LINKBANCORP (LNKB) Risk Factors

The Company currently pays a quarterly dividend of $0.075 per share. All future dividends will be dependent on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows, as well as capital regulations and dividend restrictions from the PADOBS, the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve and the FDIC have issued policy statements, which provide that bank holding companies and insured banks should generally only pay dividends out of current operating earnings. The FDIC also has the authority under federal law to enjoin a bank from engaging in what in its opinion constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business, including the payment of a dividend under certain circumstances. The Company can provide no assurance regarding whether it will continue to make dividend payments in the future.

At December 31, 2023, non-performing assets, which consist of non-performing loans and other real estate owned, were $7.3 million, or 0.32% of total assets. The Company's non-performing assets adversely affect net income in various ways: - the Company records interest income only on the cash basis or cost-recovery method for nonaccrual loans and it does not record interest income for other real estate owned;- the Company must provide for estimated credit losses through a current period charge to the provision for credit losses;- noninterest expense increases when the Company writes down the value of properties in its other real estate owned portfolio to reflect changing market values;- there are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets, as well as carrying costs, such as taxes, insurance, and maintenance fees; and - the resolution of non-performing assets requires the active involvement of management, which can distract them from more profitable activity. If additional borrowers become delinquent and do not pay back their loans and the Company is unable to successfully manage its non-performing assets, losses and troubled assets could increase significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's results of operations depend in large part upon the level of its net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings. Depending on the terms and maturities of the Company's assets and liabilities, a significant change in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on its profitability. Many factors cause changes in interest rates, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political conditions. While the Company intends to manage the effects of changes in interest rates by adjusting the terms, maturities, and pricing of its assets and liabilities, its efforts may not be effective and its financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

The Company's earnings and cash flows depend largely upon its net interest income. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of governmental and regulatory agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence the interest the Company receives on loans and investments and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings, which may affect net interest margin. Such changes could also affect (i) demand for products and services and price competition, in turn affecting our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits; (ii) the fair value of the Company's financial assets and liabilities; (iii) the average duration of its mortgage-backed securities portfolio and other interest-earning assets; (iv) levels of defaults on loans; and (v) loan prepayments. During 2023, in response to accelerated inflation, the Federal Reserve continued to implement monetary tightening policies, resulting in increased interest rates. The Federal Reserve has signaled that interest rates may remain elevated. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. In addition, the Company's net interest margin may contract in a rising rate environment because its funding costs may increase faster than the yield earned on its interest-earning assets. In a rising rate environment, demand for loans may decrease and loans with adjustable interest rates are more likely to experience a higher rate of default. Additionally, changes in interest rates also affect the fair value of the securities portfolio. Generally, the value of securities moves inversely with changes in interest rates. The combination of these events may adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. In addition, in a falling rate environment or the recent pandemic-related environment where the Federal Reserve held the federal reference rate near 0.00%, loans may be prepaid sooner than the Company expects, which could result in a delay between when the Company receives the prepayment and when it is able to redeploy the funds into new interest-earning assets and in a decrease in the amount of interest income the Company is able to earn on those assets. If the Company is unable to manage these risks effectively, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. Also, the Company's interest rate risk modeling techniques and assumptions likely may not fully predict or capture the impact of actual interest rate changes on its balance sheet.

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. The Company has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose the Company to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, the Company's credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Bank cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to the Bank. Any such losses could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The vast majority of the Company's loans have real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. A weakening of the real estate market in the Company's primary market areas could result in an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, which in turn could have an adverse effect on the Company's profitability and asset quality. If the Company is required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, the Company's earnings and capital could be adversely affected. Acts of nature, including hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, fires and floods, which may cause uninsured damage and other loss of value to real estate that secures these loans, may also negatively impact the Company's financial condition.

The Company's loan portfolio contains a number of real estate loans with relatively large balances. The deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in nonperforming loans, which could result in a net loss of earnings, an increase in the provision for credit losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

At December 31, 2023, the Company's commercial real estate loans totaled $1.26 billion, or 56.4%, of our total loan portfolio. Loans secured by commercial real estate are generally viewed as having more risk of default than loans secured by residential real estate or consumer loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property, the income stream of the borrowers, the accuracy of the estimate of the property's value at completion of construction, and the estimated cost of construction. Such loans are generally more risky than loans secured by consumer loans because those loans are typically not secured by real estate collateral. An adverse development with respect to one lending relationship can expose the Company to a significantly greater risk of loss compared with a single-family residential mortgage loan because the Company typically has more than one loan with such borrowers. Additionally, these loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared with single-family residential mortgage loans. Therefore, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant decline in the related asset quality. If the Company's primary market areas experience an economic slowdown, these loans represent higher risk and could result in a sharp increase in loans charged off and could require the Company to significantly increase its allowance for credit losses, which could have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

At December 31, 2023, $238.3 million, or 10.63% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of commercial business loans. The Company's commercial business loans are originated primarily based on the identified cash flow and general liquidity of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower and/or repayment capacity of any guarantor. The borrower's cash flow may be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories may be obsolete or of limited use. In addition, business assets may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Accordingly, the repayment of commercial business loans depends primarily on the cash flow and credit worthiness of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral value provided by the borrower and liquidity of the guarantor.

