We and members of our Board of Directors or executive officers are currently parties, among others, to various claims and litigation related to or arising out of the Mergers. As of February 22, 2023, four complaints were filed in federal court by purported stockholders of the Company regarding the Company's proposed Mergers. The first complaint was filed on December 15, 2022, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and is captioned Shiva Stein v. IAA, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-10602. The second complaint was filed on February 14, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and is captioned Christopher Taylor v. IAA, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-1228. The third complaint was filed on February 14, 2023, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and is captioned William Johnson v. IAA, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-165-UNA. The fourth complaint was filed on February 16, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and is captioned Brian Jones v. IAA, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-1357. The aforementioned four complaints are collectively referred to as the "Complaints." The Complaints names us and the members of our Board of Directors as defendants. The Complaints asserts violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder against all defendants and violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against members of our Board of Directors. The plaintiffs alleges that the registration statement on Form S-4 and joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC and applicable Canadian securities regulatory authorities in connection with the Mergers (the "Form S-4") omitted or misrepresented material information regarding the Mergers. The Complaints seeks, among other relief, (i) injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Mergers, unless and until certain information, as requested in the Complaint, is disclosed, (ii) rescission and/or rescissory damages in the event the Mergers are consummated, (iii) an order directing the defendants to file a Proxy Statement that does not contain any untrue statements of material fact, (iv) other damages purportedly suffered as a result of the alleged material omissions or misstatements, (v) an award of plaintiff's costs and disbursements in the action, including reasonable attorneys' and expert fees and expenses, and (vi) other and further equitable relief as the court may deem just and proper. In addition, as of February 22, 2023, we have received three demand letters from purported IAA stockholders, which generally seek that certain information allegedly omitted from the Form S-4 be disclosed. It is possible that additional lawsuits will be filed, or additional allegations will be received from IAA stockholders, with respect to the Mergers. RBA and its executive officers and members of its Board of Directors may also be the subject of potential claims and litigation related to or arising out of the Mergers, including claims similar to those asserted in the Complaint and seeking similar remedies, including requests to enjoin the Mergers. The results of complex legal proceedings, including those discussed above, are difficult to predict, and could delay or prevent the Mergers from becoming effective in a timely manner. The existence of litigation relating to the Mergers could impact the likelihood of obtaining the requisite approvals from our stockholders or RBA shareholders. Moreover, the litigation discussed above and any future litigation could be time consuming and expensive, could divert our attention away from regular business, and, if any one of these actual or potential lawsuits is adversely resolved, could have a material adverse effect on our or the combined company's business, results of operations or financial condition.