Energy is back on investors’ radar, and so are commodities Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). Brent crude is trading in the mid-$60s per barrel, having climbed a few percent over the past month after geopolitical flare-ups and fresh attacks on Russian energy infrastructure. At the same time, prices are still well below recent peaks, as rising supply from OPEC+ and non-OPEC producers has capped the upside.
TipRanks Black Friday Sale
- Claim 60% off TipRanks Premium for the data-backed insights and research tools you need to invest with confidence.
- Subscribe to TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks and see our data in action through our high-performing model portfolio - now also 60% off
That mix—moderate but volatile prices, ongoing geopolitical tension, and a world still grappling with inflation—makes energy a natural “hedge” theme. Energy companies benefit from higher commodity prices, yet many are throwing off significant free cash flow and dividends even when oil trades in the $60–70 range.
For ETF investors, that means renewed focus on a handful of significant, liquid, low-cost funds that can express different views on crude oil, natural gas, and the broader energy complex. Thankfully, three ETFs could potentially serve investor needs.
More specifically, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE), Vanguard Energy (VDE), and the S&P Oil and Gas ETF (XOP) stand out as prime vehicles for investors looking to tap into a buoyant energy sector despite the geopolitical uncertainty and the inherent price volatility seen among hydrocarbon stocks.


Market Backdrop Includes Crude Oil, Geopolitics, and Inflation Hedging
Today’s oil and gas market is being shaped by several powerful forces, creating a complex, finely balanced environment for investors. Since 2022, a persistent geopolitical risk premium has predominated, driven primarily by conflicts involving Russia and the Middle East. These tensions continue to threaten key supply routes and energy infrastructure, leading to periodic price spikes whenever critical facilities are disrupted.
At the same time, as a cartel, OPEC is carefully managing supply. The group has begun gradually unwinding its voluntary production cuts and plans to add more barrels to the market in 2025. However, it has also made clear that it is prepared to pause or reverse these increases if market conditions weaken, signaling a desire to avoid a supply glut that could pressure prices.
On the demand side, growth remains positive but is slowing. The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects global oil supply to continue rising through 2026, even as demand growth moderates, leaving the market broadly balanced yet still vulnerable to both upside shocks from geopolitics and downside risks from sluggish global economic activity.
For ETF watchers, some funds have performed better than others. TipRanks’ screener tool can help track and select the best-performing ETFs.

Within this landscape, energy stocks can function as a strategic hedge. They tend to benefit from higher oil prices and inflationary pressure, while the largest integrated majors deliver substantial dividend payouts that help cushion investor portfolios when crude prices soften.
Why Energy ETF Performance is in Focus This Year
In 2025, energy has not been the runaway winner like many analysts had expected, but it has been resilient compared to other cyclical sectors. Investors may be surprised to hear that funds tracking oil and gas are appreciating despite a weakening oil price throughout 2025. Year-to-date, the three ETFs in focus have posted the following performance figures:
- XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR): ~5.57%
- VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF): ~5%
- XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production): unchanged
So, broad, mega-cap energy exposure (XLE, VDE) has modestly outperformed, while the more aggressive exploration & production (E&P) slice (XOP) has lagged amid investor concerns about an impending supply surplus and softer prices.
At the same time, the income offered by energy ETFs is attractive relative to the broader market, keeping them in focus for investors looking to blend yield with an inflation-sensitive sector.
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE)
The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) remains one of the most recognizable gateways into the U.S. energy market, offering targeted exposure to a sector defined by both structural importance and persistent volatility. As a sector-specific ETF, XLE concentrates on the upper tier of the energy value chain, holding a curated roster of large-cap U.S. energy companies that dominate oil, gas, and consumable fuels. Its portfolio leans heavily toward integrated majors and established industry leaders, giving it a distinctly blue-chip profile relative to broader funds like VDE and more specialized plays such as XOP.
Designed for investors seeking a pure, large-cap energy allocation, XLE provides a straightforward way to participate in the cyclical dynamics of the energy market. Its emphasis on mature producers and refiners typically translates to steadier cash flows and competitive dividend yields, making it a compelling option for those looking to balance income generation with sector-driven growth potential. In inflationary environments or periods of rising commodity prices, XLE can function as an effective hedge, offering concentrated exposure to companies that historically benefit from strong energy demand and tightening supply.
While XLE does not capture the full breadth of the U.S. energy industry—leaving broader diversification to VDE and higher-beta exploration exposure to XOP—it delivers a focused, stable foundation for investors who want dependable access to the sector’s core players. Whether used as a tactical position or a long-term portfolio anchor, XLE remains a compelling choice for those aiming to harness the resilience and economic significance of the energy sector.
Does XLE Pay Dividends?
The fund’s dividend picture has worsened, much like its peers, but XLE has a dividend yield of 3.23% and has paid $2.88 per share over the past year. The fund pays Quarterly, and the last ex-dividend date was Sep 22, 2025.

Is XLE a Good ETF?
Based on Wall Street analyst consensus ratings for XLE over the last 3 months, the average price target is $103.38. The average price target indicates analysts expect just under 16% upside in XLE over the coming year.

Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE)
The Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) offers one of the broadest and most cost-efficient avenues into the U.S. energy market, making it a standout choice for investors who want comprehensive exposure rather than a narrowly defined slice of the sector.
VDE is an equity ETF with 111 holdings. Top positions include Exxon Mobil (XOM) at 23.01%, Chevron (CVX) at 15.79%, ConocoPhillips (COP) at 5.52%, and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 3.24%.

Unlike more concentrated funds such as XLE—or the higher-octane exploration tilt of XOP—VDE casts a wider net, spanning the full spectrum of energy-related industries. Its portfolio includes integrated oil majors, midstream operators, service providers, refiners, and select renewable-energy names, providing a more holistic view of the energy ecosystem.
This breadth gives VDE a unique position in the energy ETF landscape: it blends the stability of established industry leaders with the growth potential of smaller and mid-cap firms participating in the sector’s ongoing transition. For investors looking to capture not only the traditional drivers of energy performance but also the structural changes reshaping the industry, VDE presents a balanced, forward-looking approach.
VDE’s diversified construction helps cushion the volatility that often characterizes the energy market, while still allowing investors to benefit from commodity cycles, geopolitical shifts, and evolving technology. True to Vanguard’s philosophy, the fund pairs this broad exposure with low costs—an advantage that compounds meaningfully over time and makes VDE an efficient core holding for energy-focused allocations.
Whether used to complement more concentrated funds like XLE or to provide a steadier counterweight to the exploration-heavy XOP, VDE remains an accessible and comprehensive vehicle for investors seeking a full-market perspective on the energy sector’s ongoing evolution.
Is the Vanguard Energy ETF a Good Buy?
Based on analyst ratings of the ETF’s holdings, the consensus is bullish on VDE. The average Wall Street analyst price target is $146.69, implying a 16.45% potential upside over the coming 12 months.

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
The SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) offers one of the most targeted and high-conviction plays in the energy ETF space, zeroing in on the exploration and production (E&P) segment of the oil and gas industry. Tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index, the fund delivers exposure to companies directly engaged in discovering, extracting, and developing hydrocarbon resources—making it a markedly more aggressive alternative to broader funds like VDE and the large-cap-heavy XLE.
Currently, XOP is an equity ETF with 54 holdings. Top positions include CNX Resources (CNX) at 3.37%, Expand Energy (EXE) at 3.18%, Murphy Oil (MUR) at 3.15%, EQT Corp. (EQT) at 2.96%, and Murphy Oil (GPOR) at 2.95%.
What sets XOP apart is its equal-weight structure, which prevents dominance by the sector’s major players and instead distributes influence across a wide mix of small-, mid-, and large-cap E&P firms. This design introduces a higher-beta profile: when crude prices rise, or drilling activity accelerates, XOP often responds with amplified performance. Conversely, it can be more volatile during downturns, making it best suited for investors who are comfortable with sharper swings and who want a purer bet on upstream momentum.
XOP appeals to those seeking to harness the tactical opportunities embedded in the most operationally sensitive corner of the energy market. Its focus aligns closely with factors such as commodity-price cycles, geopolitical disruptions, and advances in extraction technology—all key drivers of E&P profitability. For investors looking to diversify their energy exposure while leaning into the sector’s growthier, higher-risk segment, XOP provides a compelling counterpart to the stability of XLE and the broad coverage of VDE.
Is the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas ETF a Good Investment?
Based on analyst ratings of the ETF’s holdings, the consensus is bullish on XOP. The average Wall Street analyst price target is $154.92, implying a 17% potential upside over the coming 12 months.