The Bank participates in commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans with other financial institutions from time to time in which it is not the lead lender. The Bank's commercial real estate loan participations are generally located in Pennsylvania although the Bank has from time to time participated in loans located in the states of Maryland and Virginia. The Bank also occasionally participates in commercial business loans with other financial institutions in which it is not the lead lender. These loans are limited to our geographic lending market and are generally secured by blanket UCC liens. At December 31, 2023, commercial real estate loan participations for which the Bank was not the lead lender totaled $73.1 million, or 5.8% of our commercial real estate loan portfolio. Commercial business loan participations for which the Bank was not the lead lender totaled $5.5 million, or 2.3% of our commercial business loan portfolio. Construction loan participations for which the Bank was not the lead lender totaled $14.5 million, or 8.1% of our construction loan portfolio. The Bank underwrites each commercial real estate loan and commercial business loan that it participates in and establishes the loan classification and loan provision using the same criteria it uses for loans the Bank originates. Loan participations may have a higher risk of loss than loans the Bank originates because the Bank relies on the lead lender to service and to monitor the performance of the loan. Moreover, decisions regarding the classification of a loan participation and loan loss provisions associated with a loan participation are made in part based upon information provided by the lead lender. A lead lender also may not monitor a participation loan in the same manner as the Bank would for loans that it originates. At December 31, 2023, no loan participations were delinquent 60 days or more. If the Bank underwriting of these participation loans is not sufficient, non-performing loans may increase, and earnings may decrease.

The Bank is susceptible to fraudulent activity that may be committed against it or its clients, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to the Bank or its clients, disclosure or misuse of its information or its client's information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against its clients, litigation or damage to the Bank's reputation. The Bank is most subject to fraud and compliance risk in connection with the origination of loans, ACH transactions, wire transactions, ATM transactions, checking transactions, and debit cards that it has issued to its customers and through its online banking portals. The Company maintains a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate against such risks, including data processing system failures and errors, and customer fraud. If its internal controls fail to prevent or detect any such occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Making loans and other extensions of credit is an essential element of the Company's business. Although the Company seeks to mitigate risks inherent in lending by adhering to specific underwriting practices, the Company's loans and other extensions of credit may not be repaid. The risk of nonpayment is affected by a number of factors, including: -   the duration of the credit;-   credit risks of a particular customer;-   changes in economic and industry conditions; and -   in the case of a collateralized loan, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral. The Company attempts to maintain an appropriate allowance for credit losses to provide for estimated losses over the life of the loan portfolio. The Company periodically determines the amount of the allowance based on consideration of several factors, including but not limited to: -   an ongoing review of the quality, mix, and size of the Company's overall loan portfolio;-   the Company's historical loan loss experience;-   evaluation of economic conditions;-   regular reviews of loan delinquencies and loan portfolio quality;-   ongoing review of financial information provided by borrowers; and -   the amount and quality of collateral, including guarantees, securing the loans. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires the Company to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Deterioration in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of the Company's control, may require an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, regulatory agencies periodically review the Company's allowance for credit losses and may require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for credit losses, the Company will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for credit losses. Any increases in the allowance for credit losses will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital, and may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company's actual loan losses could exceed its allowance for credit losses and therefore its allowance for credit losses may not be adequate. A significant portion of the Company's loan portfolio is secured by commercial real estate. Repayment of such loans is generally considered more subject to market risk than residential mortgage loans. Industry experience shows that a portion of loans will become delinquent and a portion of loans will require partial or entire charge-off. Regardless of the underwriting criteria utilized, losses may be experienced as a result of various factors beyond the Company's control, including among other things, changes in market conditions affecting the value of loan collateral and problems affecting borrower credit.

The Federal Reserve requires a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to a subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Under the "source of strength" doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a bank holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank and may charge the bank holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to such a subsidiary bank. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act") directs the federal bank regulators to require that all companies that directly or indirectly control an insured depository institution serve as a source of financial strength for the institution. Under these requirements, in the future, the Company could be required to provide financial assistance to the Bank, if it experiences financial distress. A capital injection may be required at times when the Company does not have the resources to provide it, and therefore the Company may be required to borrow the funds. In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will assume any commitment by the holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank. Moreover, bankruptcy law provides that claims based on any such commitment will be entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of the holding company's general unsecured creditors, including the holders of its note obligations. Thus, any borrowing that must be done by the holding company in order to make the required capital injection becomes more difficult and expensive and will adversely impact the holding company's cash flows, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.