The current domestic and international political environment, including existing and potential changes to U.S. policies related to global trade and tariffs, have resulted in uncertainty surrounding the future state of the global economy. In 2018, the U.S. imposed tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum, with only a handful of countries exempt from the increase. The new Trump administration recently enhanced these measures by increasing the tariffs on aluminum and steel to 50% for all countries except the United Kingdom, expanding the products on which the tariffs will be assessed to include derivative products containing steel or aluminum, and terminating all countrywide exemptions and the product specific exemption process.
Throughout the first Trump administration, the U.S. and China imposed a variety of tariffs on most goods traded between the two countries. This included the imposition of tariffs on a substantial number of Chinese-origin goods resulting from the U.S. investigation of Chinese theft of U.S. intellectual property under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which the Biden administration continued and increased for a number of products. The U.S. and the European Union also imposed tariffs on each other's products stemming from a dispute at the World Trade Organization related to aircraft. The Biden administration and U.S. Congress created significant uncertainty about their review of tariffs and future relationships between the U.S. and other countries with respect to regulations.
Since taking office, the new Trump administration has implemented various new strategies regarding tariffs. President Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA") to impose 25% tariffs on products from Mexico and 25% tariffs on products from Canada (with a lower 10% tariff on Canadian energy and energy resources) but exempted from the tariffs those products that are entitled to preferential treatment under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. President Trump also imposed a 20% tariff on all imports from China and Hong Kong under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Acting on an investigation concluded during the first Trump administration, the current Trump administration imposed tariffs of 25% on certain passenger vehicles and light trucks and parts for those vehicles.
Most recently, in April 2024, the Trump administration imposed a universal "reciprocal" tariff of 10% on all countries and higher rates for certain countries, which took effect on August 1, 2025. While ongoing litigation challenges the IEEPA tariffs, arguing that the tariffs exceed the statutory authority under IEEPA, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted a temporary, administrative stay, which keeps the tariffs in place during ongoing litigation. The tariff actions by the U.S. may result in a decrease of global trade volumes due to uncertainty, may create an administrative burden, and will cause retailers to make difficult decisions as to how to pay the tariff or absorb the cost into their profit margins.
While we have exposure to implemented tariffs at this time, in regard to our supply chain and end-user demand, any expansion in the types of tariffs implemented has the potential to negatively impact our supply chain costs and the operating performance of our customers, which in turn may negatively affect our sales, gross margin, and operating performance. Additionally, there is a risk that continued U.S. tariffs on imports could be met with additional retaliatory tariffs on U.S.-produced exports and that the broader trade uncertainty could intensify. This has the potential to significantly impact global trade and economic conditions in many of the regions where we do business and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
In addition, with respect to sourcing products and raw materials from third-party suppliers in other countries, our ability to timely or successfully import such products or those made with such raw materials may be adversely affected by changes in U.S. laws. As a result, products we import into the U.S. could be held for inspection by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol ("U.S. CBP") based on a suspicion of noncompliance. Additionally, the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act ("UFLPA") empowers the U.S. CBP to withhold release of items produced in whole or in part in countries or by companies included on the UFLPA entities list, creating a presumption that such goods were produced using forced labor. In January 2025, the Department of Homeland Security added to the UFLPA entity list, marking the largest single expansion of the list to date, and including a large supplier of critical minerals and one of the world's largest textile manufacturers, both linked to forced labor practices in the People's Republic of China. Although we do not believe that our suppliers source materials from entities included on the UFLPA for the products they sell to us or use to manufacture our products, we could be subject to penalties, fines or sanctions if any of the suppliers from which we purchase goods is found to have dealings, directly or indirectly, with entities on the ULFPA entities list. We are committed to complying with the UFLPA and have taken significant steps to assess and mitigate risks within our supply chain. Given the complexity and multi-tiered nature of global supply chains, achieving full traceability for every supplier and sub-supplier presents substantial challenges. However, we are continuously working to enhance our due diligence processes, leveraging available data and supplier engagement to ensure compliance to the fullest extent possible.
While any detentions or detainments we have experienced have not resulted in any material impact on our business to date, future detentions, as result of noncompliance or in connection with forced labor enforcement (including noncompliance by or enforcement against our suppliers and manufacturers), could result in unexpected (i) delays or rejections of products scheduled for delivery to us, which could in turn affect the timing or our ability to deliver products to our customers; (ii) supply chain disruptions and increased operating costs; (iii) damage to our customer relationships; and/or (iv) negative publicity that harms our reputation, any of which could have a material impact on our business and negatively affect our ultimate financial results.
Except as noted in this Item 1A, there have been no material changes to the risk factors described in our Form 10-K for the 2024 fiscal year ended January 3, 2025.