect the physical and psychological health of minors. This circular required all online games to incorporate an "anti-fatigue system" and an identity verification system, both of which have limited the amount of time that a minor or other user may continually spend playing an online game. We have implemented such "anti-fatigue" and identification systems on all of our online games as required. Since March 2011, various governmental authorities, including the MIIT, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Public Security, and other authorities have jointly launched the "Online Game Parents Guardianship Project for Minors," which allows parents to require online game operators to take measures to limit the time spent by the minors playing online games and the minors' access to their online game accounts. On February 5, 2013, the Ministry of Culture, the MIIT, the GAPP and various other governmental authorities, jointly issued the Working Plan on the Comprehensive Prevention Scheme on Online Game Addiction of Minors, which further strengthens the administration of internet cafés, reinstates the importance of the "anti-fatigue system" and "Online Game Parents Guardianship Project for Minors" as prevention measures against the online game addiction of minors and orders the governmental authorities to take all necessary actions in implementing such measures. In August 2021, the GAPPRFT issued the Notice by the National Press and Publication Administration of Further Imposing Strict Administrative Measures to Prevent Minors from Becoming Addicted to Online Games, which imposed an array of restrictive measures to prevent underage users to indulge in online games. For example, all online game enterprises can only provide minors with one hour of online game services between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. on Friday, weekends and statutory holidays, and are not allowed to provide online game services in any form to minors in any other time. Further strengthening of these systems, or enactment by the PRC government of any additional laws to further tighten its administration over the internet and online games may result in less time spent by customers or fewer customers playing our online games, which may materially and adversely affect our business results and prospects for future growth.
See a full breakdown of risk according to category and subcategory. The list starts with the category with the most risk. Click on subcategories to read relevant extracts from the most recent report.
FAQ
What are “Risk Factors”?
Risk factors are any situations or occurrences that could make investing in a company risky.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that publicly traded companies disclose their most significant risk factors. This is so that potential investors can consider any risks before they make an investment.
They also offer companies protection, as a company can use risk factors as liability protection. This could happen if a company underperforms and investors take legal action as a result.
It is worth noting that smaller companies, that is those with a public float of under $75 million on the last business day, do not have to include risk factors in their 10-K and 10-Q forms, although some may choose to do so.
How do companies disclose their risk factors?
Publicly traded companies initially disclose their risk factors to the SEC through their S-1 filings as part of the IPO process.
Additionally, companies must provide a complete list of risk factors in their Annual Reports (Form 10-K) or (Form 20-F) for “foreign private issuers”.
Quarterly Reports also include a section on risk factors (Form 10-Q) where companies are only required to update any changes since the previous report.
According to the SEC, risk factors should be reported concisely, logically and in “plain English” so investors can understand them.
How can I use TipRanks risk factors in my stock research?
Use the Risk Factors tab to get data about the risk factors of any company in which you are considering investing.
You can easily see the most significant risks a company is facing. Additionally, you can find out which risk factors a company has added, removed or adjusted since its previous disclosure. You can also see how a company’s risk factors compare to others in its sector.
Without reading company reports or participating in conference calls, you would most likely not have access to this sort of information, which is usually not included in press releases or other public announcements.
A simplified analysis of risk factors is unique to TipRanks.
What are all the risk factor categories?
TipRanks has identified 6 major categories of risk factors and a number of subcategories for each. You can see how these categories are broken down in the list below.
1. Financial & Corporate
Accounting & Financial Operations - risks related to accounting loss, value of intangible assets, financial statements, value of intangible assets, financial reporting, estimates, guidance, company profitability, dividends, fluctuating results.
Share Price & Shareholder Rights – risks related to things that impact share prices and the rights of shareholders, including analyst ratings, major shareholder activity, trade volatility, liquidity of shares, anti-takeover provisions, international listing, dual listing.
Debt & Financing – risks related to debt, funding, financing and interest rates, financial investments.
Corporate Activity and Growth – risks related to restructuring, M&As, joint ventures, execution of corporate strategy, strategic alliances.
2. Legal & Regulatory
Litigation and Legal Liabilities – risks related to litigation/ lawsuits against the company.
Regulation – risks related to compliance, GDPR, and new legislation.
Environmental / Social – risks related to environmental regulation and to data privacy.
Taxation & Government Incentives – risks related to taxation and changes in government incentives.
3. Production
Costs – risks related to costs of production including commodity prices, future contracts, inventory.
Supply Chain – risks related to the company’s suppliers.
Manufacturing – risks related to the company’s manufacturing process including product quality and product recalls.
Human Capital – risks related to recruitment, training and retention of key employees, employee relationships & unions labor disputes, pension, and post retirement benefits, medical, health and welfare benefits, employee misconduct, employee litigation.
4. Technology & Innovation
Innovation / R&D – risks related to innovation and new product development.
Technology – risks related to the company’s reliance on technology.
Cyber Security – risks related to securing the company’s digital assets and from cyber attacks.
Trade Secrets & Patents – risks related to the company’s ability to protect its intellectual property and to infringement claims against the company as well as piracy and unlicensed copying.
5. Ability to Sell
Demand – risks related to the demand of the company’s goods and services including seasonality, reliance on key customers.
Competition – risks related to the company’s competition including substitutes.
Sales & Marketing – risks related to sales, marketing, and distribution channels, pricing, and market penetration.
Brand & Reputation – risks related to the company’s brand and reputation.
6. Macro & Political
Economy & Political Environment – risks related to changes in economic and political conditions.
Natural and Human Disruptions – risks related to catastrophes, floods, storms, terror, earthquakes, coronavirus pandemic/COVID-19.
International Operations – risks related to the global nature of the company.
Capital Markets – risks related to exchange rates and trade, cryptocurrency.