Takeaways for Energy ETF Investors
- Costs: Both XLE and VDE stand out for their exceptionally low expense ratios, reinforcing their appeal as cost-effective core holdings in the energy space. XOP’s 0.35% fee, while higher, remains reasonable given its more specialized, higher-turnover strategy and the amplified exposure it provides to the exploration and production segment.
- Income: For investors prioritizing yield, XLE and VDE typically deliver dividend payouts in the 3%+ range, offering a reliable income component alongside sector exposure. XOP, by contrast, tends to produce a lower yield, reflecting its focus on growth-oriented exploration companies that are more driven by commodity-price movements than by income generation.
- Volatility: XOP carries the most elevated beta of the three, with price action that often accelerates in both directions during commodity swings. VDE offers the smoothest ride thanks to its broader, more diversified composition, while XLE occupies a middle ground—less volatile than XOP but more concentrated than VDE.
Oil and Gas Market Trends
Global oil markets are entering a period of shifting supply dynamics, with production set to expand meaningfully over the next two years. According to the latest IEA projections, global supply is expected to rise by just over 3 million barrels per day in 2025, followed by an additional 2.5 million barrels per day in 2026. Much of this growth is driven by non-OPEC+ producers—most notably the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Guyana—whose output gains continue to reshape the global supply balance. While some OPEC+ members are also incrementally increasing production, the momentum remains firmly concentrated outside the cartel.
Against this backdrop, OPEC+ policy remains a key stabilizing force, though the group has adopted a more flexible and cautious stance. The alliance has already begun easing portions of its voluntary supply cuts and is slated to raise output by more than 500,000 barrels per day starting in August 2025. Even so, officials have signaled a willingness to slow or pause further increases in early 2026 if the market begins to show signs of oversupply. This measured approach reflects the bloc’s desire to avoid flooding the market at a time when inventories are rising, and demand growth remains moderate.
Oil prices have settled into a “middle zone”, with Brent crude trading largely in the mid-$60s to low-$70s through the second half of 2025. The recent range reflects a market caught between two competing forces: steady supply growth—particularly from non-OPEC+ producers—putting downward pressure on prices, and persistent geopolitical tensions providing intermittent support. The result is a price environment that is neither tight nor sharply weakening, but instead characterized by cautious stability as the world moves toward what many analysts expect to be a more supply-heavy 2026.
ETF Investor Takeaways for Oil and Gas Investors
If OPEC+ maintains a disciplined approach to supply management and global demand turns out stronger than expected, the energy sector could regain momentum—with broad-based funds like XLE and VDE well positioned to benefit from improving sentiment.
Conversely, if the expected surplus materializes in 2026, integrated majors—which dominate both XLE and VDE—are likely to hold up more resiliently thanks to their diversified operations and steadier cash flows. In that environment, the more price-sensitive exploration and production companies that drive XOP’s performance could face sharper volatility and more pronounced downside pressure.
Natural Gas Fundamentals and Seasonality
Natural gas is a major earnings driver for many energy companies, especially those with significant liquefied natural gas (LNG) operations. Given that oil and gas often occur together within “hydrocarbon reservoirs,” companies exploring for oil frequently discover natural gas in tandem, making gas production a supplementary part of their portfolios.
After the disruptions of 2022–23, global gas consumption has resumed its structural upward trend. Demand reached new highs in 2024 and—despite regional variation—continues to grow in 2025, led primarily by emerging markets where industrial activity and power needs are expanding.
A substantial pipeline of LNG projects is also set to reshape supply dynamics. Projects under construction or already sanctioned are expected to increase global LNG export capacity significantly by 2030, improving long-term affordability and helping reduce the frequency and severity of price spikes.
Demand patterns remain strongly seasonal. Winter still brings the highest consumption due to heating requirements, while a secondary summer peak emerges in markets where gas-fired power supports air-conditioning and elevated electricity loads.
ETFs for Different Investor Profiles
Energy ETFs vary widely in structure, volatility, and underlying exposures, making each better suited for certain types of investors. Conservative allocators may prefer diversified, lower-volatility mega-caps; total-return investors might seek broader exposure to the full energy value chain; and tactical traders often gravitate toward higher-beta, commodity-sensitive ETFs. Matching the ETF to the investor profile ensures the risk/return characteristics align with long-term goals or shorter-term tactical positioning.
Conservative Income Seekers / Core Sector Allocators
Best fit: XLE or VDE
Rationale: Both funds offer low fees, broad exposure to large integrated oil & gas companies, and dividend yields typically in the 3–4% range (variable with market conditions). Their mega-cap weighting results in lower volatility than that of more niche energy ETFs. XLE is slightly more concentrated in ExxonMobil and Chevron, while VDE offers broader diversification—both are suitable as a core energy position in a long-term portfolio.
Total-Return Investors Seeking Broad Energy Exposure
Best fit: VDE
Rationale: VDE tracks the entire U.S. energy sector, including large-, mid-, and small-cap producers, refiners, and service companies. Its broader industry coverage provides greater diversification than XLE and may enhance long-term risk-adjusted returns for investors seeking comprehensive exposure rather than a concentrated mega-cap approach.
Tactical Traders and High-Beta Growth Players
Best fit: XOP
Rationale: XOP is an equal-weighted ETF focused primarily on exploration and production (E&P) companies, which tend to be more sensitive to oil and gas price movements. This structure gives XOP a higher beta, greater volatility, and stronger upside/downside swings compared to XLE or VDE. It is well-suited for shorter-term tactical positioning, directional commodity views, or expressing high-conviction trades, though with the trade-offs of higher volatility and higher fees.
Choose an Energy ETF in Today’s Market
In an environment shaped by shifting supply dynamics, geopolitical uncertainty, and the push-and-pull of inflation, no single energy ETF stands out as universally “best.” Instead, each offers a distinct role within a well-constructed portfolio. XLE and VDE serve as resilient, income-generating anchors backed by mega-cap stability and broad sector exposure, while XOP provides a higher-octane, price-sensitive vehicle for investors looking to express tactical views or capture upside during stronger commodity cycles.
Ultimately, the right choice—or combination—depends on whether you prioritize reliable dividends, comprehensive long-term exposure to the full energy value chain, or a more aggressive position tied directly to the ebb and flow of oil and gas prices.
Power up your ETF investing with TipRanks. Discover the Best AI ETFs, carefully curated based on TipRanks’ analysis.



